₦airaland Forum

CSTRR:
No, it's not.

Who flee their country to live in SA? It's definitely not SA women now is it!

BloomingDale:
Ok. The South African lady should not even had made that comment in the first place, as it seems neither parties are checking out for each other so it seems a moot point anyway. The Nigerian ladies I know will always upgrade and never downgrade, no matter how ugly they are. Lol.

We are only seeing screenshots of the SA lady's replies.I wanna know what the other person said before she made that comment.Nobody is blocking you from "upgrading" with whoever you want lol...we aren't on each other's radar,as you said yourself,so let's respectfully keep it that way.

BloomingDale:
You don't understand. Nigerian women are not even checking out for you guys, so for her to come out to say South African men are not checking out Nigerian women just took them by surprise I guess. I don't think Nigerian women are losing any sleep over South African men not checking out for them. Lol.
I don't think you guys are even on their radar. I've never heard about Nigerian women discussing about other African men. They have bigger fishes to fry, I guess.

What part did I not understand? I am addressing the delusional comments on the topic.

The comments are hilarious but she's right on the money about us SA men not finding Nigerian women attractive.It has nothing to do with us "being broke" as the people in the comments are trying to convince themselves,not everything is about money anyway,are we ugly? Absolutely not.The avarage Nigerian woman is built like Mark Henry from WWE lol,way too masculine to attract men.Nigerian women are not rejecting us,we are just not looking at them to begin with.If you have been to SA or at least watch South African television then you will understand why we only have eyes for SA women.The only beyond borders women that matter are those from Botswana,Swaziland & Lesotho I don't know why Nigerian men and women in the comments are making it sound like Nigerian women were even considered viable contenders in beauty as far as SA men are concerned.You guys are basically fighting to be queens of a non existing kingdom...but anyway,carry on with delusions.

CSTRR:
Men that are not good enough for south African women,and made them to start chasing Nigerian men.

Nigerian women would eat South African men alive.
They are not on the same level.

Lol @ *chasing*

It's the other way around.

Korn - Coming Undone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSJXle3LP_Q

Chris Rea - Fool if you think it's over

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aZBqrHs4qo

Someone here is still holding his breath hoping I reply to his childish taunts.

LeSudAfricaine:
Smart move

He's still baiting me to engage him further and I won't entertain it lol.

morpheus101:
You are reaching now.

You were referring to the preceding statement below and the not the "subsequent" which is a response to a different statement you made.

Please pinpoint the implied justification below

"Contextually speaking the "Ghana must go" saga by Nigerians and the enforcement of the "Aliens compliance order" by Ghana had deeper political undertones that just the "rumblings of the poor class" of either country. We can expansiate on that if necessary."

And just like that I close the convo...adios

LeSudAfricaine:
He'll spin it and then it will become this pointless, tedious and endless war of sematics and him trying to prove he's "smart" and all,

I'm getting tired already.

morpheus101:
Outrageous yes, but the aftermath of post-cold war alignments played a heavy role in the initial expulsion of Nigerians out of Ghana and the subsequent event was nothing more than retaliatory in nature.

Would highlighting this whole paragraph help?

morpheus101:
You'd have to point to where in my statement I imply justification. An underlining reason for an action and its justification are two different things as the latter reflects some sort of condonement of that action. Read slowly next time around.



Outrageous yes, but the aftermath of post-cold war alignments played a heavy role in the initial expulsion of Nigerians out of Ghana and the subsequent event was nothing more than retaliatory in nature.

Wena re-read what you just wrote and you'll see where justification was implied.

morpheus101:
I see where you are going with this, you are trying to regurgitate the point that if the Nigerians or Ghanaians could expel each other's citizens, then how can either one of them plead the moral high ground when it comes to SA pushing for the same. This would be sound except for the below reasons:

1. The premise above supports the idea that because an evidential "bad policy" was implemented by one country then it is therefore permmissable or at the least understandable if another country engages is such an act.

2. Contextually speaking the "Ghana must go" saga by Nigerians and the enforcement of the "Aliens compliance order" by Ghana had deeper political undertones that just the "rumblings of the poor class" of either country. We can expansiate on that if necessary.

3. The economic integration of Ecowas in relation to that of SADC is a testament to the realization of these "archaic" policies that were a reaction and result of that era.

Unbelievable! so because there were deeper political undertones then it justifies the action? Shouldn't it had been more outrageous that the top brass are the main perpetrators in contravening the very same pan African ideology they had sworn to uphold?

morpheus101:
If I am understanding the first question being asked, then the answer would be the ideology and concept of pan Africanism precedes the "Ghana must go" saga.

If I understand the second question being asked, then I would respond that the ideology of pan Africanism continues to be a defining political and economic policy practiced in relation to other African states.

If the mentioning of the incidents of mutual expulsions of both Nigerian and Ghanaian citizens from each other's countries is being cited as an example of the non-existence of this political and economic policy between both countries, then you would have to expanciate and clarify what you are insinuating?

Mutual expulsion? Weren't you supposed to be the "big brother" that would provide sanity to chaos?

LeSudAfricaine:
Ah typical, Nigerians thinkng they're special. South African women date whoever they want, form Pakistanis, Coloureds, Indians, whites, purples, yellows, etc, and they are likely to date men from the SADEC bloc(Swaziland, Botswana, lesotho, Zim, etc) first before they even bother with Nigerians. what makes you think you're special?

They always take this route whenever a debate about serious stuff becomes too much for them to handle.I think they believe it's the only punchline they can use on us.

morpheus101:
I understand that you youngies over there have generally dismissed the ideaologies of pan africanism that were more familiar to your fore-fathers and have embraced a neo-nationalist stance guised in "patriotism", hence the ignorant comment above.

I am not surprised at all, wena!

Interesting! So which one precedes the other? "Ghana must go" or "the ideology of pan Africanism"? I really would like to know which one between us was the first to dismiss the said ideology.

43Ronin:
E pain am lol. But seriously bro why do your women love naija men so badly Like they can't do without them ni

I'm hearing it from you so why don't you tell?

43Ronin:
Yeah, but that's because if not for nigeria & AU, the boers would have still been whooping ur lazy negro backs in their mines. Its not our fault your women love Nigerian men, be honest is it our fault

You were dropped on your head by your mother.Your uneducated comment proved beyond any shred of doubt.

morpheus101:
They have a historicity of being xenophobic to blacks in general. What's your people's excuse?

And you decided not to challenge the ban because of history yet toothless dustheads at AU would have been moving at a speed of light with endless press conferences demanding an apology if it was South Africa...yah neh

WannaHowzit:
Lazy, jealous, xenophobic Emeratis

"Ordinary Muhammadans"

morpheus101:
Yes, because when it becomes complicated, the brain checks out or simplifies the matter.

let me give you more stuff to run away from as well. When an inference is made on data it requires a certain percentage of a confidence interval required to determine if the sample sizes used vary and are ubiquitous enough to lend credence to that statistical inference.

I've been meaning to ask - how's the UAE ban treating ya? Why are these Arabs being xenophobic to "hardworking" jooz from Nigeria?

WannaHowzit:


Our dear Morbid419scam gets carried away sometimes.

Way too much.

morpheus101:
Point 1. Who is trying to impress you. Already know you have deficiences, this is for all on nairaland to interpret.

Point 2. Just say you want me to speak in lay man's terms and I will, no need to digress. If you count a random sample of any 10 Nigerians this means that 9 of them are definitively poor, no?

Point 3. If we are to interpret these statistical extrapolations as you do, this would amount to the same statistical interpretation that 1 in 5 South Africans is HIV positive. If you count 5 of your friends (random sample) this would "definitively" mean at least 1 of them was HIV positive, shame?

You are a buffoon but you just don't know it yet.

Couldn't even care to read.

morpheus101:
When one thinks that the mastery of "statistical extrapolations and inferences" on raw metadata is a definitive approach to logical arguements then one's bantu education has truly failed him.

Only a buffon would believe that an "extrapolative inference" of a population size like Nigeria with over 100 million people would indeed have an illiteracy level of 90%. You really believe that for every 10 Nigerians you have ever met, 9 of them are poor.

Try testing that theory out in your country, see if it holds.

Not impressed by the pseudo-intellectualism.You trying way too hard to not come off as one of the dummies,but we both know better don't we!

morpheus101:
illiteracy has nothing to do with the level of intelligence in groups of people. It only points to the lack of access to "information" that would propel them out of impoverished states within a hierarchial construct required to advance up pyramid of needs. That's why Nigera

Correlation does not imply causation you illiterate numskull.

Poverty rate sitting above 90% but Morphy thinks all these desperate mental gymnastics are going to change anything.

morpheus101:
[s]THe accolades are extremely important because it says that the people from these countries are naturally endowed with brilliance irrespective of geographical constraints that have been thrust upon them as result of neo colonialism and the manifest destiny doctrine of Western civilization.[/s]

Illiteracy rate sitting above 60%

omonnakoda:
A dog is a dog wherever it lives? Stop boasting about your zoo and zookeeper
Tell us what is the prevalence of HIV among Black South Africans That should make you sober. You have nothing to boast about

Boast about what is in your head?
Oh


NOTHING to report empty head

All you know is entitlement , drugs , alcohol and rape

And you argue just like a barefoot savage bandit from the northern part of your country.Imagine someone thinking they can have a productive debate with you... couldn't be me.

omonnakoda:
Boers are more educated than Zulus

32:1 ratio of doctors/professors

White to black
Explain that ratio please

Changing moniker won't make that go away

Do I really need to be lowering myself like that? Explain anything to a skull miner who resides in a 5th world wasteland? Lol

omonnakoda:
Change of moniker
Countries positions change all the time China was hell on earth 60 years ago 1958-61. If you had any education you would know

What matters is the quality of your people

The black South African likes to boast about a South Africa where he is a slave and at the bottom of the economic pile

Boast about South Africa all day long

The question that won't go away is what is the contribution of Zulus and other black South Africans?

You boast about a country where proportionally for every black doctor or professor there are 32 who are non black

That means black South Africans are liabilities

When you see Nigerians in South Africa they are not there to compete with Zulus for jobs but with the Boer

You really love bringing China into every argument.This Makoko sewer rat doesn't even know that Boers aren't that educated,they definitely don't outperform black South Africans academically.So you jappa all the way from your desert wasteland to compete with mediocre? Your skull is too thick to realise the only thing you will always excell in are the crimes you're internationally known for (no need to name them because everybody already know)

And isn't your country's illiteracy rate sitting over 60% ? You can't even read and write your own names.

BigIyanga:
Got better counter?
Why arent black SAs outshining and outworking other Africans in EU, US, Canadians? I havent met any black SA doctor/IT programmers in UK, US, Canada.. Are you saying that SA pays better those countries?
You guys dont have intellectual rigor and tenacity to compete at the global stage?
Amazon AWS in Cape Town hires more Naija developers and engineers than black SAs

And poverty capital of the world still you remain.So tell me,of what importance are these accolades to you if your country is still one of the worst places to live on Earth?

BigIyanga:
95 of lands in Naija are owned by Indigenous Nigerians.
90% of 20m houses in RSA are owned by whites and Asians
95% of 50m houses in Naija are owned by Nigerians.
95% of banks/insurance and finance companies in Naija are owned by Nigerians.
Nigerians own 100% of Shoprite in Naija.
Nigerians own majority of MTN in Naija
Nigerians have more millionaires and billionaires than black RSA…
So how are you guys better?? Make it make sense for me.

This topic is dead.