Even your wives and girlfriends masturbate to the memories of the sexual passion and intense marathon fvcks they had with their ex-boyfriends even as they are in commited relationships with you their husband and boyfriend
Also, remember she would always cherish the memory of the man that disvirgined her
women know that what they want from men (money) they can't survive without, but what men want from women (sex) men can survive without. Women know that what women want from men (money) women can't masturbate and get, but what men want from women (sex) men can masturbate and get. Because what women want from men is a real thing, but what men want from women is simply a feeling. You can create a feeling from nothing but you can't create a real thing from nothing.
And the day men fully realize this is the day the Pussy Cartel will cease to exist.
But as long as men continue to walk in ignorance women are the only winners in this Game, because women get paid while men simply get laid. Women walk away with money, men walk away with mere memories.
Your fears are valid, and it is a very serious issue that may not seem so at the moment.
Smart! Never give up leverage. Smart men who are red-pill aware and are deep in the game know that leverage is invaluable in long-term relationships. A man, however great his red-pill awareness, cannot operate effectively and unchallenged as the head and authoritative figure without leverage. Also, having leverage isn't just enough, a man must be aware of his leverage and wield it unapologetically to his benefit.
Leverage is important, it can even determine and regulate female behaviour and attitude in the relationship if it is used wisely. Change leverage and see a different version/attitude of your wife.
Men who think leverage isn't important or that much of a big deal —or that the issue of leverage is simply petty secondary school manipulation tactics— are just ignorant and know nothing. Never give up leverage by whatever means.
Hmmmm. You have carefully thought too deep strategically. Nevertheless, I would always advice a man never to move with his spouse abroad. If possible, go alone and improve yourself abroad; send money back home regularly; and come back after your are done. If you decide to act differently, ensure that if sh!t goes to fan, you don't lose all you have worked for, you are not financially blighted, and you can move your kids with you back to Nigeria. Whatever you decision you make, ensure you can easily endure and move on if the worse happens.
Over there, there are many eventualities that can befall you in forms of opportunities for your wife to change, scheme and misbehave. I don’t need to explicate, do I?
@UppaZakum A nice plan. Just don't mind her; forge ahead with your plan instead. Let her sort herself out. If possible, don't take her abroad. Put yourself first and keep yourself safe.
Well, you know what's up and the right route to take, but for some reason something is holding you back. Could it be that you don't want to be inadvertently mean and cruel to who you perceive to be a good woman? Well, if that's the case, find calm in the fact that it is perfectly normal for red pill execution to demand some level of coldness and indifference from time to time to prevent you from getting fleeced, played and ensure positive/desired female response. Besides, I will always repeat that you don't take your wife to stay with you permanently in a western society.
Glad you are not easily carried away. You might think you know your woman, until certain situations reveal a beast and personality you never knew of.
Ask men if the version of their wives they saw in the divorce court, western environment (especially when the migration is permanent), or breadwinning position are the versions they experienced during dating (before marriage) or when they were breadwinners. Even western men who marry western women see a different version of their wives when situation changes... you grab? Even western divorce attorneys and divorced men have a saying: "you never know your wife until you meet her in court."
My point is, instead of thinking you know your wife and banking on that, just follow the red pill which never fails. Finally, I must repeat: (1) Always put yourself first, (2) Never put yourself in a situation where you depend on a woman's money, (3) Ensure that you are always above and bigger than your woman. Never help elevate your woman's level to yours or above yours. If a women must grow, let it be without your help. (4) To add, never put your safety, well-being, and financial situation at risk because you want to accommodate the interests of a woman. The games women can play are too inconsiderate and unforgiving for men who take such risks or give too much benefit of doubt.
Wise of you to realise where you bleeped up. A man must never ever let a woman have full access to how much he earns, has, or the flow of his money. Of course, they will try to find, but never let them... e get why. If they don't like it, they either hold their peace, or move on to a new husband that will show them his financial records. It is that simple.
By the way, I am curious as to the life you've led and, if any, previous marital dynamics in which you found it okay to let her in on your finances. Where you always a red pill guy during your marriage? Or did you just slip up in the moment due to ignorance or temporary weakness?
Well, redpillers know that you don't take what comes out of a woman's mouth seriously. Of course, she will give her best on this plan of hers and say anything to convince you to support her plan, even making promises she knows she won't keep. This is the feelings/emotions of the moment; even if she thinks she will keep to her promise, situation will expose her female nature and she will follow suit without remorse. All that really matters to her is her objective. It is left for you as a red pill guy to detect this and remain steadfast in not yielding to feminine wiles.
As for her plan to support you when she is stable and you need her help, I need not say much. You will see a different side of your wife if you find yourself in this situation, and you will certainly not like it. You will most likely not believe what you are seeing. Worse is if she happens to meet other well-to-do men that she feels are above her new level and better than her dependent husband.
[1] As promised, I will now share my perspective. Also, for the sake of others that will hope to learn, I will delve into much details.
Great! Glad to see you are devoted to improving yourself and you have crafted a solid plan to undertake such improvement. Nothing wrong here.
Well, your wife has seen an unmissable opportunity to achieve financial independence for herself in a more successful, liberal society that gives women insane leverage in marriage... or more generally, the intersexual dynamic.
This opportunity deeply aligns with her personal interests, and as a woman, she will put her interests and feelings without regard to the sacrifices and costs incurred by her man. Afterall, in a woman's eyes, a man is simply a vehicle to her destination/objective in her survival script. You must have noticed this in the way she always remained unmindful of your logical reservations and possible downsides you will face if you strung her along. This is not a mistake; your wife knows what she is doing.
If she has calculated that the vehicle is no longer needed, it will be brutally discarded, resented and/or snubbed, regardless of the "damages" and sacrifices the vehicle endured (willingly or unwillingly) to get her to her destination/objective. You become in her eyes a deadweight that slows her down. This happens when you are no longer needed; when you have landed beneath her; or when you financially depend on her.
You must take note of the last two paragraphs: do not let the playfulness, respect, sex, show of kindness and present profession of love from your wife beguile you into disbelieving them. Never get lost in the sauce. If you dismiss the red pill here and you succumb to the situations I warned you against after taking your wife abroad, you will discover real quick that you never really knew your wife. Also, just to add, the fact that some ladies spent their whole lives in Nigeria doesn't mean they are not aware of how domestic, marital and child support laws work over there.
Whatever you do with your woman, ensure you always put yourself first and you are above her. Never raise her to your level or above it, and never be in a situation where you depend on her financially. If a woman wants to grow, let her hustle it on her own. If possible, don't take her abroad. Her behaviour (due to the Nigerian environment, leverage, and your masculine attitude here) won't necessarily be the same in the western environment. The Western world corrupts and embolden women with impunity. If things are working well for you here, leave her here and go pursue your dreams. As you get better, your family will benefit from it.
pansophist: You have to leave your girl and your friend. Under no circumstances and begging should you accept them back.
If you forgive a woman for cheating on you, you’ve proven to her that you’re a weak man, and you’ll be punished for it, only a matter of time.
Also, you won’t feel like a man. Your pride, ego, masculinity will feel shattered, like a tamed lion, where a dirty pig can come and shit on, and you will pay fully (bride price) for it. You’re defeated.
Deep in her psyche, she will feel like she is the best you can do, hence, you can’t act like a man and kick her out, which will embolden her. She will be tempted to push the goal post further, to see your breaking point.
Your friend will not respect you, and every body that hear about it won’t rate you. You won’t even rate yourself.
If you can’t reach her for hours (maybe because her battery is low), something in you will always suspect she has gone to cheat. Believing her on anything without verification will be difficult because the trust is gone.
She will be tempted to overdo and overprove herself, because she knows the dilemma you’re in. You don’t trust her, and she won’t trust you either.
With every child she begat, you’ll always wonder if it’s yours and if you should do DNA, especially if you think the child doesn’t look and act like you.
With every small argument, you’ll say things that you don’t have to say, because you’re operating from a place of incurable foundational wound.
The persistence of the relationship will be an evidence that you are not man enough to call it off, and negotiate a better deal for yourself. You’ll both low key-hate each other for settling with each other.
The door of hell has being open and it must consume one person. If you stay in the relationship, then you’ve paid for her sins and it will consume you. If you let her go, she will pay for her sins and it will consume her.
In reality, you’ve lost nothing if you let her go. The pain and emotional trauma you’ll feel after her departure is like recovering from an addiction. With time, you’ll feel better than before.
Right now you’re fighting a one-front battle, which is to let her go. If you stay in the relationship, it becomes a two-front war, which is to forgive her, forgive yourself, and tolerate all the assault that comes with negotiating a bad deal for yourself.
If she happens to cheat again (which is high likely), you will never forgive yourself because you saw it coming and decided that you deserve the worse. Hopefully it doesn’t lead to depression.
Marriage is sweet, but hell if done wrongly. Hopefully you won’t find peace at a bar, than in your own home.
Uptheante: If you don't take your woman abroad with you, she will be fücƙed by other men as you are not around to monitor her. You will be sending her money that she will be flexing with other men
Chai you have a valid point It is a loose loose situation Go abroad to a none gynocentric country best solution like middle East
ubunja: yes, men can turn down sex due to self-control and morality issues. That's commendable. The "but" here is that no man must think doing so has a bearing on how women view him. As concerning value and worth. Because at the end how it plays out is That pucc you're passing on to appear special/different from other men, the lady is just going to take it to another guy! Usually some guy who's always available for quick cheap no-stress sex. Some guys just make it so hard and complicated to give them sex girls simply stop offering.
I'm sure we've all heard of a situation where some morally upright gentleman of a guy had a lady always visiting him acting funny for him but the guy was always "controlling" himself until the lady gave up, stopped visiting and somehow ended up getting pregnant for some clown. What the gentleman did is really not playing hard to get in the dating sense, he just missed opportunities.
Okay let's switch genders for better clarity.
How does a woman play hard to get?
We go back to the foundation of male/female dynamics: Men love sex, Women love money. Men want sex, Women want money.
A woman then plays hard to get by being stingy with SEX. Cause sex is what men want. While a man plays hard to get by being stingy with LOVE aka commitment, cause that's what women want.
A man doesn't play hard to get by refusing sex just as a woman doesn't play hard to get by refusing love/commitment/money. A man takes the sex but refuses to give the woman that one thing she wants (love/commitment/money) -that's him playing hard to get. Because until a man is in love or committed the woman hasn't actually got him.
Same way,,, a woman takes the love, commitment and money that's offered to her but denies men that one thing they all want: sex. Cause until a woman has given a man sex, the man hasn't actually got anything worthwhile from the woman. He hasn't yet "got" the woman. The moment of truth for women is when a man finally commits. And the moment of truth for men is when a woman finally gives sex.
If you're a woman it doesn't matter if Davido or Chris Brown wants to sleep with you. What matters is Do they want to commit?Do they want to marry you? That's the question cause that's what really determines your worth IN THEIR EYES. Being good enough for sex is inferior. Being good enough to committment is superior. Its when a man commits that you have got got him.
That's why when a woman cheats a man's first question is "Did you sleep with him?" Cause for men there's nothing serious until sex happens. And when a man cheats women's first question is "Do you love her?" Cause women understands that men will fucc anything, its when a man commits that things become serious.
Men and women are looking at sex and love from opposing sides, so what they value, what they see as valuable, is also opposed.
When a girl tells her friends "Moses loves me!" What do the friends ask? They ask, "What has he done for you?!" Meanwhile, if a guy tells his friends, "Dorothy loves me!" They're going to ask "Did she let you smash?"
Which is to say, A woman can't say "Moses loves me cause he had sex with me". Not really, cause sex is not something men control. Just as a man can't say,"Dorothy loves me cause she bought me this and that". Cause a womans commitment is worthless. As long as he hasn't smashed Dorothy, his friends can't really be convinced Dorothy loves him. Cause the only thing of value Dorothy has is the pucc. Until she puts that on the table, she's holding back.
All this is to illustrate both men and women understand the "moment of Truth" concerning each gender. A woman can't use commitment to show a guy she loves him, just as much as a man can't use sex to show a woman he loves her. Women express love by sex, men express love by commitment. Hence that woman who's hard to fucc is the woman everyone fights for cause she has value.Just like that man who's hard to commit is the man everyone fights for cause he has value. Which brings us full circle back to the virgin and the Bad boy as the most valuable in the dating field.
Western society is messed up,there's a part in the documentary where it was revealed that under Canadian law,a child can undergo sex change without the permission of the parent.Theres a children's book for ages 10,which had the illustration of 2 men having sex undecided WTF.
These people are messed up beyond messed up,now we're dealing with feminist bullshit and emasculation of men,in the future it will be something more terrible
ubunja: okay here's one of the unfinished Miseducations i left hanging when i abruptly stopped writing. I wrote this I think a year or so ago, I hope it makes sense:
THE MAN WHO SITS AT THE TOP OF THE SEX PYRAMID.
There's a sexual hierarchy in society. Levels, if you will. Like the levels on a pyramid. The Incels sit at the bottom getting no pussy, above are the Simps, used for their resources but getting breadcrumbs, above them sit the Betas, or the "patriarchy" - our fathers and most men. These are the "alpha providers" women settle down with. Above this group sit the PUAs, the Pick Up Artists who trick women into bed. Women have a special kind of hate for these fellows. Above these fellows are the Alphas, the Red Pillers, many of whom are former Betas played by women but who now know their worth. Above them are the Players, Thugs, Bad Boys, Chads, Tyrones, criminals and all those men in prison, these are the sexual alphas, but social failures. They get the best and the most sex but manu are uneducated, broke and jobless. They have the best genes, and are the most gorgeous and the most fertile of men. They're the Sexual Imprint of virtually every girl because girls lose their virginity here. Women want to get pregnant here. Single mothers are made here. And wet coochies go here. When women are younger and fresher and wanna experience life they go here. It is women's previously unknown preference for this group that is pushing many men to the Red Pill.
Let's move on,,,,Above these men sit gigolos, male prostitutes, male strippers, exotic dancers, massage therapists and personal trainers, - men paid by women for sex. Where men traditionally are the ones who buy sex, the sheer sexiness and bed skills of this group is enough to flip the script and force women to break with tradition and pay for sex.
AND FINALLY, OVER AND ABOVE EVERYONE, sitting at the very top of the sex pyramid, dominating the sexual hierarchy, chosen and tutored by prostitutes and dealing only with them, is a Man the French call the Maquereau. Or the Mackerel. Who is known in the west as the Mack. But is universally known as the Pïmp.
Beyond this Man whom prostitutes pick, build and then pay to have sex with, who moves in a world opposite every man's - there's no one. He is the best of the best. The Game in the flesh. PUA and Red Pill philosophy is actually a watered down version of Pímp's game.
But hold on,,,, while there's no one greater than the pímp in the game, while no man is better than him when it comes to women, there's Someone equal to him. Someone who matches him and with whom he shares the top spot. Someone who knows what he knows and who moves how he moves. This Someone inhabits an entirely different world, but that is as filled with women and pussy as the pímp's own world is. Time and again this Someone hits the news for his sexual debauchery and scandals but is judged far less harshly and always given a pass. And it's not surprising that many pímps when they retire, they become him.
This Someone is the Preacher.
Outside of the Pímp, no son of Adam dominates women as completely as the Preacher. Besides the pímp no other man understands female psychology as intimately as the Preacherman.
And it definitely doesn't help that many pímps have preacher-like monikers, eg the pímps Archbishop Don "Magic" Juan, Minister Seamore and Pastor Troy: Video title - "Pímp Interview: Pastor Troy"
Add to that the pímps' penchant for quoting scripture and oftentimes referring to the IZM as the "gospel"; hearing a pímp talk is no different from hearing a preacher preach.
But it is the pímps who retire to be preachers that is the master stroke. This is an impossibly genius move that takes the pímps from one world of women to another world of women. From pussy to pussy. It's almost as if women escape the pímp on the streets only to meet him at the pulpit. And terrible is the financial and sexual exploitation women have experienced in the hands of the Pulpit Pímp.
He has more power over their minds and emotions than their own husbands. And they would rather disappoint their husbands than disappoint him. You only have to see how women's faces light up when they talk about the preacher, fondly calling him, "my pastor" or "the dear Man of God". You only have to see the massive female following preachers have. How women vastly outnumber men in their congregations. Then you'll appreciate the scale of the pímping that is afoot against the female gender. Observant men are starting to joke, "if you want coochie, start a church!" It used to be, "If you want money start a church!" Now with the nonstop rumors, sex exposés and scandals it's becoming clear that churches are as rich in pussy as they are in money.
Hypergamy means women dating higher, and they date men that genetically and financially appeal to their nature and also based on status, looks, power, intelligence, dominance, and adventure
OKAFOR's LAW. where a puccy once fûcked has a potential to be fûcked at a later time by a guy who may be her sexual imprint, ATM, or who is able to stimulate her feelings into horniness
WOMEN ARE CURIOUS! Curiosity rules women. Women want to know what lurks behind them. Women are moved by feelings and since feelings don't last long, they become more curious and veer off into adventures and places that can amplify their feel-good moments. Boredom is not for women, isolation is a pain in the nerves. As a result of feelings, women are attracted to the mysterious and the mystery.
Religion is full of myths (mystery), and women are attracted to preachers because they understand mysteries based on their relationship with God
Whether some powerful men are disrespected by women behind closed doors doesn't matter. What matters is if the majority of women are attracted to his power. Power doesn't only mean political, economic, cultural, social, or financial ability (but in our common lingua, power is mostly associated with them). And of course, women are attracted to men with political, financial, cultural, and social power.
In whatever way power presents itself, women are always attracted to something higher than them.
men must set good standards and not come cheap. Besides, women would go for the best and wouldn't settle if given the option. Why should yours be different? Men setting good standards and not compromising on it will incentivise more females to sit up to meet up (if they can't find their way around it and exploit loopholes). Though they won't change on the inside and will put in more effort to cover up their shenanigans so they can compete to meet men's standard.
Depedestalizing women itself is a core change, cause we're all brought up to believe women are perfect angels who can do no wrong and until the red pill a lot of us were ready to die for women. But thats changed.That realization of female truth can sometimes be so shocking that when men learn the truth about women, their whole life reorients. Knowing the truth about female nature has the tendency to make a guy move different in all areas of his life. That knowledge impacts his social, professional and spiritual life equally. So who's to say there's no core change?! The core changes. Cause I can bet my bottom dollar the beliefs a lot of red pillers hold now, will have disgusted them if they heard about them while at primary school.
Club gals, prostitutes, church sisters whether virgins, non virgins with minimal sexual experiences or retired hoes pretending to be good wife material are still women
Her religious devotion doesn't exempt her from the brutal sides of female nature Her family upbringing even if it's strong, patriarchal, good values doesn't change her core innate nature
Always remember she's a woman first, I would repeat she's a woman first, female nature, AWALT, hypergamy, briffault law, light switch effect, it doesn't matter how she presents herself as decent, chaste, religious, conservative, she is not the exception to the rule o, we are in modern time, redpill is compulsory for modern men whether they are in modern societies or traditional societies
emmaodet: I don't understand this statement. Can you shed more light on it? I see you have been reading a lot of redpill books bro due many comments you drop here. Thanks for the redpill comments, you are well celebrated.
Leverage is any advantage that gives you an upper hand in your dealing with women so that you can checkmate her feral nature and always be in a position of power in the relationship
1)The ability to walk away because you have options typically because you have high SMV 2)Having money ( relatively comfortable that she's dependent to you to a reasonable degree and used to the financial stability) 3)The ability to replace her 4)The ability to practice traditional gender roles due to strong institutions like sound family laws, strong influence of religion and traditions 5)Her choosing you because she is the one chasing, heavily invested in the relationship emotionally by having genuine desire in you so you have advantage in the sense that you are the one that loves the least hence the one in power 6) Having strong masculine frame with strong boundaries that are enforced 7)Having redpill awareness is leverage on it's own
A broke and lonely man living in scarcity of romance, sex, can't have leverage for the majority of men although we have broke thugs, bad boys, that are enjoying women at their best and having baby mamas but they are a minority, most broke guys engage in crime to attract women for sex like yahoo
Read up more about testosterone and oxytocin hormones in relation to how it affects you as a man with regards to your dealing with women and in life generally
Martinez39s: Though we can end up agreeing to disagree, but it is good that we air our views and compare notes and experiences.
That being said, I will like you to note that the way women and the conventional male mind look at sex are different. Men are the ones that associate morality and ethics with sex and they project this on women due to ignorance.
To women, sex and having their fun is just like drinking water from a tap and there are no shame, morality or ethics females associate with sex; it is strictly enjoyment. Being the solipsistic, emotional and self-centered gender in the intersexual dynamics, they follow their emotions and "wonderful" experiences which they like when it comes to sex, especially when they think they won't get caught.
What is doggy to a female? What is sucking d!ck to a female? What is threesòme with two guys and double penetration to a female? Absolutely nothing! As long as she likes it, she knows can take it, and the secret opportunity is there, she has no problem. It is strictly enjoyment. Morals, ethics, upbringing or religion won't stop her from doing with the sharp guy what turns her on, the only that will stop her in such scenario is if she is not interested (ie. turned on) in the style and doesn't have the kink.
With women, there is nothing like sex styles and kinks for hoès/bad chicks/prostitutes/ slay queens and sex styles and kinks for good girls. Such distinction and classification don't exist with females, they only exist in the minds of naive men due to society upbringing. With females it is either they enjoy it or not, shikena!
This is why all girls are sexual freaks to the guys that turn them on and apply game. That's why as a married man if your wife is forming holy holy and refuses to give you doggy claiming it is the stuff of hoès and she picks offence, know that you are being scammed because she will giving it to the guy who turns her on and unleashes the inner hoè.
A hoes or non-virgins past and secret escapades can come back and haunt you and your family in the future, her private leaks with her exes or other men can be exposed to the public, her adultery escapades can also be broadcasted via social media platforms or even life Television just look at Tega and Boma of Big brother, Kim Kardashian sex tape, formerly married Mia Khalifa, Lana Rhodes who wants to settle down with an high valued man, Jada pinkett Smith who disgraced will Smith, all this women past greatly to degree influenced their significant interest future
There's nothing to be gained by lumping virgins and nonvirgins together. If anything it emboldens hoes while discouraging virgins. I've personally always made a conscious effort to commend virgins and let them know they're loved above hoes. I wouldn't want a virgin to see no distinction being made between herself and a hoe then be discouraged and ask herself "Why am I even torturing myself keeping myself for marriage?!" That would be a disaster. The world already mocks virgins, we dare not do that here.
Yes a virgin can be a hoe tomorrow cause she has every right to give her pucc to anyone she likes, so what? She's a virgin now. Enjoy the moment. Let tomorrow worry about its own problems.
Romance › Re: Reality Every Guy Need To Know ( STRICTLY REDPILL) ... by JESHAL007: 12:13am On Feb 25, 2025
