Johnydon22's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Johnydon22's Profile › Johnydon22's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 (of 489 pages)
urahara:Chai Ayaff died sef you have finished me.. Bornu ![]() https://eyeopenerblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/okon-520x245.jpg |
dblackninja:Gim gim sound can only be thought off in the same sense as sound not an image.. Like i said above: thoughts are not limited to images, you can think with words and no images. So the conclusion: A blind man can think but can never imagine up images therefore he might dream but the dream might only be sounds and feelings and not actually images? |
Chukwu - Supreme impersonal Igbo God intermediary deities Amadioha (also called kamalu or igwekala) - God of thunder ruler of the skies Ala - Goddess of the soil Iyi - Goddess of the river fijioku - God of yam Ugwu - God of the hill Ekwensu - God of tricks, mischief and most time success in trades. Many others .... Igbos help me out here |
dblackninja:So you think if a man blind from birth opens his eyes now and you bring Red, Yellow and Blue and ask him 'Have you imagined them before? he will say 'yes'? |
SirWere:You see the only reason why you can imagine a sphere after feeling one is that you have seen one. There is completely no imaging, and our imaging is not formulated by 'feeling, taste' these can only provide thoughts on their own scope but not an image to one who has never ever perceived images. do you think a blind man knows what 'light' is? how then can there be imagination without neurological illumination? |
dblackninja:It gets complicated. . . You might remember/imagibe how something smells or feels or feel the contours but how can you imagine an image of it without seeing it since the onset of your being. Do you think a blind person who has never seen blue, can automatically recognize blue immediately he opens his eyes for the first time? and be like "Ehee that's the colour blue" |
Reyginus:Thinking doesn't necessarily must include imagery, so blind person can think surely. So since they have no imagery how can they imagine up anything or dream up one... How can one dream of up when you don't even know what up or down looks like therefore don't even know them. I doubt.. |
SirWere:You are still not getting it brother, there is no need to reset the cells here... the cells all think that there are witnessing time as normal, like when you spend what seem to you to be 1hr in a blackhole. Your cells won't shrink and get old, no it is still just like 1hour to you, the only problem is that when you get to earth that 1 hour was actually 100 years. So here time runs slower but to the observer still looked same only when compared to a faster time medium. |
Now going from the direction of the discussion SirWere is about to pull with Reyginus a thought occurred to me. Our dreams are from the imagery of the neurological systems, our imaginations are directly as a result of the neurological imaging firings, the images we can form in our minds or dreams are all emanating from previous experiences of that even when you don't remember. The only reason you can imagine an aeroplane or dream of one as we have today is because you have seen one, if you never have and was asked to imagine one you imagination will be too far from aeroplanes we have. So now the problem is. Do blind people dream or can they ever imagine? |
SirWere:Not really, what he is trying to explain is much more bigger than what you might be thinking. Gravitational dilation, the more the gravity the slower the time which makes it seem that near a blackhole (immense gravity) time slows down so much that it is nearly stopped. If you spend 1hour in a blackhole or too near one, when you come back to earth you will see that most of your children are already grand parents. But to you, you only spent 1hr and will still look same. . . |
urahara:Still same person Logicboy, logicbwoy, JackBizzle and any other Moniker(s) he might have in between. |
dblackninja:https://www.nairaland.com/2992899/fermi-paradox |
Reyginus:lol not disappointed you choose to remain agnostic over the ancient astronaut theory, that is practically ok. To me i have always maintained and have been ringing it into ancient astronauts theorist's ears. That we do not know how ancient civilizations built stuffs yet doesn't mean they got help from aliens, it simply means We don't know yet … I'm not a fan of using Ignorance as evidence for speculations like some conspiracy theorists would do |
dblackninja:We have a thread about it on the science section maybe i should provide the link or copy to this board? |
urahara:Jackbizzle is same as Logicbwoy. . . Logical son of a Bizzle ![]() |
charix:Main stream religions thrive on fearful conformity to authority, a boat of faith paddled by fear and ignorance and incuriosity. To me some of the religions i respect and emulate most are ones that in totality gears towards harmonization and oneness with one's self and everything. In order words, freedom, peace and self control.. Jainism came close enough!!! I am irreligious but i know admirable qualities when i see one... you should go beyond the ideas of your limitations my brother. |
Reyginus:Hahahaha i see you are a staunch conspiracy theorist always suspecting everything might be a matrix. . . I get you brother. from your last paragraph mentioning the great Pyramid or saucers, i know a lot of ancient astronauts conspiracy theorists think there are proof of alien visitation and technology. Do you hold this idea too? You think once extra-terrestrial beings visited? and rubbed off some of their tech on us? (Like great Pyramid or something)? |
dblackninja:Already did but cannot engage in childish emotional squabbles that will reduce the quality of this thread Meanwhile I seriously respect that manIn a while... |
urahara:Exactly, if there was a time in the future of humanity then where are the the visitors from the future? But wait what if they already came and the course of history changed therefore the future they came from did not exist so there couldn't then come in the first place.. hahahahaha |
dblackninja:Someone at -6 can know because it's still happening at a given time only their location on the globe as mapped by the earth's rotation around the sun differs. so time zone is directly proportional to our rotation around our axis not a difference in TIME as a dimension |
Reyginus:Exactly. . . What do you think about my above questions ^^^^ I see some about to go personal with some discussions here and it's going to get real childish soon. |
Boss @Reyginus: Lets further our discussion. . . What do you think about extra-terrestrial civilizations and the universe? Have you heard of the Fermi's paradox? And what are our chances of exo-planetary colonizations, what do you think about them? |
charix:They said finish the book a demon will appear, i finished it and patiently waited for the angel or demon to appear hoping it is a female ![]() Boss there is nothing ominous about that, it's just a case of monkey analogy. |
Reyginus:Yes brother Not at all, time zone to us is measured from the rotation of earth around it's axis.... That mapping is just a human representation to keep event... I've heard of a plane that left the airport 2016 and landed 2015.. Hahahaha that's not time travel at all, time zone is totally something different... |
urahara:Lets not dogmatize this discussion brother!!! |
Logicbwoy:Yes that's why i think for me the rules might just be there are no rules that is why everything behaves so randomly that it hurts. . subatomic particles can be induced to speed up without any application of an external force, 1st law of motion murdered. Opposite of law is No law ![]() |
Reyginus:Time doesn't run backwards, you imagine going back in time and meet your grand father then murders him automatically you won't exist in the future therefore there is no you at all. Then if there is no you how then did you murder your grand father? . . . .Its a fun brain juggling paradox boss |
Reyginus:Hahahahaha the Physics of time is different from what you are thinking here boss.. Let me explain like i explained to logicbwoy, time can go slow, stand still but not backwards. Let me use time dilation. In two bodies fires a laser beam travelling at the speed of light, one of the bodies is stationary while the other is moving half the speed of light. If both measures the speed of the laser beam fired there will still reach the same answer. (Which normally shouldn't be so since one is almost half the speed of light so is expected it's measurement should be half less than that of the stationary one) So the thing here is for the moving body, time slows down in order to equilibrate the spatial velocity dimensions and keep the constant of light (C). So XYZ (spatial velocities) + (time )= C (speed of light) |
KingEbukasBlog:Means infiniti is literally boundless and ever accommodating and so there is no cap on it. |
KingEbukasBlog:There you go, he cannot do something and also limited by his nature therefore cannot be Omnipotent. You see you have murdered the omnipotence yourself... You did it yourself. I'm through with the paradox nothing more to add |
Reyginus:Going back in time creates a paradox because if one person goes back and murders alexandar the great or Newton. this present will never turn out exact same way therefore he came from a future that does not exist. So you see, the only solution is annihilation of the paradox.. it is not feasible to travel back in time |
KingEbukasBlog:Lol these are not hypothesis rather mathematical representations... Infiniti is boundless and not limited therefore expands into Infiniti still. Infinit+ infiniti = infiniti... infiniti + 1 = infiniti too.. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 (of 489 pages)




