₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,509 members, 8,517,967 topics. Date: Friday, 13 November 2026 at 10:28 AM

Toggle theme

Johnydon22's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Johnydon22's Profile › Johnydon22's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 (of 489 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: Why Are Jesus' Genealogy In Matthew And Luke So Different? by johnydon22(m): 12:58pm On Aug 01, 2015
Scholar8200:
Can you produce Rebecca's genealogy (Just as we have Mary's)? That is the acid-test! Why will the genealogy of Jacob be traced from Isaac and Laban will be mentioned?! There is no need since the tribe being mentioned is the father's!
We don't have Mary's genealogy too, the only place Mary's parents are mentioned are in the Oral traditions of the church that makes her parents Annah and Joachim.

The Luke genealogy was not in anyway referring to Mary's genealogy, you are only assuming of which someone can also assume the matthew version is about Mary too....

following your analogy one can as well assume that Jacob as mentioned in Matthew was Mary's father and is used in Joseph's genealogy because he is Joseph's father in-law..

It doesn't work that way. . . it is either you show where the verses mentioned to be listing Mary's linage or you agree you only assuming it to be because the verses still remains clear.. "Heli father of joseph" "Jacob father of joseph"
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Are Jesus' Genealogy In Matthew And Luke So Different? by johnydon22(m): 12:42pm On Aug 01, 2015
Scholar8200:
Matthew picks up Joseph's descent from Solomon, son of David; Luke (writing to an elite who may be curious) picks up Mary's descent from Nathan,son of David and mentions Joseph being a legal son of Mary's father by virtue of marriage, according to genealogical practices. (You hardly find names of Jewish women in genealogies except for women who initially were not Jews).
I have never read a genealogy were Jacob is referred to as the Son of Laban (his wife's father) and his ancestry traced from there.

Instead of son of Isaac. . . . This is merely your assumptions because there is no way that verse in luke mentioned Heli as Mary's father, you are just assuming bros...its was clear Joseph the son of Heli
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Are Jesus' Genealogy In Matthew And Luke So Different? by johnydon22(m): 12:38pm On Aug 01, 2015
It was a desperate attempt to make jesus from the line of david which is a total fabrication..

The very idea of spirit conception kills the notion of jesus being from the line of David... You can never eat your cake and have it or lay claims of an illegitimate son being the heir of a throne.

Is he the son of joseph biologically? then yes he is from the line of David tho we dont which is joseph's father Heli or Jacob.

Is he the son of the holy spirit? then he is not the biological son of joseph then in no way from the line of David..
Christianity Etc › Re: The Mecans Side Of The Story by johnydon22(m): 12:28pm On Aug 01, 2015
Demmzy15:
Thread Closed!
Let us see you close it
Christianity Etc › Re: 5 archeological evidences to proof the Bible is real(with pictures) by johnydon22(m): 12:14pm On Aug 01, 2015
Raymondenyi:
my brother i'm not here for u, but i'll rather, u should be the one to carry out researches, the Earth is the only place U find liquid water that is sustainable, Moreso ur summation of Jupiter's moon having water, hasn't been verified... it is "believed" to contain water in ice forms (as hard as rocks) ; just as the new kapler planets (Earth 2.0) about 1400 lite years from eath is also "Believed" can sustain life.... My brother... all those re "Believed" it has never been verified.... so donnot strt feeling fly with ur unsubstantiated claims...
[b]When your baseless claims of other planets being formless and dark have been utterly destroyed i never expected any more replies. . You are not here for me but you are in a public forum and wants to sell delusional assumptions as truth to the public so do not expect them to swallow them just like that...

For all we know earth is just 1 out of billions of planets in the milky way galaxy talk more of billions of other galaxies larger than the milky way in some cases. . .

Am sure i mentioned mars water being in solid form of which curiosity Rover has confirmed of which i will attach an image from the Curiosity Rover

For Ganymede you can as well read http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2015/09/full/ the hubble telescope is not in space as a playing toy ...

Am surprised you didn't put up a defence for the presence of mountains, volcanoes, hurricanes and others which kills your naive claims of the planets being formless and dark.... Stay up to date before writing next time
[/b]

Christianity Etc › Re: 5 archeological evidences to proof the Bible is real(with pictures) by johnydon22(m):
malvisguy212:
the argument was that "the flood is a myth" the fact that many religion give similar account of the flood indicate its actually happened. Peace!!
[b]No that many religions have similar accounts of the same event at different timelines shows its just a reworked version of the same story bathed in the cultural decorum of the adopting culture because they should only be one flood not many..

There are no evidence of any global flood... the Egyptians never wrote about any global flood, no African civilization did....
but a younger civilization Israel wrote one evidently similar to an older existing one from Sumer.

If there was any global flood, no fish or aquatic creature will survive it talk more of trees surviving under water for months is practically impossible.
Scholarly consensus shows the flood story must be a local flooding and has nothing to do with other parts of the globe...

There may be an ancient flooding in the geographical location where these stories are found, but when you claim only one man survived, took all animals in a boat, a god commanded him to build...makes the myth and fabricated fables to be staring you right in the face crystal clear.

For the facts that each culture claims this feat for their own God dubs it myth and for the simple fact that younger civilizations also adopted this story and reworked it into their own cultures shows that the presence of the story in other cultures are just copying of the same fable.
[/b]
What about the rest of my post ?
Copy and paste... Of which i am not supposed to stress myself replying a copy and paste that you just went to a website to copy and paste without reading it..

Learn to make points without copy and paste...
Christianity Etc › Re: 5 archeological evidences to proof the Bible is real(with pictures) by johnydon22(m): 11:23am On Aug 01, 2015
malvisguy212:
good, all you need to do is to compear the claimed of this gods with the christians God, most of this gods claims human population being with some group of people.science confirmed just as the bible say , life began with a single cell organism . Here is more amazing proved of the bible:
/
Jesus Christ Malvisguy which day will you stop this nonsensical copy and paste in your life...Now you have shifted from acknowledging the younger fables copied from the older fables and moved on to the Comparatives of the God claims, i would only leave you to take on that claims with your fellow theists because as far as am concern all your claims are all born out of myths

All the claims of these God concepts are exactly the same as the claim of yours....
(Biblical claims One man, other cultures claims group of persons) Hereditary and Genetics has shown the group of persons is more plausible. . .
And which scientific theory says life began from a single celled organism?
(Again this shows you need to read malvisguy, bible says one man and you want to reconcile it with a unicellular organism?

For crying out loud Man is Multi Cellular organism not single
Christianity Etc › Re: 5 archeological evidences to proof the Bible is real(with pictures) by johnydon22(m): 11:15am On Aug 01, 2015
Raymondenyi:
5) Nothing ever stated in the bible has the contemporary science and world been able to defy...

I) how was the earth formed? Gen. 1:1 -tells us in the beginning the earth was formless, dark and empty. If u are science inclined, you will know this description fits other planets 9 of them, (remember how old d bible is)... and the lord breathed life into it. How else do U think or can you explain, the Earth being the only planet, that can support life? Despite extensive researches, d earth happens to be the Only planet that can support life (as was stated in the bible)
For goodness sake other planets are not formless or dark or empty... Venus and Mercury gets triple the sunlight earth gets, so is far more brighter than earth, even jupiter is brigher than earth and mars gets as much sunlight, so tell me how other planets are dark?

Formless: None of the planets are formless as they all contain geological formations and even water... Ganymede Jupiter's moon contains water even mars has solid water from frozen methane and the geological weathering as shown by the mars rover reveal evidence of ancient waters on mars. . Other planets contain mountains, valleys, cliffs, active volcanoes, hurricanes just to mention but a few. . Now you call that formless and empty?. . . Actually you just killed your own claims by mentioning science which just showed it speaks quite the opposite of what you claim.

Ii) Near Death experiences (NDE) : there have been several and countless near death experience, and their consequent testimonies... one of note is from Mickey Robinson... please endeavor if u can to go on youtube and watch his testimony...
Claims like visiting the muslim heaven others claim to visit the christian heaven while others claim hindu heaven. . . Near death experiences are more prominent on patients with heart attacks and need i remind you that the brain is the cpu of every illusion and also the last organ of the body to shut out when the body dies.
Iii) scientist just know it occurs, as cells age, but no man knows why it must, Nobody has been able to alter this cycle, no matter how hard they try... it is written..
"It is appointed unto a man to die once, afterward judgement"
What is this exactly?

For crying out loud other animals die too, even microscopic organisms die. . its all part of the characteristics of every living organism.. Non-living things cannot die, so it is clear that death is because of life..

Iv) the reunion of isreal on may16th 1948 : this was a prophesy given to ezekiel in 37:24, the lord says, that he shall gather the isrealites from all corners of the world, and shall give them their own land.
More to come
The chosen race mentality, the oldest form of racism ..sadly even africans adopted it and use it to sing song of praise for a particular people that claims the creator of the universe chose them specially. . .what type of persons would uphold such favouritism concept and still dub the god concept a universal one...

79% of present isreali nation are JEWS
20% are ARABS
4% others.

Jews still are natives in present day germany, america and many nations around the globe. . . Maybe the jewish deity needs to put more work into it before he brings all the jews back to isreal because half of the jews in the world are not israelis....

We understand your desperate attempt to link unrelated events to dub them prophecy and all but at least research before writing
Christianity Etc › Re: 5 archeological evidences to proof the Bible is real(with pictures) by johnydon22(m):
malvisguy212:
Genesis 7:19-23 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. … and the mountains were covered. And all flesh died that moved upon the earth,… All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.… and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.

This is God’s version.So did this happen?
Was there a world-wide flood? Let’s ask
the ancient East Indians, as quoted in
the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica:
(Deluge article)
“The Indian [flood] tradition exists in
several forms. The earliest is preserved
in the Satapatha Brahmana. It is there
related that Manu, the first man, the son of the sun-god Vivasvat, found, in
bathing, small fish, … it revealed to
Manu the time of the flood, and bade
him construct a ship for his deliverance.
When the time came, Manu,
unaccompanied, went on board; …”
More details are added in another
version, the Mahabharata, where “Manu,… embarks with the seven rishis, or wise men, and takes with him all kinds of seed. The fish announces himself as the God Brahman…”. (Ibid)

The similarity to the Biblical flood legend is obvious; one righteous man
commanded by God to build a boat, then later seven other people get into the boat to escape a flood, after being
warned by God one week in advance (see Genesis 7:10), taking with them seeds to repopulate the Earth, and a third version adds that animals were also taken. We find the same details, and more, in the more famous Babylonian epic, Gilgamesh.

The Epic of Gilgamesh was written
perhaps as early as 2100 BC, and on
Tablet XI it talks of the story of
Utnapishtim, which means “He who
found life” – I.E., the man who was saved from the flood. You can read this yourself on Tablet XI, which is all over the internet, but to summarize it says
“When their heart led the great gods to
produce the flood”, they told
Utnapishtim, who plays the part of Noah in this version, “Tear down (this) house,build a ship! Give up possessions, seek your life. Despise property and keep the soul alive. Aboard the ship take the seed of all living things.” So Utnapishtim did, then after loading the boat… “…the south-storm blew, gathering speed as it blew, submerging the mountains, … [later after the rain stopped] I looked about for coast lines in the expanse of the sea … On Mount Nisir the ship came to a halt. … I sent forth and set free a dove. The dove went forth, but came back; There was no resting-place for it and she turned round. [then he sent forth a swallow, then a raven, and the raven didn't return because the waters had receded]” Afterwards, Utnapishtim held a sacrifice (cf Genesis 8:20), and then one of the Gods came and blessed the survivors.
The similarities between that and
Genesis are astounding; mountains
covered, the three birds released, the
forewarning to build a ship, seeds and
animals taken, ship resting on a
mountain, etc.
I love this!
This is exactly the point, comparative similarities in the fables.… The similarities found in the two cultures are as a result of cultural assimilation, a younger culture borrowing myths from an older one because they were supposedly just One flood... The similarities in Gilgamesh and noah fables shows the younger must have copied from the older which is the point


So why then did you not mention that those other fables Gilgamesh epic and Manu myth were written thousands of years before the Noah story?
Christianity Etc › Re: 5 archeological evidences to proof the Bible is real(with pictures) by johnydon22(m): 10:31am On Aug 01, 2015
Raymondenyi:
2) sodom and Gomorrah found...
The bible told us that following the iniquities committed by sodom, the Lord destroyed the cities of the plain including sodom and gomorrah with fire and brimstone (brimstone is sulphur) ; [size=20]Well this place has been found[/size] and it is located close to the dead sea, it has unlike anywhere else in the world, balls of sulphur embeded everywhere around its grounds. It is the only place on earth where you find purebrimestone (98% of sulpur) in ball form and in millions. Everything in the city burnt and turned to ash, Also analysis of the ash found there showed it contained calcium carbonate and calcium sulfphonate; which are byproduct of combustion with sulfur and limestone...
The evidence is undoubtedly clear...
Lol this one is quite funny, the deception is clear as it is self refuting. . .


"THIS PLACEhuh"

Has no name? an alleged archeological site has no name whats so ever? . . . I think any right think person will laugh at this
Christianity Etc › Re: 5 archeological evidences to proof the Bible is real(with pictures) by johnydon22(m): 10:18am On Aug 01, 2015
Raymondenyi:
In my quest for knowledge I bumped into some revelations I'll like to share with like minds of same faith; true believers in christ... (for the doubting thomases; please Just lay rest and enjoy the show; as I am not doing this to foist convictions on anyone as I believe ur convictions should come from within)

1)Noah's Ark Found...
The bible says Noah's ark landed on mount Ararat, gen. 8:4, which is modern day eastern turkey, in 1977 ryon wyatt discovered this remains, after several archeological investigations, it was discovered this had same measurements given by the bible, and it was recognised and adopted by the government of turkey as the remains of NoaH's Ark and the area declared as Noah's national park...
In as much as this doesn't come as a surprise knowing apologetics always lie in order to link unrelated events to biblical fables and myths. . . For all i thought lying and deception supposed to be a sin for you lots or is not a sin to lie for godhuh

The piece of rock formation dubbed Noah's ark (Even tho Noah's flood story was a young one when compared to older fables) Is just a geological piece of Rock formation.
It was not found on any mountain Ararat, as a matter of fact it was found on a slope and in no way a ship, just a natural rock formation occurrence and christian apologetics want so bad to call it evidence of Noah's ark. . . I think evidence of Vishnu's ark or Gilgamesh ark should be more like it as those one predates Noah...

The picture of the site alone should be enough to make you abandon this feeble attempt in defence of a fable.

Christianity Etc › Re: 5 archeological evidences to proof the Bible is real(with pictures) by johnydon22(m): 10:03am On Aug 01, 2015
menesheh:
Why are you using harsh words. Are u a fundamentalist Christian fighting for god.
LOL calm down. . . The Op is the usual apologetic way of linking unrelated findings to his biblical fables so as to claim authenticity.... Lets take it one after the other
Christianity Etc › Re: I Am Beginning To Feel Agnostic Recently by johnydon22(m): 12:47am On Jul 31, 2015
winner01:
Almost true, except that the thoughts are more of open and liberating than subtle and in error. And truth seems subjective, at least to the atheist. As much as i want to say you try to make sense sometimes, i read your comments most times and i see empty words.
Buh kudos to you though, you do a bad job contending with believers
.
Hahahahaha i will take that as a compliment from a hurt ego and out of sentimental tilt . . . Understandable
Christianity Etc › Re: If Lucifer Is The "Bringer Of Light",...why Then Is He The Bad One ? by johnydon22(m): 12:38am On Jul 31, 2015
Esdb3:
The world reshapes word duh! Jesus is really Yashua Yaweh(his greatness) is really YAWH does that change the imperative point of the word?

Dude used to be an abusive word now it is a cool word. My point is the devil is the morning star and that is Lucifer latin word or no latin word it refers to the devil.

Name your son lucifer please and see how the world reacts to that. Please name him Lucifer I plead with you.
Hahahahaha you don't really have constructiveness in discussions ..

Anyway i only corrected your idea of lucifer being named in heaven where ever you got that from...Only showed it was a latin word rather
Christianity Etc › Re: The Lying Deity by johnydon22(m): 10:53pm On Jul 30, 2015
malvisguy212:
if I say God did not split the moon through muhammed, does it mean I never believe in miracle or I did not believe in the "splitting of the moon" ?
It means you choose the ones you believe same way muslims choose theirs yet you accuse them of not believing in miracles because they don't believe yours... You are as guilty as the ones you accuse
Christianity Etc › Re: Where Did Mohammed’s Stories Come From? by johnydon22(m): 10:39pm On Jul 30, 2015
Biblical accounts of course with the Tenark background influenced Muhammed's version greatly.

All Quranic account on Isa and Mariam are all hewn from the Gnostic Gospels of Thomas and Barnabas. . . Muhammed's account has jewish and christian background then mutilated and smeared with his own unprecedented ideas
Christianity Etc › Re: If Lucifer Is The "Bringer Of Light",...why Then Is He The Bad One ? by johnydon22(m): 10:25pm On Jul 30, 2015
herald9:
Satan is in hell, tormenting those who didn't worship god? shocked

I thought god and Satan were enemies, I didn't know Satan was part of the executive arm of God's government.

More like Buhari and the Nigeria poice force. sad
He just showed that hell is a place where demons torment humans, i thought demons were supposed to be the ones getting tormented and hell was meant for them but he is showing us it is meant for humans and the demons are the tools of torment.

More like they are working for god in his torment plans
Christianity Etc › Re: The Lying Deity by johnydon22(m): 10:17pm On Jul 30, 2015
malvisguy212:
excellent post sir, Muslim and atheists are no different, they don't believe in miracle. May God save there soul.
Funny enough i saw you arguing that God never split the moon through muhammed.. so you don't believe in miracles either and you are accusing others when they don't believe your own claim? Think about it ..
Christianity Etc › Re: If God Hates Human Sacrifice, Why Did He Sacrifice His Son On The Cross? by johnydon22(m): 10:00pm On Jul 30, 2015
Tjayjosh:
You are lost! You need salvation.
Lol bro salvation from what...?

from what God will do to her if she don't believe? Thats blackmail you know?

"Believe me/Love me or else i will hurt you" is a very egoistic show of blatant blackmail and abuse riddled in unwarranted threat wreaks of imperfection and fatal flaw, something you would expect a being powerful enough to create the universe to be well above
Christianity Etc › Re: China Removes Crosses From Christian Churches Nationwide. by johnydon22(m): 9:58pm On Jul 30, 2015
tartar9:
good development
Lol don't get all smiley about it... China also banned Ramadan fast and bet me on it when i say Moon symbols on mosques are next wink
Christianity Etc › Re: If Lucifer Is The "Bringer Of Light",...why Then Is He The Bad One ? by johnydon22(m):
Esdb3:
He was named lucifer when he resided in heaven! When he left he inherited vile names like 'the man of sin', dragon and beast. But nobody calls their kid lucifer for the evil history.
Hahahahaha no bro Lucifer is just a Latin word for morning star/ morning sun..

The devil concept was represented with the word "Lucifer" from the Isaiah account in the bible where he narrated seeing him falling from heaven like "A morning star" so the word "Morning star" when translated into Latin gives you the Latin word "Lucifer" ..

Its just a Latin word used to represent the concept of devil which was referred to as morning star.

Lucifer still today remains a normal Latin word even if you want to say "Christ our morning star"(as in the easter exultet) in Latin it is translated "Christus/Christi Lucifer"

Its just a Latin word
Christianity Etc › Re: I Am Beginning To Feel Agnostic Recently by johnydon22(m): 9:36pm On Jul 30, 2015
winner01:
even johnydon22, menehseh, weah96....learners...all of them
Hahahahahaha abi?

I agree with you tho, in life we can only keep learning. If you stop learning you start dying. So learning is rather good than bad in this case.

A subtle thought that is in error may yet give rise to fruitful enquiry that can establish truths of great value
Christianity Etc › Re: Shocking: Atheists Are Right After All, God Does Not Exist!!!! by johnydon22(m):
[b]Lol this logic is quite funny.

Existence is rooted in our perception of what is.
So since perception cannot perceive outside existence (if there is such a thing)
then

It is absolutely impossible and improbable for you to know or determine anything outside existence or above existence, there is not even any way you can know that there is anything like "outside existence" unless of course you assume it up.

So everything you poured on us here are just assumptive wishful improbability since it is not within the context of your perception.

If you (can) know anything is outside existence, it means you perceived it because knowledge is as a result of perception therefore that concept is still within the confine of existence.

So since you can not know if at all there is anything like outside existence which now begs the question; How exactly did you get to know there is anything as outside existence and something that is within the confine of outside existence..?
(Remember sheer knowledge of such even in the least sense brings it into the dimension of existence and perception)
[/b]
Christianity Etc › Re: How Atheists Handle Morality In The Absence Of God by johnydon22(m):
[b]Morality as we know it is a human concept and varies from society to society. Some rooted in the culture as we see in most religious books while others more so are rooted in empathy and intellect like we see in secular society..

Empathy is judging your actions with the feelings of others (Seeing with the eyes of others, feeling with the heart of others)

You do not need any creed or doctrine to tell you that killing your mother is wrong because if you do then it shows lack of independent ethics and moral basis even a lioness do not need you to tell it that murdering her cub is wrong.

you also do not need anybody to tell you that stoning a non-virgin bride to death (as seen in the old testament) is wrong.
Or
Killing apostates as seen in the quran is bad. . .

This shows we have an innate ability to recognize what we see to be good or not and what we think is ok for the society, you don't need anybody or book or doctrine to teach you that.

Secular definition of morality are Actions that decreases individual human suffering and/or betters societal well being, freedom, equality and justice.

Am an agnostic atheist and i recognize actions that fall within these stipulated factors, i let my empathy and compassion towards others guide my actions and this also we do without expectations of any reward after we are dead.

Morality is not distinctively Muslim, Christian or Hindu or any religion, it is a human concept and it belongs to no ism. it is not dependent on any creed, doctrine, book or supernatural for foundations because morality itself is a foundation.

What religious doctrine tag Sin has absolutely no weight on the moral weight of an action it only are actions that goes against the religious stipulated will of god whether good or bad.

Mentally, physically and emotionally we are the same. We all have the potential to great good or evil and to be overcome by disturbing emotions such as hatred, anger, suspicion, fear and greed. On the other hand if you cultivate loving kindness, compassion and concern for others there will be no room for anger, jealousy and hatred..

You do not need the concept of God or religion to have morals, if you cannot determine right from wrong then you lack empathy not religion.

And the only thing we consider good or bad are your actions towards others and the world around you.

Atheist are independent in their moral basis and also loyal to the stipulated laws of the state. . Of course i can only be sure of myself
[/b]
Culture › Re: An Appeal To The Igbos And Yorubas by johnydon22(op): 8:23pm On Jul 30, 2015
sorextee:
Nope, we don't..
This isn't true bro there are still innate sense of tribal "belong" in them and the WE and US ideology.. i have witnessed one first hand.

Most northerners here engage as mobile shoe menders, i called one to polish my shoes and another passed but they didn't even greet, normally as we always see the other one should have come to his comrade and would have taken the other shoe and polished it after they would share the money but they didn't even talk to each other and the other passed, i was curious and i asked him..

"Aboki why you no call your brother?"

in his own words he hissed and said

"He be pulani i be Hausa" i was amazed... maybe both have an unsettle score or something
Christianity Etc › Re: "Does God Exist?" Resounding No by johnydon22(m): 8:13pm On Jul 30, 2015
Esdb3:
Lol! Who says there is a house in the sky?

Stop mixing science with spirituality.

Outside the earth is even space. The body doesn't go to heaven the spirit which you can't see goes there so why then will you describe heaven as a house in the sky that you can see.

Science is not Spiritualism or Christianity and Vice-versa! They are two different things. You can worship God and be a bad-ass science student.

The problem people with your mind set have is the ability to separate the two. The gui and the dos mode though alike are different.
alright bro
Christianity Etc › Re: Bill Gates Sponsoring Boko Haram? by johnydon22(m): 12:28am On Jul 30, 2015
bro and your information basis or source is a citizen of Niger republic who somehow miraculously had more information than American and Chinese intelligence put togetherhuh makes sensegrin
Nairaland General › Re: Why Drinking Coke Is Dangerous To The Health by johnydon22(m): 12:24am On Jul 30, 2015
Teempakguy:
Man, I am really, really sorry for this, man. cry
But this is mean for scientific purpose STRICTLY!!




GUYS, GET IN HERE!
also, johnydon22
Thats scary stuff right there but i think in take of sugar should be more dangerous for advanced folks tho.

Excess of it are stored as glycogen to be reconverted to glucose and used again for future use and we young folks sure need the energy sucrose provides it can be seen in all our daily activities, we precipitate a lot and it keeps our salt and sugar level in check..

not to mention activities like sports, brain works, sexwink we sure need the Energy..

i think am just trying to muster up a defense for coke ogrin embarassed

cus am not stopping drinking that shiit cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: Open Letter To Seun (NL) To Create A Christian Section by johnydon22(m): 11:07pm On Jul 29, 2015
[b]The Op may well have a point, the islam section is a secluded remote haven for muslims where they pour out and swallow their absurdities on their own without much disturbance which has not even been a good thing for the propagation of their muslims faith because they only wish to shield it from healthy scrutiny and castigation and i practically understand the Op's sentiments and the need for him to shield his religion from same.

The islam section is a very bleak waste land, it gets little attention and is one of the sections that gets little or no interesting discussion or threads, even its topic that hits front page still doesn't get up to 2pages of comments. and in as much as it will be a matter of fairness to also give the Christians their own section it is also good to point out that it will still only turn out to be as boring as the islam section.

I think religious diversity and positions are what makes this section interesting and up the chat, remove that and the very fabrics of it crumbles. . .
[/b]
Culture › Re: An Appeal To The Igbos And Yorubas by johnydon22(op): 10:31pm On Jul 29, 2015
hakeem4:
can I ask you a question?
Do you think racism can stop ?
Before you appeal to a collective you must first win the individual. . . if we can win the individual the collective is solved, so yes i admit i have such hopes even tho it is a flimsy one and seems improbable
Culture › Re: An Appeal To The Igbos And Yorubas by johnydon22(op): 10:12pm On Jul 29, 2015
hakeem4:
I know what you're trying to do . Tbh I'm Yoruba and I've nothing against the Igbos but I took a research and found out that most of our parents have said different things about other tribes making them hate each other
And our parents are not us, we can always change what we want
Culture › Re: An Appeal To The Igbos And Yorubas by johnydon22(op): 9:57pm On Jul 29, 2015
hakeem4:
We have very different cultures so we can't cope


Don't bother preaching peace cause I know so many teenage Yoruba children and Igbo children that hate each other
and i know many that loves each other... We can never take because of death and leave the fight" we cannot take because someone hates the other and forgo to instigate peace

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 (of 489 pages)