Kobojunkie's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Kobojunkie's Profile › Kobojunkie's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 (of 3840 pages)
Kayberg:LOL... Again,.the God of the Bible says He is God of Israel alone. Are you an Israelite that you would think to weaponize His Law over the bloodline of Israel against those individuals who are not of Israel and have no dealings with that old nation that no longer exists? 🥱🥱🥱 Na the same question I been they ask since the beginning be this oh!. 🥱🥱 |
dollyjoy:That na why financial abuse of women in marriage is basically a core part of the marriage system in Nigeria. Even in the Nigerian courts too. ![]() |
EmperorIsaac:Endurance formulae of marriage only works on women with devastatingly low levels of self esteem -- mental illness ---- than on women who women who know and see themselves as the same species as their husband. ![]() |
Wealthyonos:The laws in Nigeria also do the same. No be general tradition in Nigeria say if a man gets tired of a woman, all he needs to do is send her packing? The problem is that religion and society make it harder for women to walk out of marriages in Nigeria. ![]() |
Kayberg:You no answer my questions up until now but demand I answer the stewpid assertions you, a non-israelite continue to make against other non-israelites? 🥱🥱 Even Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon--- a nation which had some direct connection to the people of Israel (judea was captured by Babylon) did not pretend the same audacity that you religious nutjobs do in claiming the God of joy Israelites as your own (declaring YHWH a liar by so doing). Nonsense! 🥱🥱 |
Negroid001:White man did not such thing here their many pastors and imams are Africans; even the babalawos and dibias in Nigeria are Nigerians. Those scammers are all Africans-- political scammers--- scamming their own gullible people as the means by which to build up their kingdoms here on earth. ![]() |
Mee346:Why would a bank place an employee on such in such a state, though? 🫤 |
Mrschiago:Why are you being placed on indefinite loan recovery suspension? Did you co-sign the loan for the customer who is nowhere to be found? Na both of una take the loan together abi wetin? 🫤 If your salary has been impacted, I would recommend you go for the second job. What have you got to loose? 🫤 |
Revealer3:1. If your intention is for her to ditch her friends later on, you shouldn't even be dating her. ![]() 2. If you're proving that you are trustworthy and reliable so that she can dumb the support she already had for you, then you should not even be considering her as a potential partner or dating her. ![]() Again, you need to find and date only those who meet all you need in a lover— as-is. ![]() |
64kent:Isn't that like her asking you if you have been plowed by men before, with you of course on the bottom and the other on top? ![]() |
koladata:1. That seems to be your particular opinion but there are many examples of such relationships with men who are nothing like what you described there. Also, most African men are that low ambitious type you describe, so may what you are describing is the typical African man whose marriage won't even work even when he makes more than his wife. ![]() 2. Well, since most African women in marriages with African men who are the providers are also just enduring, Those marriages that last are built primarily on the endurance effort's of the wives in those marriage. So, I really can't fault you for thinking that an African man in a relationship where he ain't the provider would also just be enduring. 🥱🥱 3. I can't use her as an example because the much we have of her relationship is not well documented for me to claim to know for a fact that the relationship failed because she made more money than the man. I am of the mind that the man may have left before she came to money and they may have tried rekindling afterward the money came only for that to fail too. ![]() That is why I chose to present an international case which we can both find detailed information on. ![]() |
koladata:That some of them don't last does not mean all of them don't last. I don't know who alakija is but I am sure you and I know Oprah Winfrey and her beau of over 35 years at this point in time. . So, you should be asking how can a marriage where the women makes more money be made to last despite the man not being the one on charge of decision making and controlling the money in the relationship. ![]() |
koladata:The traditional configuration of marriage basically has the woman as the slave in the marriage. But somehow you balk at the man occupying the same position he formerly meant for his wife. Why? ![]() |
By Chuck Derry For many years, Chuck Derry facilitated court-mandated groups for men who batter. One night, he started the group by asking the men what they thought the benefits were of their violence. At first, they all looked at each other (notably) and said, “There are no benefits.” This did not surprise him, as men who batter routinely deny their actions—as they deny their intents as well. So he said, “Well, there must be some benefits from the violence; otherwise, why would you do it?” They looked at each other again, and then one guy started admitting there were benefits, and then they all chimed in. Now, right before we get into the list, let me tell you why this is so important. Victims of abuse typically think he(the abuser) couldn't possibly be abusing them on purpose, right, or that it must be childhood trauma, or that he may just have problems controlling his emotions like a toddler throwing tantrums, etc. The fact, however, is far from all of that. It is merely about the calculated need for power and control in the relationship. Here is a list of the benefits of violence that abusive men cited: ➜She’s scared and won’t go out and spend money ➜Get your way: go out ➜Respect ➜She won’t argue ➜Feeling superior: she’s accountable to me in terms of being somewhere on time: I decide ➜Keeps the relationship going—she’s too scared to leave ➜Get the money ➜Get sex ➜Total control in decision making ➜Use money for drugs ➜Don’t have to change for her ➜Power ➜Decide where to go (as a couple) ➜Who to see ➜What to wear ➜Control the children ➜If she’s late, she won’t be again ➜Intimidation ➜She’s scared & can’t confront me ➜Can convince her she’s screwin’ up ➜She feels less worthy, so she defers to my needs and wants ➜She will look up to me and accept my decisions without argument ➜Decide her social life—what she wears, so you can keep your image by how she acts ➜She’s to blame for the battering ➜She’s an object ➜(I get) a robot babysitter, maid, sex, food ➜Ego booster ➜She tells me I’m great ➜Bragging rights ➜If she works—get her money ➜Get her to quit her job so she can take care of the house ➜Isolate her so friends can’t confront me ➜Decide how money is spent ➜“I’m the breadwinner.” ➜Buy the toys I want ➜Take time for myself ➜She has to depend on me if I break her stuff ➜Get to know everything ➜She’s a nurse-maid ➜She comforts me ➜Supper on the table ➜Invite friends over w/o her knowing = more work for her ➜No compromise = more freedom ➜Don’t have to listen to her complaints about not letting her know stuff ➜She works for me ➜I don’t have to help out ➜I don’t have to hang out with her or the kids ➜Don’t have to get up, take out garbage, watch kids, do dishes, get up at night with kids, do laundry, change diapers, clean house, bring kids to appointments or activities, mop floors, clean refrigerator, etc. ➜Answer to nobody ➜Do what you want, when you want to ➜Get to ignore/deny your history of violence and other irresponsible behavior ➜Get to write history ➜Get to determine the future ➜Determine what values kids have—who they play with, what school they go to, or getting to ignore the process—dictating what they “need” food, clothes, recreation, etc. ➜Dictate reality, etc. ➜Kids on my side against her ➜Kids do what I say ➜Mold kids/her so that they will help do what I should do ➜Keeps kids quiet about abuse ➜Choose battles & what it will cost her ➜Proves your superiority ➜Win all the arguments ➜Don’t have to listen to her wishes, complaints, anger, fears, etc. ➜Make the rules, then break them when you want ➜So she won’t get help against you for past beatings because she has no friends to support her, and she is confused by my lies ➜Convince her she’s nuts ➜Convince her she’s unattractive ➜Convince her she’s to blame ➜Convince her she’s the problem ➜I can dump on her ➜Can use kids to “spy” on mom ➜Kids won’t tell mom what I did ➜Kids won’t disagree with me ➜Don’t have to talk to her ➜I’m king of the castle ➜Can make yourself scarce ➜Have someone to unload on ➜Have someone to bitch at ➜She won’t call the police ➜Tell kids they don’t have to listen to mom ➜Get her to drop charges ➜Get her to support me to her family, my family, cops, judge, child welfare, prosecutors, etc. ➜Get her to admit it’s her fault Chuck Derry then asked, “Why would they give up using violence?” ➜The men then responded with things like: ➜“get arrested,” ➜“divorce,” ➜“get protection orders taken out against you,” ➜“adult kids don’t invite you to their weddings,” ➜“Have to go to groups like this.” Chuck Derry writes: “This was the first time I fully comprehended the necessity of a consistent coordinated community response through the criminal, civil, and family court systems, which can mete out safe and effective interventions that hold men who batter accountable while preserving the safety of the women, girls, and boys they abuse.” “It was on that day that I realized if I had to choose between providing batterer groups for men who batter or a consistently effective criminal and civil/family court response to domestic violence, I would choose the criminal and civil/family court response every time. There are just too many benefits gained from this behavior.” To read the full article, please visit https://www.bwss.org/abusive-men-describe-the-benefits-of-violence/.
|
Love800:Lectures are given to people you have rational authority over. You have no rational authority over a woman you are in relationship with that you would think to lecture her on what she should or should not do. She is perfectly fine sticking to the details of the contract that holds you both together. If you feel that she needs to do more then approach her with a reworked contract that sees to it that you give up privileges you formerly had if she would chose to agree to the new. Also be ready for her to present you with a prenuptial agreement in the case of such. 🥱🥱🥱 |
blesskewe:No adult really lies because they have. We all choose to lie because we have decided the person we lie to deserves to be lied to. 🥱🥱 Thank goodness that he at least confessed to you that he lied. The universe may have been looking out for you or something. Most people who lie don't admit to it, and that same person may even now be lying to several other women out there still. If you don't at least understand the level of depravity that is possible with every human being, even your own parents, then I suggest you get off the dating market and only come back when you are ready the deal with reality as it is. ![]() |
Common sense is that you only pursue and date those with whom you are aligned. It isn't smart for a man or woman who considers the keeping of contact with an ex a red flag to go after and date individuals who do not hold th same ideas as red flags. It is also not a man's or woman's place to force his/her issues on their partner. If you find yourself in a relationship where you notice red flags, what you need to do at that point is to leave the relationship. Never try to cajole or talk your partner into going from doing things the way they are most comfortable doing to doing it the way you want just because. You are meant to set boundaries for yourself alone and date only those partners who fit with those boundaries you have for yourself. ![]() |
Kayberg:You can tell the delulu/mumu seems to be extra strong with this one. This thing a simple thing, though. A Cameroonian living in Cameroon cannot invoke the Burkina Faso Constitution against a Ghanian or even a Cameroonian living in Cameroon, naw! It is impossicant and not rocket science! ![]() Again, for the umpteenth time, are you an Israelite — of the bloodline of Jacob — living in the land of Canaan, where the Law of Moses meant specifically for the Israelites(the people) that was sanctioned as the one and only National Constitution for the nation populated by the Israelites? Are all homosexuals Israelites — of the bloodline of Jacob — that you would think to invoke those laws against them? 🤣🤣🤣 What you are attempting here amounts to invoking the words of Zeus, God of the Greeks, against non-Greeks. It can never make sense, no matter how hard to try! The same way I cannot go out invoking Ragnarok against Americans is the same way, you cannot go around invoking the God of Israel against non-Israelites. E no go ever make sense! 🤣🤣🤣 Let me remind you, in all of this, the problem here is not the God of Israel, who made it abundantly clear that the only humans He interacts directly with by way of His law of Moses are the children of Israel. 😁😁😁 |
Kayberg:The mumu seems to be extra strong with this one. This thing a simple thing, though. A Cameroonian living in Cameroon cannot invoke the Burkina Faso Constitution against a Ghanian or even a Cameroonian living in Cameroon, naw! It is impossicant and not rocket science! ![]() Again, for the umpteenth time, are you an Israelite — of the bloodline of Jacob — living in the land of Canaan, where the Law of Moses meant specifically for the Israelites(the people) that was sanctioned as the one and only National Constitution for the nation populated by the Israelites? Are all homosexuals Israelites — of the bloodline of Jacob — that you would think to invoke those laws against them? 🤣🤣🤣 What you are attempting here amounts to invoking the words of Zeus, God of the Greeks, against non-Greeks. It can never make sense, no matter how hard to try! The same way I cannot go out invoking Ragnarok against Americans is the same way, you cannot go around invoking the God of Israel against non-Israelites. E no go ever make sense! 🤣🤣🤣 |
Kayberg:For the umpteenth time, are you an Israelite — of the bloodline of Jacob — living in the land of Canaan, where the Law of Moses was sanctioned as the one and only National Constitution? Are all homosexuals Israelites — of the bloodline of Jacob — that you would think to invoke those laws against them? 🤣🤣🤣 What you are attempting here amounts to invoking the words of Zeus, God of the Greeks, against non-Greeks. It can never make sense, no matter how hard to try! The same way I cannot go out invoking Ragnarok against Americans is the same way, you cannot go around invoking the God of Israel against non-Israelites. E no go ever make sense! 🤣🤣🤣 |
Coly2012:What you described is a mule, not a helpmate. It irritates you to use the actual word but not the description? That one is on you. ![]() |
Negroid001:The gods of the Christians—all at least 46000 of them— can't protect those of them in the south either. If these bandits were to show up during their Passover night vigils anywhere in the south, we are likely to see a repeat of the very same acts we have seen in churches in the Northern parts over the last weeks. The same goes for the many gods of Islam and of all other religions. ![]() |
Kayberg:Again, are you an Israelite — of the bloodline of Jacob — living in the land of Canaan, where the Law of Moses was sanctioned as the one and only National Constitution? Are all homosexuals Israelites — of the bloodline of Jacob — that you would think to invoke those laws against them? 🤣🤣🤣 What you are attempting here amounts to invoking the words of Zeus, God of the Greeks, against non-Greeks. It can never make sense, no matter how hard to try! The same way I cannot go out invoking Ragnarok against Americans is the same way, you cannot go around invoking the God of Israel against non-Israelites. E no go ever make sense! 🤣🤣🤣 |
Kayberg:Again, are you an Israelite — of the bloodline of Jacob — living in the land of Canaan, where the Law of Moses was sanctioned as the one and only National Constitution? Are all homosexuals Israelites — of the bloodline of Jacob — that you would think to invoke those Laws against them? 🤣🤣🤣 What you are attempting here amounts to invoking the words of Zeus, God of the Greeks, against non-Greeks. It can never make sense, no matter how hard to try! 🤣🤣🤣 |
Loserlose:Tell the woman that she is best seeking help from a mental health counselor/Psychiatrist, or a Doctor, depending on the nature of the issue. ![]() |
Love800:Lecture someone you claim to love after you have signed a marriage agreement that clearly spells out how things ought to go? Na women wey dey endure people with this mindset I dey pity the most. 🥱🥱🥱 |
MarketDispatch:Some husbands also plan for themselves alone in some marriages, too. ![]() |
Coly2012:You trained her therefore she is a mule for you? Yikes! The way you put it, ehn...🥱🥱 |
Diamond098454:Good for you! But I wouldn't recommend this as the way to go for all women out there. 🥱🥱 |
Diamond098454:Not when your marriage contract is traditional in the sense that the man is the provider while the woman is the submissive partner. ![]() 2. The woman can always help herself make her children at that. For instance, she can hire a maid to do her chores, a nanny to handle the kids and maybe even take them out regularly while she invests her time and energy into keeping herself looking good and on her business or job. 🥱🥱🥱 There are literally so many women out there doing exactly this, even female billionaires who live this way. 🥱🥱🥱 |
JIGGERNAPPY:There are married people out there existing as op described even here in saner climes and they are doing well that way too. So, what problem do you have with his idea? ![]() Unless you are ready to have your marriage contract redone and maybe even have your wife throw in a prenuptial for her sake, I suggest you stick to whatever original agreement you both has when you first got married. You don't expect her to add her money to the pot without expecting you to give up on many of privileges you once claimed in the marriage, do you? ![]() |
HacheNoire:1. Na poor man dey always think say all he needs to bring to the table na money. ![]() 2. Na rich robots dey pretend say money, time, and regulating of sex is all it takes. Intelligent humans instead know that they need to also be able to match the woman's energy in the relationship. No woman or man, for that matter, likes to be married to a man who does not value emotional and spiritual(not religious nonsense but social) connections in addition to the basics -- time, money, and or physical labor. ![]() Ask any man out there if his wife, who shows no emotional or social connections to him he thinks she loves him, and the answer you are likely to get is a No. Relationships thrive on emotional and social(spiritual) connection. Not just money, time, physical labor, and sex; those are just icing on the cake. ![]() Same way a man yearns for emotional and social connections with his wife is the same way the woman also yearns for the same. And this entails the need for emotional and social intelligence on the part of the man. If you have to wait for the woman to tell you or teach you what she wants, that is a clear sign of a lack of the emotional and social intelligence needed to make a relationship work in the first place. And that ain't a woman problem. It is not a woman's job to teach any man these basic things every human ought to learn. ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 (of 3840 pages)


?