Afamed:

When you said large number, that should be over 50%. My encountered in Kano. I saw less than 1% Kano Indigene as Christian. Just same with my visit to Borno, which I didn't see the Christian up to 10%. In fact through out my stay in Kano, I didn't come across any Kano Indigene being a Christian. You can disprove this with their location in Kano state.

decatalyst:
E be like say there is something about being 'a school drop out' in advance countries. In Africa, you automatically become a street urchin in most cases.

ebujany:
[/s] Looks hot....yummy [s]

BluntBoy:


Says the daft bluntboy

AllTheWayUp:
Buhari wil die a slow and painful death

We don't have a President in his country, we only have a walking dead zombie called Buhari claiming to be president

BluntBoy:


You touched nothing, you ignorant mofo

What is the difference between libel and defamation? If you can't give a straightforward answer, you might as well shut the fvck up and go to bed.

If you are going to mention this post, do well to explain the bone of contention, not this garbage you put up.

Might I remind you that the bone of contention is if defamation is a civil offense. You disagree that it is a civil offense but agree that libel is a civil offense.

Now, make me understand why libel is a civil offense while defamation is a criminal offense.

Remember the golden rule. If you don't know it, just simply don't reply.

BluntBoy:


Stop displaying such staggering level of crass ignorance.

A Bench Warrant can be recalled on the mere strength of a worthy excuse. Kemi said she had to take care of her health and it was the lawyer who failed to inform the court.

Please, answer my simple question: why is libel less of a crime than defamation?

To establish libel, it must have been published. That is clearly what should be brought against Kemi.

BluntBoy:


This was supposed to be a civil conversation, but if you want it dirty, well, you can be my guest.

However, let me make you understand something since it obviously went over your thick skull.

We don't have a law in this country. You hypocrite. I have read posts where you called Buhari a dullard. One would expect that you should have gone to face Buhari and ask him to pack out of Aso Rock, being the superman that you are. You see why you are a hypocrite?

And if not that you are excruciatingly stupid, you should know that it is almost impossible to counter a corrupt judiciary, which is the very essense why we are drawing attention to Kemi's plight. It is the same reason why people cannot face the lawless SARS but stay behind their computers to lend a voice to the struggle. It is the very reason why every sane society encourages public opinion.

Like I wrote earlier, this was supposed to be a civil conversation, but since you decided to fight dirty, well, I am all yours for the night

BluntBoy:


If anyone is confused, it is you, the thieving pastor and the worthless police.

If Libel is a civil offense, why is defamation a criminal offence? I will like you to tell me the difference between libel and defamation.

And for your information, Kemi is being held because of a suspicious Bench Warrant for her. That is enough proof that we indeed have the most worthless police in the world. And that many of you even support this blatant misuse of power is evidence that only God can redeem this country.

And ironically, it is people like who would vehemently join the Scrap SARS campaign on the day your rights are trampled upon even in a court of law.

sarrki:
I begin to be scared completely now

Serious

Nigeria is not safe anymore

magoo10:
Even a child is aware that these are coordinated terrorist attacks.

BluntBoy:


You and that thieving pastor and the lawless police are the ones confused.

First, her arrest was like a kidnap (something the worthless and illiterate police have not denied). That in itself is a crime for which Kemi must get justice.

Two, what is she being charged with? Cyber bullying. When did cyber bullying without physical abuse become a criminal charge? What is the difference between libel and what the useless police have on the charge sheet?

Vacora:



Cyber crime? What a misnomer The case relates to alleged ‘Defamation’ which remains a civil matter. Just because there is a law does not mean it is criminal per se to fall foul of it? If it is a criminal matter in Nigeria where anything goes then we are on slippery grounds. The onus is on the victim to take the writer of the alleged article to court and sue for damages. Pastor ‘cry baby’ went whinging to the authorities and then she was unlawfully arrested. She has now been incarcerated and refused bail even though we all know she will attend court. The irksome issue with the whole debacle is that it simply means anyone in Nigeria can be arrested on a frivolous allegation of publishing or writing something untrue. As much as I do not like Kemi in this matter I have to stand with her against injustice or abuse of authority all orchestrated by a so called man of God. She has been punished enough.

BluntBoy:


And please, endeavor to read the link you provided because it is obvious that you didn't read it.

I will post an excerpt from the article in the link. Here is the excerpt in bold:

Also, while libel and slander are civil offences in Nigeria, defamation and false publishing are crimes under the
Criminal Code Act

That is how confused your law is.

What is libel, what is defamation? If the police were honest, why charge her with a bogus Cybercrime charge? Ibiyeomi should be suing Kemi for libel and not the police charging her with a laughable Cybercrime charge.

Moreso, who established it as a fact that Kemi's publication was false and when? Was it after the illegal arrest or during the illegal detention even after the perfection of her bail conditions?

BluntBoy:


Oya, present the facts since you have them. I am waiting patiently.

BluntBoy:


This is like laughing at a neighbour who is being unjustly taken away by the police. You will laugh until your own day will come too when the police will come for you.

This story is not funny. It is something that all of us should condemn. What this story means is that offending a big man/ woman (a case of civil offense, at any rate) can land you in police custody.

EdifiedCEO:
Salomi Pogu rescued by Nigerian Armt Troops of Operation Lafiya Dole deployed in Pulka today she is one of the Chibok Girls abducted by Boko Haram terrorists in 2014.

http://www.newshelmng.com/2018/01/photo-of-recently-rescued-chibok-girl.html

bedspread:
If He is serious, let him and Ameachi come down let's know if it's STONING or HAILING they have for Him

Oxster:


Even tho,,,so..de snake bite am come remain dir also?doing what kwanu?ohhhh,,,I guess twas mourning 4 de deceased ?

I still don't believe that story or probably if is real let dem go 4 autopsy

De snake might not be de cause of de death

Oxster:



So after de snake attacked her,The snake also Died?

I don't believe that Shit

aribisala0:
Maybe they are not relevant why did you not just ignore them? Did I quote you to make my comments ? You just interject yourself randomly ,belatedly and incongruently and start talking rubbish . Are you the Dean of Nairaland Faculty? Go and play with your coevals

aribisala0:

It is only a foolish man that joins an argument midway and starts taking sides trying to show intelligence without a grasp of all the details
I was not talking about what is enforceable or not but about extant Supreme Court decisions
I have already, on this thread ,cited a Supreme Court case that affirm the position of Yoruba Custom that wives cannot inherit their husbands property under Yoruba tradition. That is a settled matter repugnant or not . I will here refer you to Suberu V. Sunmonu also cited in Akinnubi v Akinnubi 1
What that demonstrates then is that repugnance is not the ultimate consideration

With regard to this case of OP I do not know whether he is Yoruba or that his father died intestate or that if he did that his parents were married under Native law. So I cannot comment on that and I really do not know what you base your own conclusion on

There are so many things occurring de facto that contravene the constitution that are upheld by convention,law or jurisprudence and you cannot overturn them by mere declaration you have to test that in court. Until you do that it is merely an opinion that it contravenes the constitution

aribisala0:

My learning learned friend.
Do you now accept that it is settled that in Yoruba Customary law women cannot inherit their husband's property if they married under customary law?
Do you accept that this was not considered "repugnant" by the Supreme Court

9jakohai:


I ain't judging....have i sentenced her to jail yet?

Sin is sin.....and calling someone out about it is meant to bring someone to repentance.

(And by the way...the boy/father of the child sinned).

Yes...she had the baby....but having the babies does not change the fact that God wants us to have s'x AFTER WE GET MARRIED...and not before.

I wish the woman and her children well....infact, I don't think that the kids being born out of wedlock makes them bad....but we should not justify sin. We are the light of the world. Yes/....we sin, but we also have the repentance option.

PrecisionFx:


It's man slaughter.

Self defence no dey this one ooo. There's no one there wen they fought.

PrecisionFx:



It's manslaughter, it's very difficult to escape at least some jail time.

She needs a good laywer

chigoizie7:
I don't subscribe to rape, in fact any form of abuse is a big no for me.


However, according to the report. It said, " she sent the victims son to go buy sugar " and then lay down , only for the uncle to try doing the needful, which attracted her kicking his balls. Yes, this is good.

What I don't understand is where she picked the stone with which she hit him with, them de keep stones inside room? Or house as the case may be.
Perhaps the said uncle tried raping her outside the house.

Please I am not understanding.



Just like some one already said. She kept the stone in the house/ room( not small stone ooh, because it said SMASHED). And then sent his little boy of 10 years old to go buy sugar at around 8.30pm. And after killing him ( self defense) she convinced the little boy to shut up , locked the house and then attempts to run away.


Please I am not understanding this for the second time.



Now she said he tried to rape her. To play both victim and gender card.









I do not support rape or any form of abuse in anyway. But this case? Abeg ee get as ee be.

somehow:
Well he can only give it to cheats.

Nasiruddeen:
HAD JESUS FORGOTTEN THAT HE WAS GOD WHEN HE MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS IN THE BIBLE ? (1) Mark 12 v 29 : The Lord our God is only one God (2) John 20v 17 : I am ascending onto my father and your father, onto my God and your God. (3) Mark 15v 34 : My God My God, why has thou forsaken me ? (4) John 5 v 30 : I Jesus can do nothing of myself (5) John 14 v 28 : My father is greater than I (6) John 12 v 49 : "I have not spoken of myself, the father who sent me gave me the commandments of what I should say and spoke onto you". (7) Mark 13 v 32 : Of that Day and that Hour, no one knows, not even the Son, nor the Angels in heaven but only the father ( John 17 v 3 : This is life eternal that they know you the only true God and Jésus whom you have sent (9) Matthew 23 v 9 : Do not call any one your father here on earth for only God in heaven is your father. (10) Luke 4 v 7-8 : Get away Satan for it is written trou shall worship the Lord thy God, and only him shall thou serve.
COMMENT : I quoted these few biblical verses from the sayings of the Holy Man of God whom the Christians called their God. It always beats my imagination whenever I hear the Christians calling Jesus Christ God . This was the very Man the bible called the Prophet of God in Luke 24 v 19, Luke 7 v16, Luke 13 v 33, Matthew 21 v 46, Matthew 21 v 10-11, John 9 v 17, and Mark 6 v 4. This was the very Jesus the bible says he ate and drank in Matthew 11 v 19, Luke 24 v 41-43, John 19 v 28. This was the very Jesus the bible says he slept in Matthew 8 v 24, This was the very Man the bible says he worshipped God, prayed to him and even cried seeking his assistance in Matthew 26 v 39, Hebrews 5 v 7. Finally, this was the very Man the Christians generally believe that he was helplessly killed by the Jews and Roman Soldiers in Israel,. How then can such a being be the Almighty God that created the universe ? It is not only untenable to call Jesus God but also a theological madness to even think that Jesus is God. Such kind of belief in the Godship of a Man is not acceptable in this age of reason and civilisation. The Christians should have an independent study of their bible and revolt against their Pastors and Bishops who blatantly misguide and confuse them to worship a Man (Jésus) that was born by a Woman (Mary) , who depended on the factors of growth and reproduction. This was the very Man that the Bible says in Luke 2 v 21 that he was circumcised in his foreskin (génital) when he was eight days old. Can a sensible and civilized human being call Jesus Christ God ? No !. The Muslims, of course, believe in Jesus and his message, but no Muslim can ever make the mistake of calling Jesus God. That is the beauty of Islam.
Husaini Yusuf Mabera contributed this for the progress of Islam. For any question, objection, correction and comment you can call 08067678230.