₦airaland Forum

Some of you always like to yarn and support trash. Provided that he's mentally sound and gritty, his financial story can change for good within few weeks or months after connecting emotionally with the right woman. Emotion of love still remains the most powerful of all emotions.

With the right emotional state and overall mental soundness (with or without aptitude) and valuable contact, anyone's financial story can change for good within a twinkle of an eye.

Money remains a visitor, and no condition is permanent.

funmisticqueen:
i think you have confused respect with politeness and courtesy. Respect is earned, that's why it is valuable.

Love is not the first thing in the marriage, compatibility and values are. Love mellows down when trials come. That is why a higher number of love based marriages end up in divorce as opposed to arranged marriages where compatibility is considered.

Besides what else do you expect from 19 yr old Regina Daniels. 19 yr olds are more immature now than 40 years ago.

There's no respect where there's no politeness and self-esteem. Politeness and self-esteem beget respect - the former mentions are processes while the latter mention is the end product, thus why it's earned.

Also, you can't talk about love - the big love that is variant of goodness - without talking about respect. Respect is a major constituent of love. Love is encompassing - literally it can't hold water without its constituents/end product values like respect, loyalty, faithfulness, etc. Just as these constituents of love can't hold water without the values/mechanisms (like altruism, politeness, self-esteem, etc) that beget them too.

Compatibility and values are variables of love. This explains reason unconditionality of love never invalidates conditionality of falling in love and staying in love . . . with material vs immaterial individual's interest as the subjective determiners that can qualify one as being either genuine or otherwise.

Love - the big love, not its constituents/the smaller love like fancy, care, emotional feeling and admiration - is the most valuable and priceless thing in the world.

Ugosample:
the thing is this

those with questionable riches (this one no be even wealth) who are NOY on Interpol /FBI watchlist can enter and leave the USA (that is if they even grant you visa)

but IF you have a premonition that you are on that watch list (like some people I will not list)
you better stay away from the U.S.
two days before leavinb the country back to NiggerArea might be the the day the FBI conclude investigations on you and arrest u

Refer to my foremost submission.

realestniggah:
You have forgotten dammy krane? You think the US is a place you can just waltz in and out if you have questionable wealth.

Ever Wonder why mompha and hush puppi are not in the USA or Canada even tho they can easily afford it? You never see them go to these countries because they know they will be easily nabbed

Stop being conceited. As much as there's nothing wrong with one having little or zero knowledge about something, because no human being has monopoly of knowledge, however there's everything wrong with one who's conceited - stop arguing about something you have little or no knowledge about or trying hard to gloss your ignorance with conceit. My submission is lucid for any informed person to understand. Also stop using yourself or the people you mentioned as standard for everyone on this forum.

daddytime:
I get US visa with free Business class ticket for you E-money

I wonder who gave some of you the erroneous information that anyone with "assumed questionable wealth" can't enter the US without being arrested. Well, one can only be arrested if s/he is on the wanted list of the authorities, or if found guilty of any offence on the spot. So, one's ability to enter and leave the US without being arrested doesn't automatically make him innocent, just as one's wish not to enter doesn't automatically make him guilty of any assumed offence too.

Well, your admonition on decorum is in order.

IPOB proponents and apologists need to calm down. They need to embrace diplomacy.

A typical IPOB member is mentally parochial.

Balderdash. Generalization is the mother of all nonsense. In fact, the way most of you glorify everything West, a naive person would think that they're all aristocrats or of diplomatic ethical leanings, whereas reverse is almost the case. Small-mindedness/toxicity knows no race or gender or background.

Small-minded acts are very prevalent in the West, just like in the Black/developing/third world countries, the only difference being that, while they always perpetrate their shenanigans as predators, our representatives (in this regard) do perpetrate theirs as leeches.

You can only know how small-minded/toxic a typical Westerner is if you relate with them from an aristocratic/diplomatic position.

Self-conquest through willpower - there's no need for a long story.

Belief system matters greatly. However, religion shouldn't be that belief system because it's an object of subjugation - you and your woman should denounce everything religion.

Both of you need to take to the route of living life at the periphery of conventionalism . . . doing so altruistically and conscientiously.

RIP. Anyone who knows . . . can easily tell the reason behind his action citing his demeanour from his photos.

If you can't tell about people's overall condition at any given time through their photos and/or words, you haven't started living.

To be a virtuous wife doesn't entail you (or any other woman) indulging nonsense attitude from your husband. He's a grown-up man and should know when his habit/attitude, like in this case, drains you and volitionally strive and conquer himself, so as to stop draining you. Let him make a conscious decision to stop eating ewa from the said woman in particular and outside in general.

You've to make it clear to him that his habit, in this regard, isn't palatable, so he's to put a stop to it - you need to be polite in communicating your reservation to him though. Diplomacy will do it. If he can't defer to you in this regard then it means both of you aren't in a healthy union.

The reason you (or anyone) will feel this way is because you haven't created your life path. I can assure you that once you create your life path and encrypt it - make sure you embed it with goodness and no-nonsense, but with no room for neither servility nor evil - you'll automatically start to enjoy the new realm of life.

You've entered a new phase in your life journey.

princfred:
Sure yet playing safe - best. Why test limits?

My previous submissions are lucid, I don't have luxury of time to entertain any more rhetoric.

princfred:
Sure yet thin line separating the two can easily be blury and crossed unknowingly even unintentionally to the detriment of relationship. Why not play safe.

That's the importance of ethical leanings. A woman's (or man) ethical leanings matter the most, not her psychological leaning alone.

princfred:
Bringing up and dragging equality bla bla blawith a man connotes contentiousness and real men have better things to deal with than contenting with who they went to for peaceful cohension.

Egalitarianism doesn't mean contentiousness, so a woman can be egalitarian without being contentious.

princfred:
Men dont go after women to come and be dragging equality and separetist gender ideologies up and down and any woman who brings that often to the fore in relationships sooner or later finds herself alone as Men find that a unnecessary distraction and waste ofenergy In extension, if many women in a society do that their men will naturally not find relationship with them worthwhile.

Don't mistake a contentious woman for an egalitarian one. Meanwhile, difference doesn't mean inequality. I can only have problem with a woman (or an egalitarian man) who fails to acknowledge the difference. In our difference lies our uniqueness.

A Westernized, independent and/or feministic woman isn't automatically a toxic/small-minded woman. So, lumping (mixing up) the former mentions with the latter isn't ideal at all. And there's nothing insane about a man who loves a woman of any (or all) of the former mentioned leanings . In fact, it's only a man who has penchant for subjugation that'll abhor a woman of these leanings.

Any true sane man (person) knows that it's always easier to relate harmoniously with a sane emancipated woman (person) than an unemancipated one (whether sane or not) in interpersonal relationship, just like in any political settings.

I don't hold brief for the wannabe Westernized, independent and/or feministic women. Meanwhile, toxicity/small-mindedness knows no gender and economic class.

Creatively (divine), all women (human beings) are the same, but ethically they aren't . . . . Disacknowledgement of this simple fact will always be one's greatest undoing.

But for respect of people's right to liberty, I could've mentioned 3 different female monikers in this forum that ethically represent the 3 different standards of women worldwide - 1 of the 3 has a subset though. If you can't tell about people's offline character through their online words - irrespective of any glossing and coloration - you aren't living yet.

Bizibi:
already judging the op.....this is the eype of person that will paint a person black even when he doesn't know the person. Very typical.

Bumpkin. I'm not surprised that extrapolation and discernment aren't your forte. Anyway, it's of no value to join issues with a small-minded person like you.

Direct your further mentions to your lunatic parents.

MariaLavina:
Now I'm intrigued. Tell me more, will you?

I'll tell you more at the appropriate time, but not now. Once more, it's just a passive thing for me.

MariaLavina:
Do you know things before they happen or you just find yourself subconsciously preparing for things yet to happen? that sometimes people think you've had all things planned.

Both ways and far more.

MariaLavina:
Are you now? are you? . Are you saying you have a crystal ball with you?


Amen, thank and God bless you too.

Joking apart, I'm a passive diviner.

MariaLavina:
Lol, do people celebrate weekends? well you are right about a celebration going on though, it's dad's birthday tomorrow. It's a full house here, and we are killing meat.

You are invited.

Ahh! You didn't know prior to now that I'm a passive diviner? Of course, I knew that a kind of celebration is going on in your house.

HBD to the papa. God's unlimited blessings to him in particular and all of you at large.

She's right somehow. A woman's (or any human being) self-esteem and politeness should be the values to earn her respect, not her marital status or material possession of any kind. Respect is earned not given, so no one should expect to have it on a platter of gold (on a silver platter).

MariaLavina:
Good evening LordKO, my weekend is going smoothly. Yours?

Good to hear that. Same here too. Na cow and goat you kill for the celebration?

MariaLavina:
Lol... where did you hear that one from? Miss gini?
I have a more important role for you though, if you won't mind.

Hello! I know you're having a great weekend.

Life isn't a scam and being beneficent to others (other than one's parents, siblings and kinship in general) isn't a bad thing too. One needs to be conscientious always . . . just avoid rewarding disloyalty with more altruism or celebrating mediocrity. One of the mistakes most people usually make is terming everyone who comes around them as a friend. Closeness doesn't always/automatically mean oneness or friendship or loyalty.

ImaIma1:
I guess I have the time these days. It might change soon.

I could say the same for you

No change a beg, we no de complain. Although a more tactful you, where and when necessary, will be OK.

Your last statement isn't true.

[quote author=ImaIma1 post=80901060][/quote]E bi like say na you be the new attorney general of Romanceland and Familyland dese days, lol.

Gallant!

Such happens only when a woman is dealing with an unconscientious man. Conscientiousness is the major hallmark of loyalty, faithfulness and goodness in general. So, I don't see reason any responsible woman - one with options anyway - will enter into a relationship/union with an unconscientious man in the first place.

A man (or woman) who can't stand for that which is just, at any given time, doesn't deserve respect/close relationship of another person (others) who's sane.