₦airaland Forum

[quote author=Donald3d[/quote]It's OK bro. You're not a fool. Peace is priceless, provided that it's obtained within the confines of mutual goodness.

[quote author=Donald3d post=80846184][/quote]Conceitedness is God's gift to small-minded people like you and your ilk. I mean, it smacks of mental parochialism for you to continually deride others, or cast aspersions on them, either directly or indirectly, just because they do not share same myopic thoughts like you. In fact, any sane person who reads through that your first post will see that you based your wack submission on assumption - assumption remains the mother of all nonsense. Sane people make contributions based on fact available, not assumption.

Next time avoid deriding others all in the name of trying to appear wiser and more civil than them. Who conferred you title of the wisest and most civil person alive?

The OP's wife isn't a deity, as someone stated, and deserves no worship. Self-esteem and politeness beget respect, and respect is reciprocal. People should stop enabling nonsense under any guise.

Stop being conceited.

@OP

I hear cry of a servile man. You've a fundamental problem which makes you an enabler for your wife's toxicity towards you in particular and others in general.

I wager where your wife is now, she throws around a statement like "I'm not impure, my husband just loves me" to whosoever that cares to listen to her . . . That's the slogan of subjugators (like your wife) who're able to have servile men (and vice versa) like you.

In fact, I love it when servile and false libertarians (men especially) cry when being subjugated, like in your case, because on a normal day you and your ilk will be in a thread like this to cast aspersions on any person (man and woman) who expresses abhorrence towards small-minded women (and men) over their toxicity. And at the same time chorus with them on any denouncement they make towards any rightful thing that doesn't resonate well in their ears, just to spite and deride those against their petty attitudes, all in a bid to appear more civil than civility itself. Most of your ilk have already commented on this thread.

Hypocritically disingenuous people everywhere.

Foremost, I wonder why you would want to control another human being - have dominion over another person - an adult for that matter. That sounds repulsive to my hearing - to be in charge/lead is different from controlling/longing to subjugate someone.

Anyway, you need to make sure that the interest is mutual and genuine from both sides, that's the most important thing. Then, make sure you come (go) into equity with cleans hands and expect same from her (unpronounced) - whether she's financially wealthier than you or not is irrelevant - money shouldn't define a sane man (person). Of course, lack of it (not inadequate of it) is a sign of irresponsibleness and unresourcefulness, especially when one's hale and hearty and without any form of inhibition from anywhere.

In other words, strive to conquer yourself without longing to conquer her, and love her without hating yourself - be in charge. In the end, both of you can only have healthy and enduring relationship if you are of the same sane ethical leanings/or able to unanimously forge a sane one, wittingly or unwittingly.

MariaLavina:
That's great, sorry I couldn't reply last night.

Good morning.

I've heard that you want to throw your hat in the Miss World contest . . . Let me know if you need a chaperone.

Fountainofyouth:
Thanks jare, wannabe alpha male everywhere, see how they are bending over backward to prove what are not, not even an inch,

I've missed you sucre, how have you been?

I'm fine. Of course, I know that you're on top of the world as always.

The shameful act of any person (or class of people) who's trying so hard to denounce an ethological human classification can never stand. There'll always be alpha, beta and omega males and females, as far as behaviorism is concerned. I don't hold brief for the wannabes of any group though.

Ignorance of law excuses no one. A small-minded person's penchant for subjugation will always remain his/her greatest undoing at any point in time. Twisting any of the words or dismissing the concept or deriding others because you don't understand can't change anything. To you small-minded elements, everyone must not be subjugable.

In fact, it smacks of mental parochialism for anyone who accepts formal, moral, psychological and emotional words, but denounces their ethological equivalent in any guise, just to feel good.

Bumpkins everywhere.

MariaLavina:
I'm here, my day went well. Less work today yours?

That's good. I'm having a great moment . . . still at work.

MariaLavina:
If you say so, but I no accept sha. I no know where him dey, he left NL I guess.

You two share almost the same opinions and ideas and write almost the same way, except that he sometimes screams at his audience with his abnormal use of exclamation mark. . . I hope he's doing fine wherever he his.

Anyways, before I bore you out let's change topic. Hope you dey okay.

Where art thou? I hope you had a great day. By the way, I'm fine.

MariaLavina:
Lol, thank you. This your pidgin ehn, he get as he be. Me self be learner where that guy dey oo, the guy be my tutor then .

You brilliant pass me, this I know. No dey whine me biko.

Na learner I be for where you dey. Make you no vex as I de crack my pidgin. So, where de David guy dey now?

MariaLavina:
Wao! I'm glad I asked, I've always thought you are him. Well he used to be one of the sane and brilliant minds we have here.

No vex say I worry you.

No worries at all, anything for the elegant lady. Well, me de dey insane sometimes, lol. As for brilliant, if me go dey brilliant like you, me for no de worry nah.

MariaLavina:
LordKO are you David grey?



*I will edit as soon as you respond.

No. Na who dat one come be nah, elegant lady?

lilwetdick:
you are success conscious and i am money conscious, i guess you are the type that read motivational books all day without taking action, explain the meaning of success conscious? if it will not all lead to finance.

you still claim Conceitedness is for small mided people. every human needs some amount of conceitedness to function, to achieve basic tasks to achieve dreams, you might look at that word as evil, i look at it as a positive word the same way i look at envy as a positive word because they are good motivators.

money is good and very important, money is a means not an end,pls do not allow the media to deceive you and brainwash you that money is evil,rich people are evil,because i know for sure money solves problem, it create dreams,it creates jobs, it build society and also it can also destroy and vanish, if you do not know how to use it

You're a typical bumpkin. I'm not here to measure standard with you, and I'm certain that neither you nor the wretched people around you are fit to lace my shoes. Lol.

Direct your further mentions to small-minded like you.

lilwetdick:
i am not using my self as a yard stick, every human is money conscious, money solve many things, lets be realistic for once.

conceit is not gods gift to small minded people, conceit is a gift to all humans who knows their worth, you see, every human need some amount of ego to know his self worth..

You see why I said you should stop using yourself as a yardstick for others:

- It's not every human being that is money conscious as you erroneously asserted. Personally, I am success conscious, not money conscious.

- Conceitedness isn't the same thing as self-esteem. So, conceit is the major hallmark of small-minded people - it's God's gift to small-minded people.

- Money is good, yes. But it remains what it's; a means to an end, it's never an end itself.

Calm down! I know that you can do better than this because you're not always like this. Sheath your sword, it's not good to cast aspersions on others, especially on someone who isn't present to defend himself/herself.

MariaLavina:
Lol, i won't.

I have never seen you this way with anyone though, lol she must have really pissed you off.

Lol, I have observed her for a very long time. She derives pleasure in deriding others. Unapologetically, I loathe conceited people.

lilwetdick:
this is double standard, a poor guy is dating a billionaire daughter, we should not assume

a poor girl dates a rich guy, she is gold-digging.

can we just agree that gold digging is not gender specific

if he was dating some poor girl down the street, by now he must have had like 4 different gfs, how come he is so loyal and faithful.

Double standard from you and who? Stop using yourself as a yardstick for every other person. Only small-minded people are money conscious and derisive. It's about time you and your ilk quit this act of hypocritical disingenuousness.

Conceit is God's gift to small-minded people.

MariaLavina:




Funny people everywhere

Lol, one good thing about toxicity is that no one person (or class of people) has monopoly of it. Kindly don't be like that derisive and self-conceited element, theButterfly.

@OP

Assumption is the mother of all nonsense. Tread carefully.

Martinez39:
lol. Were you not complaining about the way nigerians reason? So I ask if they can't be reasonable in their deduction when it comes to rape accusations, the supernatural and god, can you really expect much from them? Seems you are one of them. If you can't see how my previous post is related to that post of yours then I am sorry for you. What much do I really expect from women in certain issues when they react with their feelings instead of brain? Quote me with sense or I ignore you.

Kindly stop wasting your precious time and energy on a self-conceited element like theButterfly. She typifies bumpkin. I wager the man in her life is a typical servile man because I don't see a responsible man putting up with her type.

That has always been the norm, 95% of the time.

Our problem is a fundamental one. We simply need to stop mistaken disingenuousness for cleverness and conceitedness for intelligence, respectively.

immhotep:
Wowcatty needs to marry a black woman and emigrate to Lagos ASAP.

Exactly.

wowcatty:
African child, even simply using your brain is a huge task.

Small-minded people like you always amuse me.

Balderdash.

Yes. Sane women always respect men who love them - only sane men can love. Love isn't a sign of weakness as many would want you to believe. Provided that both parties are of the same sane ethical leanings and the interest is mutual, there's no cause for alarm.

The subject of your thread and the thread body aren't in accord though.

Never say never! There're many ways of winning election.

MariaLavina:
Oya Prof, please tell me my ethical leanings.... I want to know.

As your student wey I be, after you, na still you. Don't worry, I'll tell you at the right place and at the right time.

@OP

I wonder what you intend to achieve with this irritating act of calumny against the girl in particular and disparagement of "girls" in general. Tread carefully.

SirL0neWolf:
LordKO could you explain it here?

It's not really a textbook thing - yet it's from a professional viewpoint - so it depends on your discerning and extrapolative prowess to understand me. If you can tell on anyone's ethical leanings from afar (through their words and/or actions) - of course, you can only know this if you've achieved self-realization and know your own ethical leanings - then you can easily decode a sufferer of any moral, emotional and psychological illness.

Self-centered, unkind (yet grateful in receiving), unenthusiastic, timorous and reclusive traits are the usual hallmark of a sociopath. And either natural irreparable loss or betrayal from a trusted one(s) always compound it. There's a thin line between it and an unchecked egotism.

Meanwhile, the difference between a sociopath and a psychopath is same as the difference between egotism and egoism - with greed, complacence and pleasure from others pains (exploitation and victimization of their benefactors) as the major hallmark traits of a psychopathic sufferer.

Gloriagee:
Your direct tantrum says a lot bout how opposed to differing opinions you are. Before you dish out your cruel wordings u term advise, put yourself in the op's shoes. N next time , come up with a more hip word than vamoose. U realise this is 2019, right?

Make I pity you, lol. Actually, "differing opinion" is different from derision, you should know this - it's a case of being tolerant vs being subjugable. Anyway, the OP should understand that I've no intention to hurt her or compound her woes. I offered my honest opinions in good faith and for her own good. Meanwhile, as you no come like vamoose, I no go tell you to . . . in its stead, as I still de pity you.

SirL0neWolf:
Could you expound more please?

It'll not be good to grant your request on this thread, I don't want the OP to think that I want to deliberately cast aspersions on her person.