₦airaland Forum

It's good as the court has lean towards the call to stop rationalizing abnormalities in the name of wokeness. It's always appalling seeing some sets of people rationalizing indecorous acts and equating them to rights to liberty. Liberty doesn't negate decorum.

Jerryherd:
Question is how did Omojuwa get her passport and signature

Oby Ezekwesili should stop fooling herself, she is also signatory to Amnesty international Nigeria

Had you registered a company in Nigeria before, you would have known that it's very easy to use a printout photo of a public figure or anyone and a forged signature to register a company with CAC listing them as a director without their consent. CAC doesn't carry out due diligence, at least not in this regard.

Meanwhile, the main cause of animosity between them is beyond this matter.

I neither hold brief for any of them.

Only firsthand experience has always made loud people understand that they do not have a monopoly of ruggedness or pettiness and that quiet people are not pushovers. The former takes pleasure in provoking others while the latter takes pleasure in allaying others; that is the difference.

A well-deserved honor to a true trailblazer; ebullient and erudite as ever.

Continue to rest in peace, Ikemba Ezinifite. So far, you remain among the top ten most impactful people in my life.

mariahAngel:
A wise move. To keep fit at least....whilst getting paid.

Elegant lady, with the way you like football, it seems you'll succeed Randy Waldrum since it's obvious that you can't play. Lol.

When a conscientious lady makes such a promise to you, it means she has an altruistic interest in you, so you should not let her go, and, of course, common sense should tell you not to make her experience hunger by working hard and smart in the cause of walking and working with her on your lead.

Petty liar. He posted a spoofing alert. He couldn't have covered 2 figures in that sum and still dey see almost a billion as he asserted; instead, adding of two figures will automatically make the sum some billion figure.

sisisioge:


I honestly still find it hard to understand the Igbo marriage initiation system. How could strangers reap where they did not sow bikonu? Is it too much to do the wedding in the brides compound minus all those extended kinsmen? Or do kukuma somewhere the wife's father is based whether na Lagos o abi na Kano....that will also reduce the perpetual list considerably.

15 crates of malt for youth.
5 bags of rice for the youths
40 kegs of wine for the kinsmen
50 baskets of kolanut for the elders

This haggard har*** with receding hairline, stop visiting your frustration on Igbo culture and stop jumping into something you know nothing about its genesis always.

It's only foolish and deranged people that do form opinions or make conclusions on issues based on misinformation or lies or assume to be in the know of something beyond their understanding.

Foolish and deranged elements everywhere dispensing their toxins through misinformation and acceptance of lies, respectively.

The good thing is that you won't see any bona fide or sane Igbo son or daughter talking down on the Igbo culture. Only deranged and ostracised ones do, and only foolish and deranged outsiders give them the needed support to keep showcasing their madness.

aroundtheearth:
LordKO, is that you?

Lol.

Happy Easter.

NiRfreak:
Gender neutrality is not conventional...it's made up, not the ideal. And I cant see the link btw gender neutrality and educated followesrhip

Some of you always jump into a discussion to argue directionless, not minding how and where it started. That reply was specifically for that particular person and his posit.

Erums:
And who told you it's easier to lead educated pple... Man Pls the agberos has more unity than the union of teachers... Go ask why?

I only hold brief for sane people, and my post connotes the same. Once more, it's easier for a leader to lead educated followers in any conventional gender-neutral setting than the uneducated.

Women (people in general) do not automatically take to evil because of their high educational attainment or lack of it. Where they do, it's because they've weak mental and moral profiles. In fact, higher attainment of education always makes every sane person more refined. And for a fact, every enlightened, confident and fair-minded man knows that it's much easier to have a successful relationship with a highly educated/enlightened woman who has a strong mental and moral profile than an uneducated woman regardless of her mental and moral profile. Just the same way it's easier for a leader to lead educated followers in any conventional gender-neutral setting than the uneducated. 

Conquer yourself, as a man, and then choose a woman based on her ethical leanings rather than her educational level. The fact that women are more malleable than men makes it very easy to work and walk with them and bring out the best in them. Only men and women who take delight in meting out evil against others or who are outright ignorant have always wished to have partners who are not enlightened.

Meanwhile, it's absurd that you termed an HS leaver uneducated, whereas one can be educated without experiencing any form of formal education.

The law degree will always remain the most versatile degree.

If one doesn't conscientiously spend money - not paying money to keep them, though - on one who personifies love for them in a relationship, I wonder who else they'll spend it on. And I believe this is what Reno means, if otherwise, then he's simply being hypocritically disingenuous.

Life isn't as hard as most of you've made it seem. Every relationship should always be a mutual source of renewal of energy for those in it, anything otherwise is nonsense.

ImaIma1:
But LordKO, does submission have to come with kneeling down to do things for our husbands. That was in the olden olden days, because I never even saw my mum kneel to serve my dad or my aunties.

Should submission be attached to kneeling down?

Erudite Imalma1, no. Kneeling is definitely not part of submission; that should be distinct to their tribal culture or faith.

Meanwhile, oppression and exploitation aren't part of submission and love, but most people have misconstrued them to be, and that I know is the main reason why some people don't like to hear about either of the words or feel that anyone who's a proponent and practitioner of them is either a weak person or an evil person.

Genuine love (submission) remains the greatest refreshment in life.

Only women who've low self-esteem will tell you that submission is a sign of weakness, same as only men who've low self-esteem will tell you that love is a sign of weakness.

By the way, the core difference between love and submission remains their application due to biological differences in both genders. Both genders are equal, but different. Difference doesn't mean inequality.

Meanwhile, the biggest dummy ever sold to wannabe woke blacks anywhere is that the modern White families don't practice love and submission anymore - definitely not the aristocratic White families.

plusfield:
Orji Uzor is a known unrepentant liar.
He didn't pick Abaribe in 1999. The various blocs in pdp then met and gave him the ticket and another bloc within the party picked Abaribe as running mate.
Abaribe was so powerful that ouk who had the house of assembly in his pocket couldn't impeach him on the 3 occasions he tried.

Kindly don't distort facts. As much as I don't hold brief for either of them, fact remains that OUK solely chose Abaribe as his running mate. He literally brought him into the state politics after meeting him the first time when both of them boarded an ABC bus from Lagos to Aba in 1998 because OUK missed his flight.

Her boyfriend is the source of the problem here because he obviously hasn't conquered himself. When a man conquered himself, a decision like whom to marry and where to marry automatically becomes his sole decision to make; of course, he listens to advice but without living on the opinion of the adviser, if it's against that he knows is right.

To the best of my knowledge, Igbos don't hate Yorubas. The reason why someone like the man's mother has supposedly disapproved the marriage might be for some justifiable or unjustifiable reason other than hatred for the Yorubas. It could be, for instance, that someone close to her who married a Yoruba woman in the past wittingly or unwittingly abandoned his parents and forgot about his ancestral root. I've seen this happened to a kindred relative; three of her male children who married Yoruba women and reside in Lagos and Ondo States respectively have only visited their ancestral home once or twice in the last 50 years or thereabouts - two of them are said to have even died and buried at their respective abodes a few years ago. They practically and completely abandoned their aged mother - who was their surviving parent - while answering big names in the city, until she died a few years ago.

He was jailed for violating the Canadian SCJ, which is legally justified, the matrimonial law violation of his ethical and fundamental rights and beliefs notwithstanding, and not because of misgendering.

His main enemy is the skewed matrimonial law which has systematically destroyed the family system, no thanks to anyone who wittingly or unwittingly supports liberty without decorum or takes delight in evil.

He needs her understanding to bring them or jettison the idea, not permission, where principle reigns supreme over expediency, regardless of whether or not he's the breadwinner of the family. Where expediency reigns supreme over principle, however, he won't necessarily need neither her understanding nor permission, if he's the reigning champion in the union, but will surely need permission if the wife is the reigning champion in this regard.

His posit might appear senseless or oppressive, especially to anyone who's naive or cynical and or conceited, but it isn't entirely so, although there are other equally good ways to go about it. Of course, only a foolish man cursed with the vices of opportunism and or oppression will betray such confidence placed on him by his in-laws, because in doing so or even without doing so, the in-laws expect nothing less than treating their daughter queenly, provided that she remains a conscientious wife.

If you oppose his posit but will gladly accept an equally or proportionally gift from your husband in your name, then you're a hypocrite. Love - love base marriage - is all about altruism in particular and conscientiousness in general.

cococandy:
really?
So your phone can be seized by your partner if they are not happy with how you exercise your liberty?

Believe me, I'm not stupid to expect my partner to condone any wittingly and continually nonsense acts from me. This isn't about me being timorous or self-righteous; instead, it's about living my ethical ideology. Of course, no woman is big enough that I can't seize her phone as a partner or just friend if she continually wittingly errs.

Peradventure, however, I found myself in the position of constituting nuisance and become a source of draining of energy rather than a source of renewal of energy for her wittingly and continually, she might not be able to show her displeasure by seizing my phone in such circumstances since everyone has their own way of expressing their grievances. But if she borrows gut and does, I won't see it as a big deal.

Don't act as if you haven't seen or heard of women who justifiably do worse than seizing their partners' phones in cases where their partners wittingly erred.

ABOVEDELAW:
CAN YOU CALL YOUR MUM INSANE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES?

My mother knows better and will not do anything that will UNAVOIDABLY make me call her insane. Unfortunately, I can't say the same about your mother.

Don't ask me a stupid question again because my point is concise in the post you quoted.

I wonder why you've decided to cast aspersions on the husband when you're yet to know the reason why his wife's phone is on his hold. And even if one is to assume that he collected the phone forcefully from her that won't still make him an evil person, if the wife is the type who doesn't know how to exercise her liberty within the confines of decorum. When an adult fails to justify their rights to liberty in word and action, control/abuse from the other party becomes inevitable.

I've no doubt that you're a hypocrite, citing your first paragraph "why are Nigerian Men so insensitive." Your husband isn't a standard for Nigerian men, so stop being as insensitive as your husband.

Meanwhile, stop whining and do what you know is the right thing to do under the circumstance, your husband tactlessness notwithstanding.

Wahala for any man whose core purpose of marrying a woman is because of her physical shape and beauty. An associate who married a slim woman five years ago has a balloon-like entity in the same woman today.

It's quite an unfortunate incident. It's, however, not a reason enough to cast aspersions on parents - especially the woman in this story in particular - because sometimes an incident like this is bound to happen even to one who's the most meticulous of all meticulous people.

Rogosa:
hhmmmmmmm. I don't think she did well by calling her insane regardless. I would prefer her to report the situation to me and I will handle the rest. Wisdom is profitable to direct.

Only a foolish person will long to enjoy the bounty of war without bearing the brunt of war.

Meanwhile, wisdom isn't for anyone void of knowledge. Unfortunately, it's very easy for anyone void of knowledge to equate foolishness to wisdom.

Good judgement. I wonder why most people fail to understand that right to liberty doesn't negate decorum.

cococandy:
When men won’t let this world have peace sha. Trying to rape another man’s wife. On their wedding night for that matter.
Bro code gone wrong. RIP to the dead

Doyenne of . . . Lol. You and occasional wahala are like 5&6.

Life is marvelous when you believe the promises of a new day and a new adventure every day.

Happy Birthday.

Polynek:
Pls wat is SBNR

Spiritual But Not Religious.