Lukgaf's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Lukgaf's Profile › Lukgaf's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 (of 98 pages)
Question: is it permissible to annul an engagement after two years because of the fiancé seeing a bad dream after praying istikhaarah? |
JazakumLah khaer ustadh. Allowing your wife to make crack an excessive jokes with non mahrom members is inclusive |
Brotherhood continuation: How to help each other? https://www.nairaland.com/4426184/brotherhood-continuation-how-each-other |
Refer to last week posts on Brotherhood in Islam: https://www.nairaland.com/4411881/brotherhood-islam As continuation Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him): There are different ways of supporting a fellow believer: * With one’s wealth, * With one’s position of authority or power, by means of physical service, * By offering sincere advice and guidance, * By making supplication (du’aa’) and asking for forgiveness for them, and * By feeling their pain. The level of one’s support will be affected by the level of one’s faith. The weaker a person’s faith, the weaker his support will be; the stronger the faith, the stronger the support. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was the greatest of all people in his support for his companions, so the more closely his followers follow him, the greater will be their support for their fellow-believers. al-Fawaa’id, 1/171 Sampling * Your family members are Muslims and neighbors, you could imagine how good and happy your family will be if truly they are believers?! And if they are neither Muslims nor your neighbors, then, kindness to them continues…bonds of kinship should not cut. * Husband and wife that are Muslims; husband treat wife as a sister and wife treat husband as a brother in terms of wealth, power, physical services, advice and guidance, prayer, feeling pain of one another…treatment of family, treatment of neighbor… please who will separate them?! You could imagine how beautiful, peaceful and happy family will that be? But we fail to understand who we are living with and what rights they deserve. * Tenants and landlords that are Muslims; rights of religion brother and rights of neighbor…you will hardly know who actually owns the property in respect of caring and leniency in terms of payments. In fact, many will doubt the fact that they are not from the same family. * Employers and employees that are Muslims, what will be the problem in terms of management? * Leaders and followers that are Muslims, please how will our society look like? But we fail to see ourselves as brothers ….it is always politics that we are always politicizing religion aspect of our life. We risk many things; lives and properties … risking the whole family or community or a state for politics! Had it been we know? Also, followers and leaders see each other as brothers, then, our society will be like society nurtured by Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him. *If truly we all understand the bonds of brotherhood, kind treatment of family and neighbors in Islam please…* Who will be killing innocents and call it Jihaad?! Who will be slaughtering another just because the victim is not his/her tribe? Who will be raping another? Who will be kidnaping another? Who will be using other for rituals? Who will not feel sad by the killing of his/her innocent brothers in the crisis areas (Maiduguri-Nigeria, Palestine, Burma, Indian etc.)? Who will deliberately silent in an unjust society? Who will be clapping for lies or hailing looters? Who will be blocking roads where there is possibility of another being on emergency call or visit? Who will not be giving sincere advice? Who will be maltreating his/her spouse? Some have masticated their spouse spiritually…It is not late to repent now, since death has not come, and treat him or her as your brother/sister. Muslim 1412, al-Bukhārī 5718, al-Bukhārī 5665, Muslim 2586, Shu’ab al-Imān 10379, Muslim 2699, Muslim 2732, Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2736, al-Bukhārī 5719, al-Tamhīd 18/20, al-Bukhārī 6552. al-Tirmidhī 2612, al-Kafi, Volume 2, Page 173, Ghurur al-Hikm, Page 559, Bulooghul-Marām 1539) al-Bukhaari (13) and Muslim (45). Imām Ahmad (12734) Muslim (1844), Haashiyah (2/259) al-Insaaf (11/256), al-Mardaawi, al-Mughni (6/233), Fath al-Baari (10/447), Silsilat al-Ahaadeeth ad-Da‘eefah (1/446), Al-Ijaabaat ‘ala As’ilat al-Jaaliyaat (1/15, 16) Fataawa Noor ‘ala al-Darb, 1/289-291. Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 12/255, 256, Al-Muntaqa min Fataawa al-Fawzaan (2/257, question no. 226). http://fiqhclass.org/index.php/2017/10/15/fiqh-of-brotherhood-as-a-means-of-peaceful-coexistence-conclusion/ May Allaah grant us understanding of His religion |
But can we know your stand. Because you always refute all trivial issues of Islam. Wallau Ahlam, good intention matters AlBaqir: |
Yes Lukgaf: |
I think the statement was very clear, he has never called Muslim that says April fool Kufaar. But try to explain. Could please re read over again AlBaqir: |
Question: In some foreign countries– there is the well-known custom of April Fools, which happens on the first day of April. Some Muslims are imitating them in this, thinking that it is permissible to tell lies on this day… what is your opinion on this belief and on this custom? Answer: Praise be to Allah Lying is not permissible at all, at any time. And it is not permissible to imitate the kuffar (non-Muslims) and to be like them, on this day or on any other, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “Whoever imitates a people is one of them.” And Allah knows best. Conclusion: Muslims should refrain from teasing people, telling lies and joining them in saying April fool. Extracted from https://islamqa.info/en/10834 |
lol |
Shukron yah ustadh. nice one |
be ready to come to court to proof your assertion that I am a terrorist. can you tell me why I am terrorist? For sharing posts for you people to see? new2012: |
new2012:Clear your hatred then u will understand |
femi4:Can you re read my post and see what the writer meant |
Nutase:But you too can pray your daughter be deprived her constitution right and be disallowed to graduate during her graduations in the country you pay tax. You will understand how painful it is too. |
Nutase:Anyway, since I didn't wish for anyone, then God will judge between I and you. That's it. Ire o |
ReinaFarine:OK let me tell you sir if you were given false point. God asked them to use Hijab to cover their body and not the hair alone sir. I am now asking you sir, do all these people you mentioned wear all those you mentioned respectively to official places rather than their religion places. If your answer is yes and it is their God that mandated them, then Nigeria Government should allow them too but I have not seen any of those you mentioned that will dress like that to a wedding ceremony and other public functions whereas those sisters wear their Hijab everywhere even at home to obey their God instruction. Pls let's understand one another, it is not about fighting for a religion but I think it is something we should all understand. If you are kind that've travelled to other countries with even less Muslims population, you will see Hijab or no Hijab is not a problem there, they see using it as their right. Thanks for your matured debate and time sir. |
Nutase:You are not the kind to exchange words. I was using pain to prove point rather using pain to prove pain because it is so painful to Amasa and we her family for disallowing our daughter be called to bar in the name of her constitution rights in the country we pay tax. Look, if you can hatred or love for a particular can not make you just then stop waisting your hand typing what is not. I rebook all the negative things you have been saying only because of your unjust and hatred. Iree ooo |
ReinaFarine:Yes, Hijab is the identification sir. Can you tell me other religious belief that wear their costumes to an official function if not only to thier worshipping place. Everyone knows those sisters do. |
Nutase:But common sense should tell you too that NBA is a public institutions and all citizens should be not be hindered. We all know, Hijab is part of this people's dressing but your hatred and unjust will not let you reason like that. Off your hatred for Hijab and Muslims then you will understand what I mean |
ReinaFarine:You are comparing what is not comparable. Amass can't deny her God too. And are you telling me now NBA is not for all citizens of Nigeria? Since it is a public institutions, why is embargo placed on Hijab in the first instance when they know it is part of dressings of some citizens who jointly pay tax for the construction. The thing is you guy should be sincere first, then you will understand all these. Are Muslim sisters not Nigerian? Or what are u telling me sir? Then how is Nairaland related to Nigeria. Naira land is owned by seun. Nigeria is own by all. |
I hope and pray our sister Leah Saribu be released by this guy but let's try to be just in this country. Honestly to me, I see no reason for much national deliberation on whether some part of the citizen of this country be allowed to put Hijab on their head or not. Can you kindly ask those against them whether they force them or their children to put on thier head? Honestly it is annoying |
Lalasticlala I hope you can see sense here sir. |
LIKE LEAH SHARIBU, LIKE AMASA FIRDAUS If Amasa Aljanatu Firdaus is a Muslim fanatics for refusing to remove her hijab and risk being denied the call to the Prestigious Nugerian Bar then Leah Sharibu is a Christian fanatics for refusing to adorn hijab even at the risk of her life! Like Leah Sharibu, like Amasa Firdaus. Amasa Firdaus decline removing her hijab, Leah Sharibu decline wearing hijab! Leah Sharibu decline wearing hijab putting her life on the line, Amasa Firdaus decline removing her hijab putting her 18years dream and ambition at risk!! Leah Sharibu decline wearing the hijab and risked being eliminated! Amasa Firdaus decline removing her hijab at the risk of loosing the privilege of becoming a solicitor and advocate of the Supreme Court, Leah Sharibu decline wearing hijab at the risk of regaining freedom from her abductors!! Leah Sharibu decline wearing hijab damming the public opinion, Amasa Firdaus refuse removing her hijab not minding what would be the Public Comments! Amasa Firdaus insist on wearing hijab not bothered by what wil be the reactions or feelings of her Parents, Leah Sharibu would not wear the hijab even if she would not meet her parents again! Leah Sharibu would not wear the hijab because to her it is against her religious inclination, Amasa Aljanatu Firdaus would not remove the hijab because it is not allowed for a matured Muslim Lady to go out without hijab! Amasa Firdaus would not remove the hijab even at the threat of terrorist, Leah Sharibu would not wear the hijab daring the dreaded Boko Haram! Amasa is not intimidated by the terrorist, Leah is not perturbed by the presence of the devils progeny! But unlike Amasa Firdaus, Leah was unanimously sympathized with irrespective of religious affiliation or tribal jingoism, And worst unlike Amasa Aljanatu Firdaus the President and the Nigerian Government were interested in Leah Sharibu's release!! What is the offence of my sister? Why was she not sympathised with by the President and the Nigerian government? Why cant Mr President also make a proclamation or even promise that Amasa's case would be resolved, why is it that our dear President is still silent over Amasa's case can't he realise that Amasa is the Siamese twin of Leah? They both did the same thing, and commit the same offence!! Why will he support one and leave the other to her faith? This is unlike a good father! If Leah Sharibu deserves the attention of Mr President and the sympathy of Nigerians, then Amasa Aljanatu Firdaus should be called to bar without further delay. #Like Amasa #LikeLeah. I pray God return our so dear Sister Leah Sharibu safely back from the abductor's custody and make justice reign in this our dear country for somebody like Amasa to be given their constitutional right. Sirajudeen Abdulazeez Folayemi
|
Yoruba call them Igbo |
Allahu Akbar! though we dont need to be told Quran was found in the hand of a baby or in a tree befor WE believe in the oneness of Allah and his prophet |
lereinter:But why is he fanatics? Speak with your sense now |
Nigeria movie |
Try and be asking what is not clear to you next time Kolanist: |
I am coming for you guys |
Is chatting with opposite sex on social media comes under Khulwa that is prohibited: https://www.nairaland.com/4413633/chatting-opposite-sex-khulwa-prohibited |
Praise be to Allah Firstly: It was narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him) that he heard the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) say: “No man should be alone with a woman unless there is a mahram present.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (5233) and Muslim (1341). What is meant by khulwah in this hadith is physically being alone together. The reason for this prohibition is that it is thought that this khulwah will lead to falling into what is prohibited (haraam), because it enables the Shaytaan to instill such temptation. The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) referred to that when he said: “Indeed, no man is alone with a woman but the Shaytaan is the third one present.” Narrated by at-Tirmidhi (2165); he said: This is a hasan saheeh ghareeb hadith with this isnad. al-Haakim said in al-Mustadrak (1/114): It is saheeh according to the conditions of the two shaykhs [al-Bukhaari and Muslim], and adh-Dhahabi agreed with him. It was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Irwaa’ al-Ghaleel (6/215). Al-Minnaawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “but the Shaytaan is the third one present” by means of his waswasah (whispers), stirring up of desire, dispelling of modesty, and encouragement to commit sin, until he tempts them to commit the act of intercourse or that which is less than it of precursors that will soon lead to it. This hadith proves that it (khulwah) is haraam. End quote from Fayd al-Qadeer (3/78). The prohibition on being alone with a non-mahram woman comes under the heading of barring ways that lead to shameful deeds. This is one of the fundamental principles of our religious teaching. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The basic principle is that anything that is a means that leads to fitnah (temptation) is not permissible, because the means that lead to mischief must be barred, if that is not outweighed by a greater interest. End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (15/419). If a man talks to a non-mahram woman in a private chat on social media websites – even if it does not come under the heading of the khulwah discussed by the fuqaha’ – this is still a means that leads to fitnah (temptation) and mischief, so it is disallowed for that reason. If looking, shaking hands and the like are forbidden, so as to block the means of being tempted by the woman, even if there is no khulwah, then disallowing private conversation, especially among young people and those who are thought most likely to be vulnerable to temptation, also comes under that heading. There are many religious texts which forbid seeking enjoyment in talking to a non-mahram woman and finding pleasure in listening to her voice and looking at her; this is regarded as a type of zina. It was narrated from Abu Hurayrah, from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), that “Allah has decreed for the son of Adam his share of zina, which he will inevitably get. The zina of the eyes is looking and the zina of the tongue is speaking. The heart wishes and hopes, and the private part confirms that or denies it.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (6243), Muslim (2657). Ahmad (27430) added: “And the zina of the ears is listening.” With some people, the matter may go as far as the Shaytaan tempting them to the extent that they take off their clothes for one another (exchanging nude photos etc). Undoubtedly the Shaytaan has many traps into which people fall, such as mischief, desires and temptations. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “I have not left behind me among the people any fitnah (trial) that is more harmful to men than women.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (5096) and Muslim (2741). Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “O children of Adam, let not Satan tempt you as he removed your parents from Paradise, stripping them of their clothing to show them their private parts. Indeed, he sees you, he and his tribe, from where you do not see them. Indeed, We have made the devils allies to those who do not believe” [al-A‘raaf 7:27]. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: So Allah has forbidden the children of Adam to be tempted by the temptation of the Shaytaan, as their parents were tempted, by disobeying Allah and obeying the Shaytaan in going against the commands and prohibitions of Allah. He stripped the parents of their clothing, and in like manner he may strip their offspring of the garment of piety (taqwa) and their physical garments, so that they show their private parts. End quote from al-Istiqaamah (2/170). To sum up, for a man to chat with a non-mahram woman on social media websites, in a chat room away from other visitors and subscribers, does not come under the heading of the khulwah that is forbidden, But it is disallowed because of what it involves of temptation and the likelihood of mischief. So Muslim men and women should avoid such contact, unless it is for a greater religious purpose, such as asking questions of scholars, or it is for a legitimate worldly purpose, in which case the conversation should be only as much as is needed, without unnecessary chitchat and going off topic. And Allah knows best https://islamqa.info/en/277583 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 (of 98 pages)