₦airaland Forum

ProphetJeroboam:
White girl in distress syndrome all over Twitter. lol

ibkonekt:
Very true. I dont let a woman's tears or bruises overrule common sense, facts and logic.

Personally this is what i suspect was happening

It could easily be just a clip from a bdsm master slave sex game that they were playing at that time. Anything could be possible. Let the investigation play out.

This is the sign of someone who is wise.

News Flash!

It turns out that CR7 never followed Mason on Twitter. Disregard any news claiming CR7 unfollowed Mason Greenwood... it's fake news.

Calibrator:
Even if he is innocent, his career is done and dusted.

Unfortunately that is the harsh reality of this 21st century.

Yeah! Even Johnny Depp was fired from a movie role despite evidence that Amber Heard was the abusive one. Amber Heard still walks free.

Junnior:
What I want to know now is what mason has said. Has he come out to refute the allegations? Kindly post a link to where all these is going on so that I can follow up

So far, he hasn't said anything.

ibkonekt:
To many guys crucifying this mason fellow. Do not forget female nature and their manipulative and deceptive core. Innocent until proven guilty with evidences. Do not allow your emotions to cloud your view. View with a redpill heart, see the possibility of truth and lies

Any experienced man with common sense, a redpiller at that, wouldn't declare Mason guilty because of a short audio and a video that shows she is bruised. The audio, even if it is Mason's voice, could have been taken out of context. It could have even been someone else with a voice like Mason; maybe she paid that person or lured him into it using pussy power without him knowing (you know how stupid simps can be).

If truly we redpillers have learnt anything and we are not naive, we would keep our fingers crossed until full investigation is carried out. Never underestimate human deception, especially that of a woman, and its extent. I am not saying Mason is innocent, but I am aware that the allegations could be false and he is entitled to the presumption of innocent until guilt is proved.

If you have data, please watch the videos I posted. Even if you don't want to watch any, at least watch the first video. I am not saying Greenwood is innocent, but experience and history should teach us something. Never underestimate the extent of human deception. Don't follow the bandwagon.

SOZINN:
We might be looking at the end of Greenwood's career. I don't think he is guilty, for all we know the whole thing could be a set up but even if it is. How will he be able to prove his innocence? That's the point. Thankfully, Manchester United are handling the issue in a matured manner. They won't do anything harsh until he has been proven guilty. Surprisingly, Cristiano Ronaldo has already unfollowed the youngster.

I didn't expect that from him seeing as his career nearly came to an end because of a false rape accusation. There is even an audio tape with Greenwood's voice in it which sounds like he's trying to force himself on her. I'm just sickened by the whole issue.

That technique she used on him is as old as time itself and it's one of the reasons I won't date any of these vagina people. Once they deny you sex, you have to sit with it. If you go outside its called cheating and if you try to force it, you are in trouble.

The voice note which everyone is using as irrefutable evidence of Mason's guilty could have featured someone else with a similar voice. Even if it was Mason's voice, it could have been taken out of context. Also, women (and men) have inflicted injuries on themselves to frame people up. There are even cases of women who poured acid on themselves and blamed someone else; read up on acid attack hoaxes. Remember that for someone of Mason's status, a girl might not easily want to let go.

======

(1) In this 7-minutes video, which I will urge everyone to watch to open their eyes, an abusive wife inflicted injuries on herself to frame her husband, fooled the police and sent her husband to jail. She fooled the police so well that the police helped her packed her things and some of the husband's stuff (which she claimed belonged her) as she was leaving. Unknown to her, CCTV footage showed she inflicted the wounds on herself and CCTV footages captured other events.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJwsIB0mwLk

(2) In this four-minute video, we see a millionaire's wife having a temper tantrum and hitting herself to frame the husband up. She got a self-inflicted black eye. All this came during their separation and her husband accused her of stealing millions worth of jewelleries from his home safe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yM3gygwUFAw

(3) This three-minute long video shows a news report of Bethany Storro who poured acid on herself to frame up another woman. This was shown to be an acid attack hoax.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjB0ssE0JQY

(4) Another acid attack hoax uncovered by the cops

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcfZAhrJaW0

(5) Woman stabs herself to claim self defence as she kills husband.

This is why I shake my head when yahoo boys and other fraudsters are shown sympathy.

HardMirror and CAPALOCKED, come and see something. This is why you guys keep speaking out against the belief in money rituals.

Lordcassy:
I used to be indifferent to anime but due to Hollywood shit, I now watch anime....GO WOKE AND GO BROKE...

When Gillette came out with its stupid woke advertisement, i made up my mind to stop patronising their shaving sticks. Any product that denigrates, badly misrepresents or belittles masculinity will be snubbed by me. The same applies to products stupidly advocating "girl power"/feminist ideologies.

machote:
One thing you need to understand is that A WOMAN'S PVSSY DOESN'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT MORALITY. Good or bad, it doesn't care.

It's similar for men, if a woman is a criminal but she has a banging body, we would still hit it. Attraction is all biological and not ethical.

A few weeks back, I gave an example of how I fvcked a "church girl" on a thanksgiving sunday immediately after she came back from church. You might think she's crazy, but the truth is the pvssy wants what the pvssy wants. It has a mind of it's own.

So if you're wondering why this women is "head over heels" for this man in the mugshot, it has nothing to do with her "head" but her pvssy.

Gbam! You have made good points.

JESHAL:
@Martinez39s
Good morning
Will be expecting your write-up on women and the inner hoe this weekend

LOL. You never forget, do you? I plan to write them next week Saturday or Sunday. Don't worry about the delay. I was free during the weekdays this week, but I was busy with other things.

Junnior:
I am one of those who always advocate for guys to take talks on how to make money to the business section. However, there are times when, in the course of a discussion here, someone would raise that it is important to make money. This often triggered some guys to resort to insults, because they felt attacked.
That's exactly what just happened now between those two guys. Dissect it whichever way you like. There's nothing wrong with telling someone to build himself. It insinuates nothing about the person, unless the person is insecure.
I won't classify lightwáy as a troll yet, because he is no different from jeshàl/démzee.... The message before the messenger.


I don't see anything wrong in the screenshot below, except that it's triggering. It might be uncomfortable, but I agree with him.
If I were to choose between these two options, I would rather be a rich simp than be a broke-ass redpiller. Simple.

If I were to choose between being Jeff bezos or a nobody redpiller, I would choose Jeff without flinching, eventhough I would be a big ass simp. Poverty is worse than simping. Simping is better than poverty.

This is what I make of his post.


Modified*

I see that you're saying he quoted the guy out of context. LOL.... I went back to see the original post and screenshot being referred to. .... That doesn't look like poverty. But I get what he was trying to say, and I wouldn't get triggered by what he said, but interprete it the way I just did in this post. I would say it's just a misunderstanding, but you seem to have established him as a troll already.

Thanks.

I didn't see or reply to this emboldened part as you later added while I was typing my first reply. Don't get me wrong, if we are to separate lightwáy's post from the context of the discussion, the childish intent underlying his post, and the behavioural patterns he/she has exhibited, and judge the post independently, I would have no issues with his post and those that support it. What I am against are childish games and the misrepresentation of people here.

Before people here, I included, knew lightwáy was troll, they used to reply him. Even I wrote an "epistle" responding to his inquiry and arguments. Nasri100 didn't know lightwáy was an established troll and he saw the stupidity of lightwáy's post for what it was and decided to call him out and put him on a blast. It doesn't mean he was triggered or against the message of making money and building one's self. Fortunately, he later paid heed to Ubunja's words and ignored the troll.

@red
A lot of people here have since known that lightwáy is troll, a good one. It's not today that we knew.

Junnior:
I am one of those who always advocate for guys to take talks on how to make money to the business section. However, there are times when, in the course of a discussion here, someone would raise that it is important to make money. This often triggered some guys to resort to insults, because they felt attacked. That's exactly what just happened now between those two guys.

Telling people to build themselves, put themselves first and try to be the best version of themselves is well accepted here. It doesn't trigger anyone here and people don't respond to it with insults. In the case between Nasri and Lightwày, you have to look at the context and origin of the exchange (which is clear to anyone that properly followed the origin of the exchange and its context).

Nasri100 never said that one should be poor and not build one's self. He never said that one should be comfortable with poverty for any reason and he never said he was poor and wasn't building himself. He was simply pointing out something. These were very clear, but lightwáy, in typical fiesty fashion of trying to elicit reaction and argument, jumped on his post to talk offpoint as far as the context of Nasri's post was concerned. This was very stupid. This is not the first time Lightwáy will play such games. Even the post Nasri was replying to (by Jessepaid) was talking about humble beginnings of peace and independence. Maybe it is because you haven't followed Lightwày well, and you keep no track of lightwáy's past activities. Recently, SOZINN was clearly discussing something with CamusMidas and lightwáy jumped in, "quoted" SOZINN and deliberately acted like he/she was the one SOZINN was talking to... all for the sake of creating chaos, eliciting a reaction and extending an argument. I could list more, but I won't.

Dissect it whichever way you like. There's nothing wrong with telling someone to build himself. It insinuates nothing about you, unless you're insecure.
I won't classify lightwáy as a troll yet, because he is no different from jeshàl/démzee.... The message before the messenger.

While it is good to look at the message, it also good to look at the context and origin of a discussion for better accuracy in meaning and, if possible, intent; it is also good to study the messenger if you can. This is how messages, discussions and arguments are best judged. Even Kiñg0G at some point was dropping red pill talking points, but we didn't take him seriously because we knew what he was trying to do (as he implicitly admitted) and we kept track of his lies and games... and such proved to be the best decision.

Even Nasri100 knows that one ought to build one's self, but why come to his post to stupidly and delibrately talk offpoint, act like Nasri100 endorses poverty, and tell him to build himself (even when lightwáy knows nothing about Nasri) ? If it is by message alone, then anyone can do anyhow here and still be accepted and respected when they drop something that makes sense even when the context and origin of the discussion and their pattern of behaviour show that they shouldn't be taken seriously. Even Demzèe at a point in time was called out and then ignored at a point in time. Even females who come here to brokeshame us because they hate the redpill will tell us to go make money and improve ourselves, but we ignore because we understand the context and explicit intent of their message; should we laud them? NOPE! I rest my case. We can agree to disagree, bro.

NB: for the record, Nasri wasn't triggered. If we choose to separate the lightwáy's post from the context of the discussion, then I myself have no problem with as it is his own opinion. All I am against are childish games and the misrepresentation of people here.

Junnior:
Though I do not like this moniker, I agree with this post.
A lot of guys here seem to be triggered when they are told to make money.
At the end of the day, if you fall sick and incur outrageous hospital bills, no amount of understanding of female nature will save you.

Nobody gets triggered here when you ask him to make money or focus on money. Everyone here agrees that one should build one's self. Highest, all you have is someone who directs people to the business section (and other relevant sections) when they insist we stop discussing female nature and start discussing business and financial plans.

The post that the troll was "quoting" never said anyone should be poor. The post simply pointed out something; nothing more, nothing less. It's everyone's duty to properly dissect what they read instead of hastily going along with superficial and spurious impressions. Finally, let's be careful not to fortify the madness of a troll.

Carchoice:
There’s a moniker called “fenadezisbak” I purposely did not type the correct spelling not to invite the troll to this thread. I have engaged the moniker before and called the user out for his/her mischiefs. I noticed a pattern in the monikers comment. His or her comments are geared towards reducing men’s masculinity. The moniker drums and supports everything and anything that will make a man turn vegetable, simp.....

Just a warning to readers on this page to shun every advise the moniker is dishing out. He or She seems to be a on a mission and that mission is to reduce men’s masculinity to bare minimum.

You mean this profile. Take a look at the personal text.

@Astrid4

Nice post! You hit the nail on the head. However, I will suggest you screenshot the post instead of "quoting" the post and thereby "mentioning" the moniker here. Where possible, we wouldn't want to risk the intrusion of any female or troll, and we don't want anyone wasting space here. You can even include a link to the screenshoted post. My two cents.

Wow. It is rare to see religious sheeples in Nigeria protest against their esteemed pastorpreneur.

This pastor must have done woefully and disastrously for his reliant laity/sheeples to rebel. Religious sheeples in Nigeria are usually gullible and will tenaciously defend their pastorpreneurs and insulate them from criticism with "touch not my anointed" or "He is a man of God. Thou shall not judge." What could the pastor have done?

From reading the exchange, I will exhort everyone to ignore Polynèk. SMH.

Dliquidmetal:
Now with this statement folks on here would know its either you are a troll or an idiot.
If you are redpilled,nothing would concern you if women leave or stays,thats theirs to worry about and also,i don't remember saying anything concerning hoes leaving or staying. You are changing the topic here and playing little kids emotional games,just make sure you know what the thread is all about before dropping comments.

Are you minding him? I am surprised that people are even wasting time on him. It's not as if he is new here; see the nonsense and foolishness he is expressing. He is the same person that was acting crazy and mischievous when we recently discussed marriage and old age.

Maybe the real owner of the account had his phone stolen and someone else... *coughs*

Shegzdave:
@Martinez39s
The great mathematician, someone needs your help here.

Am I about to sleep. I will visit his questions later.

@Oluwadamilare00
The picture you provided isn't clear enough.

Junnior:
Is this cruise or for real? The date is on valentine's eve

It is real.

dontai:
you are right boss. A (illiterate) truck driver who always helps me with materials from one place to the other. Told me a story on one of our journey of how a beautiful 'loyal' wife always let him fucck her from the back (doggy), but won't let him lie on top her (missionary) because she has make a vow that "kosi okunrin kankan to maa gun Ori oun" (no man will ever lay on her chest except her husband). I think they are of little brain that they believe doing wrong things in a certain way don't make it wrong, or they are just outrightly wrong? (Knowing what is right from wrong, but still went ahead and do the wrong thing, for the fact that they believe they won't be caught). What an asinine loyalty!

As I said in my post, this is rationalisation crafted to utterly suppress guilt. Where the pussy calls, she follows. Most women don't even rationalise; they just get want they want and that's all that matters.

Egbon call am "breaking the yoke of love." Lol. This is a new phrase that I like.

......

Regex:
An absolute one.

Moral lesson: whether she cheats or not, is not your business.

Gbam! Even if she tells you the following: "you are the love of my life", "this pussy is yours", "your d!ck is the only d!ck for me" etc. Know that it's all to be taken with a grain of salt. A woman can even be cheating on you while telling you all these. It's the same way they readily monkey branch to a better financial option despite having told their serious boyfriends romantic remarks like "I love you", "I will never leave you", "you are the only one for me", etc. They can even say this while cheating on their serious boyfriends.

Anyway, it's good we know the truth and discuss them.

DEMZEE:
THATS WHY HIGH VALUE MEN MARRY FOR ALLIANCE AND LEGACY, POOR AVERAGE BETA MALES MARRY FOR LOVE AND SEX PERIOD!!!

Marriage isn't about happiness or love or sex, it's about duty, responsibility and loyalty

Only fools believe women can love men

Men are used
Women and children are loved

My venerable patriarch, I agree with your post on the marriage stuff. I may add that marriage was never about romantic love from the very beginning, and for much of human history. It was usually about legacy, duty, allegiance and business.

I have no problem with people marrying for whatever reason. The objective of my lengthy post on women and cheating was to drop the red pill I know for the edification of others and for the purpose of rubbing minds (as we've always done). The discussions that have followed, and is still ongoing, may serve to provide clarifications and additions to my lengthy post. There is no intent to paint women in a negative light or portray them as evil beings incapable of good or without any understanding of morality.

Men who will put themselves in serious romantic/committed situations where they presume their women won't cheat, and they bank on their women not to cheat, should know that they stand a very high risk of being disappointed (if, to them, the situation isn't worth it or pointless to them if the woman cheats). These men would find my lengthy post helpful to reconsider things and reevaluate their expectations and priorities.

To be truthful, there are a lot of men who wouldn't bother with the idea of committed relationship if they somehow knew the particular woman that they are involved with would cheat; for them, the whole thing is worthless if the woman cheats. For these men my post is useful. If they read and then decide to consider eschewing committed relationships with expectations of fidelity, fine; if they decide to focus on other benefits of marriage, go on with committed relationships, and not care about their women cheating, that's their business (though i would never advise this or accept cheating).

Smartb0y:
I really enjoyed the trending topic, thumbs up to Martinez and ubunja.

Sadly, I'm still sensing Nawalt even with all the apt explanations.

The moment we get past our sentimentality is the moment we gain another prestige when it comes to the redpill.

The thing about the red pill is that it's not meant to please people or go down well with them. It is not meant to make people feel good about themselves and show them a moral course or what is pleasing to the ears. The harshest red pill will usually confound people and rock their feelings.

The job of the red pill is to unveil the truth, usually harsh truths, that are missing in the blue pill world and show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Redpillers will take these truths, make peace with them, and use them to work in their best interest. Of course, we all may not always agree, but we can always agree to disagree.

Regex:
I am always eager to read your post no matter how long. I am sure I'd learn something new.

Ubunja is a treasure.

@Ubunja

Thanks for your write up. It's always a privilege to learn from a much older guy who has had tons of experiences in the game and red pill. I am always looking forward to learning from you.

^{Edit: this edit has been added many many months later (July 2023) when going through my posts, as I often do. I hope to provide clarity. It is should be noted that I simply appreciated Ubuñja for sharing his perspective and I hailed him. However, till now, I still stand on my post (as you will observe in successive posts). Where our opinions diverge, we agree to disagree... as is the tradition of red pill discourse here. "If she can have the best of both worlds without consequences, she will."}

JESHAL:
The issue with your write up is that it's too densely abstract and appears flawless but remember humans specifically women have Emotionss and conscience i.e code of ethics of right and wrong, your write in a way doesn't consider the nuance of life, it makes women seem like 100% utilitarians with no capacity to do what's just even with religious and cultural influence or strong paternal guidance, they will abandon or blend their moral beliefs for the sake of hedonistic pursuit,your redpilled truth analysis appears exaggerated, for the sake of arguments I won't give personal instances of women abiding within said morality because they are anecdotal examples, do you understand the gravity of what you have been typing since morning, the most painful is that most women will cuckold their beta husbands, women can't do good from the bottom of their heart except their something to gain within the confinements of a relationship, life is not black and white, I can go on and on, but these just my opinion on the matter though

LOL. Let's do some proper analysis, shall we?

I obviously never implied that women are emotionless or without conscience. I never said that women don't know right from wrong; of course, they know right from wrong and there are women who are kind and do good deeds. Also, have it in mind that knowing right from wrong is different from actually caring to do what is right. In fact, I wrote that infidelity and all I wrote in the lengthy post do not impact a woman's morality or conduct in others aspects of life; I even wrote that a cheating woman can be kind to others and run a happy home (as long as her activities are kept secret from her husband)... how did you miss that?

You need to understand that my post wasn't concerned with a woman's behaviour in all aspects but IN THE DATING GAME AND INTERSEXUAL DYNAMICS. Besides, any talk of pleasure or whatever was referring mainly to lust, and sexual fantasies in some aspects. I was only talking about women and cheating, nothing more.

If I say that a woman will prioritise her best interests and will monkey branch to a better financial option no matter what her boyfriend has done or sacrificed for her, will you think I am implying that women are wicked, immoral and lack conscience? NO! How come it is different when I say her sexual enjoyment will take precedence over your deeds when the opportunity (as I described) presents itself? The same way religion and culture won't change the former is the same way religion and culture won't change the latter. It is what is. This does not in anyway imply that women are devoid of conscience or are incapable of doing any good deed. Let me burst your bubble, I have heard women tell me they feel slightly guilty after cheating because they know what they did is wrong, but their guilt, as it turns out, didn't t hinder them in the slightest when the pussy started calling again and they become inured to the act for whatever reason (usually by rationalising their act). Even the women who are known to be hoès or prostitutes are capable of good deeds... and do good deeds and show kindness.

Let's properly dissect what is read without letting the harsh aspects of the red pill get you in your feelings and colour your judgement. I know a lot of people hope to establish that big, happy family and have sweet kids that will carry their legacy (I am not against these). To many of these people, such dream is useless and not worth it if they aren't assured of their spouse's fidelity or if they see their wives cheating. So to keep this hope alive, they are compelled to believe that they can find a woman that surely won't cheat. Even if there is a woman who would never cheat, you can hardly tell except you can read minds and uncover the deepest intent of a human's heart.