Mickael2's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Mickael2's Profile › Mickael2's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 (of 113 pages)

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 9:56am On Jul 05, 2016

Rilwon:
Shut up! Olodo.

You remain the stiff necked senseless clown here.

and you will be the one to decide that? I have been having a smooth conversation with people here till you came in, seems like we know who the olodo is

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 9:55am On Jul 05, 2016

Rilwon:
Shut up! Olodo.
You remain the stiff necked senseless clown here.

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 9:37am On Jul 05, 2016

Rilwon:
This guy sha, why are you this stiffnecked?
You didn't bother to answer my questions, you just barge in repeating your previous balderdash like someone that is high of something.
I tire for you o

I already said it that the article is not credible enough, why don't you do yourself some help by downloading the models and read it for yourself?

I have read their mumbo jumbo news since yesterday morning, did you bother to read that is really on Jamb site?

Yes it will be based on o level for school screening but it won't be as done by Ibrahim badamosi' university because Jamb concluded that it puts students at disadvantage.

First Jamb will use its.score to provide provisional admission and then, schools will screen students using o level and Jamb score but it wouldn't be that way of Ibrahim university where points are graded. If Jamon hadn't faulted it, then I would've agreed with you, but because you are not reading from the original source, you don't know but you are willfully displaying your ignorance.

The bolder was the first fault they saw in the Ibrahim university. You don't need to mix it up with the second fault. The second fault is very different and clearly spelt out. Why are you this dishonest with yourself?
Someone has pasted the pdf file on the first page, why don't you bother to go through it?

You are seriously ignorant, who told you that UI do no write post ume?

Where did I ask you that?

And did you bother to read other proceeding points?

Yes, it was stated thus:

1.Screening of candidates shall be for those offered Provisional Admissions ONLY .

2.No written examination to be conducted

3. Verification of Course Requirements (O’levels or A’levels).

4.Verification of valid JAMB results by checking :i.Online Result Slip
ii.Printout
iii.Provisional Admission Letter iv.PhotoAlbumv.Checklistvi.Biometrics

5.InstitutionsarefreetosourcefromotherCourse(s)tocompensateforSHORTFALLinanyofthecriteria.

If you are using your head, you will notice that from the above, the screening of o level will not be based on grading of points as it was done in Ibrahim university, rather it will be based on whether your o level courses tally with the course you are applying for. But then, who knows, maybe you are reading with your nose

That's probably because you don't understand simple English as a result of your writing of o level in those village where answer are readily on ground for you. I mean seriously what is so hard the comprehending this? 3. Verification of Course Requirements (O’levels or A’levels).

And then why are you inferring to an already faulted system?
I dab for your ignorance sha

Yes,

Refer to page 28, it was clearly stated there.

And I maintain that you didn't read from the direct source and at the same time are proud of the ignorance.

you just wasted a lot of time writing rubbish. Things that I have already answered. Please move in line with the thread, do not take us back with your senseless comments

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 9:33am On Jul 05, 2016

Genius101:
we all know that credit pass is the minimum requirements for admission into any course in tertiary institutions..no one will tell you that you must have an A in biology before you can study medicine..perhaps people with deficiency in their o level or incomplete results or wrong subjects combo would be used to fill courses that are short changed

when making plans, you do not plan in line with a possible accident. It is assumed that any candidate who registers for Jamb must have gone through the brochure, so it is assumed that all of them have the right subject combo, so you see?

Deficiency in O'level could mean choosing someone with an A over someone with a C, isn't that what they explained?

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 9:18am On Jul 05, 2016

awesomeDiva:
they give based on department...

Yes! Ofcourse i meant based on departments, you will be fighting for admission with other persons in your department so also, Jamb will admit the highest scorers in each department which still supports what I said

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 9:16am On Jul 05, 2016

Genius101:
it means that people with credit passes in their o level results and people with As but ve been offered provisional admission would be on a common footing as no points will be awarded to grades

so how will they decide which candidates they will use to fill the other courses that may be short-changed?

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 9:15am On Jul 05, 2016

Genius101:
the IBB and tafewa balewa models were faulted by jamb not because they were conducted before provisional admission.from the summary of model 1(tafawa balewa)screening was done for only candidates recommended to jamb and given provisional admission so the screening was not done before provisional admission..but jamb did not fault this part.2nd summary was about life span of o'level results which jamb remarked on and faulted. now in summary of model 2 (ibb model)they screened candidates before provisional admission and jamb faulted it.they also weighted o level grades and jamb results which jamb faulted that it puts some candidates with low grades in o level at a disadvantage hence will not be used..hence after provisional admission,candidates will be screened by checking their o level results to make sure they have the right subjects combination and must have met with the course requirements and no weighting of results should be done as it would put some at a disadvantage.

this is your own opinion. Now talking about the IBB style, they corrected two stuffs, the fact that it was done before the provisional admission and the fact that since it was done before the provisional admission,it contained a wide range of scores. Now if it is to be done after the Provisional admission, the Jamb scores will all be relatively thesame or the range will be low, so that has corrected the two issues noted there, and since there won't be any exam then it means that it can be used.

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 9:10am On Jul 05, 2016

awesomeDiva:
it will be absolutely based on o'level.. but note that jamb made a remark/comment concerning using point system, that it put students with low grades at disadvantage (meaning they didn't approve such system)

well meaning they modified it. Now check this, since Jamb wil be the ones giving the admission, they will give the highest scorers, that means that everyone will have relatively thesame score or in thesame region, that has nulified the adverse effect don't you think?

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 8:57am On Jul 05, 2016

Oyejay:
What abt those that filled awaiting result on jamb website while registering, do u think they will be given adm by jamb b4 they go and tender their o'level to their skul of choice?

Yes ofcourse, as long as you see your result before november you are safe

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 8:57am On Jul 05, 2016

awesomeDiva:
they said verification and not weighing I.e for those with fake result, those that have incomplete result. they might even choose to verify the result by asking student to provide scratch card

You also skipping a major point. The place where they said something about the verification is in point 3, they did say that the screening will be after the provisional admission, does it not stand to reason that the screening will also be based on the O'level?

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 8:34am On Jul 05, 2016

Elxandre:
How did they fill it up before the advent of PUTME?

there lies your answer.

Young man, you are confused. I am a graduate by the way, before the advent of PUTME most of these lower courses were not present and schools did not have a defined capacity, so there was no need for anyone to fill up any course. That was why they made it clear that universities can fill up now. I ask again, how will they now decide who they will fill it up with?

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 8:25am On Jul 05, 2016

Elxandre:
Nah bro.
That article is crap!

the screening mentioned in the document is nust like the already existent screening you have in schools already after admission

What jamb awards since time immemorial is provinsional admission, same with what they will be awarding this year.
The screening will be same with what is already existent in schools after one is granted admission.

I do not know how I am going to explain it to you again. So let me drop one question, how are schools going to decide which candidates they will use and fill up the lower courses?

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 8:10am On Jul 05, 2016

Elxandre:
You are misunderstanding something here.
That article you quoted is not the original piece from Jamb.

Get the original document from jamb.org.ng

OKAY!!! I now understand your problem. You are angry because people are now saying that that article is the main one from Jamb? Ofcourse it isn't. The person who wrote it for premium reporters made it clear that he/she was just trying to explain what was written in the Jamb article and the Jamb model, but people and other sites started to copy and paste it and eventually the real meaning was lost. You can go to their page and check it well, they first pasted the real article then explained it, sorry if I used harsh words but you should have checked the site before lambasting them

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 8:07am On Jul 05, 2016

Elxandre:
according to the document i read, jamb score alone would be used.
The Olevel would just be verified during screening to check if you have your Olevel credits complete.

You do understand that screening implies screening in and screening out? So how will some candidates be screened out? See they identified a clear distinction between screening and verification. Now go to the last point, it was said that schools can source from other courses to complete some courses which are short-changed, so that means Jamb will send extra students to some courses and will send less students than required to some courses too. How will they now check who will be admitted? Based on O'level result, if your grades are low then you will be taken to a different course that was short-changed! This is just a matter of being able to connect point 1,point 3 and the last point in the original Jamb article

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 8:02am On Jul 05, 2016

Silvofitz:
You mixed it up altogether. You may need to read the document again. Both O' Level grades and Jamb scores would be weighted.

Thank you. He did not even read the article himself. He just read the part he wants to hear!

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 8:00am On Jul 05, 2016

STPEACE10:
can't you see that the guy copied it from premium reporter? he just pasted exactly what they wrote on their page. he even include the prayer aspect of it that was also pasted there. lolzz

are you crazy or you lack comprehension skills? Ofcourse i copied what they wrote to explain what they said and how it is related to what the posted said, can't you understand a simple written statement?!

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 7:57am On Jul 05, 2016

Rilwon:
From which Jamb source did you get all these^ from?
I'm not asking you of the nation newspaper because they also copied the rumor without reviewing it.

Yes, they would be giving out provisional admission, but where did they state that "praying is all you can do?"

Yes

It would be based on both o level and Jamb score but the o level part would be fair enough and not the alleged point grading part which was adopted by Ibrahim badamosi' university, Jamb faulted it and said it puts most students at disadvantage, therefore that process is canceled, yet, our ignorant brothers are still peddling it.

Where did they explain it?

Again I want the Jamb source and not some cooked up nonsense. I have my own Jamb source sha.

Neither of the two. No one is claiming to know everything here and no one is afraid, truth is, we should always find the root of a matter before peddling it. That everyone believes something doesn't make it true. You are expected to find the truth and hold on toit.

No one is talking about the mumbo jumbo article that was first written by premium reporter, the question is, have you bothered to read it from Jamb source on your own?

I can bet you haven't, if actually you have, you wouldn't come here to be saying the above nonsense, unless you want to prove how bad you are at comprehension which you are trying to accuse here.

I doubt if you read what I said at all! I am just comparing what they said with what you said!

Go and check the page, the first of all posted the news, then they explained the news. They didn't say that what they explained there is exactly how it was written in the Jamb site! You didn't even bother to read their article before lambasting them! That is not true journalism.

So let me ask you a simple question. It will be based on O'level won't it? Now Jamb gave two examples there,one was based on admission without O'level and one was based on admission with O'level,they clearly pointed out their remarks that the screening was done before the provisional admission hence giving undue advantage to students with good grades, now after their long scenario investigation, they now said that the screening will be done after they must have been grnated a provisional admission(that was the first point in the real article) and that it will be based on checking the candidates O'level results. Now UI too does not write putme if I am correct, but they didn't use the UI model for emphasis, they used the IBB model,so does that not mean that the IBB model is the model without PUTME that they were considering in the first place? With that in mind, does that not mean that it is the method that schools will adopt?

So from your insane question, you are asking me where Jamb explained that the universities can still conduct a screening? Didn't you see the first point they made in their proposed model?

In their proposed model, did they blatantly explain how the screening will be done? What they said in point 3 is just a matter of verification hence it is easy to see that the verification mentioned is not thesame as the screening they pointed out in their first point(i am now talking about the real Jamb article), so what that means is that the proposed screening mode was not clarified by Jamb! Then since Jamb made it clear that the screening will be on checking of O'level result then isn't it safe to infer that they will adopt the model that they used in explaining the 'admission without putme' style?

They corrected just two stuffs in that model without putme, the fact that it was done before Jamb grants a provisional admission and the fact that it puts low scoring candidates at a disadvantage. Now in their two corrections they cleared that the screening will now be done after the provisional admission and there won't be a written exam, if there is no written exam, what then will be used? Or you know something that nobody else does?! I maintain that you did not even read the article from premium times before posting this nonsensical update that you just did,PATHETIC!

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 1:08am On Jul 05, 2016

1) Before a candidate can seat be
considered for screening, he/she must have
been given provisional admission by Jamb.
The Jamb admission checker portal is going
to be opened soon for this process, so
praying is all you can do now.
2) THE POINT SYSTEM:
This is the most critical part of the process.
Jamb's provisional admission no longer
makes much sense this year, your points
tally will decide your faith. The points are
evenly spread out between your O'level and
Jamb results to provide a level playing field
for all.
In the first case, any candidate who submits
only one result which contains his/her
relevant subjects already has 10points, the
exam could be NECO, WAEC, GCE etc, but any
candidate who has 2 sittings only gets 2
points. So this means that aspirants with
only one result are at an advantage but only
just.
The next point grades fall into the O'level
grades. Each grades has it's equivalent
point, A=6 marks, B=4 marks, C=3 marks, so
the better your grades the better your
chances.
The next point is the UTME scores. Each
score range has its equivalent point which
can be summarized thus, 180-200=20-23
marks, 200-250=24-33 points,
251-300=34-43, 300-400=44-60 points.
Each categories contains 5 Jamb results per
point added, for example a candidate with
180-185 gets 20points, a candidate with
186-190 gets 21 points etc.
Points system for DE will be released soon.
3) It then comes down to the fact that fees
will still be charged for screening, it depends
on the school as well.
4) Catchment and ELDS will still be used!
Merit contains 45% of the total candidates
for a particular course, Catchment contains
35% and ELDS and staff lists contains the
rest.
5) Cutoff marks will be released by schools
this year in the form of points and not
marks. If a school declares it's cutoff mark
for Medicine as 90 points and Jamb grants a
candidate with 250 a provisional admission
but his/her total points falls short of the 90
points, then he/she will lose the admission.
So the provisional admission is just a means
to an end, not the end in itself.[\i]

Pay attention to the bold part. There is a reason why it's their number one point. The initial admission will be from Jamb which is what you are saying, this is just a possible SCREENING PROCEDURE BASED ON O'LEVEL RESULT. Since Jamb said there won't be any exam but also stated that schools can screen their candidates after being admitted, it stands to reason that schools will adopt the screening method which considers only O'level results which was what they duly explained. I don't understand what you lot are complaining about,maybe you are afraid because your O'level isn't okay or maybe you just want to claim that you know everything when the lot of you are the ones who can't even comprehend!

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 12:52am On Jul 05, 2016

awesomeDiva:
what you just said is not different from mine

exactly my point! That was what they said in their article, which means that their article isn't different from what you just said! Which means that they did not spread any false info, then why are you blaming them?!

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 12:34am On Jul 05, 2016

Dude, you also cannot comprehend a simple statement. Your whole point is that Jamb will grant you a provisional admission first, thats what everyone is saying, now after granting you the provisional admission you will still be screened, it is written in the Jamb model isn't it? The screening will be based on your O'level result won't it? So it means that they are right, maybe the point system won't be used but your admission will also depend on your O'level result, the higher the grades the better, so why are you insulting others when you too do not even understand what was said?!

1 Like

Education › Re: Correction: Clarifying The Content Of The New JAMB Modalities For Admission by Mickael2(m): 12:28am On Jul 05, 2016

awesomeDiva:
Exactly.... in each model jamb made a review and remarks/comment.
in Abubakar Tafawa belewa uni Bauchi they commented on the lifespan of certificate and the fees attached...

in IBB they commented on the point grading system that it will act as a disadvantages to many student and also the fees attached.

jamb is trying to tell us that verification of results should be done after provisional admission by jamb and not before

that no fees should be attached

no examinations of any kind

abeg naija get brain small bikonu premium Reporters caused this confusion...

on the contrary. I read their article, they said clearly that you must be granted provisional admission before anyother thing else, thats the first thing they said.

Even the Jamb site made mention of a screening after the provisional admission, hence they probably deciphered that it is the point system, if you ask me their info is truly since they said that the provisional admission will come from Jamb first

Education › Re: The Modalities For 2016/2017 Admission Processes Into Higher Institutions by Mickael2(m): 1:05pm On Jul 04, 2016

Jamean:
@ micskales

Please I need information on the modalities for applying to private universities, we can't continue to wait for this jamb test-run arrangement this year. By this I mean, will there still be screening exams organised by private universities?

Please revert, this is really urgent.

They also released the modalities for private universities, it is in pdf and you can view it with your phone. Just go to www.jamb.gov.ng you will see it there

Education › Re: The Modalities For 2016/2017 Admission Processes Into Higher Institutions by Mickael2(m): 1:02pm On Jul 04, 2016

phenom57:
They didn't specifically mention in the original file that: THEY WILL ADOPT THE MODEL WITHOUT PUTME.
JAMB only faulted the already existing models and the made their own prescription which didn't involve the quoted part

you did see the part where they said that there will be no written examination, the only thing that will be done is that candidates results will be checked and O'levels too. That means the PUTME model was not accepted, what then can you infer from that?

Education › Re: The Modalities For 2016/2017 Admission Processes Into Higher Institutions by Mickael2(m): 12:22pm On Jul 04, 2016

phenom57:
[b][/b]THE POINT SYSTEM:
This is the most critical part of the process. Jamb's
provisional admission no longer makes much sense this
year, your points tally will decide your faith. The points are
evenly spread out between your O'level and Jamb results to
provide a level playing field for all.
In the first case, any candidate who submits only one result
which contains his/her relevant subjects already has
10points, the exam could be NECO, WAEC, GCE etc, but any
candidate who has 2 sittings only gets 3 points. So this
means that aspirants with only one result are at an
advantage but only just.
The next point grades fall into the O'level grades. Each
grades has it's equivalent point, A=6 marks, B=4 marks,
C=3 marks, so the better your grades the better your
chances.
The next point is the UTME scores. Each score range has its
equivalent point which can be summarized thus,
180-200=20-23 marks, 200-250=24-33 points,
251-300=34-43, 300-400=44-60 points. Each categories
contains 5 Jamb results per point added, for example a
candidate with 180-185 gets 20points, a candidate with
186-190 gets 21 points etc.
Points system for DE will be released soon.
3) It then comes down to the fact that fees will still be
charged for screening, it depends on the school as well.
4) Catchment and ELDS will still be used![/b]

I didn't see this part in the original document

it is there, it's part of it. They gave two models, one with PUTME and one without PUTME, the one without PUTME will be adopted with only one main correction, you must be granted provisional admission before you can even be considered for the admission process

1 Like

Education › Re: The Modalities For 2016/2017 Admission Processes Into Higher Institutions by Mickael2(m): 12:18pm On Jul 04, 2016

If you want to ask any questions on this,go to www.facebook.com/nigerianstimes, they posted the news first and they seem to understand the contents well, infact the link to the main news is there

Sports › Re: All The News About The Olympic Eagles (U-23) HERE! by Mickael2(m): 2:09pm On Jul 02, 2016

Icon4s:
Players selection. That was y I wanted Keshi out. Oliseh came and same issue. Siasia too is nt left out.
A fantastic goal poucher like Isaac Success has repeatedly been ignored by successive coaches.
I have given up d idea of local coaches.
Let me see if a new foreign technical adviser would ignore Success

I have given up the idea of local coaches.

I agree with you but.... I can perfectly well understand why Isaac Success was not invited. I watch the La Liga constantly, most times his team plays on Friday night or Sunday morning so i usually keep my tabs on him, sometimes he plays arrogant football. He believes he has the talents so defenders should shiver in front of him, he tries too many tricks and all that. He even got sent-off once, and although the second yellow was not deserved it was still down to his inexperience/hot-head, so as an outsider, you may see him as a great player no doubt, but in a team you also need a good player, a team player too which was why i blamed Garba for starting him at the U-20s. But well he did develop massively towards the end of the season, i always believed that the guy is more talented than Iheanacho and the lot of them and I believe that his move to watford will cement that fact soon, which is why he isn't going to the Olympics so as to establish himself first. If you ask me, the NFF are handling his own case well

1 Like

Romance › Re: Five Abusive Words You Should Not Say To Her, No Matter What by Mickael2(m): 1:53pm On Jul 02, 2016

Larryfest:
True....but then again that's why we were created before so at all cost we must act the mature role even if she is older than you.. We are men!

tell that to the feminists

Romance › Re: Five Abusive Words You Should Not Say To Her, No Matter What by Mickael2(m): 1:52pm On Jul 02, 2016

Lagusta:
1. You are very stupid

2. You dont know anything

3. You can't do anything....

4. You mates are driving big cars you are here driving Camry

5. Look at this small boy....

6. Most men outside are better off than you...

7. You are such an unfortunate fellow....

8. Like mother like son....

9. If you don't give me money I know where to get it.....

10. Please don't touch me, I have a headache (and the stuff under is rising and falling like the naira-dollar dichotomy....

Oya wetin u talk now

Education › Re: 43 Of The 96 Howard Univrsity Doctor Of Pharmacy Candidates Are Nigerians by Mickael2(m): 9:26pm On Jun 30, 2016

IZANAMI:
OK,,,now I understand.A little above 200k is believable, but that 250k plenty gan oo..
Yh,you're right,I was earning 145K before IPPS started during my internship,I think it has reduced to 120+k now,I do work as a local Pharm from 4-8 after the hospital day's job,so my pay was just a little close to 200k then.
Anyone who earns 250k during his housemanship must be quite lucky...

And I totally agree with that last part,I worked as a locum in a community pharmacy before going for my internship,,so I understand...

You are there. Some people see doctors as pharmacists too. I had some place i was working too, a local pharmacy shop, he was making close to 600k for each import, at that moment i wished i studied pharm, but not all of them are so lucky though but they do earn well. Which hospital did you do yours?

Education › Re: 43 Of The 96 Howard Univrsity Doctor Of Pharmacy Candidates Are Nigerians by Mickael2(m): 5:46pm On Jun 30, 2016

IZANAMI:
Young man,I'm quite marveled at your height of exaggeration. Don't take the hyperbole too far for the purpose of substantiating your point..It's not possible for a house officer to earn 250k monthly,,the highest you can possibly earn is 180k and that can only be earned in national hospitals. state hospitals and some teaching hospitals do not even pay up to 150k,but it can never be below 100k of course. Even some junior registrars don't earn that much.
Of course,there's a large difference between Pharmacy and microbiology in terms of job prospect.
Like Joice21 said,just go into lecturing if you don't want to be frustrated as a microbiologist,reason being the job prospect is very limited.
If you try to work in Pharm industries,you would only be limited to the quality control and sterility assurance department of the industry and a pharmacist will always be the head there irrespective of d number of years you've being into practice.

I am not exactly doing that. Okay, not 250k obviously, I meant you can add some other stuffs, not just the housemanship, but nonethless some hospitals do pay 200k, infact med lab attendants earn up to 150k or so if I am correct, Radiography and physiotherapy also earn in that region. But about the part that pharm can earn up to 1million per week, that is absolutely true

Education › Re: 43 Of The 96 Howard Univrsity Doctor Of Pharmacy Candidates Are Nigerians by Mickael2(m): 2:48pm On Jun 30, 2016

Joice21:
Sorry dear..I'm a graduate already..a first class graduate from OAU..n I studied microbiology..n I'm so proud I did..cos I have a lot to offer..#proudmicrobiologist

Then let's draw the comparison here. Let me not use myself because I graduated with distinction, a coursemate right now who actually repeated a year is earning 250k for his housemanship alone, and after that he will start earning more, a pharmacy can earn as much as 1million from each drug he imports or sells, infact, some of them have the authority to import narcotics and even marijuana in the guise of using it for some health purposes, that is even more than a million, can you beat that right now? Abeg, in Nigeria we seek to safeguard our future, not just reading for the fun of it, so don't say that in Nigeria abeg

Education › Re: 43 Of The 96 Howard Univrsity Doctor Of Pharmacy Candidates Are Nigerians by Mickael2(m): 11:57am On Jun 30, 2016

Joice21:
I'm mediocre? Jeez! U're unbelievable..I knew there was such course as pharmacy when I opted for MCB, stop thinking with your ass..that u studied pharmacy does not guarantee that u'l b more successful than I'll be.I'm an intellect n will thrive well in whatever course I decide to study..I don't wanna argue with you..it's not my thing.

Oh but I studied Medicine and Surgery actually. Ofcourse people know that the course does exist, but it does not prevent people from running to botany and other courses because they can't do it, not because they don't want to. You are still an undergraduate or you are aspiring to become one soon? If your answer to any of the question is a yes, then won't you jump to pharmacy in a heartbeat if someone offers you that oppurtunity even if it means restarting from the scratch? Don't give me that crap, there is absolutely no comparison there

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 (of 113 pages)