₦airaland Forum

Nickshrapnel:

pu7pl3:
Red death is also a speedster, it's not the same

BlackManta:
There is a definitely a speedster villain in The Flash movie but my money's on Black Flash not Red Death...

Silentgroper:
No comment on keita's goal

Xavier5:
Happy Xavday To This Ideal.

#Xavier
#XavDay

TheKingIsHere:
So, disney that has been doing remake of all their classics are not greedy? Or is it Paramount that kept on milking the fast and furious saga? Or is it sony that have decided to milk the spidey characters in the shortest time possible?

Once you come to understand that most if not all studios are greedy, the better for you mind.

Although, I understand your plight, but there's nothing we can do as people will come out en mass to watch joker2

TheKingIsHere:
Yeah, I know it's on cw and after the season, it will be on HBOmax but this was one of the top shows last year, it should have been spaced out imo

Xavier5:
As I said before, there is no movie that doesn't need a sequel and there is no one that needs it. It's all about the film maker. Everything boils to creativity. It's an unrestricted sphere in the movie/ creativity industry.
As a writer, if you ask me to write a sequel for Titanic, I can. You may ask how? This is where creativity comes in, but the thing is I won't because I don't want to stress my brain except the Mula is bank breaking
Even matrix trilogy is getting a sequel trilogy, so?? ? ??
It all boils down to the film maker and creativity
The problem with sequels is all about one doing it well. That's just the problem. I hope Joker is done well.

#Xavier

Xavier5:
Sweetheart, greediness runs the movie industry and the business world as a whole. So?? ? ??

Talking about brand in character study CBM outside DCEU, I SUPPORT. They can do that while doing a Joker franchise besides a Joker franchise is also a character study.

I say they milk the mother fvcking IP. What is it there for if not to make money for them.

#Xavier

Xavier5:
@abduleez1, Kaycee7, johnyace

There is no movie that doesn't need a sequel and there is no movie that needs a sequel, everything boils down to the film maker. It's all about creativity, being able to come out with ideas, in this context, ideas of or for a good story. So here is the catch, will the sequel story be good or bad?................................. Till then
BUT
Joker has a good ground for sequel(s). Will love to see a sequel where Joker rises to power in Gotham, after that, will also love to see sequels where Joker fights to maintain his supremacy in Gotham against oppositions especially Raalsaghul.

Joker has potentials for a FRANCHISE.

#Xavier

abduleez1:
Nonsense!!! Some things are better left UN-fvvking-TOUCHED!!!!!!!!!

I heard the script pitch to Phillips a month ago. Didn't know it will reach this stage.
This kinda seem desperate to me.
Leave that masterpiece, Academy Winner, Cultural Upstaging, unique CBM and billion dollar record holder ALONE.

TheKingIsHere:
They made a mistake cramping Stargirl2 with Titans3.

Titans just took all the shine as most people have forgotten about Star girl season 2

Xavier5:
Yay or Nay
True or False

I hope it's true, will love to see Joker's rise to power in Gotham as the Clown Prince of Clown, I hope they explore this. The first was about Arthur Fleck becoming joker, the sequel should explore the above

#Xavier

BlackManta:
Fingers crossed

AnfieldFan:
Gomez played Rebic onside for the first, but even if he had stepped up a few yards, Robbo was also playing him onside. The midfield is where I'd look at for both goals. Diaz and Rebic dropped into midfield and picked up pockets of space behind the midfield, the CBs couldn't track them into midfield cos it would have left a huge gap.

Minemrys

Silentgroper:
He might nt have outrightly said d team selection was a gamble but he mentioned something abt how is gamble paid off. Then i noted he used the word risk..

cc: anfieldfan . Meksbig. Minemrys.

Silentgroper:
Because he starts doesnt mean he should play the full time.

Silentgroper:
Yes he did.

Silentgroper:
They dnt have to play d full matches. Rotations can occur during the matches.

Silentgroper:
Yes he did.

Silentgroper:
Vvd was suppose to start d match ahead of gomez. In short our 1st eleven should always start big/important matches, chikena.



The aforementioned is the basics of my arguement.

Meksbig:
I don't understand this your argument.. are you saying this rotation wasn't strategic? That klopp and the coaching team didn't think this through?
We totally dominated that match except a five mins spell where the team was complacent. Every player that came into that match are good solid players that have played big matches before. We have about 7 matches in 22 days so any rotation is welcome.

Silentgroper:
Yes minemrys. I totally agree wit u about d rotation of players. But my arguement here is, klopp should knw wat match he needs to rotate players, he should have dem pre-planned. If in d game wit norwich, he decides to use phillips, i do not care. We knw it's a less important cup match nd phillips nd gomez are solid cbs for d game as norwhich will pose as lesser threats to us. But starting rusty gomez dat might nt be in his 100% is a no no for that a.c milan match.

i could swear i have seen a chelsea match where chalobah was pulled out 4 christensen during half time. Cause i dont agree with this ur football tactics abt hw u cant sub a cb for another cb oo.

But i'm in support of rotating the players to enable everyone get a playing time. It just has to strategic.

Silentgroper:
Lol... I do understand d players are nt machine. But he only had a broken finger. It is nt some serious shiit.. Yeah.. I wouldnt be expecting he plays full game too. Probably should get pulled out in 80th min.

AnfieldFan:
No bro... You're mistaken...He had a leg injury scare...He limped off the pitch...
Klopp had to call him to know what was wrong... Virgil assured Klopp that it was nothing...So you see...It wasn't just a broken finger...

Silentgroper:
I guess you do not have a problem with yday's squad bcuz we luckily won d game. Hadnt been we losed, i bet dz wouldnt be ur rxn.
I just felt since we would playing less competitive teams in d epl nd carling, he could rest vvd in those games nd use fresh legs. Yesterday's game was a gamble even klopp admitted it.

Silentgroper:
We've got a carling cup match with norwich nd whatever match we have on d weekend. If vvd was rested for this matches, it would mke a lotta sense. But with a ucl match against a.c milan, klopp must be stupid for even thinking abt it.

Like someone said, we were just lucky.

Silentgroper:
It is clear liverpool is topping dz group. Athletico m might nt be dat much of a hard team to beat if dey cannot beat porto.

Wordson:
I wonder what he was experimenting, leaving Van Dijk out