₦airaland Forum

Rhodesia:
Still today most of you retain many primaeval and primitive behavioural traits of early man. Most Negroid sub-species are crude, aggressive unrefined, have a libido of a bunny rabbit in heat and have the physical prowess of early hunter gatherer man, they retain tribal customs that date back to the stone age and in live violent, tribal primitive state of human.

19th century pseudo scientific studies, you need to fast forward. Its like you just started reading Darwins Descent of man when we've blown light years ahead of that in terms of evolutionary science. Men you really are slow.

Don't you get it meat head. Both our ancestors supplied us with the same blue print to advance in the same fashion. The components for brain chemistry that combines to produce any variation in human populations is present in all humans which is why every so called race exhibits the same genetic order and disorders.  In other words there are dwarfs in every population as much as there are intelligent people. Sorry to tell you, your people do not possess any extra ordinary power over any other set of people apart from what you allude to above which is social engineering. You dodo head.

Rhodesia:
Even after being exposed to the white man's ways which the Negro seeks to emulate, he behaves in a most primitive and crude fashion akin the our own barbaric ancestors, he's demeanour and mannerisms are coarse, aggressive and harsh when compared to a refined Japanese individual.

They are often prone to outburst of primal rage and violence and violation ( especially of other homo sapien sub-species), ritually scarify and mutilate their own bodies in a fashion akin to stone age man. They retain a primitive animist-voodoo belief structure and display a keen lack of intelligence and ability to adapt to the white man's ways which they seek to emulate, yet also appear to be more connected to the animalistic urges and more of the early homo sapiens.

Where did you steal those lines from. Don't they teach you to respect intellectual property and quote your sources . Is that really your original thought. you really are a duance.

Rhodesia:
If you hate the white man so much why do you seek emulate his society, why have you not gone back to your pre-colonial roots if you hate European civilization so much?

I was just about to ask you that question too. How come your cave dwelling  ancestors didn't turn back to your Odin worshipping ways when the mediterenean romans were kicking your non european saxon azzes. Didn't you read asterix and obelix comics growing up . Sishhh!!

Rhodesia:
The out of Africa theory is debatable, multiple human origin theories are also highly plausible.

Ha ha ha!, you been hanging out on that website storm front for too long. Them fools over there are grasping at any thing that will seperate themselves from Ancient homo sapiens that migrated from Africa. Multiple human origin my Bottom. Ever heard of the human genome project. It is scentific consensus that Human beings are one and the same species with genetic mapping showing a 97.5% accurate sequencing. the remaining variations as a result of some of your ancestors miscegenating him Archaic Homo species ( the neanderthal) which you subsequently wiped out. Disgusting!On a confidence interval like that, it would mean I should believe that after taking a DNa test that shows a 98% conclusion, there is 3% chance you aint the child of your mother. That won't stand up in any court you duance. 

Your european ancestors were Children of Homo sapien Africans that polymorphed genetically, migrated out of the African continent around 60,000- 120,000 years old and changed physical appearance.  Sorry to burst your bubble.

Sub-Saharan Africa has the most human genetic diversity and the same has been shown to hold true for phenotypic diversity.[28] Phenotype is connected to genotype through gene expression. Genetic diversity decreases smoothly with migratory distance from that region, which many scientists believe to be the origin of modern humans, and that decrease is mirrored by a decrease in phenotypic variation. Skull measurements are an example of a physical attribute whose within-population variation decreases with distance from Africa. The distribution of many physical traits resembles the distribution of genetic variation within and between human populations (American Association of Physical Anthropologists 1996; Keita and Kittles 1997). For example, ~90% of the variation in human head shapes occurs within continental groups, and ~10% separates groups, with a greater variability of head shape among individuals with recent African ancestors (Relethford 2002).

Rhodesia:
whatever the case is the majority of black Africa was stuck somewhere between 9,000 and 6,0000 BC in terms of human civilization before the scramble for Africa in the 1880s.

Do you even know what period the iron age commenced. You truly are a daunce? Where did you read that gibberish, 9,000 years ago would put everyone in the world roughly at the beginnings of the bronze age and just emerging out of the stone age. Duance!

Rhodesia:
If everyone in brazil was fully African and all the whites left, it would quickly degenerate into a 3rd world shitip like Haiti.

yes just like if everyone was a pale faced cave man descedant we would all be suffering from massive waves of skin cancer.

Rhodesia:
I'm not European. I'm British by birth, English by the grace of god. Negroid savages out of my green and pleasant land!

You lucky your ancestors killed off them neanderthals.

Guess where they learnt how to throw them spears real good.

Yep!

You guessed right from their homo sapien ancestors from Africa.

Rhodesia:
please GTFO of the UK you can go to Israel or Spain or wherever but just stop coming here in droves turning England into a 3rd world poo tip.

Ah here you are still venting. was beginning to think you ran away. I'm still waiting for my questions to be answered on the other thread our high an mighty homo sapien european.

Rhodesia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Meyers_b11_s0476a.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negroid

Oh come now genius species. You can do better than post a couple of wikipedia links. I am not debating wikipedia. Can you not elaborate for us what constitutes a negro so we are fully aware of your intelletual prowess. Let us discuss this or is it that you are too much of a duance that you lack the cognitive ability to intepret complex information and can only repeat what you read.

Again based on your intelligence levels which you proudly boast can you define what constitutes a 'negro" and can you point out the negros in the pics with evidence to back up your findings.

Rhodesia:
Caucasian is not synonymous with white, in the UK Arabs are not regarded as white according to the census, neither are Pakistanis or Indians.

on the other hand in America Arabs are officially White. in Latin America someone who's white in America becomes Latino.

White is subjective. Black is also a subjective term, until the 70s black meant Indians,  and other dark skinned people of the world aswell a Negroes, up until the late the 19th century black in England meant someone who had dark hair and was slightly swarthy ie an Italian.

Black as a terminology for Negroes is a relatively recent thing. Many South Indians and Sri Lankans are as dark a west Africans, but they are not regarded as 'Black' people. Australian aborigines call themselves 'Black'but they are not Negroes, so what constitutes black and what constitutes white is subjective.

If the above bolded conclusion is subjective then the answers must lie in the definitions of Negro then. Therefore:

What is the origin of the word Negro?
What constitutes Negro?, origins in Africa, facial features, Genetics

Do enlighten me my oh so brilliant homo sapien.

Rhodesia:
ps go become a proffesor wi na Nobel Prize and then try and critidize dr James watson, that wasa meely stating the obvious that negroids are less delevpoed than other races.

I don't need to i already know the body of work and your professor is infering on the same data I am using.

In other words. Data is data until it is infered upon and it would seem "suspect" that a "white' scientist would produce conclusions that are not consistent with propping up his "race"

Dr Watson's social evolutionary science is skewed data and  does not support the evidence of biological evolution which is consistent with the inherited abilities of all human populations. That dribble is pseudo science at its best, nobel prize my AZZ!

Rhodesia:
East Asians are also more intelligent than us Europeans, do you see anybody screaming about it saying OMG that's racist you can't say that. Negroes are less evolved homonids.

Seeing that you are from the group of genius populations, could you map out the evolutionary process of the hominid in terms of genetics, anthropology and brain strucuture. In order words the hominid,  Homo sapien sapien divergence to Homo sapien sapien sapien( White people)

please classify

Please classify

please classify

Rhodesia:
Zidane looks almost European, but not quite. Go tell an Algerian he is a Negro, I think he will tell you he is either Arab or Berber which is not black. technically if you like yes they are Caucasoid, but not white.

Follow this logic you duance.

Are you both caucasian and white at the same time? If so then caucasian is synanymous with white right and designates an absolute set of phenotypicals features from which reference is drawn on. If so then anyone outside that definition cannot be caucasian but they can be  "caucasoid. Right?

The above would therefore imply that some how your "race' or features preced those of Zinadine's, meaning he is nearly a pure Caucasian/european or White but not quite, right. an "oid" is almost something but not quite.

If this logic follows and a one true specimen of caucasian exists then it can be applied the other way round and a one true specimen of negro exists as well and any one designated "Negroid" can only be almost negro and not quite falling within strict specimens. Right?

Classify these individuals for me according to your science then. Are they negro,caucasian, caucasoid or negroid?

Rhodesia:
He is an Algerian Berber.

Wrong answer. You and Dr. Watson are both duances

What race is Zinadine. Berber/Amazigh is an ethnic group.  You might as well call me a Nigerian yoruba using that designation.

Rhodesia:
Is Zindane a Negro? no. Is Nasser the Arab a Negro, No. they aren't white but they aren't negroes.

exactly my point

You are a duance.

If Zinadine is not negro. What is he?

BlackLibya:
Actually there are no Bantu native to Nigeria

Also, most of west Africa is not bantu

You picked the wrong site I guess

Please don't enducate this riff raff. He still subscribes to the old scientific classifications that categorise people into three distinctive "races" with most Africans he considers non -negro falling into th caucasoid Range,  Caucasoid meaning "almost White"

In reality DNA shows that "whites' are indeed 1/3rd African by DNA marking.

Leave him to his ignorance I beg you.

RSA:


Are you people going to continue talking,or are you going to take action,or you'll do nothing together with your uselss president? South African talk less and act more.That is why those corrupt official will hate the day they accepted their post in South Africa.
In South Africa there is no big men,people have voices in South Africa.

They also have xenophobia there too. Don't forget.

Horus:
I don't know if all of you noticed, but if you do some research on the internet you will see that the whites are not complaining about this US church ban on interracial marriage, but Blacks are complaining all over the internet about this ban. Do your own conclusion. Who is begging the oppressor to be allowed to get married with the oppressor?

Oohhh!. I know the answer to this one

"The opressed."

paniki:
It's not an assumption but a doubt based on my observation of the Afrikaans community and their conservativeness.

It's true that Dutch settlers landed in Cape Town around mid 1600s and the MEN proceeded to rap3 local black women for centuries since resulting in close to half of the current Cape Town population being coloured. But that doesn't change my doubt that a Afrikaner WOMAN would willingly have s3x with a black man in the 1950s just as I doubt that a Afrikaner WOMAN would willingly have s3x with a black man today in 2011. The interracial hanky panky that exists is usually amongst blacks and English whites who are more liberal. Afrikaners like to stick to themselves, they are ultra conservative to the point were they dislike even English whites

Sandra Laing was born in Piet Retief, a small Afrikaans town in Mpumalanga province very far away from Cape Town

It is obvious that post 1948, it would have been rare for a national party member to be hanky pankying with black people. However what is not rare is the pocket of colored communities that existed in the north western province all the way to namibia and the inherently high possibility that some "white" folk may have originated from these communities and passed or groups of "coloureds" migrated from griqua land or the cape to communities in the north.

Therefore making it extremely plausible that a snadra laing could existed allt he way in mpumalanga.

Shikena!

[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=816022.msg9694452#msg9694452 date=1323062470]oh yes, we're all one big happy family and differences between races are only a figment of our imagination since blacks are actually whites and whites are really blacks with caucasian genes.

asians are also blacks.


and not to forget- we all resemble monkeys except for white people of course who are the only race with no monkey forebears.

or is it they're at the top of the evolutionary ladder you said.[/quote]Right Right!

[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=816022.msg9694431#msg9694431 date=1323061646]^^is that the question i asked you? [/quote]When you graduate from the stage of refering to races in terms of negroid, mongoloid and caucosoid and enroll in your first evolutionary biology class then we can chat!

[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=816022.msg9694381#msg9694381 date=1323060530]didnt you once start a thread comparing every race besides whites, to monkeys?

i believe you posted pictures of monkeys and pointed out the similarities between them and specific races, excluding whites.

and when reminded of the origin of the name capuchin monkeys, you fought tooth and nail to prove that was a wrong analogy.[/quote]and as usual like a six year old you still lack the ability to comprehend the reference to the "monkeys" and "humans" in terms of climate, environment and adaptability.

Horus:
You do not get it at all. Every word have a meaning depending on how you use them so do not change my words like you. I never argue, I deal with fact only. Arguing is Ego. Dealing with fact only is knowledge.

Because when I told you that whites cannot produce anything than themselves you tald me that it was not true, and that is why I said that.

Right. You deal with facts. Sure you do,

Horus:
I didn't said melanin producing capability, I said they don't have enough melanin PERIOD. All human have melanin, even albinos otherwise the brain will not work, but they don't have enought of it.

Same question what is your point? Are we learning something new here?

You are just trying to wiggle out of your nonsensical sense making endeavor.

Tell me what point is it to say white people cannot produce black people but black people can produce white people without presenting the logic behind that.

Thats the most dafftest statment I have ever heard.

The counter to that statment would be it depends

paniki:
^^^^^

Yes they can't be 100% but I doubt that a Afrikaner woman would've been doing the hanky panky with a black man in the 1950s in fact I doubt that a Afrikaner woman would be doing the hanky panky with a black man in 2011. Besides they did blood test in the 60s which matched the father.

That assumption does not take in consideration the fact that colored people have been indentified as carrying the most diverse genotypes from all parts of the world centralized in one area.

For your info a lot of Afrikaaner did the hanky panky with a lot of Khoi people since the 1650's and many people over the generations were able to pass as  white in that society. The exchanges went well into the 50's shortlybefore most  of the colored's congregated in  district six as some of them could no longer pass for white when new laws were passed.

There is a terribly high probability for the occurence of a sandra laing within such a society

Please note her younger brother who itechnically doesnot look white but definitley passes as one

Horus:
Yes, they don't have enough melanin so caucasians cannot reproduce anything else but themselves. Can you demonstrate to me that a couple of blonds hairs and blue eyes caucasians can produce a dark skinned African with whooly hairs and bigs lips?

Oh so now its not "enough" melanin producing capability.

That statement is nonsensical. It has been proven that they have lower levels of the melanin producing gene compared to other tropical groups as a result of their adaptations to colder climates therefore it will be extremely difficult if not impossible for them to produce a gene that has been "bred" in the opposite direction.

The same goes for Black African people that live in Africa. It would pratically impossilbe for two Dinka natives to produce a child that lacks the hard coded melanin producing gene to produce very dark skin minus an "albino" defect which is a complete absence of the ability to pigment.

PS Africans like other human beings have varying levels of melanin producing capabilities which is why like every other grou on this planet also have varying degrees of pigmenttation.

What is your piont?.

You know what we should do is stage and insurrection. Destroy the evil empire called America. Set up our own magical Kingdom in Africa that offers Human rights and peace and security to our people.

Expatriate all our Diaspora brothers back to the continent, build an under water fence around the perimeter of Africa to ward off thieving vulturous pale skinned people.

Unite with all African state to build an inpenetrable airspace via our super duper out of this world Air force and last but not the least pump all our money into a space program that will find another planet where we will beam up to as soon a the other psycho pathic human populations completely obliterate themselves.

What say you BLACK PEOPLE!

Horus:
When did I said :unable to produce melanin?. Use quote and show me where I said that.

You really do't know what point you are trying to make so just quit debating with me or state your clear reason for the physical or biological defect of swapping genes with caucasians

Horus quote:
"Remember, caucasians cannot reproduce anything else but themselves.  They cannot reproduce genetic material they don’t have,; Melanin.  Therefore, they cannot reproduce us, but we can reproduce them and all others in humanity"

"White people are the albinos of a specific group of Africans and have inherited those people’s phenotypes"