₦airaland Forum

johnydon22:
hahahahahahahahaha
[size=20]Ok he wasnt killed for shagging his brother's wife many times
but just because he chose not to pour inside... [/size]

johnydon22:
it is simply very clear..

johnydon22:
Oya continue everybody is seeing you glaring twisting tactics,
try so hard we know this is not even a debate.... am loving this

bukatyne:
No sex causes bad eyes?

Is that What your doc told you?

johnydon22:
hahahahaha have you finished ? after all this you still helped me make my point. . .
[size=20]He was taken out for not spilling into his brother's wife right[/size] ..
hahahahaha chai bible oooo

Ujupsy:
Why must one close her eye 90% to see this

vfactor:
Amazing! How do people even come up with stuffs like this?
Another method is quickly scroll up and down your fone screen (better if u use a touch screen device)

dazdilijae:
You are making a big mistake my friend.
The day you vie for public office to be paid with public funds you loss the right to privacy
Read the public service rule, Constitution and freedom of information bill
PEACE

Sirniyeh:
You are making mistake. You are making reference to portion of human right in the constitution.
Remember that I owe every right to my privacy. If you are not allowed to my room, no crime in it.
It is not a must for AIT to force itself into the terrain where not permitted. Inspite of human right,
Every media house must seek permission before coverage. That's why you hear secret meetings everywhere.

johnydon22:
and his wickedness was pulling out instead of ejaculation in his brother's wife ...right?

johnydon22:
Am sure you are trying to be dishonest here and as usual lie for god...
lets see the cause of his death..

Genesis 38:8-10
8Then Judah said to Onan,
“Sleep with your brother’s wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to raise up offspring for your brother.”
9But Onan knew that the child would not be his;
so [size=20]whenever he slept with his brother’s wife,
he spilled his semen on the ground
to keep from providing offspring for his brother.
10What he did was wicked in the LORD’s sight;
so the LORD put him to death also.[/size]

johnydon22:
Now what is this your talk of possible heart attack or fear. . .
Must you always assume up lies to defend the bible?

Sirniyeh:
99% of the self-acclaimed Christians on this forum are baptised with PRIDE.

Sirniyeh:
It is only a clueless person that will reply a post with insult because that are empty in their brain to clarify issues.

Sirniyeh:
Suppossing you go for an evangelism and an aetheist asks you such question, will you abuse or curse him? It is your responsibility to make him understand what he never did. A lot of Jehovah Witness members face severe challenges in the course of their evangelism, yet they will never resort to quarrel or fight.

Sirniyeh:
The responses so far on this thread prove that the over-pompous Christians here are men and women with empty skull.

Sirniyeh:
Jesus himself was questioned.

Sirniyeh:
And the same bible states that study to show yourself approved.

Sirniyeh:
Lack of sufficient knowledge is an avenue for devil to prevail over person.

johnydon22:
and so had to be killed right?

Ugojames:
Just came across this pic pls how true is it?

ihedinobi2:
I'll probably find the book when I find the time and see what it has to say.

Sirniyeh:
Pls, we need those who understand Bible to shed light on this issue.

Sirniyeh:
Where is it written in the bible that Jesus will die at age of 33?

Sirniyeh:
Where is it written in the bible before Jesus was born that He will die on the cross?

Sirniyeh:
Where is it written as prophecy that he will die for the sin of man kind?

Sirniyeh:
It's unfortunate that most obsessed christians will not want to dissect to know that which is the truth.
it's very conspicuous that Jesus died for his
1. Lukewarmness
2. Cluelessness
3. Over confidence
No controversy about that!

Sirniyeh:
While on the Cross, jesus lamented, He screamed:
"GOD WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME?"
That was when he realised his mistake. He entered a town and began preaching, claiming their is a Super King that is more powerful than King Herod. They sought for him. He had priviledge of escape because Peter and co were ready to protect him. That was where his mistake lied. He never knew he could be killed. He insinuated perhaps he could convince the king as well. But eventually he regretted his action.

Sirniyeh:
Who can go to sambisa forest to preach to Shekau?
That's foolishness.

Sirniyeh:
He died for his mistake and not my sin

mekonglobal:
I think a river dat one is aware of its depth, does not worth diving into esp if u are not gud a swimmer.

Sirniyeh:
Hun un un ORO AGBA!

ihedinobi2:
Sin shall be a glory? That sounds very curious.
Perhaps the idea the title is meant to convey is that the existence of sin will end in glory.
That is the sentiment that I hold.

deborah777:
Into what christian movement belongs christ embassy church? Anyone has an idea?
I ask this question for understanding more about that nigerian movement. I know that it began in some campus then in mean while rev anita decided to expand it and moved to UK and then in 2001 was started ror publishing.
But theologically into what movement it belongs? That i had wondered for two years as for personal research i first found out that it is not related with NAR movement as there is no specific evidences of the movement. So whats else?

deborah777:
Well i do not remember, it was long time ago.

deborah777:
What it teached to me was what i already said that in greek words can be different meanings
and in english it all depends on translator choice what he or she thinks is better word to express the greek meaning of the word

ihedinobi2:
That is explained by the concept of eternity. If life does not end here, then "here" is a journey to "somewhere".
In Christian tradition, we are looking forward to a world where humans do not misuse their free will.
And that world will come through the lessons we are learning today about the terrible results of misusing it

Image123:
We need to first be clear on one thing.
Are we agreed that it is a command?

Image123:
If not, why on earth or heaven do you think it is a discussion or Q&A session?

Image123:
Read below.

There was no contradiction here, it is simply a matter of context. Its a long chapter of about 40 verses. The earlier part had been clear about prophesying and even made allusion to keeping silence.
1Co 14:28 But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.

Of course, keeping silence there is not about being dumb throughout church service but self control/temperance. One may have tongues and yet keep silent. In the latter part of the chapter, the passage talks about women keeping silent instead of teaching in the capacity of a leader or pastor over the men. It is not a contradiction by any means. One talks of prophesying, another of speaking in tongues, another of teaching. These are three different things. There are many activities in church like praying, singing, testimonies, report etc. CONTEXT.

CONTEXT is different. Prophecy is different from teaching or directing in the capacity of a shepherd or pastor. The establishment, corroboration and interpretation is clearer looking at Timothy.
1Ti 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to TEACH, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

The issue/context here is TEACHING, not prophesy, not prayer, not singing, not even tongues.

Yes, Paul wrote them after a particular letter from them, but you cannot just jump from chapter 7 to chapter 14 to say that Paul was interacting with some invisible letter. Where else is that interaction inbetween? Do we just make up interactions as we feel like?
Where is this interaction in chapter 13 for instance or chapter 10? Who determines what is a question and what is an answer from Paul when the text doesn't say so?

1Co 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
1Co 14:35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

These are not any interaction but visibly and clearly commands. You may disagree with these commands as opinions or bigoted or sexist or not spiritual or whatever. But don't insult us by telling us that they are quotes from another letter. The pronouns are very clear and straight. If they are from another letter, they should read as follows or similar.
Let our women keep silence in our churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but [s]they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. [/s]

And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in our church.
These are clear commands and the next verses says so.
1Co 14:37 If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.

In other words, if you do not acknowledge that they are commandments of the Lord, you are either not a prophet or spiritual or not thinking well(according to verse 37). Twisting a straight forward command into a question that it is not is not acceptable. If you say you do not understand this part of the Bible or do not agree with this part, fine and better. But telling us that it is a question and answer session, you would do well to show more proof.

malvisguy212:
ok, I want to read your explanation,
did Paul really say woman are not to preach or say a word in the church?

deborah777:
Hi Combs i studied the 1st greek language five years ago in seminary
and i have not practized it much recently.
right now i can say only that in greek the words are very meaningful ie they can have different meanings.

malvisguy212:
I don't want to argue that why I ignore most of your first post.

malvisguy212:
400 years ago women are to stay home, the Jewish culture was dominated by men,
Women could not play a significant role in the synagogue.
Read this link and know more about women in ancient isreal
http://www.bible-history.com/court-of-women/women.html Paul was aware of there culture.

MuttleyLaff:
You better start thinking so now
and imbibe Romans 12:2, to be transformed by the renewing of your mind

We are now living in a rapidly changing what used to be an exclusive man's world
but thank you God, this man's world, wouldn't be nothing, it'll be nothing without a woman
so in essence, they cant and shouldnt have in the first place, nursed the idea of promoting sexism
or reinforce the status quo underhandedly, the manner this is or was done

Scholar8200:
I like the reference to Acts 18:24-26, it further accentuates my penultimate post.
A sexist translator will not mention Priscilla, yet her name is mentioned almost if not all times her husband's name was mentioned!

Scholar8200:
Also note that the context of the couple's activity was in their home,

Scholar8200:
not the assembly of believers.

malvisguy212:
Paul was aware of there culture about women and he respect it.
But in Corinthians the context was about the prophecy and toung.
Women can have this gift and when they do, they should not assume authority over the men.
That was the message in Corinthians

deborah777:
Thank you. . First KJV bible for me whom english is not mother language is bit complicated

with its ancient english.

But as i have learned first century greek in seminary some years ago i checked it out from greek
and for tongues is used glossa and for speaking kjv divers used genos and for intepretation hermeneia which is interesting

itself.and the phenomen of speaking in tongues is called in science i think glossalia.
It is not needed intepretation always.

Scholar8200:
Thanks for that.

Scholar8200:
Look forward to your responses, do keep them scriptural.

elveco:
The Church is the body of Christ. 1Cor. 1:2, Rom. 12-5-8

malvisguy212:
yes, believers don't practice religion but believer should be tolerance in other people culture

malvisguy212:
that was what Paul did

malvisguy212:
Paul was aware of there culture about women and he respect it.
But in Corinthians the context was about the prophecy and toung.
Women can have this gift and when they do, they should not assume authority over the men. That was the message in Corinthians.

malvisguy212:
I haven't read your explanation, I will do later.

elveco:
PLEASE BRETHREN FOLLOW THIS LINK AND PATIENTLY GO THROUGH THE ARTICLE,
I BELIEVE IT WILL BE HELPFUL. THANKS:
http://www.ntrf.org/articles/article_detail.php?PRKey=16

malvisguy212:
I read the link but not all, there are many points the writer of the blog missed, see, religion is like a CULTURE, religion cannot provide all the truth for you.

malvisguy212:
Paul is a very wise teacher. if you examine history, women were culturally not educated.

malvisguy212:
It was considered the domain of men.
Even in our Western societies, 100 years ago the role of women was to stay at home, raise the family and support the husband who worked. Things have drastically changed today.
Now Paul was thoroughly saturated with the culture of his day. He could not be.
Yet, he seems quite aware of it when he talks in the Corinthians and Timothy passage that you quoted, stating this as his personal beliefs and providing his own justification.