MuttleyLaff's Posts
Nairaland Forum › MuttleyLaff's Profile › MuttleyLaff's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 (of 441 pages)
johnw74:Forget weirdness, just answer the question, so we can move on johnw74:This coming from you, shows you come before me, you're miles ahead in not able to admit a wrong johnw74:Why does God, at times, kill? How does God, at times, kill? How did God kill Onan? johnw74:Show me which bible translations has not changed what is in the original text. No bible translation is verbatim, just admit you love your dairy so much, you prefer not to be weaned off it. johnw74:OK, you asked for it. The gloves come off. Lets do a bit of exegesis on "kill" in Gen 38:10 (i.e. a bit of what does it mean?) What is the Hebrew word used for "kill" in the original text? What does that word used for "kill" in the original text mean in Hebrew? |
Pr0ton:You set off on a wrong foot clutching straws, when you started with Leviticus 18:16 and 20:21. Now you've come up with this strawman rebuttal that God is wicked and cruel Bravo, encore! |
johnw74:So if not all times, are you saying, God at times DOESNT kill sinners What killed Adam in Eden? I guess by your logic, God did, isnt it? johnw74:It's funny you're trying to find refuge in Pro 30:6 It's even more hilarious that you dont realise that out of ulterior motives, hidden agenda, ignorance, lack of understanding Hebraic culture, lack of understanding Aramaic/Hebraic idioms, lack of understanding Aramaic/Hebraic way of speaking or manner of writing etc, a lot was added to the Bible by translators and transliterators The number one myth about Bible translation is that, it is a word-for-word translation. Words have been added to the Bible, all translated bibles to-date, either had words added or removed. This is for another post Like I did before, I'll refer you to another one of my earlier post, where I wrote "Please understand how people talk, especially in this case, the Aramaic/Hebraic manner of writing or talking" https://www.nairaland.com/2217256/87-christians-probably-dont-know/1#33821241 and https://www.nairaland.com/2217256/87-christians-probably-dont-know/1#33823773 where I wrote: That hebrew word, in Gen 38:10 translated to English, is the verb "to die" so God allowed Onan to die, as earlier all along implying |
johnw74:What if I did mention about God not killing? Is that justification for making up quotes I never said or made? Is that right for you to take liberties and put words I never said, into my mouth? johnw74:You brought in sinners and concocted up quotes for me Notice here, this is my 1st post on the thread: https://www.nairaland.com/2217256/87-christians-probably-dont-know/1#33752688 and this my 1st post responding to yours on the thread: https://www.nairaland.com/2217256/87-christians-probably-dont-know/1#33814638 I came in with my first post addressing Onan's motive, what he did not die of etc, then my other 1st post responding to yours was correcting your impression that God killed Onan instead of God permitted he die. You keep veering and drifting off the original post about God "killing" Onan for spilling on the ground and not impregnasting his brother's wife as per the Levirate law Now you say you're are talking about the sinner Onan but forget Proverbs 20:9: Who can say, "I have kept my heart pure; I am clean and without sin"? All have sinned and fallen short of God's glorious standard. Whether you are Jew or Gentile, sinner or non-sinner, we all at sometime, will die when God allows it. |
wordcat:My friend, again God doesnt kill People separate themselves from God by their sins and thereby sooner or later, have death and destruction descend upon them. They plant the wind and get caught in a whirlwind they harvest "The wages of sin is death", sin kills, not God, and God, like Jesus Christ, DOES NOT KILL. God is the source of life (For more details, refer to Genesis 2:7) johnw74:It means when God lifts or removes His divine forbearance, people are left to their devices and will have a brush with death, if not outright get killed. Those people killed themselves with sin, not God. Remember Galatians 6:7? It says: Don't be misled--you cannot mock the justice of God. You will always harvest what you plant. johnw74:God allows both the righteous and unrighteous or sinners to die (i.e. God lets both the righteous and unrighteous or sinners die) but why do you have to resort to underhand tactics brother? When and where on this thread did MuttleyLaff ever mention anything about God killing or not killing sinners? To shore yourself up, you just plucked that quote out of thin air and presented it, as written and posted by MuttleyLaff. SMH, na wa ooo. |
wordcat:Haba Chief, steady now, what's this fabrication "making Onan's mother childless" all about? Why are you neglecting the remaining sons? What of Shelah, Perez and Zerah, the other sons? wordcat:People die, at times from sheer foolhardiness Death is inevitable. It is unavoidable, to die is certain to happen to everyone. People kill, God doesnt kill. God doesnt cause the death, He allows or permits it. He allows people to die |
johnw74:What? Interesting. What has this got to do with me, how did correcting an impression lead to "You are not the only one here who doesn't believe some Bible verses" Explain yourself or come out of the closest, if you are admitting to be part of the ones, here, who don't believe some Bible verses johnw74:The bolded means therefore he allowed him to die (i.e. therefore he died) We humans kill and murder, God doesnt kill or murder but He allows people to die after getting killed or murdered by other people People die from diseases, people die of old age, people die in airplane crashes, people die of all sorts Randy people too, possibly like Onan, die, when permitted or allowed to. That hebrew word, in Gen 38:10 translated to English, is the verb "to die" so God allowed Onan to die, as earlier all along implying |
johnw74:They lived all the days, they were permitted to to live johnw74:How then do people die please? johnw74:What is "he didn't live out his full number of days"? How does "Jehovah cut them short"? How does Jehovah kill?. How did "Jehovah kill him"? |
johnw74:Please understand how people talk, especially in this case, the Aramaic/Hebraic manner of writing or talking. God forbid, but if anyone should happen to kick the bucket now, please be honest, regardless of how that one got put to death, who allowed or permitted that death to happen? You do know that Satan has the power of death (For details, refer to Hebrews 2:14, Job 2:6 etc) BUT, IT IS ONLY WHEN GOD PERMITS OR ALLOWS, that Satan is able to wield this power or in a lighter mood, it's only after that permit, that the Grim Reaper is allowed to show up and make a claim If God put His foot down, you think Onan could have given up the ghost. No! If not for God, we'll be dropping like flies, dead, right now It is God holding death at arms length and shielding us from it. He makes sure we dont go before our time. Bottom line, God does not, in the real sense, kill, and certainly, God, in Genesis 38:10, did not in the literal sense, kill Onan, my brother. |
johnw74:"Therefore He killed him also" means God permitted him to die. God allowed him to give up the ghost. In any case, sooner or later, Onan would have died, it's just a matter of time. We all, are going to die, we all die anyway, so dont see the big deal in Onan's death, especially when it was a case of, he died when his time was up johnw74:The following are the verses Deuteronomy 25:5-6 5If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger: her husband's brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife, and perform the duty of an husband's brother unto her. 6And it shall be, that the firstborn which she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother which is dead, that his name be not put out of Israel. johnw74:This is the Levirate law or Levirate marriage and it only applies, if the widow, is childless. If she isnt childless, this law does not apply and the brother-in-law has no business considering or thinking of seeing his sister-in-law's nãkedness johnw74:First-borns inherit DOUBLE PORTIONs of estate or lands as inheritance, now if Onan should provide the widow with a child, he, Onan by virtue and position of next in line after the death of the childless first-born, Er, his elder brother, will lose out in having the DOUBLE PORTION inheritance of the estate or land. Onan's long throat is why he didnt want a family for his dead brother. A family for his dead brother, will be getting in his way of having this DOUBLE PORTION inheritance of the estate or land Denying the widow justice with his plan and greediness to possess more than what he deserves is what he died from johnw74:Genesis 38:8-10 8Then Judah said to Onan, “Sleep with your brother’s wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to raise up offspring for your brother.” 9[size=20]But Onan knew that the child would not be his; so whenever he slept with his brother’s wife, he spilled his sęmęn on the ground to keep from providing offspring for his brother.[/size] 10What he did was wicked in the LORD’s sight; so the LORD put him to death also. Note the "WHENEVER", in the above verse, this implies he disobeyed God SEVERAL TIMES (i.e. more than one time), anyway his number or time was up. His time came up, hence he died, and passed away. |
Pr0ton:Ignoring the Levirate law or levirate marriage, you started with a T-shirt quoting Leviticus 18:16, then frog leaped to Leviticus 20:21, Now with your three rebuttals, we have you putting up a strawman and putting forward things that has noting to do with the original post, of which the original poster (i.e. Xcozee), about Genesis 38:8, in quotes, made this statement: "Don't think otherwise or be carried away! I was also surprised on seeing it! I don't think such can be in a new testament!" Genesis 38:8 Then Judah said to Onan, "Sleep with your brother's wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to raise up offspring for your brother." |
Pr0ton:Please DON'T misuse or distort this verse. Having sexual intercourse with your brother's wife as per being a widow, and in line with the Levirate Law or Levirate marriage, is different to having sexual intercourse with your brother's wife when your brother is still alive and kicking or living. The two are chalk and cheese, they arent the same bro. Time permitting, I later might or will revist to address your three rebuttals. |
MAYOWAAK:https://s12.postimg.org/gx0egt9i5/oyinbo.jpg |
anyiway: kevoh:https://www.nairaland.com/2314872/fake-miracles-reverend-father-modestus#33749512 Fake miracle. Pay attention to 2:20–2:30 minutes section of the video, you will notice a young man drop a black polythylene bag in front of the sick man from where two dead lizards popped out from - © manuch(m) |
Alwaystrue:cc Xcozee, wordcat, Pr0ton, anukulapo, mikesaj, DProDG johnydon22 is incorrigible on this matter Read his antics here https://www.nairaland.com/2292179/please-how-true-pic#33411536 Deuteronomy 25:5-6, is the Levirate law or Levirate marriage Something similar to this, in some areas in our moden age, is still practised, but the Levirate law had a purpose for those people at that time and a very improtant purpose at that era (ref: Deuteronomy 7:2-4, Jeremiah 16:2-3 God ordinarily has no qualms with withdrawals, in fact, Onan doing withdrawal method is acceptable with any other female but oh no, the withdrawal method IS NOT acceptable by Onan with this special and particular female especially not when she hasnt got a heir yet to inherit or claim the firstborn's (i.e. Onan's brother, Er is the firstborn) double portion of inheritance It is "Alwaystrue" that with no recourse, Onan could have passed on his responsibilty to another but for the benefit of all and for a full understanding of this situation, it should be noted that Onan if not for a selfish and hidden agenda ought not to reject the whole idea. Onan didnt mind part of the whole idea, we note, his focus and sole motive whilst enjoying some of the benefit of the idea, IS TO SHIRK RESPONSIBILTY of the whole idea and to repeatedly pull fast ones on the widow, his brother wife. What was Onan going to gain or benefit from denying this widow having a child or seed? What is going to be the impact of his act on the present and future welfare or quality of life of this widow? How many times did Onan do this? Was it once or several times, before God said "Right, this is enough, you're out" Onan didnt want to raise an offspring or child for his brother that will inherit the first born portion inheritance This is what in God's eyes is cruel and wicked If Onan's brother, Er is the firstborn, died because of wickness, Onan's act must have been of the same wickedness gravity to have to die off it. Lets be honest, imagine how many in the world, should have been dead or would be dead by now, especially at this time of posting, if Onan really died because of sheer masturbâtion |
B4113y:Believing or belief in God is a faith thing, a grace thing, and also a gift, free to all B4113y:Yes, God's love is agape, unconditional. His Son (incidentally who really is Him, God) died for us. His Son was set up and killed by men but not killed by God B4113y:Yes, it is a horrendous and horrible, but it is leading by example, a demonstration of selflessness, showing great concern for other people and little or no concern for yourself or for our sake, dying to self as it were B4113y:The Lord's Prayer has all the leads we ever need For example, the proper rendering from Aramaic of "Give us this day our daily bread" part of The Lord's Prayer is: "Give us this day our NEEDFUL TRUTH, NEEDFUL UNDERSTANDING from day to day" Also the proper rendering from Aramaic of "And lead us not into temptation," another part from The Lord's Prayer is: "And DO NOT LET US ENTER into temptation," or this Benjamin Franklin version: "Keep us out of trouble" All signposts needed for this journey on earth are in the Lord's Prayer B4113y:I can give becauses to no ends but will be content with because "starvation, thirst, slavery abuse and everything else on the list" comes with opening the pandora jar B4113y:because He has a bigger plan, remember He said: "Let the children come to me. Don't stop them! For the Kingdom of God belongs to those who are like these children. Also Paul wrote: But--to use the words of Scripture--we speak of things which eye has not seen nor ear heard, and which have never entered the heart of man: all that God has in readiness for them that love Him B4113y:If venting fury, will help, please vent shedloads but do not mistake that God has lost control or is out of control. God is very much in control of all things B4113y:Is God to be blamed for making Himself vulnerable? God's love can not be questioned or can not be doubted. Are parents' love ever questioned or ever doubted? I doubt, even when things didnt look that rosy, that you've for a second, ever doubted your Mum's love for you B4113y:The ground being cursed because of Adam is why we all suffer B4113y, you no doubt have a bone, a very big bone for that matter, you want to pick with God. This is allowed, as a lot seems to be bothering and bugging you but also learn to always look on the bright side of life, as this side of life, is extremely very small when compared with the other side of it and eternity God is just, fair and right so allay whatever fears, concerns etc you might have been harbouring |
Geegee145: musKeeto:Guess who said: "The Father loves me because I sacrifice my life so I may take it back again. No one can take my life from me. I sacrifice it voluntarily. For I have the authority to lay it down when I want to and also to take it up again. For this is what my Father has commanded." Guess who said "Eli Eli lama sabachthani" Guess what it really means? |
Orunto:Pass on that, dont want to grapple or wrestle with translation and transliteration decisions We all need God's blessings |
ifeness:The Jews did not steal any story from the Egyptians, they werent into Hollywood ending It is the other way round, Jesus is real, Horus is fraud ifeness:How? In what way? If you try, bet you can do better than this Misogynist2014:Very funny indeed, Wikipedia, the breeding ground for spreading and encouraging ignorance I wonder what other source apart from Wikipedia he will next spring up |
ifeness:I do know the Horus story is studded with half-truths, unbelievable distortions and downright falsehoods when claiming parallels with Jesus' ifeness:So I read you say Misogynist2014:You beat me to the draw. I was just about asking him of same. What is the primary source of this fantasy claim |
ifeness:Trap them, more like, if going back to basics and going by the meaning of prayer in Aramaic |
paxonel:Prayer in Aramaic means Trap The word, prayer or the verb, to pray, in the Aramaic tongue which Jesus taught with, means to "trap the presence of God, trap all the Goodness of God there is etc" and as a matter of fact, the Lord's Prayer, actually is a mini gospel as everything Jesus taught is in that prayer |
ALABIFAITHFUL77:Who Is The Owner Of That Fowl That Crow When Peter Betray Jesus? Good question, only that there was no fowl that crowed, so therefore, there is no owner, and consequently no name for the owner of an imaginary fowl. An2elect2:SMH. There are no stewpid questions, stewpid people dont ask questions People dont deliberately set out being stewpid when the question asked, is a cry to understand the Bible more. It is no stewpid question, neither is it an umimportant questions to ask. Asking important questions dont come as good as this one In fact, asking important questions like these, changes teachings done in error and bursts wide open Christian fabrications We all know the New Testament was written 100-300 years after Jesus Christ died and it is important questions like these that makes one realise that there's quite a whole deal more in the Bible than meets the eyes also that a lot got lost in translations from Hebrew to Greek to English due to not being familiar with Jewish idioms, customs, Temple activities etc tpiadotcom:To learn something from knowing the name or anything about it? ![]() christofa1:Wow, anyway to start with Caiaphas was the high priest and not Ananais Back on track, on the contrary, Caiaphas didnt own a fowl, neither did his wife, nor did Ananais or Sapphira his wife, own fowls Orunto:Yes no, as no fowls were allowed in Jerusalem at that time, so no one owned fowls and so there aren't any names of owners of fowls in Jersualem then, to give you or the original poster. ALABIFAITHFUL77, dewstar, blessin30289 and Orunto, do not think that the most popular view about what the rooster is, is the truth because it actually is not. Without bogging you down or boring you with too much details, the rooster or fowl in the original Aramaic/Hebrew form is "gever", "geber", "gaver" or "gawra", this is mistranslated and in both Greek and English, ended up being tagged as our feathered friend, fowl or cóck-a-doodle-doo Mr rooster Anyway, from here on, I am sticking to using only "gever" for the rest of the post. Now, "gever" is man. "Gever" means man and you wont be far from the truth if you assume this man to be like a town crier, but there is more to it, as he actually is like the Muslims' muezzin, the man who from the mosque's tower, announces the time for prayers and the call to Muslims for prayer and worship services The "gever" as a matter of fact, as opposed to being a "town crier" or "Muslims' muezzin" actually is the Temple Crier In the temple courtyard, just like the "Muslims' muezzin" does, the Temple Crier's priestly duty is to call out to begin service and he would announce or call out something, similar to the following effect: "Rise up, all the priests, to your service, prepare to sacrifice!" "All the Levites to your stations!" "All the Israelites to your posts, come to worship!" It was this priest’s call to service, made in the or from the temple courtyard and not far from the kangaroo court where Jesus Christ was being interrogated, that was heard by Peter and not the sound of a crowing fowl missKiffy, Jesus, in effect prophesied that before the "gever" (i.e. the Temple Crier) makes the announcement (i.e. phóneó - to call out) for service, Peter would have denied him three times and as we all know, this prophecy came to pass, just as prophesied, it got fulfilled to a tee. Imagine. Trust we all would agree, how heart wrenching and painfully torn between the conscience, it would be for one, if immediately after denying Jesus, one heard this call to prepare to sacrifice, call to service and called to be at a post which one has three times denied and vacated. Matthew 26:75 Suddenly, Jesus' words flashed through Peter's mind: "Before the And he went away, weeping bitterly. |
Redlyn: UyiIredia:Some just like refusing to stay "down" after getting knocked to the canvas by ihedinobi2's thread-killer post They have been told it is a pointless question, just like ihedinobi2 earlier hinted IMHOit is a pointless question that has no answer, as this exercise for God, thought up by the original poster is a never-ending one called the "Sisyphean Task" You will find that almighty God will create a task that's so huge even he can't move or do but when it comes to moving/doing it, He moves/does it. So almighty God will create a task that's so huger than the earlier one even he can't move or do all over again but when it comes to moving/doing it, He moves/does it, again The cycle or repetition, goes on, constantly repeating over and over again, indefinitely as in on to infinity Soon realise this is a never ending task and you wont get an answer to your question because it is an unending and futile task asked off God by OP The question of God creating something He cant move, is unnecessary, as there is no outcome capable of producing any useful answer or response the OP anticipates One wonders if DProDG and his tag team friend Redlyn can explain what they find paradoxical in the question which asks: Can almighty God create a task that's so huge even he can't do? The question, without resorting to preemptive tactics, simply, demanded a binary answer |
deborah777:If the shoe was on the other foot, would you do? |
deborah777:Moses had his wife Zipporah, sent back to Jethro, his father in law, so I dont think its something new or weird. deborah777:You'll be waiting a long time as that is not going to happen |
johnydon22:In this particular case, yes it is ![]() It however is more of an expected duty or responsibility, and nothing really to do with force, the repercussion of not rising to the task can be fatal, this, Onan soon, though late, found out. johnydon22:Yes I have heard of withdrawal method and used it severally, Onan doing withdrawal method is acceptable with any other female but oh no, the withdrawal method IS NOT acceptable by Onan with this special and particular female especially not when she hasnt got a heir yet to inherit or claim the firstborn's (i.e. Onan's brother, Er is the firstborn) double portion of inheritance johnydon22:You really are doing an excellent job fending off any understanding as to why Onan didnt want to willingly pour Watching your antics and reading all your posts, the joke is on you my friend. ROTBL... ![]() |
johnydon22:OK. Why didnt he pour inside Remember you forming at Ugojames or loomer with "dont you have a bible at home" https://www.nairaland.com/2292179/please-how-true-pic#33387661 |
johnydon22:Of course, you have been yapping, but you actually have been yapping like a puppy, up the wrong tree johnydon22:Sorry the temptation to say "Welcome Johny-Come-Lately" at this point, is too strong to resist How you can read from the onset https://www.nairaland.com/2292179/please-how-true-pic#33404282 and still need corraling to the facts and truths beats me johnydon22:Bet you would have nothing more to say now please dont forget your Chance card, "ADVANCE TO GO. COLLECT $200" johnydon22:I didnt have to, the point, fact and truth were made from the onset buddy Before you started making a meal of this thread and trying to complicate it, the point was already made at: https://www.nairaland.com/2292179/please-how-true-pic#33404282 johnydon22:... just an answer to that. It's you who made a meal out of it... you tried making a simple event overly complicated ROTBL ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 (of 441 pages)





