MuttleyLaff's Posts
Nairaland Forum › MuttleyLaff's Profile › MuttleyLaff's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 (of 441 pages)
Jeromejnr:A little bird told me, she was once influenced by DCLM Re-phrasing, question to Madam now, would be, who is your teacher? |
An2elect2:What I have in my hands and holding tightly on to, are, truth and theology. Both, even if they are piping hot, I dont see myself dropping them If and when am doing opinions/beliefs/ideologies, I'll warn you in advance about it An2elect2:What I think is: "Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed" I also think the below first, second and third. First, you, should practice what you preach. Second, are you handling the truth well. Third, you really need to notice what my signature says An2elect2:Aw, an incognito proofreader Well, I will so much be indebted to you if you will kindly oblige outline out "the contradictions here and there and of course the personal opinion" I am also particularly interested you revealing what it was I have been taught and who the teacher is or was An2elect2:I referred you to Matthew 25:31–46 as when it was suitable or proper in the circumstances, to cite bible passages, didn't I? Be careful what you wish for... but never mind, as now that I know you're a glutton for bible passages, I promise, trust me, I'll take advantage of the next window of opportunity, cite bible passages and feed you a great deal of them to gorge on An2elect2:No, you, thank you. ![]() |
An2elect2:Yes and those ones, the sin of unbelief/acceptance/rejection too Christ died for us missing the mark, which essentially is what sin is. It however does belittle the fact and truth that some will inherit the Kingdom and some inherit eternal damnation. If one resigns to the truth that God is good, right-minded, honest, trustworthy, fair and just, then these things are easy to take in and understand fully. |
An2elect2:Yes everybody's sin was paid for God is omniscient, having complete awareness, unlimited knowledge or understanding and perceiving all things He knows the end from the beginning, as so in relation to "sovereign election", He knows who the beneficiaries of salvation will be. God knows those given the parachute who will stubbornly not pull the string after jumping off the plane Salvation is not forcibly given or offered against will Some of the realities of life are that people get things paid in full for them, that sometimes dont get picked up and so gets returned back to the depot unclaimed Let's digress for a moment, to briefly delve in deep waters a bit. Sin is a symptom, a malaise of some sort, it needs to rear its ugly head, allowed to bring out or do its worst and run its full course When it is allowed to develop and to finish naturally, then as promised, sin will be no more An2elect2:He went go through all of those for mankind No, it isnt necessarily a failed redemption The multitude that flood sheol and later transiting to the lake of fire, unfortunately are the irredeemables An2elect2:It is a bit more complex than that but trust God, salvageable souls will be saved An2elect2:Yes, saw the sheep. No everybody is not his sheep. Those that are not, are goats Refer to Matthew 25:31–46 for more on the Sheep and the Goats |
Yadoctora:https://s29.postimg.org/icv0ipyqv/chop.jpg [size=20pt]The Lion of Bourdillon sitting on the throne![/size] He actually correctly is the Jagaban Borgu of Borgu Kingdom It is a chieftaincy title bestowed on the former senator by His Royal Highness, Alhaji Haliru Dantoro III, the Emir of Borgu (New Bussa, Niger State) The friendship between Tinubu and the Emir dated back to the years they were both Senators in the ‘90s The Emir was crowned in 2002, after which in 2003 he bestowed Tinubu with the title where he turbaned Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu, then a Lagos State governor, as Jagaban Borgu. I think it means fearless and last man standing |
aresa:https://s29.postimg.org/icv0ipyqv/chop.jpg [size=20pt]The Lion of Bourdillon sitting on the throne![/size] |
johnydon22: Macelliot: johnydon22: johnydon22:On this thread, you started the "dumbass" name calling with Macelliot and that is "very childish" Hiswordxray:Guess the poster is a troll who without making senses, constantly and ignorantly posts on christian religion threads Ignorant about the fruit eaten, not being an apple Ignorant about the serpent, before the curse, not being a snake Ignorant about sin, as a heredity or inherited trait Ignorant about judgement passing and sentencing to the lake of fire So conceited to the extent of blantantly displaying an outright ignorant of the misapprehension of what hell is or what it really is about Ignorant of the origin of the word hell, its historical development and the way in which its original meanings over time has changed. |
Afrobaseyemi:It is clear and without doubt, very true that Jesus died for mankind's sins Afrobaseyemi:Why are you finding it difficult that somebody could die for your sins? What particularly is hard to believe in that? Afrobaseyemi:Some convincing answers will be, dont be surprised that God is love and fight the truth that God shows His love by lavishing it on undeserving people, who are, in rebellion or against Him God publicly demonstrates his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us This is real love - not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent his Son as a sacrifice to take away our sins |
silverprince413:Will say: Curiosity, as you may recall, killed the cat! Next time dont allow the serpent ask you no questions and so not to tell you no lies. PastorOluT:To fill in his idle time gap with some struck up controversies I guess |
Gombs:Yes, how you are trying to wriggle out of the Cross of being a symbol of Christianity Gombs:Just concentrate on the posts or postings and not the posters whoever you are paranoid over Gombs:Like stop playing detective for a start |
Joagbaje:[img]http://i./O5NyCibf93upy.gif[/img] Hilarious Hope you are comfortable lying like a persia rug |
Gombs:Keep on consoling yourself falsely Paul and us arent talking about the murder "stoning to death" weapon but rather where the "crime" or act as it were was carried out - at the cross, cruficfied Told you earlier, you are smart, should work it out yourself Gombs, you easily can do that on your own without assistance Gombs:We are doing detective too, a man of many talents |
Gombs:If trying to be insolent, try make me. Gombs:There you go again, calling apples oranges Murder scene is different to murder weapon What else was the cross or Calvary also called Golgotha, if not a murder or crime scene, think. Jesus was not a criminal, even Pontius Pilate on record, called to the attention of all in attendance that Jesus is an innocent man Jesus was sentenced to death on trumped-up charges, He was made to look guilty and so legally but ironically illegally killed He was killed technically Jesus had to die for us but obviously he wouldnt kill himself or commit suicide, the only legal avenue for Him to die is getting put to death on trumped-up charges He was "murdered", even the people that set Him up in Matthew 27:25 agreed to have His blood upon theirs and their children head Matthew 27:25: And all the people yelled back, "We will take responsibility for his death--we and our children!" Gombs:As said earlier said Jesus was not a criminal, even Pontius Pilate on record, before commanding and sentencing Jesus to death called to the attention of all in attendance that Jesus is an innocent man on trumped-up charges Jesus was made to look guilty and so legally but ironically, illegally killed Gombs:This is absolutely true Gombs, as no one can kill God God is unkillable unless He wants to play ball and the game Whether either I am right and Jesus was exaggerating, or I am sorely wrong is the beauty of a paradox Gombs:If it was easy to be congruent with me on that one, why kicking against other truths and facts, cant you see it makes you out looking fanatical or cultic Gombs:Dont know why you are trying so hard to extricate yourself from the fact and truth that Him dying on the cross bridged the gap between us and God Without the death, resurrection wouldnt take place or happen Gombs:Well said, and I guess, here is a good place for me to slip in and quote John 12:24 We are almost saying the same thing, but notice, according to John 12:24, it's the death and not resurrection that kick started production of many seeds or parrotting you "a lot more Jesuses" John 12:24 Very truly I tell you, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds. Gombs:Can understand and see where you are coming from. All the 3 paragraphs above are all true, good and well, BUT, it still doesnt remove the fact that His death on the cross is seen as a message and symbol of Christianity Gombs:Thrilled to read you posting it this way but will be referring you back above to John 12:24 Gombs:If "the cross is not a symbol of Christianity" then Paul wouldnt be harping about "to know nothing except Jesus the Messiah, and him CRUCIFIED." Gombs, that "CRUCIFIED" or crucifixion happened on a cross Paul was so particularly and obsessed with the cross, where Jesus the Messiah, was crucified and died. Though all well and good but not the grave when He resurrected Gombs:You are smart, work it out yourself Gombs, you easily can do that on your own without assistance Gombs:You are falling rapidly off my hand asking no-brainer questions like these. Both brought Justification before God Gombs The two, death or ressurection, are like heads and tails of a legal tender coin, they are inextricable Gombs:Post something about Roman history and their method of carrying out death penalties that we dont already know about Gombs:Whatever the prevailing official or state method of carrying out of capital punishment or the death penalty would have been the symbol of Christianity Stop going on a rabbit trail Gombs, Jesus was prophesied to die for our sins on a cross, crucified, and so he died on a cross as prophesied |
Joagbaje:I have never read anything so "confused.com" anywhere else like these It is like saying an evil person cannot commit evil because such is already evil personified or a career criminal is not committing a crime or cannot commit a crime because such is crime personified. |
Joagbaje:As usual going to great and calculated lengths to distort Just imagine, as if like it was God that first or anywhere else called believers Christians If going by Acts 11:26, ALL have or are committing grade A sin then because God afterall, hasnt or had no where called "Gods people a name" like calling them Christians Acts 11:26 When he found him, he brought him back to Antioch. Both of them stayed there with the church for a full year, teaching large crowds of people. (It was at Antioch that the believers were first called Christians.) |
trustman: Gombs:https://s2.postimg.org/gqslqiubp/m_laugh.gif If it's trying corner or to pin Gombs down, he's almost impossible to catch because he will be slippery as an eel and wriggle out of grasps How typical mixing up crime scenes e.g. the cross, with murder weapons e.g. spear, pistol or dagger, Mind you Gombs, a pistol or dagger is a killing tool, in order words both are murder weapons The cross is a crime scene, call it a "crime room" if you like, a place where a murder took place. Jesus was CRUCIFIED, "killed" on a cross at Calvary or Golgotha The cross was where Jesus Christ was CRUCIFIED The cross served to bridge the gap that was between mankind, us and the Father. The cross was where Jesus took our punishment on Himself The cross was where the reconciliation of God and mankind through Jesus Christ was done. If Gombs is asking "Can you show me where in the scriptures it was remotely suggested that the sign of the cross is a major symbol of Christianity" then 1 Corinthians 2:1-2 is suffice, as verse 2 provides a clear evidence that the cross serves as a major catalyst and symbol of Christianity 1When I came to you, brothers, I didn't come and tell you about God's secret with rhetorical language or wisdom 2For while I was with you I resolved to know nothing except Jesus the Messiah, and him crucified. |
Didnt realise he will be wearing and easily putting on a male chauvinist hat Rather he say, "I dont honestly know why" instead of the weasel out and patronizing reply of "Why? You ask God when you find him. Ask God when you find him" |
victorels: victorels:https://s21.postimg.org/nlgudo43b/s_in.jpg |
JustCare:Bet he wont be as bodacious as that next time We are merely having a natter not a last minute discussion to change their mindset True agreed that anyone affected by the incident would have been mis-swayed by the incident Not banking on any administration but itching to see how Lagos will turn out if it is not an opposition state. It is risker voting Lagos in as an opposition state. JK even attests this to be true and subscribes against it been an opposition state |
udatso: bingbagbo:Hebrews 1:3 The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven |
JustCare:Not been "partisan" here but I dont blame the Oba He noticed the "omens", and jokingly said something about it, obviously to stop it or put a check it on, the Ezes present in the meeting laughed it off, among other things, knowing that in this day and age, no one in the 21st century can perish in the Lagoon, in the manner the Oba was trying to scare or put fear on some What actually happened at Akiolu’s palace; why we clapped, laughed – Igbo leader reveals the untold www.newspunch.org/what-actually-happened-at-akiolus-palace-why-we-clapped-laughed-igbo-leader-reveals-the-untold/ Cant bear waiting any longer, the next 48 hours I mean, to see how Sat for Lagos is going to pan out Particurlarly for Lagos, it'll be interesting to see how "things will sought itself out" Be interesting to watch, IF Lagos doesnt break rank, then whether the fed/center will redeem itself for stopping the metro line project, which Fashola tried to bring back on Be interesting to watch, if all those federal roads, like Murtala Muhammed International Airport (MMIA) Airport road, Tin Can Port road, Creek road etc will get or be getting the prompt and regular attentions they need |
JustCare:Brought Lagos into contention here because of some that out of spite want to vote and make its status unchanged as in remain in opposition. Though Oba of Lagos jokingly said what he said, I do as those present at the meeting too understood why and where he was coming from. He didn't want anyone putting sand-sand in the oil JustCare:You're right as God had already passed over control to man, when he was let them have dominion. Which is why it'll be interesting to know how serious Lagos really wants to deliver itself now that the centre/federal is in the bag. |
JustCare:It will be interesting to see, come Sat/Sun how much Lagos yearns for the way forward Bottom line, God's will be done |
ydass: ebonflex: ebonflex:https://s4.postimg.org/afae3q1s9/Ken_Outrage.jpg ebonflex: ydass:https://s29.postimg.org/tvyro3uzn/Question_Mark.jpg ebonflex:https://s28.postimg.org/rddkuci4d/tat.jpg |
JustCare:Seems we are on the same page then, me no discuss politics too. Don't like to. Not in any category above, only putting the records straight as per GEJ on that "The Economist" magazine cover. Their prediction, and how they realised they've goofed to the extent of making a turnaround in a subsequent article People don't seem to notice the raised hand of a smiling GEJ on the cover, cryptically alluding he was re-sworn in ![]() |
JustCare:Beg your pardon, forerunners of which information are you insinuating here my guy. All done so far, is pointing out the anomalies and misleading analysis done here on this thread or the other on that "The Economist" cover as regards GEJ and the 2015 election outcome. We Nigerians, I included too, know what really went down or how it went down here. As said before, am not prepared to take panadull for the "The Economist" magazine's Maybe I missed what you said or wrote about the mentality of the voting Nigerians masses, care to repeat it here again. Did I detect a bit of sarcasm in the last sentence? ![]() |
JustCare:If no feelers indeed. Why did the presidency get jittery after that "The Economist"damning article? When saying feelers, it means here inciting the electorate with biased articles not favouring the incumbent or sitting president. No doubt the Nigerian electorate voted out GEJ. We are saying or have said the same thing, meanwhile the fact remains that "The Economist" made predictions for the year 2015 on their magazine cover, realised they have miscalculated as regards GEJ been re-sworn back in to power in 2015. No doubt the catalyst was the much desired change that swayed Nigerians The point is the "The Economist" was flexing muscles playing the prophet. Prophecy is not beans and this proved to be true as they got it wrong on that cover. This they soon realised which is why they jumped ship and let GEJ hung out high and dry |
JustCare:Good that you went through all JustCare:I didnt suggest any of the above changed minds but showed how the "The Economist" flexed and exercised their predictive power only to chicken out of it abandoning GEJ and sent out feelers to Naija, which to some degrees would have something to do with some naijas making up their minds The "The Economist" have sold their copies so enough of this taking panadull for another man's headache JustCare:Though it's inconsequential whether am in Nigeria or not, what are you getting at with "hope you're in Nigeria" Are you trying to insinuate something or tell me something like stolen election, rigging etc with that last sentence? |
JustCare:Another poster said that, I didnt toe that line, eaz said so, not me https://www.nairaland.com/2124687/world-powers-decided-nigerian-elections/2#32317433 JustCare:Read or follow the whole of this thread painstakingly to be familiar with the train of posts on the thread and also the other "The World Powers Have Decided The Nigerian Elections Winner. It Is Not GEJ." thread. I am only pointing out that The Economist magazine cover PREDICTED GEJ won the election, and so commisioned Matt Herring to cryptically draw in a SMILING BEING GEJ RE-SWORN IN on that edition cover only for them to baulk out, stabbed GEJ in back with a subsequent damning article and did a turnabout endorsing & rooting for Buhari They didnt have to actually come down here and vote out GEJ, the closing sentence of that article was effective enough to nail the coffin for GEJ http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21642168-former-dictator-better-choice-failed-president-least-awful http://www.sugardaily.ng/i-dont-need-your-support-%E2%80%A2-pres-jonathan-lashes-out-at-economist-magazine-for-supporting-buhari/ |
AbuMikey:[quote author=cecegorz- RESPONSE-TO- sukkot's-thread post=32375746]You lack common sense my friend. Even if you would have been believed, your stupid logic of not seeing the body of the people behind is so pedestrian. Have you ever seen a group picture where the bodies of people behind the front row is visible? Besides all the guys in front are leaders of the top world economies, and whatever happens in their countries will continue to make news whether your Illuminati nonsense likes it or not. The economist is a magazine that analyzes world economic indices on a weekly basis, so quit this your junk and amateur picture reading. The illustration is simply current affairs and expected flash points around the world in the course of the year[/quote]I think sukkot rubbished the thread with opinions and statements like the one below in quotes, and sounded like one who has read too many Marvel comic books as a teenager but cant seem to forget about them "the return of the ancient gods aka what some like to call nibiru aka the saints aka the prophets of old, and because of this a tenth planet to commemorate this return will be added to our solar system called planet X" Instead of pretending like he knew something about the "The Economist" magazine cover he should learn to use his bloated elementary knowledge of deciphering in a less cliche, less Black Jew Brotherhood and less marvel comic manner |
AbuMikey:Correction! The Latitude and Longitude coordinates 11.5 11.3 zeroes on Yobe By the way, Yobe is in Yobe State and not in Borno state!! https://s23.postimg.org/xgdlham17/yobe.jpg 11.5, 11.13 are coordinates which gives you Yobe, in North East Nigeria. Here are some interesting facts about Yobe for you: In 1983, when Chadian forces invaded Nigeria in the Borno State, Buhari used the forces under his command to chase them out of the country, crossing into Chadian territory in spite of an order given by President Shagari to withdraw.This 1983 Chadian military affair led to more than 100 victims and "prisoners of war". Until 1991 Borno State contained what is now Yobe State On 14 May 2013, President Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency in Yobe State along with neighboring Borno State and Adamawa State, due to the activities of the terrorist network Boko Haram. Abubakar Shekau, the leader of Boko Haram, was born in Shekau village of Yobe Fast forward, the Chadian forces alongside Nigeria are now assisting and fighting Boko Haram in Yobe Just as in the artwork on the Beatles' Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album cover sleeve, the writing is |
JustCare:What's to note? Fact is "The Economist" staged and instigated a "coup" as it were and set GEJ up, left him hanging out dry with that inciting article, abandoning him, after first celebrating him as re-sworn in and then suggesting to Nigerians vote for Buhari in same article, Another fact right there, is "The Economist" predicted a smiling Jonathan to be in their circle, working for them in 2015, and even hinted with the coordinates 11.5, 11.3 that Yobe where Boko Haram emanated from, needs to be dealt with but then come February "The Economist" jumped ship rooting for Buhari Refer to http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21642168-former-dictator-better-choice-failed-president-least-awful Jonathan was exasperated and replied with "I don’t need your support, Jonathan tells Economist magazine" The point is that the "The Economist" predicted that a smiling Goodluck Jonathan, the winner of the election, as re-sworn in on the "The Economist" cover, but chickened out of the prediction at the last hour. The Economist's turnabout and rooting for Buhari was an afterthought It dawned and became clear to them that Jonathan is "pouring sand, sand in the oil they are carrying", so on Feb 7th 2015, "The Economist" back stabbed him, left the knife dug in with that "A former dictator is a better choice than a failed president on... Goodbye Jonathan" article even after initially endorsing him Inspite of earlier warnings to him, like in: http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21601839-incompetence-nigerias-president-and-government-hurting-countrys, they still had faith in him been re-sworn in until the last hour, when they lost faith, jumped ship and came out boldly with: "We are relieved not to have a vote in this election. But were we offered one we would—with a heavy heart—choose Mr Buhari. Mr Jonathan risks presiding over Nigeria’s bloody fragmentation. If Mr Buhari can save Nigeria, history might even be kind to him" "http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21642168-former-dictator-better-choice-failed-president-least-awful |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 (of 441 pages)



bro

