₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,480 members, 8,517,759 topics. Date: Friday, 13 November 2026 at 12:58 AM

Toggle theme

MuttleyLaff's Posts

Nairaland Forum › MuttleyLaff's Profile › MuttleyLaff's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 (of 441 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: Finding It Difficult To Believe That Jesus Died For Me by MuttleyLaff: 7:00pm On Apr 13, 2015
Jeromejnr:
Madam abeg which church do you go to? I would love to know.

From what I read you totally confused the scriptures.

Even a scripture such as John 3:16 falsifies your claims. And not to mention others.
A little bird told me, she was once influenced by DCLM
Re-phrasing, question to Madam now, would be, who is your teacher?
Christianity Etc › Re: Finding It Difficult To Believe That Jesus Died For Me by MuttleyLaff:
An2elect2:
Okay.
But i think when it comes to the truth we should drop our opinions/beliefs/ideologies or whatever for the word of God.
What I have in my hands and holding tightly on to, are, truth and theology.
Both, even if they are piping hot, I dont see myself dropping them
If and when am doing opinions/beliefs/ideologies, I'll warn you in advance about it

An2elect2:
Don't you think so too? smiley
What I think is: "Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed"

I also think the below first, second and third.
First, you, should practice what you preach. Second, are you handling the truth well. Third, you really need to notice what my signature says

An2elect2:
I read through what you typed, and there are contradictions here and there and of course your personal opinion and what you've been taught.
Aw, an incognito proofreader
Well, I will so much be indebted to you if you will kindly oblige outline out "the contradictions here and there and of course the personal opinion"

I am also particularly interested you revealing what it was I have been taught and who the teacher is or was

An2elect2:
I'll prefer you cite bible passages ( rightly dividing the word) to back every point you raised to counter my post.
I referred you to Matthew 25:31–46 as when it was suitable or proper in the circumstances, to cite bible passages, didn't I?
Be careful what you wish for...
but never mind, as now that I know you're a glutton for bible passages,
I promise, trust me, I'll take advantage of the next window of opportunity, cite bible passages and feed you a great deal of them to gorge on

An2elect2:
Thank you. smiley
No, you, thank you. smiley
Christianity Etc › Re: Finding It Difficult To Believe That Jesus Died For Me by MuttleyLaff:
An2elect2:
at embolden good.
Including the sin of unbelief/acceptance/rejection. Christ died for this one too!
Yes and those ones, the sin of unbelief/acceptance/rejection too
Christ died for us missing the mark, which essentially is what sin is.
It however does belittle the fact and truth that some will inherit the Kingdom and some inherit eternal damnation.

If one resigns to the truth that God is good, right-minded, honest, trustworthy, fair and just, then these things are easy to take in and understand fully.
Christianity Etc › Re: Finding It Difficult To Believe That Jesus Died For Me by MuttleyLaff: 12:49am On Apr 13, 2015
An2elect2:
Okay. I get where you are coming from. But hold on are you seriously trying to convince me with just two verses that seem to agree with your view against the multitude of scriptures that teach particular redemption? LOL you no try o.

Well i must admit that this particular verse(2) had put me in a dilemma when i was still struggling with the teaching of limited atonement.

A glance at this verse(2) from a universal point of view will mean Christ died for all with no exception. However a look at this verse from the biblical perspective can only mean Christ died for all without distinction.

Before i explain what that means, it is important that we know that Christ died for ALL "our" sins including the sin of unbelief/acceptance of him as the saviour and Son of God.

1John 3:23 "And this is his commandment that we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ."

Sin is transgression of the law/commandment. This verse teaches that unbelief is a sin. If we do not obey this commandment we have sinned. Now was this sin included in the sins that Christ died for? yes. That is why salvation is of the LORD Jonah 2:9 It does not lie in our acceptance of God but in God's sovereign election.

Was everybody's sin atoned for?
If yes, everyman without exception must be saved for Christ has paid for their sins including the sin of "rejection of him" or unbelief but you will agree with me that that is not the case. Not everyone gets saved.
Yes everybody's sin was paid for
God is omniscient, having complete awareness, unlimited knowledge or understanding and perceiving all things
He knows the end from the beginning, as so in relation to "sovereign election", He knows who the beneficiaries of salvation will be.
God knows those given the parachute who will stubbornly not pull the string after jumping off the plane
Salvation is not forcibly given or offered against will
Some of the realities of life are that people get things paid in full for them, that sometimes dont get picked up and so gets returned back to the depot unclaimed

Let's digress for a moment, to briefly delve in deep waters a bit.
Sin is a symptom, a malaise of some sort, it needs to rear its ugly head, allowed to bring out or do its worst and run its full course
When it is allowed to develop and to finish naturally, then as promised, sin will be no more

An2elect2:
Isaiah 53:5" But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities, the chastisement of our peace was upon him and with his stripes we are healed."

Look at the latter part of vs 8" for he was cut out of the land of the living, for the transgression of my people was he stricken"

vs 12 " He shall see of the travail of his soul and shall be satisfied, by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many, for he shall bear their iniquities"

Who did Christ go through all these for? if everybody then it was a failed redemption and of no use to the multitude that flood hell.
He went go through all of those for mankind
No, it isnt necessarily a failed redemption
The multitude that flood sheol and later transiting to the lake of fire, unfortunately are the irredeemables

An2elect2:
If healing of the soul can only come through Christ's suffering and death as seen above and every man's redemption was obtained then every soul must be saved without a single one lost.
It is a bit more complex than that but trust God, salvageable souls will be saved

An2elect2:
John 10:11 "I am the good shepherd; the good shepherd giveth his life for his sheep"

His sheep. Did you see that? is everybody his sheep?

John 10:26 " But you believe not because you are not of my sheep, as i said unto you."
Yes, saw the sheep. No everybody is not his sheep.
Those that are not, are goats
Refer to Matthew 25:31–46 for more on the Sheep and the Goats
Politics › Re: Tinubu Celebrates With People At His Residence Over Apc’s Big Win (photos) by MuttleyLaff: 11:25pm On Apr 12, 2015
Yadoctora:
Tinubu is my man of the year.
But what does jagaban mean?
https://s29.postimg.org/icv0ipyqv/chop.jpg
[size=20pt]The Lion of Bourdillon
sitting on the throne
![/size]
He actually correctly is the Jagaban Borgu of Borgu Kingdom

It is a chieftaincy title bestowed on the former senator by His Royal Highness, Alhaji Haliru Dantoro III, the Emir of Borgu (New Bussa, Niger State)

The friendship between Tinubu and the Emir dated back to the years they were both Senators in the ‘90s
The Emir was crowned in 2002, after which in 2003 he bestowed Tinubu with the title where he turbaned Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu,
then a Lagos State governor, as Jagaban Borgu.

I think it means fearless and last man standing
Politics › Re: Tinubu Celebrates With People At His Residence Over Apc’s Big Win (photos) by MuttleyLaff:
aresa:
Tinubu in the background is priceless... grin

Sai BAT..
https://s29.postimg.org/icv0ipyqv/chop.jpg
[size=20pt]The Lion of Bourdillon
sitting on the throne
![/size]
Christianity Etc › Re: Finding It Difficult To Believe That Jesus Died For Me by MuttleyLaff: 10:15pm On Apr 12, 2015
johnydon22:
Op see it like this:
Yahweh condemn you even though u were not born yet because some mythical adam and his rib turned wif eve ate an apple because a talking snake told them to.

Then instead of just forgive them he didn't, he sent his son to be murdered and tortured sacrificed to him so he can forgive you a sin that you have not committed yet knowing that you were not born yet but will still throw you in hell if you do..
makes perfect sense smiley
Macelliot:
Why running up and down on a deadly mission....
Answer my question...
You can deny the existence of your Mom to prove your atheism.....
Fake atheist...
johnydon22:
another emotional yarn from a dumbass... Can you show me where their was a mistake from my post smiley
johnydon22:
What exactly is your problem? why the constant ad hominems without making sense...

Honestly you will make me to stop paying any mind to ur posts because you dont make sense just attack the person... Very childish..
On this thread, you started the "dumbass" name calling with Macelliot and that is "very childish"

Hiswordxray:
Yes that is what we want.
Stop responding to our post and leave religion section or stay and get converted
Guess the poster is a troll who without making senses, constantly and ignorantly posts on christian religion threads

Ignorant about the fruit eaten, not being an apple
Ignorant about the serpent, before the curse, not being a snake
Ignorant about sin, as a heredity or inherited trait
Ignorant about judgement passing and sentencing to the lake of fire
So conceited to the extent of blantantly displaying an outright ignorant of the misapprehension of what hell is or what it really is about
Ignorant of the origin of the word hell, its historical development and the way in which its original meanings over time has changed.
Christianity Etc › Re: Finding It Difficult To Believe That Jesus Died For Me by MuttleyLaff: 10:15pm On Apr 12, 2015
Afrobaseyemi:
How true is it that Jesus died for my sins?
It is clear and without doubt, very true that Jesus died for mankind's sins

Afrobaseyemi:
I'm a new convert, but right now I'm finding it difficult that somebody could die for my sins...hard to believe.
Why are you finding it difficult that somebody could die for your sins?
What particularly is hard to believe in that?

Afrobaseyemi:
You can be of help if you know of any convincing answers
Some convincing answers will be, dont be surprised that God is love
and fight the truth that God shows His love by lavishing it on undeserving people, who are, in rebellion or against Him

God publicly demonstrates his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us

This is real love - not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent his Son as a sacrifice to take away our sins
Christianity Etc › Re: If You See Adam And Eve Today by MuttleyLaff: 8:34pm On Apr 12, 2015
silverprince413:
If you see adam and eve today, what will you say or do to to them?
Will say:
Curiosity, as you may recall, killed the cat! Next time dont allow the serpent ask you no questions and so not to tell you no lies.

PastorOluT:
I am just thinking how the answers u received from this thread will be of benefit?
To fill in his idle time gap with some struck up controversies I guess
Christianity Etc › Re: The Christ Embassy Church Is A Cult by MuttleyLaff: 2:29pm On Apr 12, 2015
Gombs:
I'm glad viewers of this thread can make a good judgement of events here.
Yes, how you are trying to wriggle out of the Cross of being a symbol of Christianity

Gombs:
You never can tell... Just like how we busted WinsomeX aka Drummaboy.

Actually, one does not need special skills to know these. I've been discussing with some folks here for like 4 years, day in, day out. It is normal for me to detect a red flag in communication. If you guys would love changing moniker, no problem with me... Your messages don't change, nor write pattern.

If you are him, fine, if not fine...its not my problem. I just stated the obvious.
Just concentrate on the posts or postings and not the posters whoever you are paranoid over

Gombs:
Can we stop derailing now?
Like stop playing detective for a start
Christianity Etc › Re: The Christ Embassy Church Is A Cult by MuttleyLaff: 1:38pm On Apr 12, 2015
Joagbaje:
That's your interpretation. If you want explanation "simply ask.com"
[img]http://i./O5NyCibf93upy.gif[/img]
Hilarious
Hope you are comfortable lying like a persia rug
Christianity Etc › Re: The Christ Embassy Church Is A Cult by MuttleyLaff: 1:37pm On Apr 12, 2015
Gombs:
Well this is a slam dunk in basket ball.
After long evasion, and hankey-pankey games, you still came to the point I have been asking about. For that, I thank you.

So, then, like I asked, if Jesus was stoned to death, what what have been the symbol of Christianity? Stones or ... grin

Hilarious.
Keep on consoling yourself falsely
Paul and us arent talking about the murder "stoning to death" weapon
but rather where the "crime" or act as it were was carried out - at the cross, cruficfied
Told you earlier, you are smart, should work it out yourself Gombs, you easily can do that on your own without assistance

Gombs:
Your writing pattern is same as Goshen's... Even the way he quotes scriptures.
I don't want to believe what I'm thinking o
We are doing detective too, a man of many talents
Christianity Etc › Re: The Christ Embassy Church Is A Cult by MuttleyLaff:
Gombs:
Hush son!
If trying to be insolent, try make me.

Gombs:
So, if a criminal is executed by electric chair, is that said to be murder?
So the cross is now a crime scene?...does executing a criminal via an electric chair makes the electric chair a 'murder weapon'?

Think son.. Think. undecided
There you go again, calling apples oranges
Murder scene is different to murder weapon

What else was the cross or Calvary also called Golgotha, if not a murder or crime scene, think.
Jesus was not a criminal, even Pontius Pilate on record, called to the attention of all in attendance that Jesus is an innocent man
Jesus was sentenced to death on trumped-up charges,
He was made to look guilty and so legally but ironically illegally killed
He was killed technically
Jesus had to die for us but obviously he wouldnt kill himself or commit suicide,
the only legal avenue for Him to die is getting put to death on trumped-up charges
He was "murdered", even the people that set Him up in Matthew 27:25 agreed to have His blood upon theirs and their children head

Matthew 27:25:
And all the people yelled back, "We will take responsibility for his death--we and our children!"


Gombs:
If I slam a hammer on guys head, would it be wrong to call the hammer a killing tool? i.e. a murder weapon?

Wrong. Jesus was a sacrifice. He gave Himself up. He commanded His death Himself.

The Cross was not a crime scene...
It was the sacrifice 'platform' Jesus had to endure, for the glory ahead of Him. Jesus was NOT murdered.
Jeez...study son! It's not illegal
As said earlier said Jesus was not a criminal, even Pontius Pilate on record, before commanding and sentencing Jesus to death
called to the attention of all in attendance that Jesus is an innocent man on trumped-up charges
Jesus was made to look guilty and so legally but ironically, illegally killed

Gombs:
John 10:8 New Living Translation
"No one can take my life from me. I sacrifice it voluntarily.
For I have the authority to lay it down when I want to and also to take it up again.
For this is what my Father has commanded."


It's either you're right and Jesus was exaggerating, or you're sorely wrong. I choose the latter.
This is absolutely true Gombs, as no one can kill God
God is unkillable unless He wants to play ball and the game

Whether either I am right and Jesus was exaggerating, or I am sorely wrong is the beauty of a paradox

Gombs:
Be ni
If it was easy to be congruent with me on that one, why kicking against other truths and facts, cant you see it makes you out looking fanatical or cultic

Gombs:
The cross was where Jesus paid the price for all mankind. But it didn't end there...
He resurrected, and hence became the first begotten from the dead, because so many others were coming after Him is me, you or any New creation. His resurrection was what brought forh Christianity.

Jesus' ressurection is Christianity, he died was wonderful, for it paid the price...
Dont know why you are trying so hard to extricate yourself from the fact and truth that Him dying on the cross bridged the gap between us and God
Without the death, resurrection wouldnt take place or happen

Gombs:
But even more glorious was His ressurection, He produced a lot more Jesuses
Well said, and I guess, here is a good place for me to slip in and quote John 12:24
We are almost saying the same thing, but notice, according to John 12:24, it's the death and not resurrection that kick started production of many seeds or parrotting you "a lot more Jesuses"

John 12:24
Very truly I tell you, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed.
But if it dies, it produces many seeds.

Gombs:
What about the ressurection?
Can understand and see where you are coming from.
All the 3 paragraphs above are all true, good and well, BUT, it still doesnt remove the fact that His death on the cross is seen as a message and symbol of Christianity

Gombs:
I am in no way against the cross, for if Jesus was not dead, there wouldn't have been a ressurection. My issue is, Christianity came by the ressurection, and not on the cross. If Jesus had not risen, there would not have been Christianity, for no other religion has this, the ressurection power Christ gave us.
Thrilled to read you posting it this way but will be referring you back above to John 12:24

Gombs:
The cross is not a symbol of Christianity.
If "the cross is not a symbol of Christianity" then Paul wouldnt be harping about "to know nothing except Jesus the Messiah, and him CRUCIFIED."
Gombs, that "CRUCIFIED" or crucifixion happened on a cross
Paul was so particularly and obsessed with the cross, where Jesus the Messiah, was crucified and died. Though all well and good but not the grave when He resurrected

Gombs:
What if Jesus was sentenced to death by hanging, and later, He did ressurect?
What would have been the symbol of Christianity? Ropes or trees?
You are smart, work it out yourself Gombs, you easily can do that on your own without assistance

Gombs:
What brought you Justification before God? His death or ressurection?
You are falling rapidly off my hand asking no-brainer questions like these.
Both brought Justification before God Gombs
The two, death or ressurection, are like heads and tails of a legal tender coin, they are inextricable

Gombs:
NB:Crucifixion was a method of execution to the Romans.
It was a disgraceful method of execution.
Post something about Roman history and their method of carrying out death penalties that we dont already know about

Gombs:
Jesus could have been beheaded, what then would have been your symbol of Christianity?
Whatever the prevailing official or state method of carrying out of capital punishment or the death penalty would have been the symbol of Christianity
Stop going on a rabbit trail Gombs, Jesus was prophesied to die for our sins on a cross, crucified, and so he died on a cross as prophesied
Christianity Etc › Re: The Christ Embassy Church Is A Cult by MuttleyLaff:
Joagbaje:
We never said if a christian does something wrong it's not a sin. So I'm amazed at how you came to that. Conclusion. What we believe which I have always posted on this forum is that an umbeliever cannot commit sin. He is sin personified
It's only a christian who can commit a sin. There is sin against the brethren and sin against God.
It's a Christian that can RECIEVE forgiveness.
But here you give impression as though we teach people to do wrong and it' won't be a sin.
I have never read anything so "confused.com" anywhere else like these
It is like saying an evil person cannot commit evil because such is already evil personified
or a career criminal is not committing a crime or cannot commit a crime because such is crime personified.
Christianity Etc › Re: The Christ Embassy Church Is A Cult by MuttleyLaff:
Joagbaje:
Your assumptions are wrong brother.
And it's a sin to call Gods people a name God hasn't called them
As usual going to great and calculated lengths to distort
Just imagine, as if like it was God that first or anywhere else called believers Christians
If going by Acts 11:26, ALL have or are committing grade A sin then
because God afterall, hasnt or had no where called "Gods people a name" like calling them Christians

Acts 11:26
When he found him, he brought him back to Antioch.
Both of them stayed there with the church for a full year, teaching large crowds of people.
(It was at Antioch that the believers were first called Christians.)
Christianity Etc › Re: The Christ Embassy Church Is A Cult by MuttleyLaff: 9:44am On Apr 12, 2015
trustman:
Having said that I'd like you to answer this question:
why has the sign of the cross been a major symbol in Christianity?
One more thing - which comes first, justification or being a new creation?
Gombs:
Really? Is it by pictorial signs? What of the purported picture of Christ?
Can you show me where in the scriptures it was remotely suggested that the sign of the cross is a major symbol of Christianity?
So, if Jesus was shot or stabbed or beheaded, a pistol or dagger will be a major symbol of Christianity?
Let's not derail...open a thread, I'd be glad to tutor you on this.
https://s2.postimg.org/gqslqiubp/m_laugh.gif
If it's trying corner or to pin Gombs down, he's almost impossible to catch because he will be slippery as an eel and wriggle out of grasps

How typical mixing up crime scenes e.g. the cross, with murder weapons e.g. spear, pistol or dagger,

Mind you Gombs, a pistol or dagger is a killing tool, in order words both are murder weapons
The cross is a crime scene, call it a "crime room" if you like, a place where a murder took place.
Jesus was CRUCIFIED, "killed" on a cross at Calvary or Golgotha

The cross was where Jesus Christ was CRUCIFIED

The cross served to bridge the gap that was between mankind, us and the Father.

The cross was where Jesus took our punishment on Himself

The cross was where the reconciliation of God and mankind through Jesus Christ was done.

If Gombs is asking "Can you show me where in the scriptures it was remotely suggested that the sign of the cross is a major symbol of Christianity"
then 1 Corinthians 2:1-2 is suffice, as verse 2 provides a clear evidence that the cross serves as a major catalyst and symbol of Christianity

1When I came to you, brothers, I didn't come and tell you about God's secret with rhetorical language or wisdom
2For while I was with you I resolved to know nothing except Jesus the Messiah, and him crucified.
Christianity Etc › Re: The Christ Embassy Church Is A Cult by MuttleyLaff: 9:52pm On Apr 10, 2015
Didnt realise he will be wearing and easily putting on a male chauvinist hat

Rather he say, "I dont honestly know why"
instead of the weasel out and patronizing reply of "Why? You ask God when you find him. Ask God when you find him"
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 9:28pm On Apr 10, 2015
victorels:
I saw this. Keeping watch still.
victorels:
On the right side of the picture, A military commander with hand gloves on should certainly mean buhari. The hand without a body with two fingers pointing upward should be th swaggerlicious vice president.
notice the terrorist behind the general.

that means those on the left where Goodluck is should be careful.
https://s21.postimg.org/nlgudo43b/s_in.jpg
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 9:27pm On Apr 10, 2015
JustCare:
That's their own business. you will agree with me that some issues are so sensitive and should not even be joked with... anyways that is already a past issue... every reasonable lagosian has decided, whether before or after the incident.
Our last minute discussion can't even change their mindset.
Anyone affected by the incident has already perceived it in any of the two directions.

Hopefully like I said earlier, it will be fine with we Lagosians if it turns out either ways.
FYI banking on any administration to deliver based on this party thingy might appear more like a gamble.

We can only vote and hope for the best.
Bet he wont be as bodacious as that next time

We are merely having a natter not a last minute discussion to change their mindset

True agreed that anyone affected by the incident would have been mis-swayed by the incident

Not banking on any administration but itching to see how Lagos will turn out if it is not an opposition state.
It is risker voting Lagos in as an opposition state.
JK even attests this to be true and subscribes against it been an opposition state
Christianity Etc › Re: Did Jesus Die for Our Sin? Which Sin? Ifeann Should Please Come In by MuttleyLaff: 12:13am On Apr 10, 2015
udatso:
bingbagbo went as far as saying jesus Christ is even the father in this thread
www.nairaland.com/2233993/undeniable-biblical-proof-jesus-same
bingbagbo:
greatest mystery ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hebrews 1:3
The Son is the radiance of God's glory
and the exact representation of his being,
sustaining all things by his powerful word.
After he had provided purification for sins,
he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff:
JustCare:
That's the Oba's business... things of this nature don't give me concern.
Issues of this nature revolves around the factors that I stated earlier.
They're omens that have come to stay until great steps are taken.

oh...I understand where you were heading for...
but I hope things will sought itself out if it gets to that partisan thingy
Not been "partisan" here but I dont blame the Oba
He noticed the "omens", and jokingly said something about it, obviously to stop it or put a check it on,
the Ezes present in the meeting laughed it off, among other things, knowing that in this day and age,
no one in the 21st century can perish in the Lagoon, in the manner the Oba was trying to scare or put fear on some

What actually happened at Akiolu’s palace; why we clapped, laughed – Igbo leader reveals the untold
www.newspunch.org/what-actually-happened-at-akiolus-palace-why-we-clapped-laughed-igbo-leader-reveals-the-untold/

Cant bear waiting any longer,
the next 48 hours I mean, to see how Sat for Lagos is going to pan out

Particurlarly for Lagos, it'll be interesting to see how "things will sought itself out"
Be interesting to watch, IF Lagos doesnt break rank, then whether the fed/center will redeem itself for stopping the metro line project, which Fashola tried to bring back on
Be interesting to watch, if all those federal roads, like Murtala Muhammed International Airport (MMIA) Airport road, Tin Can Port road, Creek road etc will get or be getting the prompt and regular attentions they need
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 9:03pm On Apr 08, 2015
JustCare:
Lagos is on state out of the whole. I'm talking of Nigeria as a whole. If Lagos gets better while other lag behind it won't be fine.
Brought Lagos into contention here because of some that out of spite want to vote and make its status unchanged as in remain in opposition.

Though Oba of Lagos jokingly said what he said, I do as those present at the meeting too understood why and where he was coming from.
He didn't want anyone putting sand-sand in the oil

JustCare:
We've got to deliver ourselves...God won't come down to do that.
You're right as God had already passed over control to man, when he was let them have dominion.

Which is why it'll be interesting to know how serious Lagos really wants to deliver itself now that the centre/federal is in the bag.
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 3:57am On Apr 08, 2015
JustCare:
Alright cheesy bro

But the issue that should be on ground now is the way forward.

And Yankees plans gotta fell them soon
It will be interesting to see, come Sat/Sun how much Lagos yearns for the way forward
Bottom line, God's will be done
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Meaning Of This Sign. by MuttleyLaff:
ydass:
Hello everyone, I hope I will be able find a perfect meaning to this signs.

A friend of mine gave me this cups with the signs on them.
I am aware she paid $200 for this sign to be inscribed on this cups
https://s17.postimg.org/omvxkycjv/mug.jpg
ebonflex:
Celtic cross (obviously old-religion occult)
and not sure of the one to the right, but simply looking at it makes me uneasy.

I feel like it may have something to do with "currency of death".
ebonflex:
Then discard them all.
Those sigils usually have more than meets the eye accompanying them.
You've had
"infiltration agents" in your home all this while.
https://s4.postimg.org/afae3q1s9/Ken_Outrage.jpg

ebonflex:
Who is this friend?
ydass:
She is a business partner who had shown romantic interest in me but turned her down.
I became suspicious of those signs when she asked me if would like to be a member of the freemason,
she drove me to place in philadelphia where they hold meetings but I refused to go into the building and asked her to take me home.
Since then I have gone back to check and realised all the gifts she had ever gave me have one sign or the other.
https://s29.postimg.org/tvyro3uzn/Question_Mark.jpg

ebonflex:
Seems like a lot of trouble to brand occultic signs on glass cups and give you.
Be careful. Ignorance is no excuse.
https://s28.postimg.org/rddkuci4d/tat.jpg
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 9:44am On Apr 07, 2015
JustCare:
Don't like discussing Nigerian politics anyway...it's a politics
characterised with primitiveness, poverty, tribalism and
illiteracy.

yes...the above is what I stated in a place i mentioned you here.

well, if you claim to be a Nigerian and that you really observed, I know you won't be anywhere in the above categories undecided
Sarcasm? Yes... was only doubting your identity
Seems we are on the same page then, me no discuss politics too. Don't like to.

Not in any category above, only putting the records straight as per GEJ on that "The Economist" magazine cover. Their prediction, and how they realised they've goofed to the extent of making a turnaround in a subsequent article

People don't seem to notice the raised hand of a smiling GEJ on the cover, cryptically alluding he was re-sworn in smiley
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 7:33am On Apr 07, 2015
JustCare:
maybe you were one of the forerunners of such information which its resultant effect was extremely negligible.

Like I said before... we Nigerians knows what happened and how it happened...it's our headache not necessarily yours.

so I still stand my ground on the things I said in my previous post pertaining to the mentality of the voting masses.

You're always welcomed as an observer, perhaps from a distance cool
Beg your pardon, forerunners of which information are you insinuating here my guy.

All done so far, is pointing out the anomalies and misleading analysis done here on this thread or the other on that "The Economist" cover as regards GEJ and the 2015 election outcome.

We Nigerians, I included too, know what really went down or how it went down here.

As said before, am not prepared to take panadull for the "The Economist" magazine's mistake headache.

Maybe I missed what you said or wrote about the mentality of the voting Nigerians masses, care to repeat it here again.

Did I detect a bit of sarcasm in the last sentence? wink
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 6:45am On Apr 07, 2015
JustCare:
Feelers indeed... it never happen bro.
The question of you being in Nigeria have actually made me to know that you were not any close to the election places.
Anyway, I'm not insinuating any rigging brouhaha, though that possibility can't be ruled out in Nigeria now... well, I won't over flog the issue.
The Nigerian people voted bro...and we know better how it went.
Don't like discussing Nigerian politics anyway...it's a politics characterised with primitiveness, poverty, tribalism and illiteracy.
#lovemycountrythough
If no feelers indeed. Why did the presidency get jittery after that "The Economist"damning article?
When saying feelers, it means here inciting the electorate with biased articles not favouring the incumbent or sitting president.

No doubt the Nigerian electorate voted out GEJ. We are saying or have said the same thing, meanwhile the fact remains that "The Economist" made predictions for the year 2015 on their magazine cover, realised they have miscalculated as regards GEJ been re-sworn back in to power in 2015.

No doubt the catalyst was the much desired change that swayed Nigerians

The point is the "The Economist" was flexing muscles playing the prophet. Prophecy is not beans and this proved to be true as they got it wrong on that cover. This they soon realised which is why they jumped ship and let GEJ hung out high and dry
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff:
JustCare:
Have gone through it
Good that you went through all

JustCare:
and can still say that the above never changed the mine of Nigerians few weeks to the election.
I didnt suggest any of the above changed minds
but showed how the "The Economist" flexed and exercised their predictive power only to chicken out of it abandoning GEJ
and sent out feelers to Naija, which to some degrees would have something to do with some naijas making up their minds

The "The Economist" have sold their copies so enough of this taking panadull for another man's headache

JustCare:
hope you're in Nigeria.
Though it's inconsequential whether am in Nigeria or not, what are you getting at with "hope you're in Nigeria"
Are you trying to insinuate something or tell me something like stolen election, rigging etc with that last sentence?
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 10:29pm On Apr 06, 2015
JustCare:
Jonathan was exasperated and replied with "I don’t need
your support, Jonathan tells Economist magazine"


according to you, the above statement nailed GEJ
Another poster said that, I didnt toe that line,
eaz said so, not me
https://www.nairaland.com/2124687/world-powers-decided-nigerian-elections/2#32317433

JustCare:
SO they actually came down here and voted out GEJ? huh
Read or follow the whole of this thread painstakingly to be familiar with the train of posts on the thread
and also the other "The World Powers Have Decided The Nigerian Elections Winner. It Is Not GEJ." thread.

I am only pointing out that The Economist magazine cover PREDICTED GEJ won the election,
and so commisioned Matt Herring to cryptically draw in a SMILING BEING GEJ RE-SWORN IN on that edition cover
only for them to baulk out, stabbed GEJ in back with a subsequent damning article and did a turnabout endorsing & rooting for Buhari

They didnt have to actually come down here and vote out GEJ,
the closing sentence of that article was effective enough to nail the coffin for GEJ
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21642168-former-dictator-better-choice-failed-president-least-awful
http://www.sugardaily.ng/i-dont-need-your-support-%E2%80%A2-pres-jonathan-lashes-out-at-economist-magazine-for-supporting-buhari/
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 8:57pm On Apr 06, 2015
AbuMikey:
Harsh, but its the truth!
There was not need doing a copy job from VigilantCitizen and pasting on Nairaland.
Sukkot's thread was enough!
[quote author=cecegorz- RESPONSE-TO- sukkot's-thread post=32375746]You lack common sense my friend.

Even if you would have been believed, your stupid logic of not seeing the body of the people behind is so pedestrian.
Have you ever seen a group picture where the bodies of people behind the front row is visible?
Besides all the guys in front are leaders of the top world economies, and whatever happens in their countries will continue to make news whether your Illuminati nonsense likes it or not.

The economist is a magazine that analyzes world economic indices on a weekly basis,
so quit this your junk and amateur picture reading
.
The illustration is simply current affairs and expected flash points around the world in the course of the year[/quote]I think sukkot rubbished the thread with opinions and statements like the one below in quotes,
and sounded like one who has read too many Marvel comic books as a teenager but cant seem to forget about them

"the return of the ancient gods aka what some like to call nibiru aka the saints aka the prophets of old,
and because of this a tenth planet to commemorate this return will be added to our solar system called planet X"

Instead of pretending like he knew something about the "The Economist" magazine cover
he should learn to use his bloated elementary knowledge of deciphering in a less cliche, less Black Jew Brotherhood and less marvel comic manner
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff:
AbuMikey:
Ok.

Those arrows You see, with 11.5 and 11.3 ascribed on it, points to somewhere in Nigeria, not just 'somewhere' in Nigeria, but Bornu state!!
Correction!
The Latitude and Longitude coordinates 11.5 11.3 zeroes on Yobe
By the way, Yobe is in Yobe State and not in Borno state!!

https://s23.postimg.org/xgdlham17/yobe.jpg
11.5, 11.13 are coordinates which gives you Yobe, in North East Nigeria.

Here are some interesting facts about Yobe for you:
In 1983, when Chadian forces invaded Nigeria in the Borno State, Buhari used the forces under his command to chase them out of the country, crossing into Chadian territory in spite of an order given by President Shagari to withdraw.This 1983 Chadian military affair led to more than 100 victims and "prisoners of war".

Until 1991 Borno State contained what is now Yobe State

On 14 May 2013, President Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency in Yobe State along with neighboring Borno State and Adamawa State, due to the activities of the terrorist network Boko Haram.

Abubakar Shekau, the leader of Boko Haram, was born in Shekau village of Yobe

Fast forward, the Chadian forces alongside Nigeria are now assisting and fighting Boko Haram in Yobe

Just as in the artwork on the Beatles' Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album cover sleeve, the writing is on the wall in that picture for Boko Haram positioned in 11.5,11.13 - Buhari the afterthought is back on the scene, after their magazine cover mis-prediction of Jonathan been re-sworn in
Politics › Re: The Economist 2015 Cover Is Filled With Cryptic Symbols And Dire Predictions by MuttleyLaff: 8:42pm On Apr 06, 2015
JustCare:
Neither the West nor the economist ousted GEJ. note
What's to note?

Fact is "The Economist" staged and instigated a "coup" as it were and set GEJ up, left him hanging out dry with that inciting article,
abandoning him, after first celebrating him as re-sworn in and then suggesting to Nigerians vote for Buhari in same article,

Another fact right there, is "The Economist" predicted a smiling Jonathan to be in their circle, working for them in 2015, and even hinted with the coordinates 11.5, 11.3 that Yobe where Boko Haram emanated from, needs to be dealt with
but then come February "The Economist" jumped ship rooting for Buhari
Refer to http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21642168-former-dictator-better-choice-failed-president-least-awful

Jonathan was exasperated and replied with "I don’t need your support, Jonathan tells Economist magazine"

The point is that the "The Economist" predicted that a smiling Goodluck Jonathan, the winner of the election, as re-sworn in on the "The Economist" cover, but chickened out of the prediction at the last hour.
The Economist's turnabout and rooting for Buhari was an afterthought



It dawned and became clear to them that Jonathan is "pouring sand, sand in the oil they are carrying",
so on Feb 7th 2015, "The Economist" back stabbed him, left the knife dug in with that "A former dictator is a better choice than a failed president on... Goodbye Jonathan" article even after initially endorsing him

Inspite of earlier warnings to him, like in:
http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21601839-incompetence-nigerias-president-and-government-hurting-countrys,
they still had faith in him been re-sworn in until the last hour, when they lost faith, jumped ship and came out boldly with:
"We are relieved not to have a vote in this election. But were we offered one we would—with a heavy heart—choose Mr Buhari. Mr Jonathan risks presiding over Nigeria’s bloody fragmentation. If Mr Buhari can save Nigeria, history might even be kind to him"
"http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21642168-former-dictator-better-choice-failed-president-least-awful

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 (of 441 pages)