Oahray's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Oahray's Profile › Oahray's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 (of 379 pages)
Superstory... |
anangboy:bros you go better school o. See as you dey blow grammar ![]() |
Number 1 ooooooooo! |
hahn:well we don't have to convert them to Africans to show we aren't abandoning ours. I don't believe culture has ever been set in stone anyway. It would always bend to external influence. The culture we know now wasn't the same as in the pre-colonization era. |
Has Deejavuu come to check if her crush(es) made the list? ![]() |
BoboYekini:hmmm... Thanking yourself for wooing yourself. ![]() |
Nasty22:lol. Don't be harsh na. It's somewhat entertaining. Can't wait to read comments from the flattered, the jealous, the fan, and the foe. ![]() |
UncleSnr:*sigh* you still couldn't get the simple difference even with the explanation. Ehya, lemme try again. Both posts do not explain the same thing. My first post focused on who a NAZARENE is, that the term has nothing to do with keeping hair (like you implied). The second post was a response to a question about NAZIRITES, that they were the ones who kept hair. Now Jesus wasn't a Nazirite but a Nazarene (from Nazareth), so the reason you gave for dreads in your 'bible-characters-must-be-black-to-give-Africans-some-worth' pic is an ignorant misconception at best. You don't have to admit anyway. Most adult humans suck at it. |
hahn:the persons who didn't cut their hair, drink alcohol or touch corpses, because they were persons set aside as dedicated to God. Samson was one such person, born into it. Some became Nazirites after taking vows. |
misspicy:if you, misspicy, don ever get 90 different 'toasters' in any month since dem born you, make my account deactivate itself before tomorrow ![]() |
UncleSnr:dude, Nazarene and Nazirite aren't the same. A Nazarene simply is from Nazareth (Jesus lived there since infancy). Has nothing to do with hair. You people should stop mixing them up. If you must mock the Bible, at least know what it says. |
I wonder why so many persons have a problem with simple expression. Your topic "What a husband needs from a wife is NEVER sex" (emphasis mine) means a husband WOULD NEVER need sex from his wife at any point. Is that what you meant? I think you should edit. |
Awww... Shugaryme cum and read o ![]() |
Lol. This thread jus get as e be, from op to fellow girls commenting. ![]() |
Flashh:There's nothing hypocritical about it. Personal stuff is personal. I think the real hypocrites are those who would still bash them for being loose, if the ladies choose to tell them what they want to hear. Look in the mirror. |
Segadem:dog? Hmmm... Where would you place chimps? |
menix:honesty is not the same as being smart. They aren't even synonyms. |
donholy28:bros speak for yourself o. |
Well...
1) No one loves unconditionally.
2) No tribe is made up entirely of perfectly identical persons. |
Lol. This isn't a debate, it's a game of likes. Of course no one would agree he/she is part of the inferior gender (if there's any such thing). |
What exactly does he benefit from you (that doesn't benefit you also)? At least you enjoy his food and drinks. |
Hahaha! I wish I was a rug. Ayaf died! ![]() |
LarrySun:em... It's more like I'd love to have the awesome privilege of writing with the best writers again. If you are kind enough to include me, I'll be honoured sir. |
Mynd44:see this my oga trying to pull my legs. Where toad wan see chair give visitor? |
Hmmm... ![]() |
Hmmm... I'd get to see Llaykorn write a prose collabo Larrysun kudos! |
Oliviaarims:Alright. If that is truly your point, then it's fine. It didn't come off as the main point though. Rape is wrong and paedophilia is nasty, but there's no way I'm going to join the selective condemnation of shared ills or the subtle demonization of the malefolk. We only get to hear what makes the news. |
MrsPhyno:smh... |
Ok, so besides generally tagging men incestuous paedophiles, what's your point? |
uncle005:lolz! Unitary track? Biko what does that even mean? ![]() |
Mindfulness:now he's trying to turn tables. Not going to work sir. You are the one who added women to the list of the 'discriminated against' on custody grounds. You are yet to justify your claim. It's not okay to throw the 'discrimination' word about just to appear sympathetic to femalefolk. Yeah, I think that most men are ok with the fact that after divorce the kids stay with the mother, aren't they?Hmmm... Dunno where to start from. You don't GRANT things to people who don't want them (infact they have to ask), and it takes two to battle for custody. It wouldn't be an issue if the man doesn't even want the kids with him in the first place. I'm not even going to talk about his paying for upkeep yet having to take permission to see the same kids. Funny you call it discrimination against women. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 (of 379 pages)





