₦airaland Forum

This car is neat!!!!!!

Can 1.35 fly this car, ?

I have a very clean Toyota 2004 with a clean title, I will update you with pictures when i get access to my laptop and subsequently drop my number if you are interested.

Please help me check

2T1BR32EX4C291806

Please help me check

2T1BR32EX4C291806

I also recieved E-mail to attend a knowledge assesment/skill test in Ibadan, Anyone with useful information should please share with the house

Ribadu is the best man for the Job,

I Will like GEJ supporter to tell us what he did with $36BILLION foreign reserve since he came to office. He now has 1BILLION DOLLERS left,

Someone should tell us why he promised that elctricity will be stable by august last year and the light in Lagos has become worse.

Why must a notorious thief like Ibori be brought back to Nigeria and Why must Alamesiah still parade himself around an 'umbiased' umpire of Nigeria

Why must he concentratre all his energy and waste Niegerian resources on campaign rather than continue working like Fashola is presently doing?


BLIND FOLLOWERS OF GEJ, Please list his acheivement.

Even the UN stated that all other AFRICAN nations should employ the same method being used by Nigerian government to fight curoption when Ribadu was the EFCC boss

wales:
The presidential candidate of the Action Congress of Nigeria, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, will on Monday (today) change his running mate for the April poll.



The Ribadu Campaign Organisation’s Director of Communication, Mallam Ibrahim Modibo, disclosed this in an interview with our correspondent in Abuja on Sunday. Ribadu had earlier submitted the name of United States-based Dr. Stanley Ugochukwu to the Independent National Independent Commission as his running mate.



Modibo said Ribadu had picked a former Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, Mr. Fola Adeola, as his running mate.



He said that Adeola’s name would be submitted to INEC today, which is the last day for the substitution or withdrawal of presidential candidates and their running mates.



Modibo said, “Mr. Adeola has been picked. I’m sure that his name will be submitted to INEC very early tomorrow (Monday).”



Adeola had in an interview with a national newspaper said Ribadu had contacted him. He stated that he would consult his family on whether to accept or reject the offer.



He said, “Ribadu has contacted me, saying he wants me to be his running mate. I have not given my word yet because I have to consult my family members, friends and associates before taking such a decision.



“I have up till tomorrow afternoon (Sunday) to pass whatever decision I have made to him.”


http://www.punchng.com/Articl.aspx?theartic=Art201102214221335

This make it clear that Ribadu has good intentions for this country, But Im afraid if this combination can create political wave in the country, anyway, my vote still go to Ribadu

Yes, Ibo girls are beatuful, But they have bad attitutde and they are mostly rude

I met her in a church while singin on the alter, na so I went to tell pastor, that Its been revealed to me that the girl singing is my wife, trust the sharp pastor who knew the sista has been looking fpor husband for the past 10 years, he said, the lady has been here to tell me the same about you, we been f**kin since then

mikeansy:
Even El-Rufai does not seem to believe in this Ribadu for President thing.

Ribadu is a great guy but just not a Presidential material.

How is he not a Presidential material? Was Obama a presidential material when he won US election?

DapoBear:
Well, let's see. I'm an AC man myself. If they choose him and present him properly, I'll support him. But like I said, I do not trust northerners at all. Why is he not contesting in the north to fix that region? It is like a man with a filthy home telling me he wants to clean up the entire neighborhood. Ribadu needs to clean up his home first before he tries to clean up all of Nigeria.

Dapobear, How do you want him to clean up North, Please expanciate,


He is the best choice at leat for nw

Gbawe:
Yes you are . Jonathan is far from "harmless". In fact , I consider him the most dangerous choice Nigerians can make . he is a total prevaricator who plays politics when he must lead. Pacifying criminals and recruiting the help of those who have ruined Nigeria is what Jonathan does best . Do you know that in Ogun State 9 lawmakers (doing the will of Gbenga Daniel) set a disgraceful and dangerous precedence for Nigeria by cowering 15 lawmakers to impeach the Speaker of the house who stood against the blatantly criminal 100 billion bond Gbenga Daniel wanted to float ? After the impeachment the 100 billion Naira bond was approved in less than 30 minutes by the new speaker Pure gangster politics that totally disgraces Nigeria as a Banana republic !!!!!

Should Jonathan not have acted decisively to put these gangsters in their place[b] before others think they can act similarly without repercussion?[/b] Is it not the notion that strong punishment never follows political criminality that has led us to where we are today? To make matters worse , in the middle of that crisis Gbenga Daniel is insensitively announced as the campaign coordinator of Jonathan in the SW region !!!!! What an affront to the people of Ogun State !!!!! It is the same in Oyo and Osun State. Oyinlola and Alao Akala now feel they can do what they wan't as they are 'untouchables" as per their support for GEJ.

GEJ is bad news for the SW region and the people of the region themselves know this . Jonathan is just enjoying some sentimental support as the 'underdog' being challenged by the "callous, born to rule" North. If we do away with emotions and ethnic sentiments it becomes obvious that there are candidates who are far better than Jonathan even if they are from the North. We should vote without sentiments by looking at the actions and conducts , past and present, of the respective candidates instead of focusing alone on the notion that Jonathan must win so that the North does not gain power. Thinking like that is dangerous for our nation.

You are the best gbawe, You have said my total mind, The only thing favoring GEJ is sentiment, Nigeriansss, We are the most sentimental country I have ever seen. No wonder we are the most religous and the best nation who know how to kill and steal in the name of God, I beleive we should look at what people have to offer and remove our mind from where they come from, I will not be suprised if GEJ perform woefully, He has said he is not promising Nigerian development, But he will try, He said this categorically in 1 of his campeign speech, He is not the right person for that seat. If southerners are bent on making the next president, People like donald Duke who ha svision for the coutry should be presented and not a chicken hearthed fellow like GEJ,

DapoBear:
It is really weird. I like Goodluck Jonathan over the alternatives. But I absolutely, positively hate the PDP and want to see it broken. The PDP is the biggest impediment to progress in Yorubaland, in my opinion. Yet for some reason, I like Goodluck. I guess in my mind I think that since he comes from a minority group, he cannot rock the boat too much. If it were a Hausaman or Fulani, I could never support him.

What is the common Yoruba sentiment on Jonathan? Am I out of touch here, thinking he is harmless and liking him?

You are the best gbawe, You have said my total mind, The only thing favoring GEJ is sentiment, Nigeriansss, We are the most sentimental country I have ever seen. No wonder we are the most religous and the best nation who know how to kill and steal in the name of God, I beleive we should look at what people have to offer and remove our mind from where they come from, I will not be suprised if GEJ perform woefully, He has said he is not promising Nigerian development, But he will try, He said this categorically in 1 of his campeign speech, He is not the right person for that seat. If southerners are bent on making the next president, People like donald Duke who ha svision for the coutry should be presented and not a chicken hearthed fellow like GEJ,

kulyie:
1-sex is not a treasured experience for most unmarried men.unmarid men value sex much less dan ladies do.2-if a man begs,cajoles,blackmail or coerces u 4 sex chances are dat he has done d same to oda ladies.3-most men who are sexually active still prefer a virgin wen dey want 2 get marid (even thouh dey disvirgined oda ladies dat dey dont have plans of getin marid to). 4- dat a man had sex with a lady doesnt mean he likes d lady or has any intention 2marry her lyk many ladies erroneously think.5-ladies neva try 2 make a man lyk u by buyin stufs 4 him (in a relationship) especially wen he doesnt reciprocate wen u know he can aford to.because chances are dat d more u spend,d more u loose out.ladies pls learn from d mens view so dat u dont make mistakes dat a lotta ladies make unknowingly ok!

1
1.Absolute truth
2.May be true but not absolut truth, there is 70% truth that that is wht he does to other girls
3.Lie, A man may be sexually active and does not mind geting maried to a non virgin, Virginity is a plesure you experience for a day, u have a life time experience to tresure more that virginity, Its ladies attitude and personalty that mater most
4.Yes, Neva buy gift for a man who does not reciprocate ur geture, There is 95 percent he is counting you to be a MUMU,

Truth be told, Ribadu is the best candiate amoung these men, Banbangida is out,GEJ is mesing up and he has no real grip on Nigerian, he seems weak, Lets give this Ribadu guy a chance, I believe he is more passionate about Nigeria that all of them, He may not be the best, But I beleive he has something upstairs to offer Nigerian youth and entire Nigerian nation

The major problem I have with citizen of this nation is the fact that we are too sentimental (No wonder we are the most religious nation in the World), Goodluck J has nothing to offer this country, He has emphasize in his speech in the past and during declaration that he is not promising Nigeria anything, sooo If he does not perform no one should crucify him, I believe its time we stop beliveing easily that things are divine, Some thing can appear divine but they are actually things that just came to be without Supreeme power behing them, Its time we all put our Destiny in our hands, Nigeria need a young Blood/Firm personalty/Democrat (Maybe a Nuhu Ribadu)/, TRUTH BE TOLD

Should Nigerians also put thier leaders under pressure, I think this is the best we can do, we should go from mere comments on the page of news paper to actual revolt, Enough is Enough, Our Fathers kept queit and here we are today, If we all keep quite our own children will still meet this messedup system and Poor infrastructural state, I saw this on BBC website and I was realy angry with our leader, wat do u all think, try to read tru,


How Indonesia overtook Nigeria By Peter Cunliffe-Jones

Focus on Africa Magazine
A fear of popular revolt has kept Indonesia's leaders, even dictators, aware of the public mood From the air, the place certainly looked familiar.

I had never before been to Jakarta, the chaotic and teeming capital of the sprawling Indonesian archipelago.

But, as the plane dodged in and out between the clouds, there it lay below. And just as I had been told it would, it looked like my former home - Nigeria.

"Indonesia and Nigeria?" I'd protested to the friend who first suggested the comparison to me some weeks earlier.

"They're 7,000 miles apart. One's Africa, one's Asia. There's no comparison to make."

It was late 2003, and I was flying in from Singapore - a smart, modern Asian city, now two hours behind me to the north. I'd just been appointed Asia editor for the AFP news agency, after four years as its Nigeria bureau chief.

Lagos, my former home, is Africa's megacity, the country's hustling, bustling, trading capital. It is noisy, sometimes violent but pulsing with life.

From its crowded waterfront districts to the low-rise slums inland, it hums with activity; people making deals, making money, taking a chance and just getting by.

Looking down out of the plane's window, I took in the airport below.

"Ok, so it looks like Lagos," I thought.

Continue reading the main story
“
Start Quote
We have not fought, not really, or not enough. And if you do not fight for your rights, nobody will fight for you”
End Quote
Chukwudifu Oputa

Former Supreme Court Justice

Nigeria at 50: Special report
Still standing, but standing still
'Nothing to celebrate'
Then, emerging minutes later from the plane, I settled into my taxi for the long drive into the city centre.

When we stopped at a crossroads, crowds of noisy children emerged as they would in Nigeria to hawk their wares, offering us everything from spicy foods to soft drinks, typewriter covers to newspapers.

Both Indonesia and Nigeria, my guidebook told me, are the giants of their region, home to tens of millions of people. Both were formed as one nation by Europeans around 1900. Both were governed by the colonial system of "indirect rule". Both once made money from palm oil, and later discovered oil and gas.

At independence, the standards of living in the two countries were comparable on most measures. And since independence, both have suffered three decades of military misrule and corruption.

Their first coups were launched within months of each other - in September 1965 in Indonesia and in January 1966 in Nigeria - and their military regimes died within 12 months, in May 1998 and 1999.

It was not only my friend who made the comparisons. But, talking to the editor of an Indonesian magazine the day after I arrived, I was struck by a statistic he mentioned in passing. In Indonesia, he said, the life expectancy of a child at birth had risen from 45 to 70 years since independence.

In 1960, Nigeria produced almost half the world's palm oil, now it covers just 7% In Nigeria, life expectancy remains stuck just above 45; today it is around 47.

This prompted me to check other figures.

When Indonesia's second president, Haji Muhammad Suharto, took power in 1967 the number of people living in poverty was the same as in Nigeria; around six out of ten. Three decades later, it had fallen from six to two. In Nigeria it had risen from six to seven.

And today, Indonesia lies almost 50 places above Nigeria on the United Nation's Human Development Index. Adult literacy stands at 92%, 20 points better than Nigeria. Per capita income, at close to $4,000, is almost twice that of Nigeria.

Basic healthcare is strikingly better in Indonesia, and the same is true for education. Access to clean water and a good balanced diet are better too.

'Struggle is the reason'

Certainly, Indonesia has many troubles. But today, for all its problems, Indonesia is holding elections that the world applauds, while Nigeria's last elections, in 2007, were said to be the worst in Africa that year.

So why the discrepancy? The reasons most commonly given for the trouble with Nigeria - for its failure to meet its enormous potential as an African giant - are many and complex. They range from the legacy of colonial rule to the problems of a divided nation, and the impact of the so-called oil curse.

Continue reading the main story
Nigeria and Indonesia in figures
Life expectancy

Nigeria: Men, 47. Women, 48
Indonesia: Men, 69. Women, 73
Gross national income, per capita

Nigeria: $1,160
Indonesia: $2,010
Gross domestic product

Nigeria: $207.12 billion
Indonesia: $510.73 billion
Population below poverty line

Nigeria: 70%
Indonesia: 17.8%
Sources: UN, World Bank, CIA World Factbook
Nigeria was formed by Britain as two separate protectorates in 1900, and brought together as one in 1914.

Its close to 150 million people speak numerous languages, follow two major world religions and many more indigenous beliefs.

My own grandfather first arrived in Nigeria in the colonial days in 1928. Over the years, he rose to be part of the team negotiating independence in the 1950s.

The way he and his colleagues framed the constitution probably set the country on the path to civil war. But the comparison with formerly Dutch-ruled Indonesia shows that colonial rule is not reason enough to explain the state of things today.

Nor is a fractured society when a country as diverse as Indonesia can do as well as it has. And nor is oil, for Indonesia has that too but has managed its resource relatively well.

So what explains the difference between them? I asked a friend, Bambang Harymurti, an Indonesian journalist.

"Struggle is the reason," he suggested. Though the regime struck out at those who opposed it, Indonesians had put their leaders under pressure, he said.

Fearing revolt

While lining his pockets handsomely, amassing a family fortune estimated at up to $35 billion, Indonesia's Suharto had tasked his economic advisers with keeping him in power. What he feared most was a popular revolt.

Since the Dutch first colonised Indonesia, popular movements had always pressured their leaders. In the 1920s, a major revolt had broken out against the Dutch. The revolt failed, but it led to change.

Then between 1945 and 1949, the Islamist, communist and nationalist movements that had formed fought a bloody rebellion to force the Japanese and then the Dutch out of the colony. They succeeded.

Nigeria's last presidential elections in 2007 were heavily criticised So when Suharto took power in 1965, and though he ruled brutally, he was still fearful of an uprising and had reason to be so.

For decades, spurred on by Suharto, the economists ensured the economy grew fast enough to lift millions out of poverty.

The army - which bloodily suppressed rebellions in some regions - was used to build roads and bring electricity to the poor in the Indonesian heartlands.

The economy was diversified and oil money was used to build sectors such as agriculture and fisheries, tourism and manufacturing, to provide jobs and income. Indonesia, which was once a minor player, is today the world's largest producer of palm oil.

And these changes were made to provide the poor with jobs and income. Nigeria, which in the 1960s produced almost half the world's palm oil, now accounts for just 7%.

And Suharto was right to be fearful.

Feisty Nigeria

When the economy collapsed in the Asian financial crisis of 1997, popular resistance rose and he was forced from power.

The new rulers took note and the economy is growing again.

And in Nigeria? In Nigeria - feisty, fractious, exhilarating Nigeria - rebels in the Delta have staged attacks on oil wells.

Artists such as Fela Kuti and Wole Soyinka have railed at injustice. Civil rights groups have staged protests.

But if the songs and plays have been popular, the protests have, by and large, been attended by hundreds not tens of thousands.

So in Nigeria, leaders fear being usurped by each other and not ousted by a popular revolt. And they do not make things change.

"What I realised," Chukwudifu Oputa, the retired Supreme Court Justice selected in 1999 to look into human rights abuses under the military, told me one day, "is we have not fought, not really, or not enough. And if you do not fight for your rights, nobody will fight for you."

Nigerians fight every day, of course. They fight for survival, to put food on the table and to get by.

But have they put real pressure on their leaders?

If not, is that the reason, I wonder, that the average Nigerian lives to 47, and the average Indonesian to 70?

My Nigeria: Five decades of independence, by Peter Cunliffe-Jones was published this month by Palgrave Macmillan[b][/b]

[b]The Babangida years

By Tolu Ogunlesi
April 17, 2010 10:36PM

In his first New Year Days speech as military president, months after deposing the Buhari-Idiagbon government in a bloodless coup enthusiastically welcomed by Nigerians, Ibrahim Babangida declared: I wish to reaffirm that this administration does not intend to stay in power a day longer than is required to lay the necessary institutional framework to bring about a better and more stable Nigeria. Babangidas bonhomie (its trademark an endearing gap-toothed smile) - in stark contrast to the stern, unsmiling façade of Muhammadu Buhari, his predecessor - made it easy for him to be believed.
The distinction between the two regimes in fact ran much deeper than personality quirks. Babangida, in action, proved to be the complete antithesis of his predecessor. He threw open prison doors, setting free hundreds of 3rd republic politicians convicted and jailed by Buhari. He repealed the obnoxious Decree No. 4 of 1984 with which the Buhari regime had shackled the media. He promised to run an open administration that is responsive to the yearnings and aspirations of all the people - a departure from the high-handedness of the Buhari/Idiagbon era.
One of his first actions as military president was to allow Nigerians to decide, through public debates, whether to accept the $2.5 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan the Buhari government had been negotiating for.
After the terror of the Buhari years, Nigerians appeared to have found a statesman in military uniform.

Tough times that lasted

By 1985, Nigerias foreign debt had ballooned to $18 billion, up from $3.4 billion in 1980 (it would rise beyond $30 billion by the end of the 80s), and external reserves had dwindled to less than $2 billion. Oil prices had been in freefall for 3 years running, and in January 1986 they finally fell to less than $20 per barrel, a record low since the start of the decade.
To his credit Babangida made all the right noises about revamping the economy. In his Independence Day 1985 speech, barely two months old in office, he declared a state of economic emergency for the next 15 months. That speech went on to lay down a comprehensive plan for economic reconstruction.
This plan included a moratorium on new foreign debt, promotion of agriculture and industrial development, restriction of importation to essential commodities, financial sector reform and privatisation.

Populist leanings

IBB was a master of the populist move - ambitious government programs targeted at tackling poverty, and empowering rural dwellers. His government churned out program after program, in a bid to actualize his promises to run an inclusive, people-facing government. In 1986, Babangida launched the Mass Mobilization for Self Reliance, Social Justice, and Economic Recovery (MAMSER).
In 1987, the Directorate of Food and Rural Infrastructure (DFFRI) was launched to promote agriculture and transform Nigerias rural landscape by providing modern infrastructure. Other Babangida creations include the National Directorate of Employment (NDE), National Economic Reconstruction Fund (NERFUND), Peoples Bank of Nigeria (PBN), National Board for Community Banks (NBCB), Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), Nigeria Export-Import Bank (NEXIM), National Planning Commission (NPC), and the Urban Development Bank.
No other Nigerian government presided over such substantial expansion of government bureaucracy as the Babangida administration. In time, the fiscal prudence that Babangida espoused vanished: billions of naira were sunk into an endless transition programme, and in the early 90s, 12 billion dollars worth of windfall crude oil revenue (courtesy of the rise in the oil prices due to the Gulf War) could not be accounted for.
Mr. Babangida also came to perfect the art of dispensing patronage through political appointments (mostly targeted at leading members of the opposition) and a far-from-transparent allocation of lucrative oil blocks.

A man whose words mean nothing

Mr. Babangidas contradictions eventually overwhelmed his reputation so that when, in May 1993, the activist and lawyer Gani Fawehinmi described him as a man whose words mean nothing to him, evidence of this littered his eight years in power.
Only months after vowing to run a government by consultation with the people, Mr. Babangida in 1986 surreptitiously - and unilaterally - took Nigeria, an avowed secular state, into full membership of the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), a body which describes itself as the collective voice of the Muslim world.
Mr. Babangida lamented the large role played by the public sector in economic activity with hardly any concrete results to justify such a role.Ironically, over the course of the next five years, he would go ahead to supervise an unprecedented expansion of government. And despite his deference to the wish of Nigerians to reject the IMF loan, Mr. Babangida went ahead to implement some of the Funds most drastic requirements - a devaluation of the naira, and removal of subsidies, chief of which were the petroleum subsidies.
Mr. Babangida promised Nigerians that the belt-tightening was sorely needed: the painful injection that would usher in vibrant economic health; the mandatory dark lining before a cloud of prosperity. Those reforms, which he christened Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), came into effect in 1986, with a far-from-pleasant impact on Nigerians. Purchasing powers dwindled, inflation rose, and the obliteration of the middle class began. In 1989, SAP riots rocked the country, as Nigerians had finally had enough of economic reforms which silver lining they waited in vain for.

Greatest failings

Mr. Babangidas greatest failings were however in two key areas: his human rights record, and his political transition programme. In December 1985, a group of soldiers, which included his close friend, Mamman Vatsa, were arrested on allegations of plotting to topple the 4-month old Babangida government. After Vatsa was convicted and sentenced to death, Mr. Babangida assured a delegation of distinguished writers (Wole Soyinka, Chinua Achebe and J.P. Clark), which had come pleading for mercy, that he was determined to do everything in my power to save (Vatsa).
Hours later, Vatsa and the other alleged plotters were executed.
As opposition to Mr. Babangidas rule grew, so did his intolerance for dissent, so that he routinely shut down or proscribed media houses; and harassed journalists, civil society and labour groups using the instruments of state (the State Security Service, Directorate of Military Intelligence and the Police).
In 1986, five students of the Ahmadu Bello University were murdered when mobile policemen invaded the campus to quell anti-IMF protests. He also promulgated a series of draconian decrees targeted at quelling all opposition, and on occasion did not hesitate to deport foreign critics (University lecturer Patrick Wilmot and journalist William Keeling).
In October 1986, frontline journalist Dele Giwa was murdered by a letter bomb in Lagos. Preliminary police investigations stated that senior officers of Mr. Babangidas intelligence services, who had hounded Giwa in his final days, had questions to answer regarding Giwas death. The mystery of the Giwa assassination remains unsolved till date.

An interminable journey

A maddeningly convoluted transition programme, whose terminal date soon became a mirage - first 1990, then 1992, and then 1993 - is one of the most significant things Babangida will be remembered for.
Early on in his administration, Mr. Babangida inaugurated a Political Bureau to kick off, as it were, the national debate on a viable future political ethos and structure for our dear country.
The political bureau was soon followed by a Constituent Assembly, which in 1989 fashioned a new constitution for the country.
Also, in 1989, he created, by presidential fiat, two political parties, the Social Democratic Party and the National Republican Convention. Then in 1991, he released a controversial list of prominent politicians whom he said were banned from participating in the transition programme.
In October 1992, he cancelled the results of the parties presidential primaries, causing new primaries to be held in March 1993. And then in June 1993 he annulled the results of the presidential elections, presumed to have been won by billionaire businessman MKO Abiola.

This was the final straw
.
By this time, Nigerians had finally had enough of his shenanigans, and violent protests forced him to step aside on August 27, 1993,My colleagues and I are determined to change the course of history, Mr. Babangida told Nigerians in his maiden speech as Head of State, on August 27, 1985.
By the time he reluctantly relinquished power exactly eight years later, he had achieved that goal, far more successfully than he, or anyone else, could ever have imagined.

Source: Next
====================

The Holy Book says "my people perish for lack of knowledge".
Will you allow 150m of us (Nigerians) perish or will you ALSO forward this article on the (mis) deeds of our self-proclaimed "evil genius" to all Nigerians that you know
Will you help confirm "maradona" IBB's claim (in Germany in the 90s during one of his radiculopathy treatment trips) that we, his fellow citizens are "docile" (MUGUs) by not sharing this mail
Find a way to get involved at all levels- local, state and federal- this election period for a better Nigeria!!!






chelseabmw (m)
Re: I Am Being Blackmailed - Ibb
« #47 on: Today at 07:29:28 AM »
________________________________________
this man should be kidnapped & released after the election plssssssssssssssssssssss[/b][font=Lucida Sans Unicode][/font]

There is no Big Deal in this Topic, That Means each one cost 15,450 Naira, What I expect people to talk about is how to improve the quality of locally made product,

Hello Poster,

You can sue the bank and get the money back, Simply get a good lawyer and prove to a court of law that the money has changed your life style, Provided you statement of account shows the wrong posting, (This is proved by Nigerian Banking law)Best of luck

In short! every thing about girls na lie, From their hair(Fixed hair), their nails, their eye lashes, their boobs(Paded with foam bra), their yarsh(Tightly squized in tight trousers for us to believe its bigder), thier smile(A girl can smile soo good for you to spend any amount on her. however she can be the worse devil uve ever seen), thier skin etc, infact I the list goes on, [/color][color=#990000][/color][color=#990000][/color][color=#990000][/color][color=#990000][/color][color=#990000][/color][color=#990000][/color][color=#990000][color=#990000][/color]

I wonder why we've become the major problem for ourself in  Nigeria, Why on earth should we consider Babagida a credible candidate for 2011. The person who basterdised the whole of the Political scene in Nigeria during his tenure, , Canceled the most credible election ever conducted in Nigeria, Destroyed the economy through a selfish agenda called SAP and trampled on human right to the extent to which it was considered a Nigerian way of doing things. It was during Babangida Militry era that Bribery in Nigeria became acceptable, This MAN IS A EVIL GENIUOUS LET US SAY NOO TO HIS AMBITION[/size][size=8pt][color=#990000][/color]


In my opinion why not give people like Donald Duke who has vissions, Ribadu,El-Rufai a chance and let us see aw thing will change, We are too engrosed in politics rather than Development and I still wonder what all the likes or save nigeria group and the rest are doin if we can be watching this Babangida eyeing this position and destroy the little we have developed so far in this Democracy

Check wat the bastards did

Look at wat the bastard did

I think she is waking up to responsibility now,

Strong indications emerged on Wednesday that the Minister of Information and Communications, Prof. Dora Akunyili, wants President Umaru Yar’Adua to hand over power to Vice-President Goodluck Jonathan until his return from Saudi Arabia.

Our correspondents reliably gathered that Akunyili presented a memo containing her request to the Federal Executive Council at its meeting in Abuja. The council, which by the provision of Section 144 of the 1999 Constitution, is empowered to initiate the hand over process, however, rejected the memo.

A top Presidency source told one of our correspondents that her colleagues and other FEC members were divided on her request to “face reality and prevail on President Yar’Adua to hand over to the Vice-President,” thereby making her to withdraw the memo with a promise to re-present it at next Wednesday’s meeting of the council.

Akunyili’s action came barely seven days after FEC had passed a resolution claiming that Yar’Adua was not incapacitated to continue in office.

The council’s position provoked national outrage and debate with many concerned citizens going to court over Yar’Adua’s health saga.

The President left the country on November 23, 2009 for Saudi Arabia for treatment at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital in Jeddah.

FEC’s position came against the backdrop of a directive by the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court Abuja, Justice Dan Abutu, to it to make public a resolution on Yar’Adua’s health within 14 days.

Akunyili, in a telephone interview with one of our correspondents, confirmed that she, indeed, tabled a memo on the President’s health to the council.

She, however, declined to discuss the details of the memo or the motive behind her action.

Akunyili said, “Yes, I presented the memo to the council. Somebody must have called and told you that. I presented the memo.”

Asked the content of the memo, she replied, “I will not be able to discuss the content now. It was read but not debated and subsequently withdrawn. That means it was not taken. So, I can’t discuss the details with you now.”

On whether it meant that the memo would be taken at the next meeting, she stated, “I will represent it because I stand by whatever I said in the memo.”

Our correspondents gathered that immediately after Akunyili’s memo was read and rejected at FEC, tempers rose as a good number of ministers, led by the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Michael Aondoakaa, shouted her down.

A source disclosed that Pro Jonathan ministers were so shocked by the fiery reaction of the Pro Yar’Adua ministers, although a few latter met with Akunyili to congratulate her for her courage.

Evidence that Akunyili might have disagreed with the Council’s resolution on January 27 had shown in her appearance in the front page photograph of many newspapers, Aondoakaa, addressed the press on the decision taken on Yar’Adua.

The pretty-looking 55-year-old Akunyili wore a weary look and appeared evidently bothered.

Aondoakaa, widely believed to be one of the cabinet members preventing Yar’Adua from handing over power to his deputy, Jonathan, as Acting President, declared at the January 27 briefing that it was not mandatory for him to do so.

Meanwhile, the leadership of the Nigeria Labour Congress and some opposition leaders have concluded arrangements to hold a crucial deliberation next week on the prolonged absence of the from the country.

A top labour leader told one of our correspondents on condition of anonymity on Wednesday that the politicians planned to join forces with the organised labour to intensify the growing demand for Yar’Adua to hand over power to Jonathan.

Some of the top politicians expected at the meeting are former National Chairman of the People Democratic Party, Chief Audu Ogbeh; National Chairman of the Democratic Peoples Alliance, Chief Olu Falae; and a former governor of old Kano State, Alhaji Abubakar Rimi.

Our correspondents learnt that the main agenda of the meeting planned for next week in Abuja, was the vacuum created by the failure of the President to hand over to his deputy before leaving for medical treatment in Jeddah.

It was further learnt that the NLC had scheduled a meeting of the leadership of congress for Friday.

The acting Head of Information of the NLC in Abuja, Mr. Iduh Onah, said that the meeting of the National Administrative Council of the body would discuss “the state of the Nigerian nation.”



Comments :

Finally,Madam has pulled the bull by it horn.Now she can be addressed as HONOURABLE.On the other hand, the AGf should cover his face in shame,he is simply a disgrace to the learnerd class in the country. I only wonder what he stands to gain by not supporting that the President should hand over to his Vice. Secondly, PDP should know that NIGERIA is not pdp, so they should not run the country like thier party. Finally, the senate should rise up to the ocassion and stop beating round the bush.

Posted by: Zeno from Lagos , on Thursday, February 04, 2010

Report this comment



AGF is a shame to Nigerians by deceiving the people of Nigeria because of his own advantage. I think he should be sacked from the position he is holding now.

Posted by: Daniel , on Thursday, February 04, 2010

Report this comment



it is a good thing that finally somebody has decided to face the sad reality on the ground among the sick president toilet cabinet. the man has been away for more than two months and nor of his ministers deem it necessary to ask that he hand over to his vice, it is shame that we really lack men of honour in government circles. A lone voice in this issue is not enough. if any one among them thinks he/she has honour, let such person advice the sick man to do the right thing by handling over power.

Posted by: fredo , on Thursday, February 04, 2010

Report this comment



There is need before it is too late for AGF to stop this game of madness. It is bieng suspected that he was the one who advised the president not to present handover note to the VP when he was about to leave. Time will prove the right or wrong but I know he will end like those before him

Posted by: Oluolufemi , on Thursday, February 04, 2010

Report this comment



Those criticising madam should have a re think as she has to stay a fight from inside rather than resigning.She is courageos and even at that who does she hand over her resignation to fake cabinet members who did not appoint her? Mdam go on and fight them because AGF has gone mad.

O boy Go to interswitch straight, Ihave friend in both and i understand what im saying.