₦airaland Forum

BornnAgainChild:
We are not joking here pls

I am not joking too.
It was very traumatic.

When Tottenham cut my ticket. No greater trauma than that peeps. Imagine those idiots allow Burnley to equalize them.

analice107:
What do you know?

Like Jon Snow: Nothing.

Fxwarrior:
Byllionaire said anything you imagine is possible.

How does that translate to being able to predict the future.
Anything you imagine in the astral plane, while you have put on your astral body is what materializes.
Predicting scores is a feature of the physical. I think you misunderstood him.

ToZaraWithaZ:
They weren't the felixomor kind of Christians!

Brutality.

Fxwarrior:
In recent times there has been much talk on Astral Projection with the recent case being an altercation between Seun and Byllionaire.

Now my own is if Astral Projection is real, let them project 200 odds football to this forum. Dats all.

Did they tell you that they can predict the future using astral projection?

analice107:
SEEDS OF SATAN.

Is Satan a plant?

Terrible.
I wonder how that guy addresses the UN General Assembly.
I'm sure the Oyinbo people do not get anything that he says since Nigerians struggle to hear him.

Sarassin:
I did specify that the entire petition to Angel Sachiel is to be written in Enochian This includes the name of the Angel and your name. There is no transposition of the Theban. The order of your petition to include the symbols given in the header (not Sigils) should be in the format attached below.

Neither of Archangels Raphael, Haniel or Angel Sachiel are fallen angels, they are angels of the Elohim.

If you had an encounter with Angel Sachiel then you can consider yourself very blessed.

@last paragraph...
Is it possible to encounter Angels/Archangels without petitioning them in the manner described?

felixomor:
Just as you didnt know the meaning of evolution by natural selection. Not surprised

You are right. Oya have the last word and go.

DoctorAlien:
You need to go and read then. Biological evolutionists tell us that at some point in history, the only living thing was a cell in the ocean.

And I don't have enough faith to believe that.

You are right.

DoctorAlien:
Continue shifting the goalpost. Were you a single cell IN THE OCEAN at some point?

I don't know. That is not what evolution is.

felixomor:
That is what Darwin and atheists say.
That Nature is unintelligent and blind.
because if they admit nature is intelligent then it means someone is behind it.
So that will defeat them. So because they dont want to be defeated, they claim nature is blind.

So Please start preaching to them.

Nature is not blind.
I don't know when Darwin told you that.

DoctorAlien:
No. GOD created me. I don't believe that my ancestors were single cells in the ocean. I don't have enough faith to believe that.

I think you always confuse definitions. Nature might be different from natural forces. Man, for example is part of nature. But man is not a force of nature.

We were all single cells at some point. I cannot argue against BELIEF.

DoctorAlien:
Is the force of gravity intelligent? Is the first law of thermodynamics intelligent? Was Nature trying to create an eye, according to evolutionists, or did it just happen that the eye appeared.

Are you unintelligent. Are you not a product of nature?

DoctorAlien:
Biological evolution is driven by blind forces of nature, we are told. They said also that evolution wasn't trying to create anything in particular. Things which we don't observe now, biological evolutionists tells can happen if given enough time. LOL.

Evolution in the mere sense of the word can apply to anything, including technology. But we know that the evolution of technology is being driven by intelligent man. Nokia 3310 did not suddenly become a touchscreen phone.

Why do you keep insisting that nature is unintelligent?

Proudgorgeousga:
Felix doesn't get it because he thinks evolution disproves intelligent design.

I am starting to think he's not real. He could be a bot created by Seun to drive traffic to this section using stupidity as his modus operandi.
Everyone loves to poke fun at a fool.

felixomor:
You have not heard.
If you heard you would have known by now.
The Internet is on your palms.

I did not see it. Please tell me the difference I beg you.

DoctorAlien:
You mean you can't refute any point made in the article? Don't worry, no one can.

You are right.

felixomor:
You have admitted your folly but u are still blind to it.

Let me tell you the folly.
Evolution of IBM, Mercedes or Computers is not the same as evolution by natural selection postulated by Darwin.

For you to just appose them for the purpose of similarity is big folly.
Go and study evolution.

We have heard. They are not the same. Please tell us the difference.

DoctorAlien:
Argumentum ad hominem again. Refute with evidence any of the points made in the article or hold your peace. Don't attack the person.

We can determine what is impossible, friend. It is impossible for a triangle to have anything more or less than three sides. It is also impossible for evolution to produce an eye.

I don't see any "points" in the article. All I see is a biased writer feigning incredulity.

Ericsunday619:
I don't really believe in evolution theory. it's rubbish

It is not something to be believed. It is to be studied and understood. Just like you don't believe photosynthesis.

felixomor:
Oh Lawd! Chaiiii

Tell me the difference please.

felixomor:
Bros abeg shift....
Stop forcing yourself into conversations like this. U no dey hear.

And the worst part is u will be forming intelligence. Smh

At least tell me how it is different before telling me to "shift".

DoctorAlien:
Here is a claim by evolutionists in the OP:

"Evolutionists counter that the whole probability argument is irrelevant since evolution is utterly purposeless, and thus never tries to make anything in particular! They insist, moreover, that “natural selection” makes the impossible, possible."

Why don't you read the OP?

Your OP is a cut and paste from answersingenesis. It reminds me of those Awake magazines I read when I was younger.
Natural selection does not make the ''impossible possible" because we can't possibly determine what is impossible.
You should create your threads from less skewed sources.

felixomor:
In his mind, evolution of Mercedes benz and IBM means evolution by natural selection that Darwin postulated.
In his mind they are the same thing.

And he calls himself intelligent.

Please how is it different?

DoctorAlien:
I see that the problem here is definitions. Well, my article addresses biological evolution, not just evolution in the mere sense of the word.

They are the same thing really. You'd see it if you took the blinders off. Nature isn't unintelligent.

DoctorAlien:
[s][/s]

How does the intelligent design of the IBM Computer demonstrate evolution which[b]claims to be propelled by blind, unintelligent forces of nature in no particular direction?[/b]

You should not spin falsehood to advance your position. Nobody claims the bold.
Natural selection is neither random nor unintelligent. It also moves in a direction. The direction of the fittest and most favourable traits for survival.

DoctorAlien:
How does IBM computer, which was intelligently thought out, and consciously assembled by an intelligent Designer demonstrate evolution which claims that systems a billion times more complex and balanced than the IBM Computer came out of the chance occurrence of impossible events?

Evolution is not a "chance occurrence of impossible events". It is a stepwise process involving gradual incremental changes over an an extended period of time.
Think about the IBM analogy again. From the large and slow mainframe computers all the way to the pocket-sized devices we have today. Computers have changed drastically over time to get to the fastest and most efficient possible systems. It's not chance. It's not random. It's evolution.
I know you'll get it.
Felixmoron won't.

plaetton:
And this is how fools reason.
They skip many critical thoughts, and arrive at foolishness.

Now to the subject.

Actually an IBM computer is a simple example of the process of evolution.

I challenge you, if you're smart enough, to think deeply about the IBM Computer and how it demonstrates the processes of evolution.

I bet you he cannot.

felixomor:
Get out

E pain am.

felixomor:
Phew

You just can't bear not having the last word. Oya have it...