₦airaland Forum

Their parents might give or not give them support to marry a divorcee; however, 99.9 percent will definitely marry one - there's nothing automatically wrong with being one, since circumstances and individuals differ - whether their parents support them or not, provided that money and/or developed country residence is involved. Forget about their pretentious positions here.

It's on this same forum that some of these hypocritically disingenuous commenters vowed that they can't date or consider Nairalanders for relationship or marriage; yet, openly and secretly they were disturbing some of us who neither need relationship and marriage nor are against those in need them from here. And some even went to the extent of creating different haunting monikers to vilify some of us who rejected/jilted them while falsely accusing us of being behind the same haunting monikers.

Well, I'll marry a divorcee who's from a strong ethical leanings and is sync with me - assuming that I need a wife.

NB, to those I broke their hearts, I feel your pains, but vilifying me - quoting me here or other places to say trash - won't make you heal quickly; in fact, no one who has experienced heartbreak from me heals completely.

You're having the same problem all wannabe "independent women/people" have; self-absorption and its associated miseries like impulsivity. You won't find happiness and inner peace or experience united growth in your union, provided that you continue to do what suits you rather than what's right. Try doing what you know is right at every given time, regardless of whether it'll be unfavorable to you or the other party or not - except where life is at stake. According to you "am putting myself first in anything am doing but now I think am in a big shit. whenever am in a relationship I stay in the relationship and I go for what I want and suit me." Yet, you expect the same husband of yours to be taking your advice; a typical crass and expedient woman that only the servility from a man can guarantee her calmness.

Your husband should sit up, though, because a healthy man who perpetually can't assume the responsibility of his family reasonably doesn't worth a husband/father tag.

[quote author=Biglittlelois post=94817810][/quote]

[quote author=Biglittlelois post=94768926][/quote]

Leaving her is the practicable thing to do if she was/has been an opportunistic woman. Meanwhile, if she's always been principled, he'll be a coward if he leaves her - a conscientious woman deserves love a situation like this requires from a man. Opportunistic people don't deserve fairness and compassion.

NB, to those I broke their hearts, I feel your pains, but vilifying me won't make you heal quickly; in fact, no one who has experienced heartbreak from me heals completely - accept this bitter fact and make peace with yourself or stay pained.

pocohantas:
[s][/s]

Blablabla!!! Allow team foreign women defend one of their own.

The day you'll make vex for you for real, you'll wish you never crossed my path. Look for your mates elsewhere, at least for now, until you send in your letter of apology.

Noting can be more irritating than seeing some of you local champions/wannabe woke women (and men where applicable) using every little or single opportunity to further arrogation of purity and sophistication to yourselves.

If these two people under discussion aren't acting a film, then the crass aspect of the said Angela's attitude only portrays how the fraction of the crass and/or expedient White women behave - which anyone of you who belongs to the local champions/wannabe woke group longs for.

The point remains that not all White women are crass and/or expedient, just as it's a fact that not all Nigerian/Black women are too.

There'll always be these sets of women (people):

- Conscientious women - submissive wives

- Crass and expedient or opportunistic women - contentious/oppressive/hypocritical disingenuous wives

- Servile women - stepford/doormat wives

And from 1st hand experience, these three sets of women are in every clime; however, it's not always easy to find the conscientious ones in any of the climes, and that's why we love/even worship them wherever we see them. Of course, the said Michael's expedient/opportunistic disposition isn't in doubt as evident in his wish to have a child with another woman while still legally married to Angela.

By the way, crass and expedient - opportunistic - people remain the easiest people to outwit, their haughty or disingenuous disposition notwithstanding, and they're never meant to be part of a long-term plan for something serious.

NB, to those I broke their hearts, I feel your pains, but vilifying me - quoting me to say trash - won't make you heal quickly; in fact, no one who has experienced heartbreak from me heals completely.

Both of them facially and physically seem of the same age bracket.

HML to them.

titiakins:
but we don't know you nah

You're correct; irresponsible people don't know me - I doff my hat to the responsible ones who do.

Avoid rejecting advances or breaking the heart of the self-absorbing/opportunistic ones from a close distance; else, they'll do everything possible to ruin you or kill you.

Only an outrightly irresponsible offspring neglects their parents at old age - not even self-absorbing people, in their small-mindedness, do such.

An action like this doesn't call for a celebration. I have been flying with only hand luggage for more than fifteen years now.

He considered Oshiomhole as part and parcel of him - the team - thus the "we."

Geeman23:
the guy is master in the game of mental manipulation. I learn a lot from him. Though I hate his con way as a spiritual man. He really know how to toy with the brain of men.

One of the easiest ways to amass wealth or reign supreme over people regardless of their stratum is just mastery of human psychology and commercializing it.

He's simply communicated a DL theory that says castigate to disentangle yourself from the grip of what you don't cherish or cherish but can't get and automatically curry a false sense of importance. He should stop being disingenuous.

The truth is that only conscientious - humble and selfless - women deserve honest and queenly treatment as women, wives, and girlfriends. So, they're the ones I'll always hold their brief.

However, opportunistic and conceited/wannabe woke women - haughty and disingenuous or just the disingenuous ones - the pleasure someone like me derives subjecting them to emotional and mental stress or having them doing everything possible to get back at me after giving them a dose of their medicine remains unquantifiable.

Peace is only priceless when obtained within the confines of mutual goodness. Say no to servility. Only a weak man will hurt an ethically sound woman; of course, only a weak man too will encourage or be at the mercy of an unethical woman.

It's an open secret. Well, her ilk will soon come here to twist the story and claim victims on her behalf to suit themselves. I partially blame him, though, because he ought not to have expected a different action from a well-known opportunist.

It's an open secret. Well, her ilk will soon come here to twist the story and claim victims on her behalf to suit themselves. I partially blame him, though, because he ought not to have expected a different action from a well-known opportunist.

Your responsibility isn't to make your woman, or anyone, happy; instead, your responsibility is to do what you know is always right, and expect nothing less plus appreciation from her - of course, you must always appreciate her good deed too. Failure to abide by this rule, you'll always use servility to sustain your relationship, and the result is whining and heartbreak. A woman who's genuine interest and intention on you'll always feel happy and contented provided that you do what's right, while the one who comes into your life to rip you off and ruin you won't always feel happy and contented, especially when the right thing you do didn't favor her. Walking on this lane entails that you must possess selflessness and grit - stay conscientious.