₦airaland Forum

Jarus: Fred: Our consultant in his analysis, found out that none of these factors you mentioned was responsible for the excessive fuelling cost. It infact was the PAINT ON THE PLANE!!!


Me: Oh, interesting

http://www.jarushub.com/ysr-my-mckinsey-interview-i/

I particular like his response in this part.

There is no way you can know everything by responding in one sitting to a question and anyone that expects you to know all is a fool. You can only identify common and frequent main issues in such an interview.

Don't fret or lose your cool when someone corrects you and provides you with any information in this kind of manner. Stay cool and respond like this guy.

THUNDER4real: Do you think we are in court? or do you think we are in Nationa Assembly? its good to challenge facts but the problem is when you are confused and still you re challenging facts. my advice from me to you is to sit down on your chair and think deeply what love is.

You don't need to be in court or national assembly to make sense.

When you speak publicly, it is good for your image to make sense, otherwise it is better to be quiet and thought a foool than speak out and remove all doubt.

Only state things in public you are confident enough to defend. That is not confusion, that is just a plain old-fashion way of being sensible.

Smart interviewee.

I expect nothing less of anyone being invited to an interview with Mckinsey.

But the young ones listening, I will add a bit that instantly came to my head when I was reading because this is the kind of interview I frequently face and this is how I might have addressed it:

Fred: XYZ is airline operator and is currently having problems with their costs. Could you please tell me the items that drive the cost for an airline operator?

Interviewee: Cost can be impacted by 5 key drivers.

- Supply Cost
- Product or Process Design
- Economy of scale
- Cost Advantage due to experience curve
- Automation

For an airline operator, I suspect the major cost factors will fall under the supply cost and product/process design areas, e.g. fuel, type of aircrafts, itinerary, staff, boarding/baggage processes etc, hence why the "No Frills" competitors could rapidly enter the Western markets and gain market share by reconfiguring these two drivers.


But I must maintain that the interviewee was very good under pressure. So thumbs up.

Does these exclude the value of all other benefits like accommodation, cars etc?

Because these seem relatively low to me. I was expecting at least within the N100m to N200m range for most of them.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jobs/8546794/UKs-best-paid-chief-executives-in-pictures.html?image=5

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/oct/22/best-paid-chief-executives-america

Especially for the Mobil Oil guy. I have friends that work in Tax. Hence provide advice on Tax to executives like Oil executives (so they see ALL the earnings of these people) and many oil sector professionals in relatively lower roles to the CEO of Mobil in Nigeria make more than that N85m in the UK.

Johnpaul88: You call them conjectures? Well, i call them WORD! Nothing can be closer to the truth!

I ignore speaking about homosexuality? We have exhausted that topic already. There's nothing new to talk about. We have accepted that you guys are just unteachable. There is nothing anyone can say that will make you change your stance.

A Nigerian homosexual living in Nigeria is calling another Nigerian's life "miserable & frustrating and of which you are trying so hard to conceal" and that is not conjecture, that is "WORD"?

You are beyond a person.

Your delusion appears to be a mental breakdown.

Johnpaul88: ^^^
Guy you are just unbelievable! You run around nairaland looking out for gay related threads so you can drop your notice-me comments and hope that some of us will see through them & understand what your idea is really about.

For me, your infantile methods are simply ignoble. They only help to explain the miserable & frustrating life, which you lead, and of which you are trying so hard to conceal.

But assuming my ideas of you are wrong, whenever you see this kind of thread & you hate it so much because it represent everything your great Nation stands against, sprinkle holy water & pass!

This way remain safe from a devastating heart attack, which people of your ilk, almost always suffers!

Word!

Do you honestly think these your moronic conjectures and request for ignoring speaking about homosexuality would work?

sCun: Illiterate Scumbag I have ''showed'' you several times and I wouldn't repeat myself again. Is this the method you use when you want to run away?

You are a person!

Where did you show it?

Point to one of the numerous times.

sCun: Sagamu stop deluding yourself. Do you want to run away?
I have a host of questions that are still waiting for you to answer:
What are the imaginary modalities they can
''mistakingly'' put in place that ''might'' lead to self- employment for the graduates, when they have clearly stated that the scheme is designed to improve their chances of securing jobs? How is this scheme different from the
internships the graduates must have gone
through?
How is it different from NYSC?
Why will their family members and friends wait until after this scheme before giving them funds to start a business if the funds were truly available as you suggested?
Why haven't they presented any convincing
business proposals to banks or family members ever since they graduated as you suggested?
Scumbag, since you said NYSC is not an optimal example, can you tell me what an optimal example is in the light of this argument?
Scumbag answer my questions.
I am patiently waiting.
Remember I told you that I have your time today.

person, run from who?

The person that cannot show me where I said the scheme is optimal?

49cents: I enjoyed reading your post as they are largely constructive, objective amd perceptive!!!

Now to clarify myself

1. Yes give a woman an inch she will take a mile, but then you will agree with me that is not common to women alone but to humans in general

2. Women can be very manipulative and deceptive (but that is the basic characteristic of every Player, male or female) the name of the game is seeking your interest and protecting it at ANY and ALL cost, this are mild psychopathic cases and sadly that's has been dubbed the last option to be in a relationship with the opposite sex or even in marraige!!!!
A game of continous scheming, having the power, calling the shots etc all at the expense lof love (ok love is dead and buried, not so)

3. Sad that our society is churning out many young women and men who are superficial, vain and have twisted judgements of whom they are and how one can live so much so a lady told me is a crime-of-passage to mess around first then behave later.....the truth is like majek fashek would sing 'Only the Angels of Jah is white now' we all make mistakes and mistakes are the best that can ever happened to you if they help you grow,mature!

4. I don't judge anyone cos everyone has a past, infact your 'good' young maiden may start her own rubbish after three kids in marraige.....my position is to focus on the present, to verify the person as far as I reasonably can, never to compromise my stand with any woman on what is clear to be true and as such I am never scared to let her go, not afriad of loosing her! I know what I want I will not stop at anything to get it

It is not so for me cos I wanna play or be macho, am just being myself as I understand myself more and more daily, as I understand what counts in my life!

I can relate with any woman young or not -so-young but I would never consider dating a lady who is immature in thought, undecided in what counts for her or manipulative (only the needy or greedy are subject to manipulation)

Once a man knows himself is always in charge, he has nothing to fear with 'controlling' women, absolutely nothing

The issues I have with the OP and threads like this is that they shift focus from on how boys can be men so as to take charge in their lives and reltionship rather they spoonfeed impressionable boys with nuggets that turn them to zombies without a mind of their own and that's missing the mark!

Women are not the enemy, you are!
Conquer yourself first and the whole would ne yours for the taking!!!

So if a guy is a player that has played around, had numerous kids and abandoned the women to single motherhood (lets say 15 kids by 8 different women), he never contributed to the upbringing of the kids, but now he is 65, has no more mojo to pull women and now is ready to settle down afresh with a women because he knows he would need company and care in his old age. Do you think any of the women (be it a new one, or one of the ones he haf abandoned before) should take him?

Kai, Sagamu, it is so easy for you to intellectually bully fucktards o.

You can even take their girls anytime you want to.

sCun: You are a scumbag!
I have showed you where you said the scheme is optimal several times on this thread. if you think getting me to repeat myself while you continuously avoid my own questions will work you are on a very long thing.
Scumbag answer my questions.
What are the imaginary modalities they can ''mistakingly'' put in place that ''might'' lead to self-employment for the graduates, when they have clearly stated that the scheme is designed to improve their chances of securing jobs?
How is this scheme different from the
internships the graduates must have gone
through?
How is it different from NYSC?
Why will their family members and friends wait until after this scheme before giving them funds to start a business if the funds were truly available as you suggested?
Why haven't they presented any convincing
business proposals to banks or family members ever since they graduated as you suggested?
Answer my questions scumbag!

You are a person!

Where did you show it?

Several times?

Can you see now how being produced by a failed education system can destroy the brain cells?

Show me where you should it because I am itching to defend my statements.

sCun: Your are a scumbag!
Are you consoling yourself with all this hype or what? You are only intellectually bullying me in your filthy dreams scumbag.
You were suggesting this scheme will be an optimal example, I am still waiting for you to tell me why. While you are at it, go ahead to tell me what an optimal example is in the context of this argument. Also tell me why this scheme is different from the internships the graduates must have gone through, you keep avoiding that question.
Scumbag tell me the imaginary modalities they can ''mistakingly'' put in place that ''might'' lead to self-employment for the graduates, when they have clearly stated that the scheme is designed to improve their chances of securing jobs.
Scumbag if someone refuses to indluge you when you try to start your long and repetitive arguments that could last a whole day, it doesn't mean the person is scared. There is something called being busy.
I have your time today Scumbag.

You are a person!

Product of a failed education system, did they teach you in your failed schools that if you know you are intellectually weak, just stick to conjectures and sophisms?

Show me where I said it was optimal.

That is what you are still struggling to prove and, in your moronic attempts, giving me the opportunity to highlight you are a person.

It shouldn't be that hard. All my posts are on this thread and you quoted them, so show me where I said it was optimal.

When you show I said that, then I will have a reason to explain why I said it.

Scun, I know it is quite frustrating having someone bully you by using something you don't have: intellect.

The person is goading you and no matter how much you try, you know you will lose and you can never outperform the person.

It is as frustrating as a good looking guy telling you he is finer and smoother than you to the point he can snatch any girlfriend you have if he feels like it. And you wish that was not the case and want to prove him wrong, but every time you bring a girl to where he is, the guy snatches her and within a week don chuk her.

That is painful na?

Trust me, I have some empathy for such painful and frustrating situations.

I just enjoy being the torturer.

sCun: You are a scumbag!
Aren't these your words ''The kind of understanding of business and up-skilling that could lead to improved ability of writing business plans''?
Or are you telling me you don't know that ''could'' is the past tense of ''can''? What a scumbag! Ok I'll replace good with best (optimal)
If you say Saintfiet, for example can help
us win the world cup and I ask you why Lagerback and other foreign coaches
couldn't help us win the world cup, they
you go on to say Lagerback isn't an optimal
coach. It simply means that you are saying Saintfiet is an optimal coach.
The bolded part displays your illiteracy (once again).
Proper scumbag.

You are a person!

It is me, SAGAMITE, you think you can twist words on by omission?

Here is my post:

Sagamite: You are a person!

The whole point is that this is a scheme that would train them on the world of work. It might indirectly improve their understanding of business and their productivity.

The kind of understanding of business and up-skilling that could lead to improved ability of writing business plans.

That is the possible difference.

You are too daft to grasp that little wider thinking?

In what context did I sue "could" there? Is it not a further explanation of a probability?

person!

You are on the slab in the abattoir. This is a slaughter session!

So you now know "good" does not equate to "optimal"?

So you think you have now passed the analogy test by changing "good" to "best", person?

Oya, tell me where I said this scheme is the best for you to worthily use a "best" analogy?

Your brain is being stretched, innit?

Your failed education never stretched your brain this much and never prepared you for this kind of stretch. I am giving you the education you never had.

sCun: At least my school taught me the difference between ''right'' and ''write'', when to use ''a'' and when to use ''an''. My school also taught me when to use the present and past forms of a verb. Did your school teach you these basic things? Scumbag

And your school taught you that to achieve in life is by moronic tribal and nationalistic diatribes?

person, never compare the quality of your education to mine.

It is because of this educational privilege that I can call you out and challenge your intellect, and your poor education makes you respond by running like a p*ussy.

The education that gives me the license to intellectually bully you.

We would still come back to what your school taught you!

When schools like these produce fucktards like Scun, why should I be surprised?

https://www.nairaland.com/1527202/photo-secondary-school-classroom-nigeria

https://www.nairaland.com/1465352/deplorable-state-infrastructure-nigerian-universities

padu: Thank you for your question. I will try to summarize it, as possible as I can.
Survey Name: SMART
Focus: Nutrition, Mortality and Food security
Main Objective: To assess health and nutritional status of children and women, access to improved water and sanitation facility, vitamin A and vaccination coverage in 24 states of Nigeria.
Selected States: Adamawa, Akwa ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Benue, Borno, Cross-river, Ebonyi, Enugu, Gombe, Imo, Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo, Plateau, Sokoto, Yobe and Zamfara.
Number of Teams: 18
Each team was composed of: a team leader and two measurers, making 3ppl/team.
Four(4) Teams covered four(4) states.
Ten(10) days were spent in each State to carry out the survey.
Thirty(30) localities was selected across the LGAs of each state.
The Field Work:
-Each team performed total house listing of the assigned locality
-Only twenty-five(25) households are then selected randomly (out of the listed houses) for interview
-In a section of the interview, the respondent would be asked: "Do you have Toilet facility?"
-If the respondent claim 'Yes, then "what type of toilet facility"?
At this stage some would confess the truth and if some 'smart' respondent went ahead by mentioning the 'falsified' type, the team leader would at this point insist on inspecting the type of toilet facility they claimed to have.
There are many surprises at this stage because you would find out that some good looking houses don't have access to toilet facility! some are no more functioning for years!!! It wasn't an easy task, entering peoples toilet for inspection, in order to get the data right.

Some mugus think UNICEF employs moronic quacks!

iyke926: Nigga, truth hurts. i speak from what I know...i'm a "factist" and you betta open ya eyes. Naija is a messed up "clannistic" country. And what tha f**k makes you think that u are intellectually inclined?? I know ya type of peeps. And what makes you think that ya microscopic reasoning is coherent and others lack sound reasoning?? Dont diss Naija youths like that. If you wanna attack come straight boi.

You are a person!

Pukkah: This is part of the problem with Nigeria - turning serious discussions into a tribal mudslinging.

The youths blame their leaders for the misrule yet they themselves have become clannish, intellectually lazy and totally bereft of sound reasoning.

What do you expect from professional fucktards?

Our education system is at a low and keeps on churning out moronic fucktards like these guys and Scun who all they know is tribal disputes.

Ask them to make sense and, if they tried, you would be convinced the only solution is a shotgun is used to blow their brains to smithereens.

sCun: You are an unadulterated scumbag!
If you say Saintfiet, for example can help us win the world cup and I ask you why Lagerback and other foreign coaches couldn't help us win the world cup, they you go on to say Lagerback isn't a good coach. It simply means that you are saying Saintfiet is a good coach. Again, you don't have to spell it out scumbag!
You dare call someone a product of a failed education system when you can't differentiate between ''right'' and ''write''? What an unrepentant scumbag!
I ask again, what other modalities could they possibly put in place? Remember these are the same people that categorically stated that the scheme is designed to improve the chances of securing jobs for participating graduates. So what modalities can they possibly put in place that will lead to your aforementioned self-employment ventures?
Tell me scumbag.

You are a person!

I have always said fucktards struggle with analogies.

https://www.nairaland.com/1094114/what-occupies-minds-atheists-24/4#12884413

How did you come to the moronic decision to twist "probably" to "can"?

person, since when did "good" equate to "optimal" for an analogy?

So when I say Onazi/Mikel is a good player and probably better than some other midfielder, that means I am saying he is the optimal midfielder?

Lets deal with that unadulterated fucktardism before I address the rest. I don't like people burying their fucktardism in a heap of arguments.

I like to pick it out, isolated it and display it so their fucktardism is publicly highlighted.

Can you see how easy it is for me to intellectually pummel you?

ROSSIKE: Are you sure it's even approaching 5%?

More like .005%

And where did you get your indication from?

What research, empirical or anecdotal evidence did you use to come to your conclusion?

THUNDER4real: i know your problem is that you want to learn how to love one girl that you have been eyeing since not knowing your problem is LUST.

Ahhh!

The classic strawman attempt.

"I can't answer, so I will deflect by attacking with some conjecture/sophism that is irrelevant to the point so I can deflect and misdirect the debate".

No, my problem is with the people that regurgitate silly platitudes they have heard but have never deemed it reasonable to challenge, think and qualify it. They regurgitate it yakata hoping to get a standing ovation and encomiums on the back of the silly utterance and get some affirmation that they have said something intelligent.

Then only for such people to quibble, fumble and struggle when they are queried on the merits and logic behind that silly platitude they take pride in stating.

Next time, think through things you hear and stop vomiting it and think you are saying something intelligent.

When next your Pastor says such, raise up your hand, stand up and say "Excuse me, Sir, you dey chat shyt"!

sCun: You are a scumbag!
I said ''might'' indicates probability, where did I say probability means the same as assumption?
For you to say NYSC isn't an optimal example when I asked why it didn't achieve the same results you are expecting this scheme to achieve, indicates that you have assumed (yet again) that this scheme in particluar will be optimal. You don't have to spell it out scumbag!
All the facts have already been provided, what modalities can they possibly put in place?
Sending the companies curriculum on what to train the graduates on? Sending their own tutors to the companies?
Scumbag can you give me examples of the possible modalities you have in mind?

You are a moronic person!

Is that the deducement you were taught at your failed education establishment where teachers cannot read their certificates?

So because I said NYSC is not optimal, must mean I think another scheme is optimal?

Because I think Iheanacho might be better than Moses as a support striker, that means I think Iheanacho is the optimal support striker in the world?



And you stated you are "intelligent" and it is only my perception that you are actually a person?

And you will be fuming when I call you a product of a failed education system?

That is your "fact", person?

Your brain is made of cement!

So why were you ridiculing my attack on your moronic assumptions based on what you term "facts" by stating I said "ifs" and "buts"?

What "facts" about modalities have been put in place for you to right it off, person?

You just thought, "let me use me ignorant fucktardism to make assumptions and open my gob like a pure person"?

sCun: You are a bloody illiterate Scumbag!
You are not in a position to call anyone a product of a failed education system when you use phrases like ''an assumptions''.
You said this scheme ''might'' (another probabilty from Mr facts) improve their understanding of business and productivity.
When I asked you how this scheme is different from NYSC and internships in doing that, you suggested that NYSC isn't an optimal example, I then asked you why you think this scheme will be an optimal example. It is left for you to answer that.
While you are at it, also tell me how the scheme is supposed to be different from internships. I can see you dodged that part.
Go back to the article all the details you need are there, I can't understand what facts about the implementation you need again.
All they are to do is to send the graduates to private companies, NGOs and government agencies where they are expected to get training that will improve their chances of securing jobs later.
What other facts do you need Mr probabilities?

You are a cretinous person!

Since when did probability mean the same thing as assumption?

What moronic school produced you?

Since when did "might" and "if" represent an assumption, cretin?

So because I said NYSC is not optimal means I stated this is optimal, cretin?

You asking me if the scheme is optimal is your evidence of me stating the scheme is optimal, person?

SHOW ME where I said the scheme was optimal.

I should tell you how the scheme is supposed to be different? person, you think I am a product of a failed education system like you that makes assumptions and call it "facts"?

person, do you know what modalities they would put in place to ensure the outcomes are achieved? Tell us the "facts" na?

A mooron that said "might" is an assumption.

Chartey: It's your type that says ...to serve our fathers' land..." when singing the national anthem. Fatherland is not equal to father's land. So if we say Africa is the motherland, it means Africa is the land of our mothers abi?

Really!

{Says Felastically} Ahhhh.

Please tell me what "fatherland" stands for.

I wait.

sCun: You are a scumbag!
What were you thinking when you said the scheme ''might'' lead to self-employment ''if'' managed properly?
The facts provided is that the scheme is designed to provide graduates with experience that will improve their chances of securing a job later. That is the fact provided. You are the one who foolishly jumped in with probabilities. You are now crying for facts eh?

You are a pure person!

A product of a failed education system.

Since when did "might" and "if" represent an assumptions, cretin?

person, where did you see me state this scheme is optimal?

person, which "facts" provided led you to the assumption that the modalities would be the same as NYSC? Why are you such a cretin that could not think of probabilities since "facts" about implementation has not been supplied?

You saw "facts" now? Show us the facts.

Cretinous product of a failed education system. Which schools taught you to be so moronic?

sCun: The same pûssy that is busy pummeling you on this thread?
www.nairaland.com/1522402/sure-p-pay-unemployed-graduates-n25000/7#19713124

A person that does not know the different sources of finance is claiming to be "pummeling"?

Product of a failed education system, please go back to where you are "pummeling" me and answer my questions.

sCun: You are a scumbag!
If NYSC and Internships aren't optimal examples, what makes you think this scheme is?
You are now talking about assumptions, whereas all your argument from the beginning have been filled with ''ifs'' and ''buts''. I made a comment based on the facts provided, then you jumped in with your probabilities.
I asked you where you think they'll get the money from, you suggested banks and family members. You are yet to convince me on why the family members will wait till after this scheme before giving them funds to start a business if the funds were truly available, you are yet to convince me on why they haven't presented any convincing business proposals to banks or family members ever since they graduated.
Do you know of anything called ''collateral''? Do you think a Nigerian bank will give you a loan simply because your proposal sounds interesting without anything for them to hold on to if it fails?
You are a scumbag!

You are a person?

Where did you see me say this scheme is optimal?

Since when did "ifs" and "buts" become assumptions?

What "facts" have been provided? Your assumptions are "facts"?

Cretinous product of a failed education system. Which schools taught you to be so moronic?

THUNDER4real: I can't start giving you lecture on love but i have one definition of love for you: " love is not only something you feel, it is something you do " also coming down to your question about falling in love with some one else while your still married, the simple answer is that the giving of love is an education in itself, we as human determines who we give our love or not when we really understands what is love. for example we don't really need to have emotional feeling when we say we love God but by practicalizing those things he wants us to do. this is also applicable to a man - woman relationship,where they both does things that pleases the opposite partner in marriage. there/4 saying you love sm1 out of marriage is lust, and that emotional feeling you have for that person will wear out with time.

Oh, Mr Lecturer!

So to you love is a choice?

You can choose who you want to love? You choose who you are attracted to?

So I guess you, as a knowledgeable person on "love", can choose and determine to love this person?

https://cdn2.holytaco.com/wp-content/uploads/images/2010/10/111007_ugly_woman_shirt.jpg

So in your understanding of love (a word which I obvioously do not understand as you said), the love between a man and woman is the same kind of love between man and his God?

Ah, Professor in Love ni wo! Na you be PhD holder in the understanding of love.

sCun: Finish what? You think is is about today alone? I will always attack you whenever I see you commenting on Nigerian internal issues. What kind of a frustrated bîtch are you? I even saw your post on another thread calling for Nigeria to be divided, that was when I followed you. How the fûck are these things your business? You better find somewhere else to take out your frustrations.

Sweetcheecks, when he attacks you, just notify me and let me come and bully him a bit.

Then watch him run like a little p*ussy because he is scared shyt of my intellectual pummeling.

https://www.nairaland.com/1524957/kenyan-men-chase-capture-cheetahs/5#19712642

He is really a cowardly p*ussy has no balls.

sCun: You are a proper scumbag!
What training on the world of work are they supposed to get that is different from what they got as youth corp members?
Are you saying that Youth corp members do not get training on the world of work?
What about the total of 1 year compulsory internship they must have done during their time in school?
Don't internships provide training on world of work?
You are too dense to see that this scheme doesn't change anything.

You are a person!

Is it not dependent on how the training is modeled and implemented?

Or you think the NYSC is optimal example for job training modeling and implementation?

person, when you have a brain, you will maybe listen to the details of the proposal before making moronic assumptions.

person, so you are not arguing anymore about how finance is raised?

sCun: I am sorry. I don't find you worthy of examining me. Where you got the idea that most people see you as intelligent, more so a billion times more intelligent than me, is what I don't know.

But if you are confident you are intelligent and have any balls, you will take up the challenge and instead turn the table on me, not run.

Take up the challenge and show it is only a "perception" that you are the bluntest tool in the box.

Surely it is because you know you are intellectually bereft that is why you are attempting to run?

sCun: You are a scumbag!
Why didn't they use the money they saved during NYSC to for the self-employment ventures? Are you saying they need more money from this scheme or what?
What has been holding them from presenting ''good business plans'' to banks since?
How will this scheme change that?
What stopped them from presenting good business proposals to their families since they graduated?
What will this scheme change?

You are a person!

The whole point is that this is a scheme that would train them on the world of work. It might indirectly improve their understanding of business and their productivity.

The kind of understanding of business and up-skilling that could lead to improved ability of writing business plans.

That is the possible difference.

You are too daft to grasp that little wider thinking?

sCun: You are a scumbag!
We are talking about the same graduates that couldn't save from the 20k they earned as youth corp members. Some of them probably served in places with lower cost of living than where they are now, they probably got free accomodation and gifts in form of food stuffs and properties from their hosts then.
Do you think banks give out loans just like that?
Are those family members and friends supposed to suddenly fall from heaven after the scheme? Where have they been?
YouWIN isn't the topic of our discussion.

You are a person!

And what makes you think many could not save at NYSC?

Are many still not living at home with their parents now?

You think banks wouldn't give loans in a society pregnant with opportunities because of colossal public failures if people come up with good business plans?

How many young Nigerians ever bother to put a business proposal to family members and demonstrate willingness to execute it?

You are a person? Is YouWiN not aimed at the same demography?

I thought you moronically said youths don't have access to funds? You were too dumb to think comprehensively about how funds are raised?