Senatorkolade's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Senatorkolade's Profile › Senatorkolade's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (of 9 pages)
Some people argue that they did not order for the GCMS notes and re-pllied, they got an approval. It is possible because what VO A saw as unreasonable in your entire profile may make a lot of sense to another VO B but this scenario is one out of ten. GCMS allows you to know the mind of the VO that treated your file no matter how generic it is but the choice is in the applicant whether to order for it or rush to reapply like that. NOBODY IS FORCING ANYBODY TO ORDER IT. MIND YOU, THE $5 YOU WILL PAY ONLY GOES TO THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT AND NOT ME. SO I HAVE NO INTEREST IN IT. BIKO! |
henricson:ONE WAY IS FINE |
vibrant99:Not all comments need to respond to. We need to ignore certain individuals on this forum |
Ezriela:Don't rush, apply for your GCMS notes. That only purpose of the visit may encompass some other hidden concerns which only GCMS notes can reveal. |
Aneeta133:If you peruse the case law very well, the presiding judge queried the VO's decision of refusing the study permit on illogical progression. The court held that in actual interpretation of the law which the visa officer misquoted, study progression does not necessarily mean from lower level to higher level. The applicant demonstrated that he wanted to pursue a program from a theory based course he got in Nigeria to a more practical one in Canada. To the judge, this is a progression. Also, the court faulted the VOs submission that the course of study is not reasonable as to why the applicant wanted to INCURE that cost of studying in Canada after the applicant had explained it in the SOP. Then the court submitted that the onus is now on the VO to provide his/her own explanation as to why he/she felt that the applicant's explanation is unreasonable. |
THE PIECE BELOW WILL HELP THOSE REFUSED ON STUDY PLAN PROGRESSION IN TACKLING THE VO's CONCERN In the recent case of Omijie v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 878 [CanLII link], Mr. Omijie is a 26-year old citizen of Nigeria who sought to study at Alberta’s NAIT for a Bachelors of Business Administration program after he had previously graduated, three years prior, from a Bachelors of Science from a university in Nigeria. Mr. Omijie’s student permit application was rejected, and not for the first time [as will be discussed below]. This case highlights the dilemma faced by many study permit applicants, particularly from countries such as Nigeria, where the last figures we have from January – March 2017 show that the number of successful applicants (371) compared to unsuccessful (2,174) and total applications lodged (2,545) leads to a 14.5% success rate. 371 2,174 2,545 53% I would assume that rate has worsened since with the volume of students seeking entry into Canada from all over the world. One of the major issues under scrutiny was the fact that the Applicant was seeking a degree to continue studies in a related area at a related level. It is also important to put into context that the Applicant’s study permit refusal had already gone back once to the visa office for reconsideration after a decision by Justice Diner. The reason it was sent back by the Federal Court was due to (as we will see also from this decision) a lack of explanation for why the “educational and employment history” was problematic. As summarized in this decision about the first judicial review: Justice Pentney (former Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney General of Canada many of those practicing will recognize from filing previous Judicial Reviews) made two very interesting points, set out over three paragraphs of his decision, as to why judicial review should be granted and the matter sent back to the visa office for redetermination. In paragraph 23, Justice Pentney exams the evidence that was put forth by the Applicant for explaining why he wishes to pursue studies in Canada – specifically a desire to pursue hands-on, practical, and technologically advanced training. The Visa Officer does not question the evidence provided but finds fault in the cost of relocating to Canada to undertake study at the same financial level. This is very common among international students who do often come with Bachelor’s or ther advanced degrees from abroad but wish to gain Canadian specific qualifications which may require them to start at a lower level or pursue diplomas. Justice Pentney acknowledges that the Applicant may not have set out the grounds of why there was a logical progression between the two studies clearly but that the Officer’s decision to reject what was presented without adequate explanation was itself unreasonable. A recent trend of overseas visa office refusals that I have seen (both on the student and TRV side) is that the decisions are generally becoming more and more trite, with less and less reference to evidence provided. While a decision-maker is presumed to have reviewed all evidence, silence with respect to evidence that can corroborate the Applicant’s statements and that directly contradicts the visa officer’s decision, can render a decision unreasonable. That being said, with judicial review being a costly procedure, and with the possibility that matters such as these can end up in a loop of judicial reviews and refusals, it is pertinent to put the best foot forward in the first application and make it abundantly clear how the Applicant meets the statutory and regulatory requirements of a bona fide student (or visitor as the case may be) that will leave Canada at the end of their stay. In this matter, reference to policy and to previous refusals (if any) is crucial. Whether it is putting a succinct cover letter or organizing the online submission in a manner where the visa officer is clear as to where documents are located, these small steps when a visa officer has only a few minutes to review a file and render a decision, goes a long way. The Omijie decision also highlights another issue (and common point of misunderstanding) for those who pursue judicial review and expect that either the process will allow the judge to grant the study permit or else that once it is returned for reconsideration a student permit will be shortly granted. |
Lagos2canna:I got the info from a lawyer |
Lagos2canna:DONT EXPECT ANY UPDATE TILL MID NOVEMBER FOR ONLINE (London) APPLICANTS |
Success2019:How many years program? |
THIS WHY CANADA IS VERY TOUGH ON NIGERIAN VISA SEEKERS Despite being the world’s largest black nation with over 180 million people, thousands of Nigerians regularly leave the country daily to seek asylum in other countries. According to a special focus by Per Second News, for example, 13,656 Nigerians applied for Canadian Temporary Resident Visa between January to March , 2018. A whooping 175, 474 Nigerians applied for the Temporary Resident Visa in the North American country between 2013 – 2018, according to documents sent to Per Second News by the Canadian Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship office. The Canadian Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship approved a total of 82,277 applications from Nigerians, while 87, 247 Nigerians saw their applications denied. The Canadians say most of those granted visas refuse to go back to Nigeria and instead seek for asylum in what the Canadian authorities called ‘an unprecedented surge of asylum seekers from Nigeria.’ Asylum seekers at the US-Canadian border So far this year, the majority of illegal migrants arriving in Canada are Nigerians who have recently been issued U.S. travel visas. “It is apparent that they obtained those visas with the express intent to actually go to Canada,” said Hursh Jaswal, communications director for Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen. “They land in the United States, where they stay for a very short period of time, and then make their way to Canada.” Per Second News in a report last week revealed that the Canadian authorities has urged U.S. embassy officials in Lagos and Abuja to crack down on visas, saying many of the asylum seekers had valid U.S. visas and used the United States merely as a transit point. The number of U.S. visas being issued to Nigerians has since dropped, said Mathieu Genest, a spokesman for Canadian Immigration and Refugee Minister Ahmed Hussen, revealed. “Nigerians do not want to settle in the U.S. but in Canada. It is much easier for a citizen of Nigeria to obtain a tourist visa for the U.S. than for Canada,” Stephane Handfield, an immigration lawyer in Montreal, said. “So they get a U.S. tourist visa, stay a few days in the U.S. and cross the Canadian border.” Asylum seekers in Canada The Royal Canadian Mounted Police said more than 25,000 people were intercepted as they crossed from the US since January 2017 to March 2018. Responding to query by Per Second News, the Canadian Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship office, said that although a Canadian official has been sent to work with US visa officials in Lagos on three separate occasions and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Minister Ahmed Hussen met with Nigerian government officials last month, it is important to note that Canadian authorities are not interfering or involved in decisions regarding the issuance of US visas. “The U.S. is responsible for each decision that is made on whether to issue or not a visa. At the highest levels, both Canada and the United States have reaffirmed their determination to work together to combat abuse of US travel documents. This is part of the mutual long term cooperation between USA and Canada to protect our borders, said Nancy Caron, spokesperson for the Canadian immigration in an email to Per Second News. “The Government of Canada continues to expand its overall outreach efforts to inform people and provide the facts about Canada’s asylum system by working closely with our missions in the U.S., by engaging with communities in the U.S. and issuing messages on social media channels in both Canada and the U.S. to provide accurate information.” “The Government of Canada is committed to orderly migration, which includes providing protection to genuine refugees based on a well-founded fear of persecution, she told this newspaper on Monday. ” The government is unwavering in its commitment to ensuring the safety of Canadians, protecting our well-managed immigration system and fulfilling our international obligations. Minister Hussen has been clear that Canada’s asylum system is intended solely for those in need of our protection and it must be done through the proper channels. Entering Canada by irregularly crossing the border is not a free ticket to stay, each claim is heard by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) and unsuccessful claimants are removed to their country of origin.” The Canadian immigration also revealed that there have been no visa policy changes for Nigerian nationals. ” Visa applications are considered on a case-by-case basis based on the information presented by the applicant. The onus is on the applicant to show that they meet the requirements for a temporary resident visa (TRV). All applications from around the world are assessed equally against the same criteria. Canada does not limit the number of temporary resident visa applications that are accepted from any country. |
From February 2017 to March 2018, a total of 23,577 claims for refugee protection were made by irregular border crossers, according to the latest available data from the Immigration and Refugee Board -- the arms-length body that processes asylum claims. Of those, a total of 3,462 claims, or 15 per cent, have been finalized. Of the claims that have been finalized, 47 per cent have been accepted, 36 per cent have been rejected, nine per cent have been abandoned and eight per cent have been withdrawn or classified as "other." After Garneau made the statement in May that more than 90 per cent of irregular migrants were being rejected, government officials later clarified that he was referring specifically to the number of Haitians who crossed into Canada last year at unofficial crossings. The majority of asylum seekers this year are Nigerian, and as a result may be more eligible for asylum, given the state of conflict and persecution of certain populations in Nigeria, the government has said. IRB data shows that between February 2017 and March 2018, 68 per cent of claims by asylum seekers from Haiti whose claims had been processed were rejected, while only nine per cent were approved. Meanwhile, 46 per cent of Nigerian claims were rejected and 33 per cent were accepted. Only a small percentage of the total claims have been processed so far, due to a significant backlog at the IRB. Only 1,074 Haitian claims and 361 claims from Nigerians have been completed. |
Godisgracious:You don't need any tutorial. Self-practice with study material is the key. Visit the following sites: 1. www.ieltsliz.com 2. www.ielts-up.com You can use the first website for the online tutorial and the second website for tutorial and sample questions. Hope this helps |
yhemight:Write the through the web form to withdraw your application |
Frankrobbn1:Once they set their eyes on Nigerian applicants, they don't waste time in copying and paste refusal grounds. I think what heightens their suspicion about Nigerians is the alarming rate our people are frivolously seeking asylum in Canada. It got to a point when Canada had to warn USA of being too loose in giving visas to Nigeria because once those Nigerians enter USA with their visa, the next move is to head straight to Canadian border for asylum. Now USA has gone back to their old way of visa refusals to Nigerians |
MISFITrep:5 million? Did you apply through agent? paper or online? |
kennykentipsy:Your relatives here can do that for you. Let them go to the WAEC zonal office of where you sat for your exam. They will fill a form and pay certain fees which I don't know for now. They can also go to your university and request for your transcript to be sent to WES |
MISFITrep:I think so |
Jummy902:Sorry about this refusal. These Kenya VOs don't send. Somebody can disagree but the fact is that many of them don't read the SOP even if it is a half page. |
Henhy:Since you are not married yet, you need to show more social and economic ties to Nigeria. You can use your parents as ties and back it up with the submission of Justice John O' Keefe in the judicial review case Tharsini versus Canada (Citizenship and Immigration Canada) 2012 FC 1518 when the court submitted that "one can only assume the officer concluded the ties are weak due to only a single family member being in that country. However, to judge family ties solely based on the quantity of family members is to ignore the relevant factor of the strength of the child-parent bond. |
[quote author=Louisanc post=72331588]Good morning all... ****Long post alert I will be submitting my application via paper route on Wednesday.. please help advice on my application. the first application was refused on August.. have ordered reasons.. purpose of visit, financial status and asset and travel history (I don't have any) ducoments to be submitted : - All CIC documents - SOP (6 pages, am going for pharmacy and I was admitted in physiology and pharmacy dept to do some courses before applying for college of pharmacy ) - LOE (2 pages explaining the refusal reasons) - first sponsor my brother (he has paid my fees $25,000, his SOA, deposited #500,000 in my account, affidavit of sponsorship and sponsorship letters - 2nd Sponsor my Boss, I have only worked for him for two months ( his SOA, affidavit of sponsorship, letter of introduction, study leave letter, letter of introduction, deposited #500,000 ) - My qualification certificate Bsc in Biochemistry (2.1) - My two months SOA cos of when I started the work - birth certificate, passport, waec, hsse cert I want to book appointment but am only seeing option for Biometric enrollment. I think that's all Please gurus help n review and tell what else is needed. thanks. [/quote Have you travelled before? And to where? |
Henhy:What is your current job? What did you study and what are you going for? Are you married |
042viber12:Share your profile first |
042viber12:Amen |
Austacus:You can travel anytime from November |
Jummy902:Then you stand a higher chance of approval |
Austacus:Are you sure of this? |
Jummy902:If you did not do upfront medical, I am sorry, you have been refused |
henricson:Congrats I tap into your success. It seems our Nairobi friends have repented |
THIS IS WHAT I GOT FROM LONDON VISA OFFICE. We write in reply to your enquiry dated 12th October 2018. Please note that your application for a study permit to Canada is currently under active review. Every effort is being made to complete processing as quickly as possible. You will be notified via your online account once a decision has been reached. We trust this information is of assistance to you. Kind regards, JLW High Commission of Canada in the United Kingdom Immigration and Medical Services Division Canada House | Maison du Canada Trafalgar Square London | Londres SW1Y 5BJ |
muizzzz:PRAY |
In most cases, the refusal letter a times alone may be misleading and if you follow those refusal reasons alone without the GCMS, you would likely risk another refusal except the GCMS notes carry the same word for word reasons for the generic refusal letter but how would you know? For instance, in the refusal letter of an applicant, the following were ticked 1. Purpose of visit 2. Travel history 3. Personal assets and financial status But the GCMS notes carry "After careful review of the application and supporting documents provided, applicant appears to have limited economic and social ties to home country as well as limited funds seen in order to support studies and limited travel history. Study plan does not appear logical considering economic conditions and employment prospect in the applicant's home country, and taking into account factors including travel history, economic establishment, I am not not satisfied that the applicant would respect the terms of admission as a student in Canada. Based on the evidence provided I am not satisfied applicant is a genuine student who intends to study, complete the course of study in Canada and depart at the end of authorised stay. Refused. " If this applicant had followed only the refusal letter, he would be tackling his PGD as purpose of visit reason, he would not touch limited funds concern, he would also missed the ties to home country which were not mentioned in the refusal letter but elucidated in the visa officer notes. |
Louisanc:GO THERE WITH YOUR CASH. THEY DONT ACCEPT CARD PAYMENT |