₦airaland Forum

pocohantas:
Your mother failed you and I hope this serves as a lesson to other greedy young girls.

Please endure and work it out with him.

---

koning:
See the people you take make example?!. Are they rich? The lady is right. I did not watch the video, but going by the heading, she is 100%right.

Seyi Law and Aina you mentioned never lived abroad per se. They only visited and then got carried away. I know some traders who go to Europe twice a month for years, but will never live in Europe.

Being rich and living in UK is a waste of your richness if you are a Nigerian, African or just black.

But, with your mentality, I'm sure you will not understand.

NurseSnowToYou:
Oh my, please do tell me more about my own Black American woman toxicity... 🤔😅.

ednut1:
ethopian bible is different from the normal bible you use today. The colonialist never took it there as it was there. They brought it to Nigeria and other parts

meobizy:
Whargabbl, Whargabbl, whargabbl.

ednut1:
Oyinbo brought the religion to you. In their own country they are not attending churches. When will we get sense

Dtruthspeaker:
Since you agree that yhwh is not His Name whether personal or otherwise, then it stands to reason that it can belong to Canaanite god or any god or thing.

And therefore, it is right for Christians to completely discard and reject it especially as it even claimed by a Canaanite god, the same Canaan and their gods, The Supreme God wanted to annihilate.



No issue here



"El" is actually not confined to Canaan alone as we have "el" in Igbo for elochukwu and eloka, in Edo we have Elo and Eluwe and in Urhobo we have Elohor. Also in Spain, Mexico, Brazil, Uganda, they also have el.

Even Isaac got Isreal has the "el" as given directly by God.

So "el" is universal and cannot be claimed to belong to a specific society.

But no one claims owners of the word Yahweh.



Nothing there says yhwh.
All say the Holy exclusive Name we call "God"!

I am very certain that if any one should call God, Sango, every Christian will never agree.



I never said a claim is Truth. I clearly said a fact not rebutted, is deemed True.



I find no reason or cause to seek where I Am comes from because it is very clear on its own nor care about yhwh since he is a Canaanite god



The Name of God is everything. For in His Name alone, the earth shakes, doors open, evil flees.

And Hosea 2:6 shows that she was serving Baal and God responded against her even though He draws her back.

And the word in verse 16 is Baali, and not Baal.

So, this is Wrong!

'Inclusive' race bans women and girls over 12

A charity run organised by the East London Mosque Trust has excluded women and girls aged 13 and over from taking part.

The Muslim Charity Run, which was held in Victoria Park in Tower Hamlets on Sunday, said on its website: "Our inclusive atmosphere ensures that every individual, from the youngest to the oldest, can take part and make a difference."

It added: "This is open to men, boys of all ages and girls under 12, but everyone is welcome at the park to cheer on the runners."

The organisers have been contacted by BBC London for comment.

The 3.1-mile (5km) event, previously known as Run 4 Your Mosque, was the 12th race to be held by organisers.

It faced criticism on social media, where people questioned why women were not allowed to take part in the race, given the focus on inclusivity.

sonmvayina:
Educate yourself if you may.

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/4036882/jewish/The-Vision-of-Ezekiel.htm

Dtruthspeaker:
It is not that I accept the claim but the fact i find that people cannot validly deny and rebut it.

Which means that it stands as True because this is usually how all Truths stand (Law of a fact not rebutted, is deemed True)

And you know basically this is how the bible successfully stands as True despite all the attacks.

So, righteousness dictates that what happens to the right hand must happen to the left.

Then, my next objection is that seeing that the word Yahweh is corrupted by being a name shared by a Canaanite god, then knowing God is Holy and His Name must be Holy, there is no way that He would accept sharing a name with a Canaanite god.

Absolutely impossible!
Most especially seeing all the other Holy Names He has.

So this leads me to believe that and conclude that Yahweh cannot be the referring to The Holy One of Isreal.

Dtruthspeaker:
Thanks for the in sight but I respectfully disagree.

So first, with an open mind, it is said that "YHWH" is from the Isreal language Hebrew.

And Google says that
"Hebrew language originated from the Canaanite language group, a branch of the Semitic family, around the late second millennium BCE".

And Isreal was in Canaan and in disobedience to God, they frolicked with the Canaanites and served their gods.

So now, we have the yhwh looking like it belongs too much to Canaan land.

And your argument about Abraham being not a Canaanite definitely means that he spoke a different language exactly how a A Yoruba man speaks a different language from the urhobo, hence Oluwa/Olorun in yoruba is technically and linguistically not the same Oghene in urhobo.

Ehen, this case is exactly as when the Edos and Deltas most commonly and other tribes say "Sango ki... or thunder faya...", People would think that Sango too is their god cos dey say it a lot. But Sango is a Yoruba god. And not

I believe this is what happened to the word yhwh as the language of the Canaanites was taken up by the Abraham's children exactly how Nigerians living in Germany now speak German and may in some cases their native languages. Which is what must happen to Laban.

Then the remainder of your argument does not stand as no where is yhwh stated in those passages.

What those passages clearly reveal is that the peoples recognise that The Greatest and Mightiest God, Whoever He is truly Rules and that when He shows up, the world knows and bows down, even when they have their own gods.

Thus, those passages only prove what we already know to be true that in every place The All Ruling God is recognised and recognisable as shown even here where Yoruba, Edo, urhobo, ibibio all have the Name they call The All Mighty and Ruling God, even when they have lesser gods.

Dtruthspeaker:
Then, since you dispute that that Google's reports on Yahweh being a Canaanite god is not True, then the burden is on you to supply the valid evidence and proof in rebuttal to me and Google if you have it. But I know you don't have any hence all these antics of placing burden of proof even when it is your turn to prove your denial but you cannot because you never knew that Yahweh that people scream all over the place is a Canaanite god

sonmvayina:
Answer my question, I will answer yours. You have to be truthful as possible as you can.
Question 1: where is it stated in the Tanakh that God has a son who was part of the triune God that he was sending as a sin sacrifice to himself, in other to save mankind from the hell that he created. (I just rephrased my question)

sonmvayina:
Answer my question, I will answer yours. You have to be truthful as possible as you can.
Question 1: where is it stated in the Tanakh that God has a son who was part of the triune God that he was sending as a sin sacrifice to himself, in other to save mankind from the hell that he created. (I just rephrased my question)

sonmvayina:
As how??
When did Psalms become prophecies??
They are songs or recitation during community services. Not prophecy. It is grouped under writings not prophets. Other books in that category includes proverbs, job, songs of Solomon.
Read the whole chapter to understand what message the writer is passing. You can't just take one line from it and run away from it. You won't understand anything like that.
Read the whole chapter then comeback and tell me what you found. I will wait.

sonmvayina:
I

The author of the gospel put it in Jesus mouth because they had the Tanakh as they were forging the gospel. They were looking for passages to pass off as the hero of their story.

The psalm is about David. He was being chased by people who were planning a palace coup. And want to kill him. The psalm is about him. Not a future person. It is written in past tense..

sonmvayina:
All those things you listed are what God prohibited in his laws. Like No one comes to the father except through me, God specifically warned that "Do not have any other God before me in his second commandments. Which means we should come to him directly...it makes we wonder which God Jesus it actually.
God never said he had a son in the entire Tanakh, why all of a sudden, because you read a book from unknown authors that Jesus said he is a "son of God" and has come to save the world and you believe it when God did not order it to begin with....

That is the delimma.

jmoore:
Believe all these copy and paste at your own peril.


Is South Sudan the most wealthiest country?

You think cows are ants?

Gabrielshow24:
😔He didn't have a name. He is a dependent god. He needs man for all his qualities 🥱. He even needs man to keep committing sins so that he can forgive them😁. By the way, he is a composite god!

honesttalk21:
It doesn't require much thought to see that I am is clearly different from I am that I am.

It similarly doesn't transform to calling YHVH.

Surely there's nothing logical missed.

geoworldedu:
Wonderful. Time for me to cash out on the gullible sheep. D

AntiChristian:
How many type of death dey? When Lazarus died was he in coma for Jesus to raise him up?

Forget Genesis, God didn't say Adam will die. If he said that Adam would have died! There's nothing like spiritual death or physical death!

Death is death!

You Sabi reinterpretate your Bible o!

Die is no more die again and it means something else!

honesttalk21:
I commend your efforts however too shallow.

Was the Prophet pbuh Taught by Waraqah or Jabr?

You caim Waraqah ibn Nawfal was a close family tutor of Muhammad pbuh.

However the clear reality is Waraqah was Khadijah’s cousin, making him the Prophet pbuh's cousin-in-law, not his uncle or teacher (Ibn Hishām, 1955).

Both shared distant descent from Qusayy ibn Kilab, but this was true of most Quraysh, and does not imply an intimate family tie (al-Tabari, 1987).

No historical source records ongoing meetings before revelation. Their first encounter came only after the Prophet’s experience in the cave of Hiraʾ (Sahih al-Bukhari).


You also claim: Waraqah instructed Muhammad in Christianity and scripture. But the is that by the time of their meeting, Waraqah was already old and blind, incapable of actively teaching (Bukhari, Kitab Badʾ al-Wahy).

Earlier, he had been known for writing parts of the Gospel in Arabic script, but this was publicly known, not secret (Donner, 2010) and quite a different from public oral preaching.

His actual role was confirmatory as he saud this is the Namus who came to Moses.” He validated, but did not provide content.


Again your claim that the kinship terms used in hadith prove close relations (my nephew,my cousin) but In Arabic tribal etiquette, ibn akhi (my nephew/son of my brother) was a respectful form of address for younger tribesmen, not literal genealogy (Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari).

Khadijah calling Muhammad your nephew, O my cousin was polite framing, not evidence of hidden Christian teaching or close genealogical relationship. This language reflected Quraysh norms of solidarity, not intimate family tutoring.


You claim Khadijah must have been discussing the Bible with Waraqah already and don't appreciate the reality of her turning to him because of his public reputation as a man of scripture, not because of secret Christian instruction.

There is no evidence that Khadijah was a Christian herself; Islamic sources consistently describe her as a believer in the One God, not as a practicing member of the Church (Donner, 2010; Neuwirth, 2019).


You particularly refer to a claim that Jabr the Christian slave taught Muhammad pbuh and though the Quraysh did accuse the Prophet pbuh of this, the Qur’an preserves and refutes the charge. The one they point to speaks a foreign tongue, while this Qur’an is in clear Arabic speech” (Qur’an 16:103).

The Quraysh themselves acknowledged the Qur’an’s unmatched eloquence in Arabic, yet accused him of learning from a foreigner an inherently contradictory claim (Reynolds, 2010). Translation effects would not explain the Qur’an’s unparalleled rhythm, structure, and coherence, which stunned native poets and linguists (Neuwirth, The Qur’an and Late Antiquity, 2019).


Your further claim that the Qur’an plagiarized from earlier scriptures is purely unfounded.
The Qur’an overlaps with Biblical traditions but reframes them with corrections and theological originality (Neuwirth, 2019).

Scholars such as John Wansbrough (1977) emphasize that the Qur’an is not derivative but engages in intertextual dialogue with late Antiquity’s religious environment. He showed that the Qur’an is not derivative but engages in intertextual dialogue with Late Antiquity’s religious environment reframing earlier ideas with originality. In other words it converses, it does not copy.

honesttalk21:
Jesus never called God by the name YHWH but instead called Him Father by the Jewish figurative sense of intimacy and obedience. The holy Name does not appear in the Gospel narrative following Jewish worship practice of not using its pronouncement. Speaking of the I am (ego eimi) statements of John, they were common Greek statements meaning I am he, and not an identification of YHWH. Jesus thus ever identified Himself as the servant of God and not God Himself.

Expanse2020:
Perhaps you should point it where it's said that or you misquoted

Expanse2020:
Perhaps you should point it where it's said that or you misquoted