₦airaland Forum

Shollyps:
..


God be like...... hey...you have offended me!



here,have my son and kill him so I can forgive you!

asalimpo:
Like i said, your elitist stance is pathetic.
You want to say, that to debunk evolution, i should become a scientists (probably get a phD),
in other words, without complicated knowledge, i should simply accept the stance of scientists?
You're a joker. Even this stance is illogical.
But you want others, to accept the theory (conjecture) who don't have formal education in science?
see the hypocrisy in you. Why not require that the people you preach to obtain, a formal degree first and publish peer reviewed papers first before you preach your theory to them?

A scientific theory has to be logical. Failing the laws of logic it becomes nonsense.

2) The 'theory' is a conjecture and many scientists within the community, a percentage, are not agreed on it.

asalimpo:
Yeah, save your elitism. And if convincing paper is written, will the atheistic scientific community publish it?
By the same vein, if the bible is to be debunked,
Scientists should be capable of creating life from nothing. Creating a universe from nothing.
Then they'd be able to say with authority, how a world and life can be created. They can't
so for now they are just babbling observers spewing their ungodly opinion.

Also, prove authoritatively that there's no spirit world.

Like i said and like is known, qualified and educated scientists are not agreed on evolution.
It's still a myth.
You can debunk any claim by a simple explanation. All complexity can be relayed in simple terms.

musKeeto:
Funny times we live in... When religions claim not to be religions, but attribute atheism as a religion.

It seems religion has become unattractive and repulsive to those who should treasure it most.

That's a good start.

musKeeto:
Funny times we live in... When religions claim not to be religions, but attribute atheism as a religion.

It seems religion has become unattractive and repulsive to those who should treasure it most.

That's a good start.

Okorieikechukwu:
The homogeneous and isotropic law of the universe has given a clue as to what to expect from other planets. Thus, I do not think that the alien life will posses a different nature or form as we have here. It's possible but not true until proven. The truth is that, it is the same silicon or earth like material that we will see in mars or any other planet. The same sand, air, methane, organic nature and so on and so forth and as such, we don't expect to get a weird being as people think. we may only get a more hardened being due to the nature of the planet. but they will still have that same body system that cosmology taught us.


Jonnydon, please correct me if they is any mistake from the above.

johnydon22:
Nothing at all my brother.. You can imagine a creator of the universe that thinks Stars could fall, snakes used to talk, vegetation before sunlight, and man that is predominantly Hydrogen, oxygen, carbon and nitrogen is made of sand (silica).

Like seriously these Gods need secondary diploma.

It has been shown over and over again that "the god did it" hypothesis is a primitive superstition derived to fill in the gap left by the void of human ignorance in the face of the cosmos.

The Ancient greeks thought the milky way band across the sky was a milk spilled from Hera's bossoms..

it is noble poetry but is naive and chastising study to uphold these absurd personal beliefs and superstitions is an insult to human intellect..

And the people having a personal relationship with these creators cannot even relay to us a single unknown fact of cosmological manifestations but rely on science to modify their interpretations of religious books.

Psychosis has never been more obvious

gbam!! nail straight on the head.........if a soposed creator of the enormous cosmos doesnt know such little details about his creation......it would be an insult to my intellect to acknowledge it/ or whatever .........worse part is the dude says we gon roast in hell

KingEbukaNaija:
Hehe .. bad guy I see you man . Its funnier how it takes years of study to come up with those emulations and then modification of the emulation just to achieve the same design that putatively came from chaos .

johnydon22:
what if the universe requires a designer, does this mean this designer must be eternal?

does this mean it can not be a race of intelligent beings? they surely must need a plain to exist unless this creator is just a conscious nothingness.

Not only is the assumptive creator hypothesis vague you also need to assume up it is eternal and not also a product of natural development.

-it is a humanoid
-has a son
-likes burnt flesh
-having a personal relationship with you.

This your "god" is simply too small for the cosmos ...

Your argument is that artificial entities are inspired by nature there for nature must have been also being designed just like artificial entities... it is not only weak but absurd and even kills your god hypothesis.

Because your belief pictures a god whose being also inspired nature, so if nature is designed because artificial mechanisms emulates nature then this "god" whose complexity nature emulates must also be designed as nature is .

if you argue it was not designed then you have shown emulation does not connote the emulated was also designed like the emulator ..

and your argument is killed by your own baseless assumptions more...

KingEbukaNaija:
As expected from a shallow thinker, a mediocre . Its a tough nut to crack so you can label it whatever to feel good again . I understand bro

KingEbukaNaija:
Stating that its weak ... and running away .

Ok ... lol

KingEbukaNaija:
By an eternal conscious creator ? Yup .

well , if that's your argument, then its weak....look for another.....bye

KingEbukaNaija:
This is a non sequitur to what I posted . I doubt you understand the argument .

KingEbukasBlog:
2. Man emulates nature but fails to admit nature was indeed designed .

1. RoboScorpion vs Scorpion

2. Robodog vs Dog

3. Artificial neuron vs human neuron

4. Man's arm vs Robot's arm

The former is described as intelligently designed but not the latter Do you see why atheism is irrational and the atheists need to understand the Logic of God and EVERYTHING ?

oglalasioux:
Very nice thoughts and so so true. However, don't disprove witchcraft. It exists but not in the sense we know it.

Science has proven that the human mind can be artificially controlled. There is something Africans of old discovered millennia ago and that is forces of the universe; gravity, electromagnetism and the two nuclear forces. That is what they built their shrines and deities around.

The CIA uses radio waves to control human beings. Africans know that technology but because they practice it through their deities and shrines we call it witchcraft.

The lesson from your post is that man is the architect of his problems. Yes. Man, especially the black African, should abandon witchcraft. It's a science they know but use arbitrarily and dangerously. That's the only hope for the black man; fleeing from anything called religion.

so africans use radiowaves for witchcraft??....impressive...............btw nice writeup op

Teempakguy:
African americans are more attractive.

Why?

Because they _fucking live in a first world. Nigeria is a Third world, People are suffering, We don't have light, water, Good food, No gyms, no libraries, Schools are utter crap . . . you should realize that the fact that any African is even remotely attractive is a miracle. most of them are struggling to survive. It follows that Attractiveness isn't at the top of their agenda.

Tellemall:
I never bothered reading them once I was told I wasn't educated. I simply am not bothered.

Our views are too different. If I'm expected to read all that, then I deserve some sort of politeness in return. Not autistic rambles and self proclaimed intelligence that is lacking.

You may read or watch them. I refuse to.

Thanks. Bye.

**Also, I shouldn't have commented on a thread meant to please atheists. I do not wish to be mentioned or stalked by irate female atheists who are looking for who to look down on.

Tellemall:
"Crying" another one of your favorite words. The trail continues.

"Bullying" Lol.
OK. "Victimization". Hahaga.

You are wasting your time.

You think I'm female? Lol.

Some pretty dense assumptions. Who told you that you could educate me? In knowing everything you know nothing..

ogechieku:
I am really geting disappointed in every one of your responses. I cant believe that a scientist, a highly trained person in field of science couldnt be far better than a lady who does not have high sch certificate. Your responses are not scientific in any and alway sound like someone who lacks home training. Anyway, anyone that leaves Nigeria to that place you are becomes rude and uncultured. Many of my questions are scietific but none of your responses is scietific. If you cant be scietific and polite let stop here.

yeah i suggest you stop here too....

KingEbukasBlog:

lol.....what i actually find funny is the fact that you think youre making sense.......seriously just read what you wrote one more time....."smart dude ebuka"

KingEbukasBlog:
I know right ?

cos the topic itself is the definition of irrationality