SupremeCourt: Anybody with above mediocre intelligence knows when a foreign partner builds for you an aircraft engine, transmission, avionics, computers, electronics, weapons systems, that is 95% of the airplane.
Ghana has draftsmen that can draw aircraft design and ask Britain to do the rest of the work. So what did South Africa build in the AHRLAC if not alumi body, rubber tyres, paint job?
Like you dont know what technology is, maybe you went to village school, then some Southie fools you around.
Bros. You're saying thrash, and no southie is fooling me. Everyone here knows I don't go with their opinions.
How will someone open his or her mouth and say avionics, weapons etc makes 95% of an aircraft? You think designing an aircraft is about a diagram?
Hey man, my major is Aerospace engineering ( Aircrafts manufacturing and design) so I'm obviously not typing thrash as you feel.
There's a difference between drawing and designing an aircraft.
SupremeCourt: Old man, you can play the buffoonery all you want. Boeing did not sell engine to South Africa, you got engine from Pratt & Whitney USA. Boeing is developing an integrated mission system for the aircraft enabling ISR and light strike missions for AHRLAC safety & security, and military variants. That makes everything in your aircraft American made except the artists drawing, aluminium body and tyres.
Show us where Airbus or Chinese companies have their entire avionics and electronics built for them by Boeing, maybe America built JF-17 Thunder for Chinese.
Keep pretending you dont know what I am exposing, I have thrown all of you into national embarrassment because of your fraudulent claims.
Have you heard of CTT Inc? , Annapolis micro systems, Giga-tronics, ciao wireless, wolfspeed, mercury systems, irf solutions, gore, comtech PST, elbit systems, Plath, Raytheon, virtual labs, CSIR, Harris etc
These guys are the ones making aircrafts avionics and electronics. Forget the fact that you've not heard of most of them but those F-15,f-22, f-16, b-2. These guys are the ones who manufactured the electronics.
Now who's getting the credits ? Boeing and Lockheed Martin.
Designing an aircraft itself is an issue. Most manufacturer won't even try going into manufacturing avionics.
SupremeCourt: Bro, do I sound like an olodo to you? I said when 95% of an aircraft is built for you by America under technical partnership agreement you dont go about flashing it in front of others asking them to show you who else in Africa can do it, while you deny the huge foreign input for your own product. You dont understand my point? I expect you are smart enough to get it. Anyone who cant see the point am making needs to up his ante on logical thinking.
What exactly is still your point?
95% is being built under technical partnership agreement. How did you arrive at such figure? Aircraft design isn't about drawing I hope you know?
Designing an aircraft itself excluding avionics is definitely more than 5%
Engine made by Pratt & Whitney company America Transmission systems also made by America All Avionics, Electronics, Computers, Weapon Systems, Surveillance Systems made by Boeing company America
Artists design on paper, aluminium body, color paint, 3 rubber tyres made by Paramount company South Africa
Remove American hardware parts and engineering skills, the skeleton bones left of your aircraft will end up in a museum. Yes bros, AHRLAC is 95% made by America, this is the truth you people hate me for saying.
Nothing wrong if USA builds aircraft for RSA, just be honest and admit it, dont come here and peddle lies to us asking us to show you made in Nigeria product when you flash made in America product in our faces as if Nigerians are fools. Honesty is the best policy, be truthful and save yourselves from embarrassment. Thanks.
Bro, you're getting all this wrong. This isn't how aircraft manufacturing works.
newafricaken254: off topic:massive SVBIED has hit Russian convoy consisting of trucks and soldiers traveling on top of BTR-80 APC in lattakia,Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) alqaeda affiliate in syria has claimed responsibility.releasing photos of the attack
However, Syrian security forces had a very different versions of events, a senior officer told Al-Masdar News on Friday evening, who insisted that the above images were fabrications taken out of context.
The exclusive military source admitted that an explosion had indeed taken place in the Bustan Basha area on Friday, but said that it had occurred after a Russian jet accidentally dropped its reserve fuel tank shortly prior to landing at the nearby airfield.
He underlined that no one was hurt as the fuel tank dropped from the sky and added that the Russian jet had returned from an air raid in eastern Syria.
Images were also released by the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) showing its side of events, including a photo of the alleged crater: