TenQ's Posts
Nairaland Forum › TenQ's Profile › TenQ's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 (of 490 pages)
LegalWolf:Mr LegalWolf, God knows the truth of my heart that I do NOT in any way hate you. God knows that I have prayed for you for good many times. I wish you success and fruitfulness in your career and ALL your endeavour. This is the full truth from my heart and God knows that. My greatest joy would be to know that your name is written in the Book of Life (Register of God's own). I was almost a Muslim at a point in my life and so, I understand the bias and opposition you as Muslims have towards EVERYTHING that have to do with salvation in Christ. I know that from baby-hood, Islam has inoculated you against the Gospel of Christ unto salvation. It is not your FAULT, it is your foundation and spiritual environment to which you were born. If I had your environment, I may not be different from you. Because God LOVES we humans above every Creature he had made, He provided His own solution for the redemption of those who will accept His Offering of Love. The path to salvation has been provided by God, through the LAMB of God who is the the Messiah made to be an infinite sacrifice to pay for the cost of our violation of integrity of God. A question you can ask is WHY was the Messiah's special Attribute relevant to his Prophethood? What was God "hoping" to achieve? I would be a wicked human being who know the way of Salvation and chooses to be silent. If I have to break your arm that you would be saved, I will gladly do it again and again. There is a way that seem right to a man, but its end is destruction. My dear LegalWolf Forgive my "brashness", "no be small eye one dey comot seed from the palm kernel." To discover the TRUTH between conflicting narratives, what we do as rational beings is to ask to questions (this is what you lawyers do in the court of law). When logic begin to break down or contradictions in narrative is observed or inconsistencies are noticed in a set of narrative, we assume that it must consist of many UNTRUTHS. This is what I do with Islamic narratives : I ask questions and post the several issues that are indefensible in the hope that you too will ask yourself the relevant questions that will lead you to the Truth of Salvation. Once again, LegalWolf, God forbid that I would ever have the dream or hope of evil against you. I am sorry if I come across to you as such. As-salamu alaykum |
LegalWolf:A man who defends the document he received from a fraudster is at the risk of losing everything including his eternity. God the Creator of ALL CANNOT make human-like MISTAKES found all about the document you have in your hand. The one who gives Life and Salvation is the Messiah! |
LegalWolf:As you can see, it is impossible to defend Islam without looking stupid! I passionately invite you to the Messiah for your salvation! |
LegalWolf:Hello LegalWolf, Nice to see hear from you. How's the cold weather. Keep warm. Your colleague and birds of the same feathers is most likely closer to you than to me. You may ask your other black widow cloth wearing folks of his whereabout! Anyways, nice to hear from you. As you can see, it is impossible to defend Islam without looking stupid! I still passionately invite you to the Messiah for your salvation! |
FreeStuffsNG:Nigeria who does not mine nor produce aluminium is exporting it to wiser countries!? Who has bewitched us! |
Explore2xmore:And I have. Is it untrue that it is normal and natural that followers pay for the error or judgment of their leaders? Nigerian economy for instance is mismanaged by a few but paid for by the rest of us. Is this not natural. A father arrested and jailed for fraud will affect the progress of his children. Is this not a natural consequence in nature? Explore2xmore:Quote one instance when David and Solomon gave a joint judgement over any matter. Israel is God's own property. Death is a home coming and not annihilation therefore, when God kills his own, he commits no evil against them. You probably exactly like atheists disagree with this statement. Your eyes is fixated by what is physical and of course not surprising that your paradise is sensual in nature. |
Veecruz:Are the bride and groom having a controversy here? No! |
MaxInDHouse:The spirit of argument has possesed your soul. Are we speaking of God's objection or man's objection to a wedding!? Have you ever seen where during a wedding the clergy says "Oh Lord, Do you have any objection to this wedding?" "Speak or forever keep quiet!" I don't have time to waste on you |
MaxInDHouse:If the tradition did not originate from Adam and Eve, tell me who the tradition originated from. At least, there is no where God Commanded such in the Bible. |
MaxInDHouse:In other words, it is a tradition inherited from Adam and Eve? SMH!! |
MaxInDHouse:So, you are following traditions of men as you cannot find a single scripture to back up your assertion! |
Explore2xmore:Now, you throw your Prophet under the bus again! You claim biblical God, he says his Allah and the same Qur'an 29:46 "... We believe in what has been revealed to us and to you (the Bible). Our God and your God is one and we fully submit to him" Is this statement a lie? Biblical God indeed. You now know better than your Allah! SMH!! When a leader makes a mistake, it affects his followers : didn't you read that? SMH! And I have asked you a thousand times now. According to you, David made a wrong judgement! Then, Tell me how the poor man is guilty and the rich man righteous! Is this difficult? |
Explore2xmore:So the stolen story is Allah's perogative?? Khai! No wonder you were tongue tied with giving reasonable logical answers. The question was about the two litigant that came to David and not Allah. Find another excuse! Let's assume that Allah was detailed and narrated all the ordeal between the two litigants, can you answer the following questions 1. Did David now asked the rich man to tell his own side of the story after his repentance? 2. What then was the aftermath of the litigation? 3. What happened to the Ewe in question: did David divide it into two? 4. Please justify how the poor man was wrong and the rich man is right in this case? |
MaxInDHouse:To, who then according to the Bible will ask the question? Can you show me the verse? |
Explore2xmore:Doesn't God have prerogative over life and death again? If God doesn't, then there is cause for explanation |
Explore2xmore:Because you claim your story is a parable to which we don't even know the narrator. Do you know have the answer? |
Veecruz:Deu 25:1: "If there be a controversy between men, and they come to judgment, that the judges may judge them; then they shall justify the righteous, and condemn the wicked." As I know, wedding celebrations is not a controversy : is it? |
MaxInDHouse:Are you saying that the culture of asking if any one have anything against the marriage union is found in the Bible? I want to learn: can you show me from the scripture? |
[quote author=Explore2xmore post=126995635][/quote]You asked the question about Why God killed the children of Israel: how have I contradicted myself? Even though I said that : Did I not explain further that 3. David was the king over Israel, his actions and inactions naturally affect the whole of Israel. Just like our politicians mismanagement of our national wealth affect ALL Nigerians irrespective of how pious one is. 4. It seems that prior to the time of Ezekiel, it was normal for others to partake in the punishment of sin of an individual. Ezekiel rights this by saying. There are several instances of that in the Bible before Ezekiel Ezek 18:2-3: "What mean you, that you use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge? As I live, said the Lord GOD, you shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel." Death to God is a return back to him |
Explore2xmore:1. God did not give any explicit reason why the children of Israel were complicit in the sin of David. Any explanation would be a conjecture. 2. Death to God is a home coming. And God reserves the right to call ANYBODY home in death at any time. Do you disagree that God is sovereign over who lives and who dies. Even foetuses in the womb die and no one can challenge God for it 3. David was the king over Israel, his actions and inactions naturally affect the whole of Israel. Just like our politicians mismanagement of our national wealth affect ALL Nigerians irrespective of how pious one is. 4. It seems that prior to the time of Ezekiel, it was normal for others to partake in the punishment of sin of an individual. Ezekiel rights this by saying. There are several instances of that in the Bible before Ezekiel Ezek 18:2-3: "What mean you, that you use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge? As I live, said the Lord GOD, you shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel." 5. Are you saying that Muslim children don't die and if they died, is it a punishment from Allah to the child? Death to God is a return back to him Will you now answer my own questions now? Indeed it was a parable but they didn't jump any fence nor go to the king for settlement. Prophet Nathan gave the parable to David. David's judgement was that the rich man must die and Nathan told him: "David, you are that man" because you can have any woman of your chosen and you had many wives but you decided to take the wife of a poor subject. |
gaskiyamagana:Show me just one parable in the Bible that is a real life event! Just one is enough! If David was part of the story and the fence of his palace was part of the story, it cannot be a parable. Or better still, Show me just one Hadith of Mohammed that say that it is a parable. |
gaskiyamagana:Unlike you Muslims, we answer questions 1. The statement "you have fought with God and with man" is spoken by the man with whom Jacob wrestled in Genesis 32:28. 2. There is no explicit mention of a referee in the biblical account of the wrestling match between Jacob and the man. 3. The phrase suggests a dual fight involving Jacob and both God and the man, indicating a spiritual encounter. 4. The biblical text doesn't specify the exact style of fighting; it describes it as a wrestling match. 5. The Bible doesn't mention an audience for the wrestling match between Jacob and the man. 6. The location of the wrestling match is mentioned in Genesis 32:22 as the ford of the Jabbok River. 7. The concept of "and have won" may be interpreted spiritually, suggesting a transformative experience rather than a conventional physical victory with a clear decision. Because, just with a single touch, on the thigh of Jacob, he experienced a dislocation. As clearly as I have answered your questions, kindly answer mine. Let's assume that Allah was detailed and narrated all the ordeal between the two litigants, can you answer the following questions 1. Did David now asked the rich man to tell his own side of the story after his repentance? 2. What then was the aftermath of the litigation? 3. What happened to the Ewe in question: did David divide it into two? 4. Please justify how the poor man was wrong and the rich man is right in this case? |
gaskiyamagana:You have not even answered my questions as per how the story was a parable. You who have not even been able to answer my questions nor explained the verses in question want to teach me: how!? Do you want me to give you an example of a parable from Jesus? |
gaskiyamagana:You forget that Christians are well aware and familiar with parables as Jesus taught a lot with parables. With every parable is 1. The narrator 2. The storyline 2. The recipient of the narrator You have not been able to tell us which is which because as I can see, David himself is part of the storyline thus he cannot also be the recipient of the story involving him. If it was indeed a parable, then the events NEVER Happened : is this your conclusion? |
Tajbol4splend:The culture of asking if any one have anything against the union is not found in the Bible but it is an aplmicaiof common sense. The purpose is to publicly verify that neither the bride not the groom have not committed sacrileges like 1. Having another prior wives 2. Carrying the pregnancy of another man 3. Either party being a criminal 4. The man have done abortion for another girl or causing other lust related harm etc Those who have the reasons would state it. The wedding would be suspended until verification has taken place. But it is not found anywhere in the bible |
jaephoenix:How is that your business? Have I ever asked you if you are the Son of your father? |
[quote author= post=126988854]What a terrible way to die. Ojediran’s demise is the fourth death among the lecturers in the faculty this year alone, We hereby call for recruitment of more hands to ease the burden of the current staff members. May the Souls of the departed Rest in Perfect peace 🙏[/quote]The after-effects of Sai Baba! So sad the pressure finally broke him! |
gaskiyamagana:I am not challenging you to the contrary : I only ask you questions you refused to ask yourself! My zero qualification is making me seek for understanding as a layman from your esteemed knowledge-base. My query is because the story is highly Illogical and it seems even you do not have the mental sagacity to unravel it. The questions were very simple Okay, let's assume that Allah was detailed and narrated all the ordeal between the two litigants, can you answer the following questions 1. Did David now asked the rich man to tell his own side of the story after his repentance? 2. What then was the aftermath of the litigation? 3. What happened to the Ewe in question: did David divide it into two? 4. Please justify how the poor man was wrong and the rich man is right in this case? Why is it that Muslims reach a brickwall whenever the technicalities of the Qur'an or Hadith are discussed? Is it because normal logic break down? |
gaskiyamagana:Thank you my brother for calling me Olodo. Unfortunately, you just manufactured a new conjecture. The story was a parable: But David was Real! David's prayer House Fence was Real! David's repentance was Real! The Report of the Offence was Real! So my brother, What was the parable? Who was telling the parable? Why was the parable told? What are the Evidences of your conclusions and responses to the questions? |
gaskiyamagana:Does it even make sense to you that your ficticious Isa corrected Christians 630 years after he was supposed to have left the earth? Why not answer my questions? Are you ill equipped to do so? 1. Allah knew that Jesus had faithful followers and mother and siblings who follow him with their lives 2. It is understandable if Allah decieved the Jews and Romans that he had replaced the true Jesus with a fake one on the cross. 3. Allah then waited for 630 years to reveal the Qur'an which clearly refutes and corrects the deception of the Christian with only one VERSE which till today Muslims have manufactured several conjecture as it explains nothing. Why do you think Allah decieved Mary the mother of Jesus, the Apostles of Jesus and all the Disciples of Jesus? Tell me how Jesus left the world without the knowledge of His disciples without conjectures. |
AntiChristian:Did you not just say: "Muhammad salallahu alayhi wasalam didn't write Anything from the Qur'an!" I have shown you that you err as your Quran was written by Mohammed. Even if we choose to trust your scholars wasn't the Qur'an not written on the bark of trees, stones and anything that can be written upon? Do you now admit that the Qur'an was written or you need more evidence? |
jaephoenix:Says one who is not known by God for anything good and of value! |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 (of 490 pages)
