Romance › Re: Uber And Bolt Drivers Are Harassing My Girlfriend by TenQ: 8:18pm On Oct 08, 2021 |
shortgun: Can I report Uber and Bolt Drivers? They keep harassing my girlfriend whenever I book a ride for her to come to my place, meet up with me or go back to her house.
I am busy most times and don't have the time to pick her up or drop her off.
She keep telling me of the harrasments and how she will prefer I pick her than book a ride. I always overlook her complaints until yesterday a bolt driver who told her he's married came back to her house to look for her after a ride yesterday!!
The randy man picked her from my house, I spoke with him on the phone and she told him she's in a relationship but he still carry his poverty stricken blokkos to my girls house?
I tot guys that do uber are trying to make ends meet? I always tip them cos I tot they need help but this have shown me that they are just a bunch of unserious people. How does she dress? Enticing? I can bet this with you |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 5:37pm On Oct 08, 2021 |
LordReed: No, the implication is not that all logic is faith, rather if the only reason you think something true or real is because it is logical then you are believing so by faith. Logic is not evidence of the reality or truthfulness of a thing. Can you solve any arithmetic addition between any two arbitrary whole numbers? Of course, the answer is YES. Have you solved ALL possible arithmetic addition of integers before? NO, you havent. So, how do you KNOW that you can solve any arithmetic addition between any two arbitrary whole numbers? LOGIC SAYS:The rules of mathematics are invariable, thus if you can use the rules of mathematics to correctly solve problems of additions, then the same rule will help you solve any future arithmetic addition problems. Can we say the statement of Logic above is not evidence of the reality or truthfulness of the answer to the question. LordReed: Well then you'll have to prove that any of these are correct. Well then you'll have to prove that your statement below is correct The records of all the wars, famines, epidemics, natural disasters are not physical evidence prove that God doesn't exist LordReed: Says who? Why can't the universe have always existed? The inflation theory (update of Big babg theory) proves otherwise. The age of the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years. Thus the universe has a beginning LordReed: Exactly! They are proof that no god is intervening in the affairs of men which directly contradicts the properties of the bible god. If you want to use the Bible God as your example, then, you'll have to ask yourself the question 1. In the Bible, even in Israel, does God ALWAYS interfere with nature? 2. In the bible, has there been EarthQuakes, Wars, Famines, Disasters etc on the earth? How then is today different? LordReed: I don't know what a spirit is so I can't say anything about that. If there is a god that is physical we must first know what properties it has before we can investigate it. If you care to list properties a physical god has I can venture some ways we can test if such a god exists. Unfortunately, the God of the Bible has never been described as a PHYSICAL BEING. God is a Spirit. A Spirit is any Conscious Being with no material Body.Shutting out your mind on this possibility does not change anything LordReed: You asked me why or how I became an atheist. I am not arguing the existence of a god with you but if you want to dispute my atheist position that's great I am happy to oblige you.
Yes it is implausible because we are not that kind of machine. "Biological machines" don't run on software, they run by reason of interconnected physical systems which can sometimes give rise to emergent properties. Now, since you have concluded that man is more akin to a mechanical CLOCK than an Advanced AI robot, then its a waste of time. Don't forget that Object oriented programming is an attempt to clone how humans reason to computer programming: Polymorphism, Encapsulation, Data Abstraction and Inheritance |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 2:00pm On Oct 08, 2021 |
LordReed: I did not write that anywhere so I don't know how you arrived at that. You said: LordReed: Logic is performed in the mind, you have shown no substantive way that you confirmed that what is your mind is real and true. It is purely in your mind hence faith. In other words because I have a LOGICAL DEDUCTION (which is of course of the mind) to justify my position of the existence of the Soul by comparing it as an equivalence of a SOFTWARE, your conclusion is that it is purely of my mind hence FAITH. Hence, you have simply said that any logical deduction is Faith!LordReed: LMFAO! There records of all the wars, famines, epidemics, natural disasters are not physical evidence? Bwahahahaha! So what are written documents? Immaterial spirits? LMFAO! Now, if I use the same standard for you, you will begin screaming.How about if I tell you that the Evidence of God is YOU How about if I tell you that the Evidence of God is CONSCIOUSNESS How about if I tell you that the Evidence of God is CREATION How about if I tell you that the Evidence of God is that the PHYSICAL must be CAUSED (there is no perpetual existence of the Universe) The records of all the wars, famines, epidemics, natural disasters are physical evidence that 1. Humans exist, the sometimes fight amongst themselves, they sometimes go hungry, they fall sick and the DOCUMENT these events LordReed: I have no evidence for a god so I have no reason to believe in a god. I am an atheist, you don't need to accept my label it's not your concern what I call myself, just like I don't care what you call yourself. How can you prove that the converse: If God is a Spirit, what evidence would be sufficient to prove or disprove Him? If God is Physical, what evidence would be sufficient to prove or disprove Him? LordReed: Look up the meaning of atheist.
I enjoy talking about certain subjects that are usually found in the religion section. I would much rather prefer if Nairaland had a philosophy section then I would hang out more frequently there but as it is there isn't one so all such topics are lumped under religion. BTW this topic is not in the religion section is it?
You can make anything your life's purpose why would that concern me?
I am not arguing with you about the existence of your god. I asked you to tell me how you confirmed the existence of spirit/soul. You brought in the issue of God. We were talking about the Soul/Spirit of man Let me ask you a sincere question: Is it implausible that physical living beings are run by some kind of software? |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 9:44am On Oct 08, 2021 |
LordReed: Logic is performed in the mind, you have shown no substantive way that you confirmed that what is your mind is real and true. It is purely in your mind hence faith. So, according to LordReed, LOGIC is FAITH! SMH!! LordReed: I became an atheist because the evidence showed that a god as I then believed did not exist. Either the god has different properties or it outright doesn't exist, in either case I have no good or sufficient evidence to continue to believe in a god. But you actually didn't show any evidence!A proper evidence should be PHYSICAL isn't it Then, For once, you showed that you are actually really not an atheist but an Agnostics. You have no reasonable conclusive answer of any certainty if God exist or not. Of cause, God has an outrightly different Property (He is a Spirit) and God is certainly not Physical Yes, you have no good or sufficient evidence to continue to believe in a god NEITHER do you have any evidence to the contrary. LordReed: The evidence was the volume of human suffering. If we merely take all that we have observed in recorded history, the wars, plagues, famines, natural disasters, epidemics and so on, it represents a volume of suffering that to any sentient being world be incomprehensible and devastatingly mind blowing. Yet I believed there was a god watching all of this take place with no attempt to plainly intervene, while calling this god all good and all powerful. I now asked myself if I was someone who did not believe in this god and was told that this world with all its suffering was the work of an all good and all powerful god would I believe. My sincere answer was no I would not believe it because the evidence doesn't show that such a god could possibly exist. From that moment I became an atheist. Unfortunately, what you call "evidence" is no evidence. It's very similar to concluding that Nigeria do not have any President Buhari simply because there seem to be so much suffering of Nigerian citizens. LordReed: I don't need to believe anything to be an atheist, I lack belief in any god or gods of any kind. Simple. This statement is merely self consolation. Why? If the above is true, why then are you ALWAYS on the Religious section of Nairaland. Do you think it makes sense for me as a Christian to make it my life's purpose to discredit the existence of Amadioha, Ogun and Osun goddess. Why should I be passionate about arguing with people who believe in the reality of Spiderman or Superman except if I secretly truly HOPE and WISH these so-called superheroes don't exist |
Politics › Re: Tanker Drivers Begin Nationwide Strike Weekend Over Bad Roads, Others by TenQ: 8:38am On Oct 08, 2021 |
Didn't you hear Buhari saying that they have tared 20 million kilometers of road just before the election! ?
Audio repairs! I am hoping that Buhari will do third term so that we can vote him in again to kuku finally disintegrate the Nation.
|
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 8:33am On Oct 08, 2021 |
LordReed: Then you simply believe it by faith. You have not confirmed it is real except in your mind. That is what faith is. Faith! ! ! ? ? ? LOL!!! When did LOGIC become FAITH? When did BELIEVING become FAITH? Did you become an Atheist by LOGIC or by EVIDENCE? What is your Evidence for becoming an ATHEIST? Did you simply believed to become an atheist? ? ? |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 8:20am On Oct 08, 2021 |
LordReed: I am not asking you about analogies I am asking how you confirmed that this spirit/soul you claim exists is actually real. If you like repeat yourself like a broken gramophone record. I have answered you! It makes LOGICAL sense to me, if you need proof of logic, I can only give you WHY it makes Logical sense to me and I have. Is a human being similar to a mechanical CLOCK or an Advanced AI ROBOT? |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 9:50pm On Oct 07, 2021 |
LordReed: This is funny. You keep using analogies where the answer to your question of how to show something is correct is right in front of you. Testing is the answer and of course data. Can a man eat a bag of rice ? No because he has tested that he can't even finish a pot so he know he can't finish a bag. So simpolified the question remains how did you confirm that the things you say are real and correct? How did you test your logical inferences? Since the man did not attempt eating a BAG of rice, he has no empirical physical evidence. He is just making a LOGICAL projection that if a man cannot finish eating a big bowl of rice, then he wouldn't be able to finish eating a bag of rice. In other words, my analogies stand. The fact that something makes logical sense does not imply that a PHYSICAL PROOF has been presented. The important criteria is that IT AGREES WITH COMMON SENSE and PROJECTIONS from known facts about similar things. |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 9:07pm On Oct 07, 2021 |
LordReed: Can you just answer the question, how did you confirm that your logical sense was correct and real. How does one confirm that ones logical sense is correct that and real that a man cannot eat up one bag of rice? Must one attempt trying to eat a bag of rice to make a correct logical conclusion? How does one confirm that ones logical sense is correct that and real that a foundation designed for a bungalow cannot carry a 35 storey building structure? Must one attempt building the actual structure until failure to make a correct logical conclusion? How did you confirm that your logical sense was correct and real in the above scenarios?What am I getting at?The fact that something makes logical sense does not imply that a PHYSICAL PROOF has been presented. The important criteria is that IT AGREES WITH COMMON SENSE and PROJECTIONS from known facts about similar things. Is a human being similar to an advanced AI robot? YES Is it feasible to have AI robots that doesn't have computer programs written to set their behaviours? NO Are computer programs within an advanced AI robot tangible/physical? NO Is it absurd that a human being has some form of advanced AI computer program running him? NOThose who understand the above call this apparent SOFTWARE PROGRAM the SOUL/SPIRIT of man. This is an example of how logical deductions are made. |
Politics › Re: 2023: Where Nigeria’s President Comes From, Isn't important ― Atiku by TenQ: 4:41pm On Oct 07, 2021 |
|
Culture › Re: Fallen 100-Year-Old Tree In Oyo Rises Again, Pulls Crowd (Pictures) by TenQ: 2:41pm On Oct 07, 2021 |
|
Romance › Re: My Fiancee's Unstable Look Is Threatening Our Relationship. Please Advice Me by TenQ: 2:33pm On Oct 07, 2021 |
MaXiK: Good day Nairalanders!!
Please I need your advice. My current girlfriend has all the good characters that perfectly defines a wife material plus she's a scholar and also a virgin (not particularly concerned about this anyway but to evince how disciplined she is) but sometimes she will look attractive to me and other times she will appear unattractive and I won't feel attracted to her at all. To clarify things, this changes has nothing to do with her dress sense neither my beholding senses but real changes in her facial appearance and allurement.
To be frank and sincere, she is just greatly above average in attractiveness but she's not stable in her look, she falls far below average occasionally. Also we're both dark in complexion and I will prefer my children to be lighter than I am, if not fair.
I have been trying to look beyond her look by focusing on other quality attributes she possess but the issue about her irregular look keep on fluctuating my feelings for her.
The crux of it is that I'm in my early thirties I need serious relationship; someone to build future with and finally get married to but here I am with someone that meet up with more than seventy percent of my requirements in my ideal wife but with unstable look that is threatening my feelings for her.
I am concerned about this because of some issues we consider trivial are still crashing marriages these days....
My questions:
How important is look in marriage? Is it me that is making issue out of trivial matters because this lady is receiving a lot of relationship advances from people far better than I am and she's turning them down to maintain her commitment to our relationship? Is there any possibility of stability in her look in the future considering that she's still in school?
Your genuine, mature and constructive advice is highly needed.
I will appreciate ones from those who have experienced what I'm currently going through. Looks is not too important in marriage. Infact, if your wife is former miss Nigeria, once you marry her, you wouldnt see that again as any big deal. The things that are most important to men in marriage are: A woman who 1. Presents and atmosphere of PEACE and RELAXATION around the home 2. Honours and Values your IDEA, WORK, PERSONALITY and PRESENCE 3. Serves everything (FOOD, SEX, SPEECH, etc) as serving Her King 4. Will not take advantage of your WEAKNESSES and VULNERABILITIES What make women look different?Their Hairstyle and Makeup! Be the one to select her Wardrobe and Hair styles |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 2:19pm On Oct 07, 2021 |
LordReed: Your logical sense is also known as intuition and we all know your intuitions are not always correct. Our intuitions may tell us that the earth is flat because to the eye it looks flat but that is not correct as the earth is not flat so we must find a way to confirm if our intuitions are correct. Which is my question to you how did you confirm that your logical sense/intuition on this matter is correct? I hope you know the difference between logic and intuition? Intuition has to do with gut FEELING not determined by reasoning. Logic has to do with REASONING, DEDUCTIONS from available knowledge. Your example of the flat earth is about our PERCEPTION and not INTUITION. How does a virgin male dog know how to mate with a female dog on heat? Is it by Perception, Intuition or Logic?Is a human being more like a mechanical clock or an AI robot? |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 8:21pm On Oct 05, 2021*. Modified: 9:58pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
LordReed: That is why I said "and your intuition". Now I asked how you substantiated this claim, I didn't ask for physical evidence. What convinced you that soul/spirit are real? If only your intuition and what the Bible says were all it took then you believe it by faith. Did I mention my intuition? No. You have gotten me wrong again. TenQ: I did NOT just take it by faith: I said, it makes logical sense that a "software" runs our physical consciousness and that this "software" is the soul/spirit of man.
I said:
Looking for a physical evidence of the soul and spirit is exactly like asking for a physical evidence of a software in the hardware.
The Soul or Soul/Spirit is what produces INTUITION and INSTINCT as functions of the software that runs the hardware of living beings. E.g. A male dog somehow know how to mate with a female dog on heat without any training. A software contain both data, information and instructions. These are the functions of the soul. In other words, apart from the scriptures, it MAKES LOGICAL SENSE to me. Any other explanation is like assuming that a man is similar to a mechanical clock. To me, a man is closer described As an advanced AI robot rather than a mechanical clock |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 3:36pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
LordReed: So aside from being told by an ancient book and your intuition, is there anyway you have substantiated the existence of spirit/soul or you just take it on faith? I did NOT just take it by faith:I said, it makes logical sense that a "software" runs our physical consciousness and that this "software" is the soul/spirit of man. I said:2. It is logical as the soul/spirit are the equivalence of the Operating System and Application Softwares that powers the physical body of a person Looking for a physical evidence of the soul and spirit is exactly like asking for a physical evidence of a software in the hardware. The Soul or Soul/Spirit is what produces INTUITION and INSTINCT as functions of the software that runs the hardware of living beings. E.g. A male dog somehow know how to mate with a female dog on heat without any training. A software contain both data, information and instructions. These are the functions of the soul. |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 2:05pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
LordReed: Are you bereft of understanding? I asked:
See the jargons you are using to answer. Does the claptrap you have written answer the question I asked? Thank God for records! LordReed: When you are ready to actual present evidence for soul/spirit lemme know. But I can answer the other question too 1. I follow the teachings of the bible and the bible teaches that soul and spirits exist. In fact, the bible says "God is a Spirit" 2. It is logical as the soul/spirit are the equivalence of the Operating System and Application Softwares that powers the physical body of a person |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 12:04pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
LordReed: Yeah sure ignore my responses then pretend like you have actually answered my question which by the way I asked first but obliged you a response. This is how we know those who honestly interact and those who don't. When you ask a stupid question, I give you a gentle converse. 1. A spirit is immaterial but you insist I should give you a Physical evidence. It's just like me requesting that you to bring out the software in your laptop and place it on the table for all to see. Apparently, this is what you ask for: bring a spirit to the physical realm. 2. The fact that there is no machine that can physically interact with a spirit is no proof that spirit don't exist. Just as the fact that square root(-1) isn't physically presentable does not mean it isn't a realistic in computation. You it's like attempting to measure the charge on an electron with a ruler. If you think it is a logically correct question or demand for the physical proof of a program running your laptop, then, you can't be helped! |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 1:19am On Oct 05, 2021 |
LordReed: When you are ready to actual present evidence for soul/spirit lemme know. When you are ready to actual present evidence for the program in your phone, let me know |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 10:24pm On Oct 04, 2021 |
LordReed: And I answered in the affirmative. As to how I know my phone has software, I understand the structure of the phone's operations and I have seen it demonstrated.
Meanwhile my observations stand, your have never met your god, angels or demons nor are stories and false equivalence analogies evidence. You know the programmers of your phone!? What is the evidence you have softwares running your phone? You are just repeating the same thing: was the phone programmed in your presence? If your phone is truly powered by softwares, why don't you bring the software out on the table for us to see or at least take the picture of the software? |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 7:22pm On Oct 04, 2021 |
LordReed: Glad you said programmers because there isn't a single programmer called The Programmer, there are several and I have met some. You on the other hand have never met your god or an angel or a demon nor can you say go here and meet an of the mentioned beings, instead you rely on some stories from the Middle East. Stories are not evidence nor are analogies, before you start trying to draw the usual false equivalence parallels with programmers and software. I was very specific with my question How do you know that your phone or laptop is powered with a software? You've never met the programmers (of your phone), have you?
|
|
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 6:12pm On Oct 04, 2021 |
LordReed: How do you know soul/spirit exists? How do you know that your phone or laptop is powered with a software? You've never met the programmers, have you? |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 4:38pm On Oct 04, 2021 |
LordReed: Even your bible says the dead know nothing nor is there any activity in the grave. When you actually provide evidence of the things you claim then we can take it seriously. The physically dead of course his body knows nothing! But the physically dead his soul/spirit is alive. Resurrection is the recombination of the physical body with the soul/spirit of man. You don't have to agree with this. At death, the answer will be obvious and glaring |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 12:35pm On Oct 04, 2021 |
LordReed: Nor do people carry out any activities after they are dead so I guess your hell concept is nothing but a story you tell yourself for comfort. The only justice available to us is the one we can collectively arrange now. We get nothing waiting for imaginary heaven, hell and judgements after death. Its either HEAD or TAIL! You'll see the one who actually fooled himself. We both will KNOW at the other side |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 9:40am On Oct 04, 2021 |
LordReed: What justice is achieved by torturing someone forever? TIME DOESNT EXIST AFTER DEATH |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 9:34am On Oct 04, 2021 |
LordReed: So what does "the state" benefit from torturing the perpetrator forever? The state doesn't need to benefit anything as the state is the executor of JUSTICE! |
|
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 9:07am On Oct 04, 2021 |
LordReed: What does the victim benefit from having the perp tortured for eternity? It's never about the victim. It is about the offence of gross WICKEDNESS to a fellow human being due to selfishness. In the world, there is what we call "offence against the state"! |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 7:58pm On Oct 03, 2021 |
LordReed: So what will the torture benefit the victim?
Nope I expect there to be justice meted out to the perp but not everlasting torture nor do I expect that a god that is supposed to be all wise is unable to figure out what to do with criminals any better than humans. Justice is two ways: The wicked planted evil and Justice make sure he harvests in many fold the reward of his deeds. The good person planted goodness, justice is making sure he receives many fold the reward of his deeds. |
Family › Re: "Virginity Doesn't Guarantee A Successful Marriage" Is A Statement Of Stupidity by TenQ: 7:21pm On Oct 03, 2021 |
chival: Virginity is a virtue no doubt and young ladies should strive to go to their marriage beds with their virginity still intact. However, the truth is that virginity alone will not guarantee a successful marriage. I have been married for almost 13 years and I know marriage takes a lot of work and sacrifice on BOTH sides. Does being a non virgin guarantee a good marriage? If not, your point is not good! |
Family › Re: "Virginity Doesn't Guarantee A Successful Marriage" Is A Statement Of Stupidity by TenQ: 7:19pm On Oct 03, 2021 |
brodalikeme: I disagree with you absolutely! The virtue of being a virgin as lofty as it is alone, cannot guarantee a successful marriage.
Brand new tyres alone does not make an efficient vehicle. Clean cups doesn’t make great drinks. There are so many important tiny components that makes a good woman/wife. Therefore, the higher a girl's body count, the higher her chances of having a good marriage. Does this make sense to you? |
Politics › Re: Michael Ebonhor: Robbers Plucked Out My Eyes Because I Had No Money by TenQ: 7:07pm On Oct 03, 2021 |
LordReed: So how does torturing the perpetrator provide recompense? Is the torture going to restore the eyesight or provide the victim with anything useful? The blind will receive his sight back at resurrection. But would you rather that the wicked person who gouged out the eyes of a fellow man go unpunished!? |