TewMuch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › TewMuch's Profile › TewMuch's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (of 34 pages)
I say skip town.She deserves to learn her lesson.Who gives a crap.Too many young girls 4king married men.A LovePeddler should know her place and not be threatening all sorts.Depends on if you and your husband want that bagagge in ur life.She doesn't seem like she will ever let you guys have peace.She seems hungry and desperate.To me this seems like an affair not a 1 nighter.I hope you got tested.He told her to take the pill,she wanted the baby.She got her wish.Maybe ur husband lied and promised all sorts.Hear from her as well so you know the real truth nd what kind of a man ur dealing with as well.He may do the same in ABJ, nd blame it on the alkie.What's a grown man with 4 kids doing at a club anyway?Ur husband is highly suspect, him nd d girl are having an affair.Open ya eyes. |
Dis Guy:Is it not the same thing with what ever N55bn will buy? or because it is more expensive it will work all by itself with no employees needed? Same difference, ess is just cheaper. If that is your argument then the election should be moved back 6 months so Nigerians are well prepared. What is the rush? oh i forgot, rigging the elections. |
Goodluck and his staff should contact these people for prices. They will get better stuff for less than N20bn as long as they dont mention they work for the Nigerian Government. ![]() http://www.essvote.com/HTML/home.html Nairalanders please help the stupid government do their home work. Always inflating contracts shamelessly. |
N55bn for what! Its high time Nigerians stop awarding contracts for everything and maybe having the EFCC or Ribadu buy these types of things. Am sure the contractor and Jega are making about N20bn or more from this. The way they call billion, billion these days na wa oh. These people are shameless. When will Nigerians say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH? It doesnt even seem worth fighting for them. It seems like its best for them to suffer. Jega is ridiculous to have come out with such numbers. What a fraud. Nairalanders please let us look for the price of voting machines for the Nigerian government, since they cant seem to get anything right. Please post price quotes for them. ![]() |
Abagworo: |
Cohomology:And the sick thing is Chinese people are even worse that Nigerians when it comes to environmental ethics or business ethics. None whatsoever. Nigerians always scream about not wanting to die, but all these nonsense their leaders do kill them faster than they can imagine. How much can you possibly pay a Nigerian as bribe to kill himself? I am thinking anything? No wonder the cases of cancer is rising and killing Nigerians like rats. Really Nigerians need to change. This is too stupid to be true. |
snowdrops:Nothing wrong in what she said. She said either Edo or Igbo. If she was ignorant in her statement, then you correct her and tell her which kind of tribe has such name. I think it is either edo or urhobo or an ND tribe if thats his real name. They like to put k before p. Yoruba will say Pele, they will spell it Kpele. So anyone that can validate that this is a Nigerian and not a Cameroonian please come to our aid. We are tired of this disgrace left and right. ![]() |
When other pastor's are buying private jet, what do you expect common pastors to do? They have a target, and have just realised that the sky is their stepping stone when you become a pastor. Any which way to join the big boys. . Going to scam Ghanians, thats why they keep returning them by the plane loads. They should please leave them there. What kind of Nigerian name is kpanoko sef? . Are they sure this is the true, true name? |
They should leave Lagos out of this. It is too crowded and polluted to be dealing with gas flares. What kind of crazy country is this? No planning at all. A whole commercial center will have a refinery smack in the middle of it. These Nigerian leaders are very crazy. ![]() |
@ stupid Aare, pride comes before a fall.You command respect, but refuse to give respect(to other kings), even rubbish the institution to elevate yourself.Who cares about a damn title?Bigger and more successful people in this world prefer their first names(Bill Gates).So Afe, you are lucky they even called you chief, which is all you are.Nigerians believe so much in useless things, shows how our leaders think.When they get small change they begin to act crazy.To get respect, you have to humble yourself and give respect to the lowest of the low.Then maybe you become more human.Very stupid man sha. |
Very high, not monetary though.They can be advised on how to refocus their cause to help Nigeria.To kidnap you know which set of people, |
Becomrich0: |
Kobojunkie: |
9jaganja:You are really a lunatic. please leave my posts alone. I no get your time. With your unintelligible vague statements. You are irrelevant. What is the topic about? haha. Brain freeze or memory loss? I did say i was going to check the US angle, and i did say i was not sure about that right? Loonie, |
proof that you guys say a lot of things you do not know. The UN does not require NADA from the peace keeping countries. Only their officials. So Nigerians are not responsible. In CONCLUSION. Will get back on the American soldier one. Read article below carefully: http://www.fmreview.org/FMRpdfs/FMR27/11.pdf |
Sexual abuse of children by UN Peacekeepers Marian Houk Middle East Times, January 4, 2007 GENEVA -- The accusations are sickening - so why did it take the London newspaper, Daily Telegraph, six months to publish them? Were they waiting for Kofi Annan to leave? Were they making sure their own investigative reporting was complete and correct? The accusations were published in the article, "UN staff accused of raping children in Sudan," written by Kate Holt in Juba, southern Sudan and Sarah Hughes. The Daily Telegraph reports that: "The abuse allegedly began two years ago when the UN mission in southern Sudan (UNMIS) moved in to help rebuild the region after a 23-year civil war. The UN has up to 10,000 military personnel in the region, of all nationalities and the allegations involve peacekeepers, military police, and civilian staff. The first indications of sexual exploitation emerged within months of the UN force's arrival and the Daily Telegraph has seen a draft of an internal report compiled by the UN children's agency UNICEF in July 2005 detailing the problem. In a six-month investigation, Kate Holt gathered more than 20 victims' accounts claiming that peacekeeping and civilian staff based in the town are regularly picking up young children in their UN vehicles and forcing them to have sex. It is thought that hundreds of children may have been abused." What? UNICEF has known about it for a year and a half? Hang on for a minute, and let's go back to the UN itself. The Daily Telegraph says, "Responding to the report, Jane Holl Lute, the UN assistant secretary-general for peacekeeping, said: 'There could be truth. These environments are ones in which it is difficult to ascertain the truth , I do not believe these are new allegations. Nevertheless, we will treat them as seriously as we treat all other allegations,' she told the Associated Press in New York. She said she had spoken to the force commander and chief of staff in the UN mission in southern Sudan 'and I know they are very well briefed on what UN policy is and have taken steps to implement that policy across the board in that mission , But we don't have the facts yet in this case, and we need to ascertain the facts and follow it through to appropriate resolution and take action if necessary. We won't be complacent and there will be no impunity to the full extent of the UN's authority'." Of course, that is a pretty big qualification - the UN actually says it has little or no authority over its peacekeeping troops, because they are not, technically, UN staff members. Peacekeepers are provided by their own national governments and are not subject to UN disciplinary procedures, nor, by agreements (yes, worked out by the UN) with the countries in which the troops are deployed, are they subject to prosecution in the "host countries." The UN says all it can do is to send any miscreants home, and hope they will be punished there. Until now, that has not really happened. The UN, however, could threaten to send back a whole national contingent, if its members were accused of sexual abuse, couldn't it? Countries are dependent on the UN allowances, paid by special assessments to Member States, to governments which contribute troops and other force participants to a UN peacekeeping operation. They might respond to a threat to cut off their allowances (deployment, daily, repatriation, and more, ) UN Watch, an NGO established by a former US Ambassador in Geneva in 1993 with the primary purpose of watching out for what the UN does regarding Israel, has called on Ban Ki-Moon and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour to establish an international independent panel of inquiry into the allegations reported by the Daily Telegraph.: "UN Watch has been one of the leading non-governmental organizations urging the Human Rights Council to take action against Sudan's atrocities in Darfur. We represented the largest NGO coalition at the recent special Council session on Darfur and played a similar leading role in other UN human rights forums. It was UN Watch's intervention that led the UN Working Group on Minorities to hold Sudan to account in its report last year , We were shocked to read of the allegations - detailed in a 2005 internal UNICEF report and corroborated by evidence gathered by the Daily Telegraph and NGOs in the region - that, since they were deployed two years ago, UN peacekeepers in southern Sudan have regularly been sexually abusing children who already have suffered so much in the recent civil war. "In our advocacy, we have consistently argued for UN intervention to protect civilians in Darfur from the horror of mass rapes, killings and displacement. We continue to believe that an international force in the western region of Sudan will bring far more help than harm to that region's victims. But unless the UN takes immediate, firm, and sustained action against the reported abuses by its personnel in other regions of Sudan - and indeed around the world - we fear that today's allegations will pose a setback to this effort." Are we to understand from this that UN Watch knew about, or has been aware of, the UNICEF internal report on this situation, prepared in 2005? [Editor’s Note: In fact, we had no such advance knowledge and nothing in our letter implied so. Click for more.] This story has another dimension, however, and it is alluded to in the letter from UN Watch - the government of Sudan is being pressured to accept large UN participation in a "hybrid" force with African Union forces in Darfur, though the government is apparently still reluctant to go through with the deal. The Daily Telegraph reports, in its story of sexual abuse in southern Sudan, that "the UN is pushing to be allowed to launch a new peacekeeping mission there to help end the humanitarian crisis that has spiraled in recent years. The Telegraph understands that the Sudanese government, which is deeply opposed to the deployment of UN troops to Darfur, has also gathered evidence, including video footage of Bangladeshi UN workers having sex with three young girls." The Daily Telegraph includes some very unbecoming comments made by UN officials "on the ground" - six months back, in May - to their reporter: "The British regional coordinator for UNMIS, James Ellery, has refuted the claims, arguing that there is no substantiating evidence. 'I will refute all claims made on this issue,' he said in an interview last May. 'We investigated all allegations made and no evidence was forthcoming. None of these claims can be substantiated. This is the most backward country in Africa and there are lots of misunderstandings as to the UN's role. Over 90 percent of people here are illiterate and rumors therefore spread very quickly.' "Mr. Ellery insisted that his organization was following correct codes of conduct. 'We provide regular briefings on the UN code of conduct. Nobody employed by the UN is meant to have sexual contact at all with any local person,' he said. He did, however, appear to acknowledge that the organization might not be able to ensure that all its staff behave according to standards. 'We are applying a standard of morality that is very, very high but we cannot expect that soldiers when they go abroad are going to behave themselves as we think they should. There are a wide range of countries being represented in the UN forces and among these there is always going to be a bad apple'." The local government does not look too good, either, in this report: "The Daily Telegraph has learned that a number of complaints have been made about the behavior of UN personnel stationed in Juba. Yet those accused have not been tracked down nor has there been any attempt by the UN or local officials to interview those making the accusations. The fledging government of southern Sudan is believed to be too concerned to maintain good relations with the UN to challenge the organization , Juba's county court judge, Ali Said, said that the region had seen an increase in child prostitution since the UN arrived. 'The majority of people working for the UN and NGOs are men and need to be entertained. But no cases have come to court,' he said. Coming back to UNICEF, the report goes on to say that "An unfinished copy of the internal UNICEF report, seen by the Daily Telegraph, shows that the UN has been aware of the problem for more than a year. 'Evidence suggests that UNMIS staff may already be involved in sexual exploitation,' the report says. 'UN cars have been staying into the early hours of the morning, as late as 6am, at a restaurant/disco called Kololo in Juba , adult informants reported seeing a UNMIS car stop along a main road in Juba to pick up three young girls'." UNICEF is part of the UN system, but it is also a separate agency, funded not by the UN budget but by its own solicited contributions from individuals and donor countries (remember the UNICEF greeting cards? And the Halloween trick-or-treat collections?) Because of its dependence on donations, which in turn depend to a large extent on publicity, generated by news stories, UNICEF is often seen by other organizations as rather aggressively elbowing competitors aside to take credit for this or that success, in many humanitarian operations. So, why did it sit on these accusations, when it could have trumpeted its efforts to protect mothers and children? Perhaps to protect its position in a UN-led operation? Unfortunately, the UN's record is all-too-poor on such matters. Instead of offending the troop contributing countries - over which the UN says it has no power [blame the Member States, not the Organization -- a constant refrain of the UN Secretariat], they will punish the UN staff. Of course, if a UN staff member has sexually abused anyone, he or she should be punished. But that's not how the UN operates, unfortunately. One proposal now under consideration, courtesy of Prince Zayed Al Hassan, Jordan's outgoing UN ambassador, who was also Kofi Annan's Special Adviser on Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in UN Peacekeeping Operations (Jordan is a major troop-contributing country), is to collect DNA samples from men and women (these are not troops, but civilians) being sent on peacekeeping. The DNA samples are to be returned to these personnel once they return from the field! [It should also be noted that the UN rarely sends experienced core staff on these missions - their supervisors often resist sending them. The result is that persons with little or no experience with or knowledge of the UN are sent to remote and difficult locations with inadequate or non-existent administrative and other support from headquarters, are being sent on the most critical peacekeeping missions. This article is the conclusion they came to in 2007. So i guess they expect Nigerians to maintain the DNA samples ![]() |
Ileke-IdI: |
9jaganja:All i know is the special forces, probably. But i dont know about the regular soldiers, i will have to ask to confirm that. Maybe medical records but DNA, that one i will have to ask. |
Ileke-IdI:If you read my previous posts you will see that i said if they can prove it by DNA or had the Nigerian parent sign their birth certificate (supported by DNA tests); then they are Nigerians. Now if they cant? Then they are Liberians. Also i doubt the UN has DNA samples from all the African soldiers that go on peace keeping missions. All i know is finger print, to identify them as soldiers and in times of death. |
Kobojunkie:Am i now supposed to be a mind reader? you came out of no where giving examples. Try to give clear statements and not vague examples, the burden is on you. You even stated that the woman knew who the man was. Who is to say he did not give the sample willingly to help her? |
9jaganja:Dude, she was talking about a random person. Talking like they just presented the baby's DNA and they automatically got the American and gave the baby citizenship. She needs to be clearer with her statement. I dont really know about the American soldiers having a DNA database. If you are talking about finger print, then yes. But the DNA database is very questionable. You will have to be able to identify the person. Can you imagine how many mixed breeds are running around in vietnam and japan? lots. |
Ileke-IdI:Nigerian Soldiers have DNA in a system? funny stuff. dream on. Kobojunkie:If you have been reading the previous posts, you will see that your recent posts in response to mine were unnecessary. And you were not clear on whether DNA sample was presented by the father. At bolded, well if they can identify the men why didnt they already? And why havent they come forward to do DNA tests? Go back and take the time to read, then come back and make a better argument. |
Kobojunkie:Go back and get that your story right. So the whole of America has one type of DNA? Dont you have to know who the father is and be able to identify him physically and have him give samples willingly? Think. |
9jaganja:Sure, what you are saying makes a lot of sense. In that case every where Nigerian soldiers have gone for missions, any miscreant can come and claim they were despoiled. So Nigerians must just take their word and give them citizenship, since they are honest and sincere people. In that case, we should be expecting about half of Africa to come and claim they were despoiled. Nonsense. No country ever accepts responsibility based on talk. They have to prove it, which they have none! Nigeria is not a free for all, we already cannot feed the people we have. |
9jaganja:Nigerians that have no National identification number, and probably no way to trace these people after they leave service. Nigerians can only be found when they want to be found.lol. Also, these women say they were raped. Who will come and confess that they raped a woman? My guess, none. So Liberia should embrace their children with love. They are not Nigerians. |
9jaganja:Until they can provide proof of the bolded above, and the Nigerian soldier comes forward to accept responsibility and sign the birth certificate. Also, after DNA tests. Then sure. But this is highly unlikely. So as it stands, they are Liberians. |
9jaganja:Nigeria does not owe them anything. I dare you to try stepping into and American or US embassy and alleging all what these women are alleging, just to get citizenship and recognition. In just 2 minutes, you will be thrown out on your ass in the cold. Their country should take responsibility, those are the negative aspects of war. Next time they will look out for the best interest of their citizens, rather than letting rebels take them over. Too bad, Nigerians are not the baby daddy's. ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (of 34 pages)


. Are they sure this is the true, true name?