₦airaland Forum

[color=royalblue] A man who can't cook is likely a spoilt brat or a sexist _prick who thinks putting a pot on a stove belittles his masculine ego or his essence as a man. He most likely grew up with female relatives but he refused to learn how to cook.


Also, he'd more likely be the type who eats out regularly. Any man who's used to eating out would likely avoid his woman's homemade meals when there's a quarrel. Of course we know what shunning our women's food do to them.

[/color]

prettysassygirl:
foe where,all of them are wired to sleep around,only my God can keep a man in check,if na for love,story for the gods,they are just like he goats

[color=royalblue]
By extension, your father is a goat which makes you a kid. Interesting revelation!
[/color]

misspicy:
[b]The OP is advocating for men to appeal to women's subconsciousnesses in the event of a sexual relationship, But me thinks this can also be disastrous,I like to rationalise issues such as this and think outside the box


What happens in the case of a separation which could be due to many factor,women are emotionally unstable beings and tends to drift towards that man that gives them the necessary emotional support especially when they really need it.

[color=royalblue]
Now, Misspicy, which would you prefer?

A. A man with whom you had mind-blowing sex occasionally but who considers you as nothing than a sex object - a willing body to pleasurable gratification or;

B. A man knows your pleasure spots like your hands and still dedicates time to note your mood swings, knows how to use soothing words, shares your pleasure and pain yet he still looks at you with star-struck gaze like you are the epicentre of his private universe.

You'd chose situation B? I thought as much. You want to be loved and pleasured no matter how fleeting it is.
[/color]

Now imagine a relationship between a man and a woman,which emotional seduction is employed but hit the rocks maybe few months after,the woman would surely go into another relationship,but might find it difficult to adjust to the new man,because she can't get the one who has appealed to her senses out easily,This is a disaster waiting to explode

To me this is what causes negative issues between a lot of couples,imagine Theson.ofmark in an emotional sexual encounter with his woman and she unconsciously mentions the name of her EX How would you feel?[/b]

[color=royalblue]
If my woman screams out her ex's name while on our flight to Cloud Nine, then it's a failure on my part. It's because I haven't been able to superimpose myself on her subconscious like her ex did. Which is where emotional seduction comes into play.


I use it so I have no fear of the situation you illustrated. I'd make sure I always serenade her which, of course, pushes her ex to the fringes of her memory only to be recollected at intervals - lengthy intervals.
[/color]

Lezzlie:
lolz, Isn't it self evident? Women are bereft of emotional anchor and sexual fulfillment from men.

Let's deal with the coldblooded truth without seeking consolation in lies and false praise.

The vast majority of men are selfish pricks who don't give a good goddamn about pleasing women. It's basically bang and go!!!

At the risk of sounding boastful, I have had lovers now married who still bug my phone after years of marriage. My last girl shamelessly told me she was going to cheat on her hubby with me. That's a cold reality of life .

It takes more to understand women emotionally and sexually. So when the OP talks about the "emotional imprints" , blurred and vivid images jumped into my head in recollections of women who impulsively, in a swift moment of emotional free-fall , called me daddy.

And that word was humbling and deep; for in the moment that marked her essense ,she endeared me with a name which carries the weight of her progenitor!

[color=royalblue]
This, ladies and gentlemen, dudes and lasses, captures the essence of this thread. [/color]

falconey:
At the end i'm getting laid right?

[color=royalblue]
See? That's the point a lot of guys have failed to grasp. ANY man can work her body sexually but she wouldn't have affection for every man who's had _coitus with her. She'd eventually forget some. It'll be like you never met.

And the circle of hunting for random girls to bed continues yet you leave droves of emotionally unsatisfied women in your wake. A shortcoming as bad as not satisfying their sexual cravings.
[/color]

---

Diddyydiva:
Lemme go and get my dictio

Ermmm bros Theson.ofmark this is absolute wickedness nah


Ladies' mind are naturally flexible, we are controlled by emotions, Little attention and care gets into our heads.

Why will you encourage guys to manipulate us?


Its unfair

[color=royalblue]
On the contrary, missy, I am encouraging men to consider you women as more than sexual objects; as sentient beings with emotional needs which need to be met.
[/color]

vizkiz:
seduce her emotionally? That is a new one

can we get to furck women emotionally too?

[color=royalblue]
Make no mistake, sex is wholly physical. Ever wondered why that female chose to date the other boy over you even though you've gotten down with her once? She considers you as no more than an object of pleasure and him her emotional anchor.

I bet she'd forget about you in less than a year but him? She'd remember him ten years later.

He did what you couldn't do: he went a step further by conquering her mind along with her body.
[/color]

Decker:
Robert Greene would endorse this.

[color=royalblue]
Now this feels like déjà vu - you retorted to the post with my exact retort months ago.

Robert Greene focuses more on sexual seduction though, as against emotional seduction.
[/color]

Over the past number of weeks in this section, there's been a deluge of threads about dissecting the time-proven tactics of taking females to the zenith of sexual pleasure with their backs arched as they slowly descend to reality; their fists clenching to rumpled bedsheets like cotton steerings as they navigate their way through "Pleasure-topia".
Great feeling, yes? Now, the thing is something has to have lured the female in the first place. I mean, barring the countless females in the red light district, you can't just walk up to a female and say, "hey, let's tumble beneath the sheets". At least not in ideal situations. Now that's where[color=royalblue]
emotional seduction[/color]comes to play.

Emotional seduction is about conditioning a person's subconscious to like you and, possibly, love you. More like imprinting yourself on their mind - some sort of emotional stamp. Emotional seduction is what differentiates your lover from that boy/girl you had a sexual romp with.

It's no news that you don't have to have feelings to crave a person sexually. It's why a man can stab a woman who just gave him a mind-blowing _fellatio session.


As a narcissist (we're all narcissistic but I'm honest enough to admit it, even birds preen ), I kind of fancy the idea that thousands of kilometers away, there's one girl (or even ten ) who after months or years of being apart still craves to be with me (not just sexually).


My point? Instead of trying to get into the panties of countless random females who would have memories of me erased with the passage of time, I'd rather channel that attention into befriending a relative few who would carry mental imprints of us in our private world for life. [color=royalblue] I call it "quasi-immortality" - living on via recollected memories of others.[/color] We don't even have to be lovers but if we do, then it's a win-win.

Maybe I am a little old-fashioned. Then again, maybe this is me opining that there should be more to a guy-girl relationship than just tumbling beneath the sheets.

Instead of just getting into her body, go a step further by getting into her head, her life, her world. Those mushy feelings aren't all that scary and might be worth it. Now it's up to you to find out : [color=royalblue]
Seduce her emotionally.
[/color]


P. S: In a sequel thread, I'd be highlighting proven methods of emotional seduction.

QueenValerie:
I be QueenV, who rules the land!!
I answer to none certainly not you this man!

[color=royalblue]
What's a Queen to KingSLAY in his KINGdom? A female who sits on the side while I direct the affairs of mortals?

You had your chance, lass. Now begone! KingSLAY has zero tolerance for giddy LITTLE girls. He's got topical issues to attend to. Go play with your Barbie dolls till your King DEMANDS your presence.
[/color]

Truckpusher:
Dami isn't pretty at all - You need glasses bro .

[color=royalblue]
She is pretty. You know, the makeup-induced kind of pretty. For a product of Obasanjo's loins, that's positively surprising.

Iyabo is so, so, so you-know-what-I-mean-by-stalling. So bland!
[/color]

QueenValerie:
But I wanna know now!! Tell me,I demand it!

[color=royalblue]
You don't demand from KingSLAY, lass! You plead your case with him and if he deems you worthy of his presence and your request worthy of his time, he'd consider being generous.

Now rephrase your request, humbly this time!
[/color]

QueenValerie:
What attempts an what am I supposedly "hiddin'"

[color=royalblue]
We'd find out when it is revealed by _Bumbae. Until then, do not interfere with it.
[/color]

[color=royalblue]
1. Deboye: The Army Officer who, like his father, got shot in the butt while fleeing a battle scene.

2. Gbenga : The emasculated male progeny who gets taken for a ride by everyone. So weak in character, his dad picked his wife to bed with knowing fully well there'd be no repercussions. Infamous for driving against the traffic in Lagos during the last decade.

3. Iyabo: Not exactly an eye candy but with a brain I'd wish for in the head of any female I settle down with.


4. Dami: She's pretty! Get it? PRETTY! How's it possible for an offspring of OBASANJO to be so pretty? The mum must have been a looker.
[/color]

QueenValerie:
No.But why you curious

[color=royalblue]
You've been hellbent on thwarting attempts at uploading which, by default, would pique the interest of a curious mind.

You've got something to hide.
[/color]

[color=royalblue]
[/color]

QueenValerie:
No!! Lies it is

[color=royalblue]
It's out of curiosity. Now that you've objected to it, I am curious. Have you got something to hide, missy?
[/color]

[color=royalblue] Tall or short, just be pretty, intelligent and cultured. [/color]

BumBae:
Thank God i saved it lol no more pic of cats


Pls anyone that wants the pic ... Cc tsom

[color=royalblue]
I just saw this. If you will, do go ahead.
[/color]

[color=royalblue] May01, I have seen and replied it. [/color]

Elxandre:
Chief grammarian sir,

Unfortunately you also suffer from selective amnesia to have missed the extra man( Referee), whom aided the your staying alive in the one of the fixtures (can't remember which of the legs anymore).

[color=royalblue]
Excuses. More excuses. The only kind of retorts you give to explain away EPL teams failures against Barcelona.
[/color]

Plenty of refused penalty pleas that night.
Barca robbed Chelsea more to be honest.

[color=royalblue]
Was there any injunction barring Chelsea from scoring from open play? There goes your excuse - out the window and fluttering in the wind.
[/color]
But the 2012 match was brutally against Chelsea.
Poor in the league, against a Messi enjoying his personal best season till date.
I still commend Chelsea for staying alive till this day.

Torres late goal sent Accra crazy that day

Only useless English teams like Arsenal and Manchester City will succumb easily over two legs.[/quote][color=royalblue]
Arsenal and Man. City are top EPL teams and no walkovers. Barça's victories (amongst others) over them lends further credence to the superiority of La Liga since the turn of the 21st Century.
[/color]

may01:
Hi, you've got mail

[color=royalblue] I just checked and there's none from you. Do resend. [/color]

Elxandre:
Chelsea beat you last time out with 10 men, so what are you saying?

[color=royalblue]
A 10-man Barcelona team also beat Chelsea in 2009 with the away goal rule to qualify.

Abidal was given an undeserved red card.

Suffering from selective amnesia?
www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2009/matches/round=15279/match=302812/postmatch/report/index.html

[/color]

Chanchit:
Someone saw all the rubbish/foolish threats arsenal were making he was telling me he's scared, I told Arsenal would get a draw only if Messi fails to enter that pitch. Me weh support Messi against Nigeria.

[color=royalblue]
Same here. I celebrated Messi' goals against Nigeria during the World Cup and everyone looked at me like I was nuts!

Well, who cares?
[/color]

Synzu:
Hehehe..... Bookworm


I'm sure u know TSOM is just goofing around, he doesn't even have a cousin

Synzu:
[color=royalblue]
I'd tell her. You're a good woman not a home-wrecker.
[/color]
I go do u back no worry.

Synzu:
Hehehe..... Bookworm


I'm sure u know TSOM is just goofing around, he doesn't even have a cousin

[color=royalblue]
This reminds me of pranks friends and I use to play on each other in school once in a while.


JulietCutie, do go ahead. I was just teasing Synzu. I'm sure you know that.
[/color]

Synzu:



Ya'll just don't want me to be happy


I'm sure she knows its not true

[color=royalblue]
In other words, my cousin doesn't make you happy? Talk to her. You two can make it work.

By the way, the Printing Press man told me to inform you that the wedding invitation cards would be ready by Thursday.

I hope the T. M wear is the lemon and white lace material?
[/color]

Julietcutie:
hehe y d info na ...wasnt planing on doing anything wit him...lol and i wish ur cousin safe delivery nd happy married lyf

[color=royalblue]
I'd tell her. You're a good woman not a home-wrecker.
[/color]

Julietcutie:
lol really chilly indeed

[color=royalblue]
Missy, just so you know, Synzu is engaged to my cousin and she's 3-months pregnant for him. The wedding is in a month's time. Except you want to be his mistress.


If you doubt me, ask my sister-in-law, Bumbae.
[/color]

[color=royalblue] Nice piece. Beautifully written and thought-provoking.


That stated, men should live up to their responsibilities. Granted, he made a mistake...Wait, a mistake? Scratch that- no child is a mistake! The least he could have done was take care of the child's emotional and financial needs. Imagine knowing your father, seeing him on a regular basis but not being able to bond with him. Such mental torture.

The annoying part is that at the end of the day the irresponsible father gets the credit as the sire of a progeny he abandoned and bears his name while the mum makes do with whatever is left.

Silly man!
[/color]

Synzu:
Wasn't referring to myself, even though I know how many ladies I've snatched and the one's that were snatched from me.

[color=royalblue]
You're preaching to the choir, bro. We've all 'snatched' from others consciously or not since they (ladies) are always attached to someone.
[/color]

Synzu:
Na today u just realise?? Just pair with someone who matches your persona and chill till some other guy comes to take her away. Then pair with someone else again

[color=royalblue]
Maybe the reason she'd leave with another guy is because you've shown you do not want her to stay. Maybe.
[/color]

irunooboo:
may leprosy wipe out your entire lineage. bastard son of a rabid whoorish mother

[color=royalblue]
Done with grieving in advance for your family?
Can't keep up with your lies, transsexual?

Here's more detailed foretelling of what would happen to their corpses:

There'd be a gas leak minutes after they choke to death by fumes from the burning curtains. The resulting conflagration would wipe whatever is left of their history - like they never existed.

You, on the other hand, would be caught in between the thighs by a rusted ,jagged wreath iron while starved street dogs help themselves to the withered dangling pieces of your cut flesh.

You'd wish to pass out but soldier ants certainly have other plans as they'd take turns dragging bits of your flesh within every orifice of your sandy terrain to fertilize Mother Earth - the only positive purpose you'd serve.


Airheaded cross-dresser!
[/color]