₦airaland Forum

mazaje: Screaming that a Jewish tribal deity is perfect doesn't make him so. . .You guys claim your god isw all god and my point is the god portrayed in the bible is not all good simple, he is evil even as acknowledged by the bible, he confess of his own evil deed and even apologized for it in the book of Isiah. . .

By the way the story about the Amalekites is actually non historical and remains a Jewish mythology. . .

Smh

v

mazaje: What is all this rant all about?. . Is your god good or not?. . .Human dictators are not good. . .A dictatorial boss is not good. . .Here we are talking about a supposedly all good god. . .Or do you now accept that your god is evil?. .

What ?

Yahweh is PERFECT !

That you are so blind without a sense of Justice, is it my fault ?

That it flew over your head that the Amalekites attacked the Israelites first without provocation killing innocent children and women and men/slaves from Egypt, untrained in war fare, is it my fault ?

Is comprehension your problem ?

Cant you read in your previous post up there that Yahweh had asked an innocent nation(Kenites) to move away from the Amalekites to avert them being destroyed also ?

Were the Amalekites innocent as charged ?

That you have hetrade for Yahweh that you cannot keep his laws is whose fault ? Mind ?

Abeg, shif !

Your sense of Justice is leaking >> basket sense of Justice.

Who cares about what you think and accused Yahweh of ? your kind i suppose !

Smh

What is all this fancy talk all about where the universal sovereign is concern ?

Are you the one that sets his standards for him ?

"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;" (Exodus 20:4-5).
.....................

^
Is he supposed to owe his creatures any explanation concerning his actions, by the way ?


what Imput did the creatures input befor they were created ? Where then does this 'right' to question Yahweh comes from ?

In my company, i can hire and fire any body that does not abide by my layed down rules and regulations, did they open the company for me ?

Rebels !

That he decides to answer questions and gives explanations and reasons for his actions at all is just because of his higher standards.

Who told you it is democracy ? Rebels !

You cannot even question human dictators, but you think you have the right to question Yahweh right ? Because the universal sovereign tolerates such questions(though he is not obliged to) you take advantage and over do it and deriding him, even when his Judgement was purely based on Justice ? smh.

so, is this now the actual or there is hope of restoring the old one ?

*Just being curious though*

Alfa Seltzer: All these bla bla and twisting just because you can't stand quoted from your sacred book.
Let me dismantle you one by one. If you say good morning and that person takes offense, then YES!, there's something wrong with that person. You get it? There's something wrong with people taking offense when no offense has been intended expecially if the action was one of repeating sacred words (like good morning) to the person feigning offense.

John 3:16 already misrepresents itself and doesn't need me. It makes no sense at all.

And if you take salutation for an attack, then you have a problem.

Here you go again showing your ignorance of the scriptures. The King James version said to bake cake with sh.it. Here:

Ezekiel 4:12

King James Version (KJV)

12 And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+4%3A12&version=KJV

Lol.

Funny guy.

This is a vers that expressed the anger of Yahweh towards Israel and Judah for their iniquities and Ezekiel was asked to demonstrate what will eventually happened to this rebellious Israelites when they eventually go on exile.

see:

"Therefore thou shalt set thy face toward the siege of Jerusalem, and thine arm shall be uncovered, and thou shalt prophesy against it." (Ezekiel 4:7).

"And thy meat which thou shalt eat shall be by weight, twenty shekels a day: from time to time shalt thou eat it. Thou shalt drink also water by measure, the sixth part of an hin: from time to time shalt thou drink. And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight. And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them." (Ezekiel 4:10-13).

"Moreover he said unto me, Son of man, behold, I will break the staff of bread in Jerusalem: and they shall eat bread by weight, and with care; and they shall drink water by measure, and with astonishment: That they may want bread and water, and be astonied one with another, and consume away for their iniquity." (Ezekiel 4:16-17).
.................

To show the seriousness of what he will allow to happen to Israel, he asked his prophet to demonstrate the seriousness and prophesy it.

aManFromMars: Need to update the OP, but muskeeto's been banned...

Should I create a new one?

No !

Explain your plight to the Mods.

They can give you a temporary access.

Afteral, you let it(Muskeetoe) go voluntarily.

Peace

Fhemmmy: Yves4real really tried . . . I duff my hat for her and all other ladies as well.

yes, that ^ is true.

But i cant help noticing the positive influence you personally have had on this thread.

Especially your antics .

Adds spices to every thing here

Again, miss Royally, ever willing to serve.

The op, great thought.

Infact, you've all been great.

Great people, great thread.

Wishing you all keep it up.

You have all made people see how interestingly fun fill it can be for people to study and know there bible personally.

Great Job guys.

Keep it up.

Peace.

Fhemmmy: Yes, i made it . . . . dancing azonto

Yeah

truthislight: If you had stayed back a little, you would have been the one.

You were almost there.

Fhemmmy: Actually . . . I would have love to see that happen, for the man to come from behind and just WIN

truthislight: If you had stayed back a little, you would have been the one.

You were almost there.

but the women Are very Good too.

But i noticed that a very fast network goes a long way in aiding one in winning, yeah, not when it ensures ones post to registered first.

But, wait ! i cant remember seeing 4real being a rabbi .



I maybe wrong though.

Fhemmmy: Women will never get close to being a WINNER again oh

where act though Fhemmy ?

Page 400 beckons on you oh!

Fhemmmy: Women will never get close to being a WINNER again oh

Now Fhemmy, take this thread to page

million likes

https://images.sodahead.com/polls/003413331/4352333062_thumbs_up_answer_1_xlarge.jpeg

Great thread, great work and a wonderful people.

dagr8: Just want to use this opportunity to say kudos to Divepen for opening the most active Religion section thread...

To Divepen and to all who are making it possible ( both MEN and WOMEN ) God bless u plenty much....am proud to be part of this


page 400 here we come

I cant remember seeing a thread on NL that has gotten this far, and it promises to go much, much more, with the life and character you and all this wonderful women and men bring to the thread.

Its so beautiful, i cant believe i have followed a 400 page thread

Fhemmmy: Nice one . . . was hoping that we make MM7 to give the first poster on 400 page something . . . . Only if na MAN sha, if na woman, they will get an e-handshake from G.O. Divepen.

If you had stayed back a little, you would have been the one.

You were almost there.

Fhemmmy: I will like to be jare, cos will make sure man wins all the time

Am very sure the women will not agree.

If you become the permanent Rabbi, will women ever win again ?

[quote author=lana_Vello]hallo afribabe!!!

did 'truthislight' sleep off?[/quote]Lol

i was on and off the thread, but my system was still connected.

You almost used two or three question to win a whole days quiz, 4real would have sued you to the women court. Lol.

@Fhemmy

very funny you.

striktlymi: That question is like asking how I know that you area JW or that Alfa is a(n) [s]Atheistic Satanist or that Italo is a Catholic[/s]...is it not obvious??

Ok then, you are able to know all you assumed by the content of their post then.

So, what has an ID posting on any thread got to do with its religion if he did not post on religiouse matters or issues or even reflects on that ?

Alfa Seltzer: Is the problem to do with who is posting or with the content of the post?

Yes the content. Else, from ones ID, you will have to start telling us who is a christian or is not by their ID, even the newly registered ID without a post.

striktlymi: Guy get upto speed!!!

Then i guess it is the content of a post that determines whether it is christian or not.

So, anybody can post on any thread, but the content is the issue/the determining factor.

Peace

striktlymi: The same way we know those who claim to be Christians.

How ?

striktlymi: The question rather should be: what business has a love song from one CHRISTIAN to another CHRISTIAN has to do in a NON-CHRISTIAN chat thread?

How do you know who is a christian ?

By his/her post or by his/her ID ?

If a christian gets a second ID and post a romantic son on the non-christian thread will that make him not to be a christian anylonger ?

Please answer.

striktlymi: Ishi this really is quite simple. If we don't want to be offended then we should not offend others. LB is offended by what Christians are doing in 'his' thread, hence the need for us to take a step back and respect 'his' wishes.

yes, peoples wishes should Be respected, but not a selfish individual ego freek whimps and demands that does not stand for the majority.

Muskeetoe is an atheist but makes romantic post on that so call christian chat box and no one ever complains.

What had happened is not same.

striktlymi: Those words might be 'offensive' to Christians but to a satanist they are like sweet music...

There will always be a conflict between Christians and non-Christians...knowing the best way to deal with these conflicts is priceless. A Christian can post a love song to our Heavenly Father in the 'Christian' chat thread and get a medal for it but a satanist will do same and earn himself a ban.

Hence the need for a separate chat thread where the rules are more accommodating for them. The ish here is that there is such a thread but 'Christians' are bent on doing stuff in there uninvited which makes it unfair. We can't eat our cakes and have them.

Is there a praise song on the non-christian thread ?

Is a romantic song and a praise song the same ?

Am really getting tired of this line of reasoning.

Alfa Seltzer: Obinoscopy disagrees with you.

Ehm, I left you a personal message over there. Check it out.

Must you always look for trouble ?

Shame no dey catch your object of praise ?

You seem to bring it to new lows by the hour.

Your ways are not dignifying for an ambassador.


Smh

striktlymi: If I backup any further, it will be me at the bottom of the cliff.

No, but rather you will see the imbalance of the two instances.

striktlymi: True!

I guess we just have to wait and see Alfa's love songs to satan grace that thread.

You are not balancing this.

No one praised any body on the non-christian thread but rather, they just had a regular gist there.

On this, i think you are inciting Alfa to look for trouble.

Let him post exactly a similar stuff that was posted on the non-christian thread and see if there will be any complaint.

Peac

Alfa Seltzer: I just made another Satanic Praise post there. Let's see how long it lasts.

Did any body went to the non-christian thread to say praise the lord like you have just did ?

They simply had a regular gist. Dont look for trouble, men !

Smh

striktlymi: Hi ATMC,

I would have agreed with you but we all know the events that lead to the creation of the non-Christian chat box. That chat box was expected to accommodate only non-Christians. The only time that Christians can be accommodated in that thread would be when one of their own 'welcomes' one.

How do you know who is a 'non-christian' ?

The post or the ID ?

Peace

@ Benimoor

good work, good work men.

BERNIMOORE: Truthislight, lets discuss some bible truth here,

isaiah 42:6

6 “I, the Lord, have called You in righteousness,

'have called you', is a past tence here, that one is very sure

...... (a)and will hold Your hand; (b)I will keep You and give (c)You as a covenant to the people


Was God not here assuring jesus his chief servant there in heaven before giving him out as a covenant as revealed by prophet isaiah ?


yes or no?

Unless someone wants to deny Jesus preexistance, else it is very obvious who Yahweh was talking to.

Jesus was right there in heaven when that statement was made, Yahweh was not talking to an absentee, but to the messaiah to be, while he was still there in heaven assuring him of what he will do.

Yes! he was talking to Jesus.

Jesus himself said that the son can do nothing of his own initiative, but whatever he sees the father doing, so does he, "as he hears, so he judges.

Peace