₦airaland Forum

jumzzy448:
@Carefree, can you please cut the op some slack. Stop this your I know it all attitude.

Please go easy on Carefreewannabee and allow me to admit my part in her sour attitude. The serious rinsing I've been giving her as NL' foremost Femnivore has wreaked havoc with her normally placid mood !

TV

cococandy:
I'm not arguing that. Nor am I interested in numbers or proportion.

I wasn't arguing for or against. I plainly stated I hadn't been aware of that fact?

cococandy:
Older men marry younger women more easily than older women marry younger men(in my side of the world)

Which is the point I made, older woman - yonger man couples are relatively few??

cococandy:
I only used such examples so that in each case, it is clear who's contributing the aging gametes.

The fact that "eggs" are not "aged" as such and sperm are, is not the whole story in procreation.

cococandy:
But even older male/older female mating poses a risk of birth defect and which is more often than not a fault from the aging sperm and not the eggs.

As per my post above, age in women is about capability/fertility, in men it seems to be more about quality

cococandy:
I'm talking the biological aspect not the social one.

And that's perfectly fine and understood, but the two work in tandem, and for a reason !


TV

Just read through all the links. Interesting, although nothing new in an overarching sense – both men and women have optimal marriage/childbirth windows - but informative in the additional detail and the insight given to the hows and whys.

As women age, fertility wanes, but the quality of their eggs – of which she receive a full complement at birth – does not.

As men age, the quality of the sperm produced – as production is continuous – reduces, and they are more likely to pass on DNA mutations to any offspring.

Obviously if the mothers copy of the affected gene is fine, there is a decreased risk of the bad gene being passed on. It also seems, that where they are passed on, paternal bad genes are more likely to lead to miscarriages.

The effects seem to start showing in men around 40 (but could be earlier?) and are more noticeable by the time they hit their 50’s. It’s also very much lifestyle and environment driven.

A healthy lifestyle of good eating, exercise and the like should enhance the quality of sperm. Some of the chemicals in the food chain and contaminants everyday items certainly give pause for thought.

For women, as they age, it’s the ability to conceive that wanes. For men, it the quality of their sperm. You have been warned. GO out and marry. Marry well and with understanding. Try and do it in as timely a manner as possible.

Strong marriages, healthy homes , flourishing societies.

Brought to you by the BeFoRe^c Foundation.



TV

cococandy:
This bit is true. I know it to be true.

When Older male- younger female versus older female -younger male couples mate, it is more possible to have birth defects from the former group than the latter

We all know that men also have a "window of opportunity" when it comes to marriage and childbirth. Although I hadn't actually heard the above before - but assuming it's true - all the more reason for men and women to consider and engage marriage in a timely fashion.

One thing though, what is the proportion of "older female - younger male" couples (and I don't mean a relatively small age gap)? A rather small percentage I'd wager - and even smaller when you think in terms of "marriages/real committed relationships".

Cougars feeling funky are hardly likely to be in permanent/long-term relationships with children in view. It's more likely the young bobo has his fill of her and then finds himself a nubile young filly to procreate with .


TV

swaggzo:
hahaha.. He undercover aye?? :p

No Balls!


TV

carefreewannabe:
All you do here is to force your narrow-minded views on people by means of cheap propaganda that denigrates women and determines their value by age and their ability or disability to push out babies.

Who cares about what you admire?

Tell it someone who cares.

No Content! No Gifs!!


TV

BananaBender:
LMAO! Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha

Is this a joke? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Pulling the sympathy card huh?? Sholly denigrated my wife, my wife's parent and all. *cry-cry*

You insulted your wife when you made this comment:
"They simply cannot touch Mrs TV01 - not in pedigree, heritage, character, demeanor, graciousness or beauty. My delightful wife epitomises all that deep down they aspire to be, but even deeper down realise they can never attain to.

How can an admixture of desperate and ageing singles, bitter and lonely divorcees, plain-faced lesbians (yes, I know cheesy!)low brow, low rent, low class and low bred, damaged & limping, treadless purveyors of slut-ho doctrines even stand"

Your high standard having wife must be so proud of the above. Yep, you weren't referring to me but when you insult women, I take that very personal.

Wait, are you okay? Are u hurt?



Mr Jesus-Jesus, why are you lying. You're the christian here, right? How can I run from you, my post was probably 15min apart at most.

Bwhahahahahahahahahahaha, plus I was busy making fun of you offline. Who hasn't met a happily married feminist?? Where does he live?


[img]You first pretended not to have seen the pic – ok, I’ll afford you the benefit of the doubt – you then tried to make it about my wife and my caring about your opinion of my wife ![/img]

aaaawww, see dude, I didn't know I hurt your feelings like this oh. Bwhahahahahahaa, we were obviously running on a different frame of mind.

If you truly posted a picture of your wife, how come no one made a comment about it? I don't think anyone saw the picture but hey, you can prove me wrong, post again.

I made it about your wife?? Refer to the post above, bwahahahahahahaha This dude is crazy.



Bwhahahahahaha You are pulling every sympathy card you can get.



You are delusional, and not smart either.

Babble, my one line response is babble?? I don die with laughter

Let's start from the beginning. This time I promise to refresh the page every second, promise to respond within 5min.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha, I am laughing so hard right now. LML.

No Pic! No Contest!! No Surprise!!!


TV

@betterbest,

It can't be easy and I wouldn't wish your predicament on anyone.

Forgiving infidelity, while in itself is highly commendable, it does not of itself restore trust. The truth is, you should have put a stop to progressing the relationship – not necessarily ended the relationship - at that point and not resumed progress until you were satisfied that your WTB fully appreciated the error of her ways, was totally repentant and trust had been restored.

Glossing over the issue and “progressing” only left it to fester. You continued on to marriage without true pause for thought, reflection and healing. I can only advise you to re-trace your steps to the point of infidelity and work to rebuild the trust. You cannot rightfully divorce her – you married her with full knowledge.

As a man, you need to fully get to grips with what happened and be sure within yourself that it was indeed an error – never to be repeated. Your wife’ role will be perhaps more important here.

If you don’t, you’ll never fully appreciate your wife or enjoy your union. You have no reason to doubt her faithfulness since you married, so please focus your efforts on restoration, rather than reflecting on the past.

Why needlessly suffer and blight your present and future – and remember your child - for something that can be consigned to the past – where it belongs?

This thread may help. https://www.nairaland.com/1284024/broken-dejected-found-out-wife#15631088
And I expantiated here; https://www.nairaland.com/1284024/broken-dejected-found-out-wife/2#15635959


All the best


TV

^{I hope other men can learn, that “love”, while important, does not sustain marriage in or of itself. OP has rightly stated that trust is the pillar. I hasten add to that other things, such as, shared aspirations, commitment and honest communication and rightly calibrated expectations.}

carefreewannabe:
In your bush.

Wasn't your wife 30+ when you married her? Didn't she accept your proposal without properly knowing you?

I'm struggling to grasp the point you are making Whatever my Wife' situation, I made my choices, and took charge for my preferences with full understanding when we married - as did she. All I do here, is outline my thoughts on how other men and women interested in marriage can best do the same.

Up until now, I’ve always admired your devotion to your cause - even if I see it as woefully flawed - and willinglness to discuss factually without resort to ad-hominem.

For some reason – and most unfortunately – you seem to have departed from your previous standards. I thought the addition of well-timed gifs was for the most part an improvement, other than that, it’s been all downhill.

Like I said, you are presenting as increasingly wild and desperate. Presenting very little for this Femnivore to feast on - please give me a break - or perhaps take one yourself


TV

Shirley07:
Did Christ say children and daddy are one?
It's a wonder how you claimed to be the head when your intelligence isn't up to a pinch of salt because if it was, you would understand the sentence 'Love comes with submission'. In other words, it means you can't love without submitting. However, you can submit without any ounce of love. The earlier you realize you're such a dunce, the better.
Also, if that brain of yours can't grasp what I meant by every christians is required to have Christ as their role model, then that brain is a waste of space already because I never said only christians have Christ as their role model like you were insinuating. However, all christians must be like Christ because christian itself means to have a christ-like nature. It's a waste of time conversing with you anyway.
And let me repeat it to you, I imbibe Christ's doctrine and yeah, Christ was a feminist. There are many things he did in the bible that showed he was one. For example, he didn't condemn the adulterous woman that was brought to him because he realized the hypocrisy of the men that brough her, afterall she didn't commit the adultery with herself yet the man who was with her wasn't brought forward by the hypocrital men. No wonder Christ asked them to cast stones if they are without sins.
Another is talking with a samaritan woman which was forbidden according to the jewish law which finds it degrading for a man to converse with a woman let alone, a samaritan.
There's also Mary madgalene, whom the disciples had issues with and labelled her as wasteful yet had no qualms associating and eating merringly with Zacchaeus, the publican. Anyway, we're all aware of how Christ shut his disciples down.
Not to also forget the two Lazarus' sisters, Martha and Mary. According to the scriptures, Mary was being reprimanded by Martha for learning under Jesus' feet instead of her to be in the kitchen but Jesus shut Martha up. And according to the jews in those days, anyone that learned from a rabbi is expected to be a teacher and Jesus obviously aware of this, had no qualms teaching Mary, the way he did with his disciples.
And the greatest is telling the hypocritical pharisee that husband and wife are one flesh, which means no one has the right to treat the other the way he/she likes but to treat each other as one body, just like he is one with God and the Holy Spirit. So, Christ was a feminist and by his grace, I'm one. I repeat Feminism brought about women emancipation and you can shove that into your ass.
That said, if you can't see where Paul addressed christian slave masters in ephe 6:9 to lessen their threatning on their slaves, then that eyes of yours is better off being shot because it's useless. Like I said earlier, I don't blame you because if you were a slave, you won't be here dribbling out saliva to drive a point. What am I even saying? you're better off being a slave because that primitive brain of yours reason like one.
Moreover, there are many things Paul said in the bible that were contradictory to Christ's teaching. For example, Christ said anyone that call his brother a fool is deem for hell but Paul didn't heed to that warning. Christ also said we shouldn't swear nor boast but Paul had no qualms doing such.
Whatever, carry go with your paul's doctrine but I'm for Christ, a feminist!

My, my, my, you really are confused/delusional aren’t you

You’ve charged Paul with being;
1. A champion of slavery
2. A misogynist
3. Anti-Christ

Whilst to you Jesus The Christ is;
1. A role-model
2. Social Justice Warrior (SJW)
3. A good man (according to your friend and fellow "Feminianity" devotee CarefreeWannabe)

If you would only know Christ as God Incarnate, Lord, Saviour and Master (did that hurt ?), your eyes would open. Till then…

Paul never said a word that contradicts the teaching of Jesus my Lord & Saviour – or that didn’t echo God’s eternal plan. He merely gave more detail of the working of the church and relations between husbands & wives, men & women and the brethren.

It’s a shame that you have to assassinate the character of The Apostle Paul, merely to suit your feminist beliefs. It’s instructive that you have not been able to quote any scripture to back up your claims. Just a long, tired, easily discredited narrative – that you clearly learnt second-hand.

Christianity and The Gospel nowhere and in no way subjugates women or brings anyone into bondage. Men and women are equal in worth, value and in the sight of God. And don’t forget, Christianity emancipated women! You are your ilk are in bondage…to a devilish ideology.


TV

^{**NL foremost Femnivore - on a turkey shoot **}

Shirley07:
I don't aspire to be a trophy wife.

Trophy wife na beanz?
Do you think just anyone can be a trophy wife?

You need to be cultured, well-spoken, properly maintained, possess fine deportment, be easy on the eye and committed to being a "wife in the true sense of the word .

From what you've displayed here, even Gollum would look at you and say "at best, she makes a good case for charitable polygamy"


TV

^{**NL' chief Femnivore - snacking & flossing**}

BananaBender:
This is not about your wife, I truly and honestly do not care about her. I'm sure she doesn't need the online validation either. Oh wait, she married you

BananaBender:
I missed the above. My opinion about your wife clearly matters to you. Please, post again.

So let me get this right; you came into the thread denigrated my wife, my wifes parents and my wifes husband (me that is ), without any provocation or reason whatsoever – in fact, you pivoted it off a lame attempt to exonerate CareFreeWannabee from same?

And then, when I offered a show and tell instead of a boring give and take of invective, you ran? Not to say I’m surprised, you have form, having done so in pretty much all our previous encounters.

You first pretended not to have seen the pic – ok, I’ll afford you the benefit of the doubt – you then tried to make it about my wife and my caring about your opinion of my wife !

Good to see that feminists delight in attacking any women who does not necessarily share or give credence to their views.

So just in case there’s been an “innocent” mix-up, here is the offer again;

My wife, according to you, must have low self-esteem, low standards and was poorly parented. Especially since she allowed herself to be wooed and courted by someone who committed to loving and cherishing her and any children we may have together.

I invited you to show a picture of yourself as one who possesses high esteem, was well brought-up and has high standards (even if only in a relative sense). So much esteem, and so well brought-up, that you are able to mate indiscriminately - in and out of season - without any concern as to the commitment or care of those who penetrate and relieve their lust with your body .

Having waited, I even went ahead to post my wife’ pic first. All I could see in response was some obscurantist babble? I am pretty certain of what to expect from you – but let’s see if you’ll surprise .


TV

@BananaBender

I can see you on, so I'm assuming you are preparing a response.

Anyway. I've attached a picture of my wife - clearly dripping a lack of self-esteem.

And why wouldn't she when I crossed the ocean to ask her family to grant me the honour of loving and cherishing her as a husband?

Presumably your side-chick swag and glorified ghetto runs girl glamour knocks that for six? Do any of the married men you purloin know or care anything of your pedigree? I am of course assuming you know it to share it.


TV

^{**I can see some of my votaries here - no doubt wanting to see what they aspire too **}

BananaBender:
I don't think carefree's post was meant to disrespect your wife.

No one said it did - and I don't believe she would or has.

BananaBender:
If she is truly all of this, she lowered her standards when she chose to be with you but then again, a lot of women out there have been brought up to have low self esteem.

...but just in case there was any doubt, you thought you'd dish some to the both of us.

BananaBender:
That's why we need feminism.

We? I never saw a happily married women wrapping herself in that ideology.

But back to my wife, no need for mindless invective, post your picture and I'll post hers. Then you can post a picture and/or resume of the man that has committed to you and any children you may have together.


TV

carefreewannabe:
I have zero respect for religious hypocrites.

And by all means continue to call it out when you encounter it !

carefreewannabe:
Remember that I will be back each time I spot your cheap propaganda that denigrates women and determines their value by age and their ability or disability to push out babies.

Men - mature, strong and possessing understanding - will always consider their marriage partners in terms of their youth, beauty and fertility. It's a basic biological imperative.

Plus, your mish-mash ideology of choice and relativity cannot deny men the right to do so - however much it makes you squirm. Women are free to slut around to the point of needing re-treads, kill their unborn babies on a whim and freeze their eggs until they are 70. Men will respect them and their choices, but we know what ours will be !

Do you have respect for irreligious hypocrites ?

Toodles


TV

^{**flossing feminist remnants out of his pearly whites **}

carefreewannabe:
Interesting that you had to defend yourself against my assumption.

I am good.

And telling, that unable to proffer insightful content and running out of gifs, you resort to perjorative assumptions.

"Good" is clearly an abstract value

Try aboniki - hot but soothing


TV

pickabeau1:
For someone to be so reviled by some females here
His religion, his posts even his wife is not spared
I wonder when his son will become game.

Even the bible toting females can't resist to take dogs at him

Immediately a post insulting him is put up, u see the likes rack up....by default every time

Na wa....


TV01..your positive demeanour is astounding

It's nothing - have I had to resist to bloodshed? They are mere miscreants, slightly irritable. If my master was persecuted, how much more a mere disciple like me?

The exact right word "toting" - anyone can tote a gun, only a few can actually handle it correctly, let alone shoot straight - they are few and far between on the board.

They simply cannot touch Mrs TV01 - not in pedigree, heritage, character, demeanor, graciousness or beauty. My delightful wife epitomises all that deep down they aspire to be, but even deeper down realise they can never attain to.

How can an admixture of desperate and ageing singles, bitter and lonely divorcees, plain-faced lesbians (yes, I know !)low brow, low rent, low class and low bred, damaged & limping, treadless purveyors of slut-ho doctrines even stand

I spare them for the most part, because that's what she would exhort me to do. Did I mention righteous

As for my kids? I'll wait till I see theirs. Chances are their eggs will remain frozen instead of fertilised

I shall contine to speak the truth and stand for the best interest of strong families and a flourishing society. Afterall, it's the family section no?


TV

carefreewannabe:
I wouldn't be surprised to discover one day that TV01 is a pastor milking his stvpid church members.

And they will all fall for it because Mr Television knows how to make use of thesaurus and they are all r*etarded.

I can confirm - and my early posting history on this forum clearly shows - that I am anti-mandatory tithe, and believe money should only move within the body of Christ based on "need".

Further, I am not a Pentecostal or denominationalist of any kind. I do not belong to, own or operate any form of religious organisation. You are appearing increasingly desperate and unhinged - a sabbatical would help you re-think, re-group and assimilate the deep truths I have graciously imparted to you !

See you back.


TV

carefreewannabe:
Anyone who follows you and supports you has a one digit IQ.

There are 7.125 billion people and at least half of them are stvpid so it won't surprise me that many will follow you.
See achievement.

No gifs, no content, ad-hominem against me and invective against 3 billion + people .

You are clearly in meltdown -you are close to joining the long list or those I have left with limps, wounds and chronic conditions - time out perhaps ?


TV - Nairaland' leading femnivore

Mutaino7:
u deserved my followership*dico needed*.. I love how u own, dictate and slice arguments..

Appreciated

carefreewannabe:
And the blind are leading the blind.

No Gif, no content ! But lots of soreness because the truth is evident.

You are becoming redundant !


TV

BananaBender:
I have nothing against virginity but no woman should be a virgin because of another person.

You remain a virgin for yourself, not because you want a man to validate you.

You are more than your hymen, you deserve to be respected regardless.

asandigbo:
am not saying otherwise.

I am.

Present 2 women to a man who desires to marry; #1 has had numerous lovers #2 has had none

ATBE he will choose #2 as his wife. And he'd be right and smart to do so - as led by documented research.

He'll still respect #1 though


TV

Merlissa:
The husband looks scared

That's not the husband...(it's his younger brother) ,they did the marriage in absentia thingy...her real hubby had problem with his visa and was worried about losing his early morning cleaning job in "outside London" !


TV

crackhaus:
Obviously something is pissing you off, else you won't be going off tangent like this.

Not really, she's just naturally shrewish !


TV

Shirley07:
I said Paul championed slavery, which is the truth.

No, it's not the truth. It's the mindless cant of feminists and rebellious women

Shirley07:
However, Christ never taught us such and a true christian has christ as his/her role model and his words becomes his/her watchwards.

"Role model" - More gifs please...

You don't have to be a Christian to have Christ as a role model - but that probably explains a lot.
Christ without the cross, makes about as much sense as a saviour without salvation - but like I said...your choice.


TV

pickabeau1:
TV01

https://www.4thletter.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/laughter.gif

Graciás bro


TV

Shirley07:
Of what use is it when Paul constantly contradicts not only himself but Christ? He abolished the law when it comes to salvation and said Christ has freed us from all bondage but hadd no issues bounding women to one. That's basically bullshit and hypocrisy!

Please demonstrate clearly - from scripture - where Paul contradicts himself
Are you claiming that there is a mistake with the biblical canon or error within it?

Shirley07:
If Paul actually knows the true meaning of love, he will know that love comes with submission and that every christians is required to love one another and humble himself/herself like little children, like Christ taught us.

Yawn, more of the unthinking belief that claiming "love" obviates everything else and is unstructered, unthinking and non-discerning ?

Not to mention the confusion around "submission" - if I submit to my boss at work does that mean I love them or that they love me? Or that they also submit to me because of the lorrrf ? Likewise the home, husband/wife. Yes, it will be easier to submit to a man that loves you properlly, but the bible nowhere claims that love is a pre-requisite for submission.

Shirley07:
And all those history you wrote up there are just meaningless bullshit because everyone and his dog knows that without feminism, women emancipation wouldn't have taken place. Female license to education, political right and jobs in the society, liberation from male dominance and justice for women rape/sexual assault e.t.c wouldn't have even surface.

Coogar, Pickabeau, somebody, anybody...please help me with a gif of someone laughing uproarously ! Feminism emancipated women !
It was men with Judeo-Christian beliefs that emancipated women. It was the Gospel - and parts very much written by The Apostle Paul - that shaped their beliefs. Truth hurts. As a feminist why do you feel the need to purloin Our Christ and His Gospel or malign His servants?

Shirley07:
I'm sure Christ did his best in the liberation of women but not Paul. Infact, the Jews state that as one of the reason why Christ was hated, apart from him claming to be the son of God.

You are not sure about anything except your enslavement to feminist ideology !

Shirley07:
The truth is Paul championed women slavery and slavery as whole. If he didn't, why will he say women salvation is only by children bearing stating reason that Eve was the one that got deceived and became the sinner? So, Adam wasn't deceived?

Please show us clearly where Paul did any of the things you claim above. Then it can be confirmed or refuted - not just asserted !

Shirley07:
Not to forget the part where he was addressing christian slave masters. A christian shouldn't even have a slave in the first place but no, our dear Paul didn't think so.

Please show us where Paul addressed a Christian slave master condoning there practice of slavery

Shirley07:
And I don't blame you because if our fore fathers didn't fight for their freedom and you were still a slave, feeding on crumbles, you won't have the mouth to be spitting out gibberish.

I know feminism and the hordes of SJW would have secured our liberty no ?

Shirley07:
Whatever, I'm not stopping you from imbibing Paul's doctrine as long as you don't come here spouting rubbish why women should submit when my Christ said two shall becomes one and he's in the best authority to state such because he knows what it means to be one with God and the Holy Spirit.

So two becoming one means there are no roles and responsibilites for husbands and wives. It means this is not authority and structure in marital relationships. It means all Christians must submit to one another in love? Lemme ask my son if he would like to go to school or watch TV and eat cookies and ice-creram all day - and then submit in love

Shirley07:
And before coming here with your nonsense, practise what you preach with your wife first.

Ephesians 5:25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her
I'm practicing and Wifey is not complaining - any joy in locating a properly feminised husband? Let us know how you get on with that, and how happy you are when you do - there may be lessons to be learned !


TV

carefreewannabe:
self-deception

https://old.shareasimage.com/service/quotes/pro/01-14-13/for-everyone-who-exalts-himself-will-be-humbled-and-he-2.png

Gif Meister

Please let us know when you have some insight to share.


TV

Misogynist2014:
In one word, they are not Christians. CONGRATS!!!






It is very föölish to compare 2000 yrs ago, when little was known of Africa, when slaves were normal and Rome reigned supreme to 21st century. I think the bible was fair enough to instruct Christians to treat their slaves well. Did Jesus or his disciples own slaves?

They want you to prove Christianity right, you are a loner.

I think you misunderstood my post.

Carefrewannabe and Shirley07, both believe that Christianity condones slavery. Shirley07 additionally claims that Paul sees the husband/wife relationship as akin to a slave/master one.

I solidly refuted both errors !

As to comparing Africa 2'000 years ago, I actually compared the Christian exhortatio of 2'000 years ago to most non-Judeo-Christian based countries of this present day. And am bold to declare that many of those countries, even now, do not match up to that ehortation.

Am I clear, or are you of a different opinion?


TV

^{...or perhaps I misunderstood you?}

.

Peggy,

A mens sexual health is often tied to other things;

Stress is a big one – the stress of being a married man – especially a responsible one who wants to provide the best for his family – can be huge, and bear on a mans libido

Feeding into this are lots of other things, work situation, finances, family life events etc. Your job as his wife is too help him manage his stress levels – even if they are not articulated or plainly apparent.

Exercise & Diet – When I coach men who wish to improve their marriages – even if there is no problem – I always touch on this. It’s very important.

Physical wellbeing doesn’t come in a bottle. It’s takes continuous endeavour and a systematic approach. He needs to maintain an exercise regime that brings gains, but also takes into account your circumstances and environment.

Long-term the benefits are priceless. Improved health – may also help with his other conditions. Better, feeling, better looking, more enrgy and enthusiasm, and an increased libido – which all the other benefits actually feed. Double fo’ yo’ money! Seek medical clearance that he’s fit to exert himself.

Exercise should be combined with a good diet. You should be able to take charge here. But work with him, as wholesale changes may be required and he may resist to begin with.

And of course see a doctor. A good, competent one. But as he’s been “potent” in the past, I shouldn’r expect anything structural to be the issue?

Please try to stay away from, or only consider medication as a temporary fix. At age 35 – there is no reason why he shouldn’t still be functioning at his peak. I personally do not like medicine as a long-term solution.

Hopefully exercise and diet together with managing his stress levels should do it. Draw on your faith if you have any and deal with any past hurt/wrongs first. Forgiveness alone is a great healer..

Work with him. Work together. It’s something you can overcome if the will is there. All the best.


TV

Good effort Wonlasewonimi, Sagamite and Coogar'

Contracting definitely has it's merits. I sit next to two at work. And both cinsidered their positions and actually gave up perm roles.

In addition to those mentioned, they also avoid most of the politics and get to keep it fresh, building more extensive networks. Wonlasewonim actually has a point about benefits though. Lot's of firms are still cutting back and those he cited sound eye-wideningly juicy - and probably not to rare at worker-man level !

However, even lower down non-contributory pensions of 20% and bonuses of around 15% still make a difference. Not to mention paid holiday, family health insurance cover and a number of other - albeit - small - ones - all add up.

Security is often cited, but that's not a big seller in the current market. Although If you are a perm, a 4 figure pay-off is always likely.

I didn't cause the derailment, only helped it along !


TV

bukatyne:
You think you are the only one good with insults eh?

No, not by a long shot - but I'm way better at it than you !

crackhaus:
Yesterday was her birthday so maybe just put her on a waiting list or something.

Really? Happy birthday Bukatyne. Many happy returns. What would you like?

1. Anti-wrinkle cream
2. Middle-age spread reducing juice
3. Attitude adjustment pills
4. An extended deluxe rinsing
5. Peace

Choose wisely !


TV