Windywendy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Windywendy's Profile › Windywendy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 27 pages)
yodiyokun:I don't perceive Afribank's management as being credible. What happened with all that noise the former MD made as to the accounts being manipulated? The Management didn't even deem it fit to give an update on the issue. They manipulated the stock price from N9.1 to N11.51 and then went on suspension after releasing what seemed to be a fantastic result, with the hope of doing a PO. Later, it seemed like they saw that they could do more than N11.51, so they came up with all that blab about how they've decided not to do a PO anymore. Once again they released what seemed to be a fantastic result, manipulated the price to over N30 and then suddenly went on suspension AGAIN, saying that they've applied to do a PO YET AGAIN. They didn't even deem it fit to address the issue raised by the prior MD as to the credibility of the accounts, and didn't bother to tell what the outcome of the so-called investigation into the matter revealed. I'm not too keen on investing a company like that, if you ask me. Something seems fishy. |
@Emmaachile: Thanks! |
EMMAACHILE:Naaa, not so fast! It ain't realized until it is SOLD . But seriously, the info you posted earlier has picked my interest. If you have the prospectus pls upload it on your site -- I know the offer has closed but will just want to see what plans are in the offing. Thanks |
EMMAACHILE:Hmmm, interesting information. I'll look this up, might be a good one afterall. But Emmaachile, do you figure this German brewery giant can turn the company around in 12months? Last I heard, the company was moribund -- as in zero production. Also, are they planning to introduce new brands, 'because the old int'l breweries brands weren't that much of a hit and I can imagine that their market share would have gone to the Guinesses and Nigerian breweries of this world. Have any idea what plans they have going forward? Please share. |
RoughCut:Kai, no misquote me o! If oga see this one now, na yawa be that ![]() But seriously, you're right though. Can you imagine international breweries PO being oversubscribed to the point where the company has to return monies |
pinokio:what? speak up, say something we can understand apart from "hmmmm" of course ![]() @Wanaj0, I quite understand your view point. A correction is in order, but you'ld still see higher PE's before that happens, especially with all the PFA funds and other PE and hedge funds coming into the market. As long as there are no comparable alternative outlets for investing these funds, they'lll find their way into the stock market. And you and I know what happens when you have too much money chasing a few good stocks . . . If on the other hand you still decide to keep your money under your pillow, then you need to let me know where you live so that I can send some "awon boyz" to give you an incentive to not do that just kiddingSeriously, though, put your money to work for you. |
wanaj0:Hehehehe, which years were those? must be good 'ol days gone by . . . But kind sir, you might never see such PE's again, especially as the market is rapidly changing, so you might as well put your money to work for you . |
All of una wey dey send me email asking if the price of one stock or the other is going to double or tripple within a certain timeframe, make una take time oh! When it comes to such matters, I no know book o! That's bigboylarry's sole territory and usurping is not allowed ![]() |
model1780:Be careful though. History is not necessarily a good predictor of the future, especially in a market in which the fundamentals are rapidly changing. |
wanaj0:You're very right Wanaj0, Flour mills is wwaaayyy cheaper going by the PE alone. But I believe Bagco's PE should be higher than that of Flour mills, because it has a higher growth potential than flour mills at least as far as I know. How much higher this PE should be than that of flour mills is an open question. But 23 is not that bad, especially in comparison to the market as a whole (how many liquid stocks have PE's under 20 ) and in comparison to the packaging sector specifically. |
damoche07:Oh ok. Thanks for the clarification ![]() |
pumping777:@Pumping777, I'm still interested in why you think growth may not be sustained for AG leventis. Just checking to be sure I have all my facts right . . . |
easimoni:awwwww, thanks for the clarification I was beginning to think there was another windywendy impostor ![]() |
Pennywise:Don't be deceived. NO BODY makes 25% return every week on the NSE, not even Fatherof2 himself . @Fatherof2, if na lie I lie, pls speak up ![]() |
Mr. Cee:FSDH |
easimoni:Which proshare article was that? I wasn't quoting any proshare article. I use excel to do moving averages, and I do that for stocks that trigger my interest |
aktopgun:Well, you're absolutely right, and infact that was one of my main reservations. I don't see Nampak sitting down and folding their arms while Bagco is trying to invade their space in the flex packaging market. But Bagco already has a market (at least flour mills will be using a lot of those flex packages), and so at least has a fighting chance. This is one area I think they can leverage the muscle of the parent. But let's see how it plays out eventually. As an aside, how's it going with the new baby ? |
aktopgun:Nampak and Bagco are not directly comparable. The only aspect of Nampak's business that's comparable directly to Bagco's is the flex packaging (Morpack) which is billed to come onstream in 2008. That segment of Nampak is doing well. Now, I'm not a Nampak shareholder, but I did look at their FY06 financials while doing the ground work on Bagco. There's a lot of reasons those guys are not doing well, but their flex packaging division is doing well. Take a look at the financials yourself on their website. You could also look at investors' presentations on the website too. Also, if you look at Nampak's financials, you'ld see that flex packaging is not a significant part of the business. |
no_shaking:You mis-understand my point. The balance sheet post IPO will be substantially debt free. Current total Long term debt is about N4.8 billion and with 90% of the PO used to clear debt, this is more than enough to get rid of the LT debt and also reduce the over-reliance of overdraft. I'm not sure why you're comparing interest expense to turnover. But let me give you another perspective on this. Interest expense for FY06 was N865million. With the interest bearing debt gone, and the dependence on overdraft reduced, this will free up at least N865m to income. This amounts to like 13kobo per share (using 6.215b shares). For a N3.9 stock, that is substantial. Also, the company has already invested heavily in production upgrade and expansion and also done some re-organization -- check out the cash flow statements and you'll see the progressive investment over the last 3 or so years. I'm guessing that's how they came about all of this debt in the first place. So the fact that they're not using the IPO to invest in expansion does not mean there isn't room for expansion. The investment has been done already, and the company is already beginning to reap the benefits -- take a good look at the operating results and profit ratios from 2006 and compare those to the prior years and you'll see what I'm talking about. The investment and reorganization started in 2005 I think. I personally think the expansion is going to come largely from the flex packaging and from the fact that they'll have more working capital to do business. This is a good deal in my opinion. Also, I don't understand what you mean by "not much is changing strategically". Did you read the prospectus? A lot has changed strategically, all the way up to the corporate governance structure. Pls expansiate further on what you mean, perhaps I've overlooked something. With regard to flour mills being the major customer, well, I'ld say this is true. But take a look at the note on related party transactions, and you'll see that flour mills does not contribute up to 50% of the company's turnover. 2006 was about 41% and that's the highest so far. This admittedly is a risk, but not as risky as the alternative bag company (in my opinion). But take a look again at the prospectus and let's discuss further. |
Temmie10:Temmie10, do you have the detailed Bank Phb prospectus, all I could find is the abridged one. |
@ Jehosaphat: here’s my take on Bagco—This deal is a BUY! • The projections seem realistic based on the historical numbers, and in my opinion, very conservative. I actually believe they’ll exceed the projections because of the Morpack to come on-stream early 08. Flexible packaging is profitable business (that’s the reason Nampak of S.A took over CMB a while back – the flexible packaging segment of that business is the second most profitable after the metals and glass segment, and does increasingly well every year) and I don’t believe the projections in Bagco’s prospectus reflect the full potential of Morpack. Also, with the possible alliance with Eleme petrochemicals (which I strongly believe is very likely to happen), that’ll result in further reduction in cost of production and increased sales – perfect recipe for increase in profits, if you ask me. • At a current PE of about 23 (I used 6.215 billion shares in my analysis) relative to a PE of about 38 for Nampak (which arguably is not directly comparable, but still is the most comparable company right now listed), this deal is fairly priced. Average PE for the performing and actively traded companies (i.e. beta glass, avon crown and nampak) in the packaging sector is about 24. I believe Bagco has a higher growth potential than beta glass and avon crown and should therefore command a higher PE, so 23 is quite reasonable in my opinion. I also believe that the forward PE is actually going to be lower than what has been projected in the prospectus due to the what I consider ‘conservative’ estimates. • The management team is SOLID and very experienced, and that to me is the best part of this deal. I also like the corporate governance structure in place. If you noticed, the company hadn’t been doing well prior to 2006 but took off in 2006. This seems to be the result of both the investment in production upgrade and expansion, and the reorganization done under the new management. It seems like these guys are good at what they’re doing. Also, return matrices (return on asset, return on equity and profit margins) are quite impressive! I like the crop of peeps on the Board (yes, I read every detail! ).• The balance sheet looks solid (I’m factoring in the fact that 90% of the PO will be used to pay off interest bearing debt), and the business generates cash! It looks like the reorganization is actually yielding interesting results, even with the heavy debt burden and working capital restrictions they're currently experiencing. Can you imagine what this business will do when that burden is gone and there's more working capital available? Perhaps that's the reason flour mills is still holding on to 70% who likes to let go completely of the goose that lays the golden eggs .My two biggest reservations however are: (1) Morpack is going to be taking Nampak head-on with regard to competition, and I’m not sure how this is going to play out. Nampak is no newbie in the business and will therefore not be an easy contender (if you get my drift …). Let’s watch and see. (2) There’s pending claims and litigations worth N650m. I wonder where they’ll get the money from if the liability materializes – however with flour mills owning 70% of the company, I guess they’ll rise up to the rescue. I also don’t understand the note on the dividend for FY08. The calculation seems to be based on the outstanding shares pre-IPO and I’m still wondering what exactly that means. Overall however, I think this is a good company that’s in the early phase of a good growth trajectory – their investment in production capacity over the last 3years and their reorganization is just starting to pay off really well. I like it, especially as they’ll have little or no debt burden post IPO this should make it easy for them to expand further if they do decide to . . . . I’m IN . I also like the fact that 70% of the shares are held by the parent company, as this reduces the NSE float but this one is just "jara" o . . .Oh and in answer to Wanaj0’s question about transfer pricing, I’m not too worried about that. If you look at note 5.24.1, you see that although Flour Mills owns 70% of this company, less than 50% of the turnover actually comes from related parties (Flour mills inclusive). Infact, the number for 2006 was less than 30%. So it seems like these guys can hold their own if push comes to shove (if you know what I mean). Also, unlike the other guys (ala SAKS), their customer base is quite diversified. |
youngdoc:Yes you're very right, market sentiments can greatly overwhelm fundamentals, but not for long. Ultimately, the market comes back to its senses (otherwise companies like Nampak and CI leasing would still be trading at N1 and companies like DSR would be trading at 56 . . . get the drift?). Personally, I don't do long term in companies without solid fundamentals, and I won't do POs in such companies either, esp. as it could take a while before certs are verified and a sale can be executed. How many peeps that bought the DSR PO sold at prices above N50? Quick returns based on sentiments are best executed on the floor (in my opinion). Onto the question of whether Bagco will go the way of DF due to market sentiment, the answer to that question is . . . hold your breath and catch this . . . locked up in Bigboylarry's crystal ball !. So you should direct the question to him . Will take a look at bagco and share my thoughts. |
RoughCut:Hmmm, are you thinking what I'm thinking? MAJOR CLEAN UP. I hear the certificates have started being despatched by First Registrars (haven't confirmed though) and that listing will happen soon. |
@ aktopgun, you're surfing nairaland while madam is in labor? just kidding sha But that's a sure sign of addiction, so it's official : YOU'RE ADDICTED TO THIS THREAD.Congrats on the birth of the newbie, and welcome to the world of diapers, gurgles, burping, etc etc |
jehosaphat:Will see what I can come up with this weekend. As an aside, for those who bought the Union Diagnostic PP, I heard it was 100% over-subscribed. |
@Wanaj0 and Yodiyokun, Thanks a lot for that spreadsheet. It's absolutely PRICELESS! Whao, such wealth of information. I started to do something like that in order to track stocks in relation to their highs and lows but keeping it updated was such a challenge! You're definitely the official GURU!! Great job, and thanks once again for sharing! |
Mr. Risky:Thanks a lot!! AG leventis is still a long term stock in my portfolio, I like the deal with Cummins -- has a lot of great potential. I've been accumulating and have no plans to sell in the immediate future. I strongly believe this is a N12 - N13 stock based on expected cashflows from their new projects. In addition to the deal with Cummins, they've also been developing new real estate and have embarked on some tourism ventures. I'm accumulating because it's relatively illiquid, but at the right price, liquidity will show up (remember CI leasing?) and guess who'll be doing the selling then . . . I'm also liking Cornerstone -- I just exited over the last week and am planning to re-enter at some point, depending on what I find about the deal with the so-called PO I don't like the sound of the PO yet. I however like the fact that they've restructured the board and the core PE investors are now actively involved in running the company. That will open a lot of doors as those PE investors have a lot of connections just think what's happening to CIleasing with Aureous' influence. I'm also liking no loving Diamond for the medium to long term. Having read up on them, all I can say is "whao"! Actis is actively using its influence to put those guys on a fast track. I haven't got in yet, because I'm yet to figure out how the GDR will affect my opinion. From a market standpoint though, I like what I see.Short-term wise, Japaul is good -- I bought a lot at 6.02 when it was on offer, but this was based on both instinct yes, instinct, and some news I heard about the major contracts from some of the oil majors. My broker told me that the one and only Mr. J.A Paul himself had a meeting with the brokers on the floor and told them that with the contracts they have, they'ld do very very well even if they do not get any new business over the next two years. This is really short term for me and I'm still watching closely. Redstar is another good one. I got some during the initial listing. Heard there's a PO in the offing -- it's short term for me because I don't' have much info on them at the moment. For momentum traders, watch first aluminium (yes, I said first aluminium ). Not a long term play at all, but you can make like 20% -- it's already below its 50-day MA. I strongly suspect (and this is no reason for anyone to be investing) that they might be a takeover target by UC Rusal -- it just makes sense from a purely business standpoint. But then, that's just my opinion, innit ![]() IEI might also be one to watch short term. Those guys seem very innovative and I'm liking what I see. I however don't like their 16b outstanding shares, and the stock is WAAAAYYYYY overvalued. I don't know what the market sees in it to put such valuation on the stock but I've been "cycling" in and out of that for some time now -- risky but profitable. If it again falls sufficiently, I'm in yet again I need more cash to buy more fundamentally sound companies |
samstone4:WOW! that's even worse than DSR's oversubscription at least I got 88k for every 100k I applied for! This is sure going to be one joy ride ![]() |
RoughCut:Yep, I agree -- another case of market inefficiency, and I sort of suspected this would happen! And just like DSR, the price will most likely first rise sharply and then cool off at a more realistic level which would most likely be when most people will be able to sell. If you didn't buy the IPO, you can take advantage of the folly by buying on the floor and riding up to an exit point, but it's not a long term stock for me. |
FatherOF2:@Fatherof2 You might want to thread carefully with point #5 as history doesn't always necessarily repeat itself when it comes to stocks trading. I believe that as more and more informed peeps enter into the market, some historical trends, esp. the more obvious ones, will cease to exist |
easimoni: Naijadr:***post modified to refocus attention to the "koko" of what I'm trying to pass across*** ![]() |
wanaj0:Oga Wanaj0, I see you've been doing some great work here. Keep it going! As per Bagco, I've not really looked at the prospectus in detail, but from a cursory glance, I liked the balance sheet and the fact that the business seems sound. I however did not understand why they're excluding the PO issued shares from the 2008 dividend. I'll take a more detailed look and share my comments. @Jehosaphat (hope I spelled this right): same applies. As an aside, I think Fatherof2's strategy is sound -- Just another way of taking advantage of the inefficiencies inherent in the market, esp. one as predictable as the NSE. I also use the strategy to generate cash for my longer-term investments, and it does work at least until it stops working . However I limit the amount for now 'because it's highly risky, esp. if one gets caught napping. Coupled with using fundamental analysis, you can make both short term gains arising from the market's near-sightedness and the long-term gains which are much higher think of it as taking money from both ends . That's my two cents. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 27 pages)
When it comes to such matters, I no know book o! That's bigboylarry's sole territory and usurping is not allowed
) and in comparison to the packaging sector specifically.