wike is awake he is packing or packed self

shamecurls:
Finally.......Wike will sweat today

INEC getting ready for a re-run


Dakuku wins re-run election


Wike collapses after hearing poll result

GEJ sympathizes with Wike



Buhari Congratulates Wike

Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu pays Gov. Dakuku a courtesy visit

EFCC arrest Wike

e.t.c....

Na you they judge am, monkey......If bayelsa didn't teach you a lesson, I hope you come to rivers and vote so you experience your humiliation first hand,

GANJAFARMER:
The Supreme Court can't afford to fumble with this judgement.

Wike is coasting to victory , the killer party is already threatening Rivers people with the military because according to a reliable source , the Judas of Ubima knew that the supreme court won't shoot themselves in the foot after Ambode's victory over the PDP candidate based on the same scenario and this was why they hurriedly used the appeal court to sack the house members with the hope that during the rerun for the house members election they will use Federal might to have a clear majority which will enable them impeach Wike as a clear majority in the house - if you ask me , I'll tell you that this is a long shot and they will surely miss the bus.
APC is a demonic party and whichever way , we will reject them in Rivers State by any means necessary.

All this mouth go end soon.

shamecurls:
Finally.......Wike will sweat today
INEC getting ready for a re-run

Dakuku wins re-run election

Wike collapses after hearing poll result
GEJ sympathizes with Wike
Buhari Congratulates Wike
Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu pays Gov. Dakuku a courtesy visit
EFCC arrest Wike
e.t.c....

your myopic view will not allow u see beyond your nose..

Wike vs Dakuku: How the Supreme Court May Decide

In a few days the Supreme Court will bring the Governorship Election case in Rivers State to a conclusion. One issue that will attract close attention is how the Apex Court will decide the fate of the card reader in view of

Section 160 of the 1999 constitution (which empowers INEC to makes its own rules without any approval from the President)
Section 49 (which provides for the mode of accreditation and voting),
Section 52 (which prohibits electronic voting),
Section 57 (which empowers INEC to determine how voters can record their votes)
Section 138 (1) of the Electoral Act (which provides the four grounds for the nullification of an election),
Section 138 (2) (which states that an act or omission of an INEC staff which is contrary to the directive of the Commission but not contrary to the provision of the Electoral Act shall not by itself be ground for questioning the election
The Manual for Election Officials and Approved Guidelines and Regulation 2015 made by INEC (which expanded the accreditation process to include the card reader)
The interest generated by the Rivers state case may be situated in the case of Governor Ambode vs Jimi Agbaje in which it was decided, from the trial court up to the Supreme Court, that the non-use of the card reader is not a valid ground for the nullification of an election.
Governor Wike’s camp has latched on to the Ambode/Agbaje case and the pronouncement of the Chief Justice of the Nigeria on conflicting judgments as a possible escape route from the adverse judgments of the Tribunal  and Appeal court.
One important element which may guide the Apex Court’s decision is how the issue of the card was framed in the Rivers case. In the Ambode/Agbaje case, counsel to Agbaje, as it were, implanted the non-use of the card reader into section 138 of the Electoral Act.
Indeed at the Tribunal level, Dr Dakuku sought for four reliefs one being the nullification of Wike’s election based on non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act and the 2015 INEC manual for election and approved guidelines among others. The card reader issue was embedded in the INEC manual and approved guideline (2015).
One knotty appellate issue was whether the manual and approved guideline were ultra vires or intra vires with respect to the Constitution and the 2010 Electoral Act. However, at the Tribunal level,  Wike’s adverse judgment was mainly based on the gross irregularities noticed across board in INEC accreditation records as captured by card readers and incident forms, result and collation sheets and the disastrous testimonies of witnesses both for INEC and Wike during cross examinations.
INEC called 16 witnesses (who were all Electoral and Presiding officers) while Wike called 24 witnesses (who were voters and law enforcement officers) to testify on their behalf.  Of the 40 witnesses, the Justices found only one, DW14, to be credible. The remaining 39 witnesses, according the three the Tribunal Justices
“Were manifestly unreliable, incredible and their characters impugned as a result of cross examination”
On the other hand, this is what the Justices said of the 56 witnesses called by Dakuku and the APC,
“We watched the witnesses when in witness box and we do not see any element of untruthfulness in the demeanour. They testified directly as to what they observed at the election and such evidence remains credible and reliable.”
The probative value ascribed to witnesses became an issue (issue 7) during the appeal. The Appellate Court however said quoting a Supreme Court case
”Evaluation of relevant and material evidence and the ascription of probative value to such evidence are the primary functions of the trial court which saw, heard and assessed the witnesses as they testified. Where the trial court unquestionably evaluates the evidence and justifiably appraised the facts, as it has been manifestly shown to have been done in the instant case, it is not the business of an appeal court to substitute its own views for the views of the trial court. The application of this trite principle by the lower court cannot, certainly, be a basis for the reversal of the court's decision.”
The Appeal Court went on to conclude that
“The only rare occasion this Appellate Court is allowed to intervene and interfere with the findings of a lower court or tribunal concerning evaluation of evidence of witnesses who testified before it and the use to which documentary evidence are put by the tribunal is when the Appellant can positively show that the findings are perverse and not in consonance with the totality of the oral and documentary evidence on record before the lower court or tribunal.”
The Appeal Court held that the Tribunal findings were in consonance with the testimonies of witnesses and exhibit tendered. 
On the vexing issue of card readers which was embedded in the INEC   election manual and guidelines (2015) the Leading Appellate Judge  (with other concurring) said
‘’As for sections 49 and 52 (1)(b) of the Electoral Act as amended which were heavily relied upon by the appellant and I do not see any conflict between the two sections of the Electoral Act and the Manual for Election Officials and Approved Guidelines and Regulations made by the Independent Electoral Commission. They actually complement and supplement each other positively to enable INEC conduct transparent, free and fair credible election.’’
‘’The introduction of the card reader to a polling booth unit for authentication or verification of the biometrics of a voter is not ultra vires but intra vires as it gives teeth to the provisions of section 49 of the electoral act. A person who has no business at a polling unit is thus put at bay.’’
Wike appeal to the Appellate court was based on 27 grounds distilled into seven issues. The Appellate court ruled against him in all seven issues. Having read both the Tribunal and Appeal Court Judgments and seen how thorough they were in their application of the law and evaluation of witnesses and evidence pleaded, it is highly unlikely that Wike Appeal’s will succeed at the Supreme Court.

This court is filled to capacity ooo

na abia own I day expect.....nothing concern me with rivers

GANJAFARMER:
The Supreme Court can't afford to fumble with this judgement.

Wike is coasting to victory , the killer party is already threatening Rivers people with the military because according to a reliable source , the Judas of Ubima knew that the supreme court won't shoot themselves in the foot after Ambode's victory over the PDP candidate based on the same scenario and this was why they hurriedly used the appeal court to sack the house members with the hope that during the rerun for the house members election they will use Federal might to have a clear majority which will enable them impeach Wike as a clear majority in the house - if you ask me , I'll tell you that this is a long shot and they will surely miss the bus.
APC is a demonic party and whichever way , we will reject them in Rivers State by any means necessary.

. It only takes a demon to identify other demons. Please allow the Supreme court to adjudicate on the matter. The Lagos case is entirely different from the bloodbath you had in Rivers all in a bid to grab power forcefully. Wailing wailers are really depreciating in IQ these days. Wike lost at the tribunal and court of appeal, let's wait and see who wins today.

emekamigo:
Wike vs Dakuku: How the Supreme Court May Decide

In a few days the Supreme Court will bring the Governorship Election case in Rivers State to a conclusion. One issue that will attract close attention is how the Apex Court will decide the fate of the card reader in view of

Section 160 of the 1999 constitution (which empowers INEC to makes its own rules without any approval from the President)
Section 49 (which provides for the mode of accreditation and voting),
Section 52 (which prohibits electronic voting),
Section 57 (which empowers INEC to determine how voters can record their votes)
Section 138 (1) of the Electoral Act (which provides the four grounds for the nullification of an election),
Section 138 (2) (which states that an act or omission of an INEC staff which is contrary to the directive of the Commission but not contrary to the provision of the Electoral Act shall not by itself be ground for questioning the election
The Manual for Election Officials and Approved Guidelines and Regulation 2015 made by INEC (which expanded the accreditation process to include the card reader)
The interest generated by the Rivers state case may be situated in the case of Governor Ambode vs Jimi Agbaje in which it was decided, from the trial court up to the Supreme Court, that the non-use of the card reader is not a valid ground for the nullification of an election.
Governor Wike’s camp has latched on to the Ambode/Agbaje case and the pronouncement of the Chief Justice of the Nigeria on conflicting judgments as a possible escape route from the adverse judgments of the Tribunal  and Appeal court.
One important element which may guide the Apex Court’s decision is how the issue of the card was framed in the Rivers case. In the Ambode/Agbaje case, counsel to Agbaje, as it were, implanted the non-use of the card reader into section 138 of the Electoral Act.
Indeed at the Tribunal level, Dr Dakuku sought for four reliefs one being the nullification of Wike’s election based on non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act and the 2015 INEC manual for election and approved guidelines among others. The card reader issue was embedded in the INEC manual and approved guideline (2015).
One knotty appellate issue was whether the manual and approved guideline were ultra vires or intra vires with respect to the Constitution and the 2010 Electoral Act. However, at the Tribunal level,  Wike’s adverse judgment was mainly based on the gross irregularities noticed across board in INEC accreditation records as captured by card readers and incident forms, result and collation sheets and the disastrous testimonies of witnesses both for INEC and Wike during cross examinations.
INEC called 16 witnesses (who were all Electoral and Presiding officers) while Wike called 24 witnesses (who were voters and law enforcement officers) to testify on their behalf.  Of the 40 witnesses, the Justices found only one, DW14, to be credible. The remaining 39 witnesses, according the three the Tribunal Justices
“Were manifestly unreliable, incredible and their characters impugned as a result of cross examination”
On the other hand, this is what the Justices said of the 56 witnesses called by Dakuku and the APC,
“We watched the witnesses when in witness box and we do not see any element of untruthfulness in the demeanour. They testified directly as to what they observed at the election and such evidence remains credible and reliable.”
The probative value ascribed to witnesses became an issue (issue 7) during the appeal. The Appellate Court however said quoting a Supreme Court case
”Evaluation of relevant and material evidence and the ascription of probative value to such evidence are the primary functions of the trial court which saw, heard and assessed the witnesses as they testified. Where the trial court unquestionably evaluates the evidence and justifiably appraised the facts, as it has been manifestly shown to have been done in the instant case, it is not the business of an appeal court to substitute its own views for the views of the trial court. The application of this trite principle by the lower court cannot, certainly, be a basis for the reversal of the court's decision.”
The Appeal Court went on to conclude that
“The only rare occasion this Appellate Court is allowed to intervene and interfere with the findings of a lower court or tribunal concerning evaluation of evidence of witnesses who testified before it and the use to which documentary evidence are put by the tribunal is when the Appellant can positively show that the findings are perverse and not in consonance with the totality of the oral and documentary evidence on record before the lower court or tribunal.”
The Appeal Court held that the Tribunal findings were in consonance with the testimonies of witnesses and exhibit tendered. 
On the vexing issue of card readers which was embedded in the INEC   election manual and guidelines (2015) the Leading Appellate Judge  (with other concurring) said
‘’As for sections 49 and 52 (1)(b) of the Electoral Act as amended which were heavily relied upon by the appellant and I do not see any conflict between the two sections of the Electoral Act and the Manual for Election Officials and Approved Guidelines and Regulations made by the Independent Electoral Commission. They actually complement and supplement each other positively to enable INEC conduct transparent, free and fair credible election.’’
‘’The introduction of the card reader to a polling booth unit for authentication or verification of the biometrics of a voter is not ultra vires but intra vires as it gives teeth to the provisions of section 49 of the electoral act. A person who has no business at a polling unit is thus put at bay.’’
Wike appeal to the Appellate court was based on 27 grounds distilled into seven issues. The Appellate court ruled against him in all seven issues. Having read both the Tribunal and Appeal Court Judgments and seen how thorough they were in their application of the law and evaluation of witnesses and evidence pleaded, it is highly unlikely that Wike Appeal’s will succeed at the Supreme Court.

huuuuuuu true but.............

#istandwithwike#...victory is sure...

sportskid:


It is your family that is gone,nama, you people will just stay outside rivers state and speak rubbish

I will reply you later .

Get a life

Left the court some moments ago, no space to sit!

Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
1m
@inecnigeriaprescribed and introduced card reader for effective and efficient conduct of the elections - Olujimi
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
2m
There witnesses weren't witnesses of truth only petitioners witnesses were the accepted witnesses - Olujimi
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
5m
The conduct of the election was not in accordance with the layer down rules.... Olujimi
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
6m
... They established corrupt practice's not only card readers - Olujimi
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
7m
For the main appeal, There appeal lacks merit. I submit the petition was not based on card reader alone When the EPT wrote there judgement.
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
10m
Paragraph 10,1,2,3 They include issues 1,3,5 which they ought to have filed a motion for us to respond.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
11m
We urge you to discountenance there appeal because we are short of time to respond - Olujimi
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
12m
Let me refer to the appellant brief#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
13m
We adopt the brief and urge your lordship to dismiss this appeal for lack of merit - Olujimi.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
14m
We filed our brief in opposition on 18/1/2016#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
15m
Olujinmi SAN adopting his brief.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
16m
I oblige your lordship.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
17m
The remaining authorities relys on onus of the petitioner to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
17m
...Were never demonstrated be4 the court. The card reader can't assist them
because wht they declared was more than what@inecnigeriadeclared
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
19m
There case they never relied on any voters register, some of the voters registered they tendered in 11 lgas......
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
22m
They need to show evidence of over voting or lack of accreditation. This is in line with Shinkafi's case....#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
23m
We draw your attention to additional list of authorities,determined in this SC particularly the judgement of JNC Onoye
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
24m
We sited list of authorities that dates 26/1/2016, my Lordship we draw your attention to few.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
26m
Brief of argument is dated 8/1/2016, we adopts this briefs of arguments.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
27m
The Appeallant adopting there briefs.
#RiversSuprem

Wike's election was nullified on other grounds apart from the card reader. Those other grounds include violence and alteration of result sheets.

GANJAFARMER:
The Supreme Court can't afford to fumble with this judgement.

Wike is coasting to victory , the killer party is already threatening Rivers people with the military because according to a reliable source , the Judas of Ubima knew that the supreme court won't shoot themselves in the foot after Ambode's victory over the PDP candidate based on the same scenario and this was why they hurriedly used the appeal court to sack the house members with the hope that during the rerun for the house members election they will use Federal might to have a clear majority which will enable them impeach Wike as a clear majority in the house - if you ask me , I'll tell you that this is a long shot and they will surely miss the bus.
APC is a demonic party and whichever way , we will reject them in Rivers State by any means necessary.

so u mean PDP is a righteous party u be M U M U

It's not just about card readers.

There are other issues regarding non-compliance with the electoral act, intimidation of voters, ballot box stuffing and widespread violence.

Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
1m
And it is not a challenge for us to file a motion. We refer to PW 40&49
#supremeCourt
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
3m
My lord our brief doesn't require any motion to be filed because they abandoned there responsibilities..... - Emmanuel Ukala SAN
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
5m
We didn't file any brief ,because we have an appeal against the judgements my lord ~ Wole Olanipekun SAN ~
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
6m
Onyechi Ikpeazu SAN- We did not file any brief of appeal, because we didn't agree with judgement
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
8m
They've not demonstrated any issue for your Lordship's to turn this matter around - Ali Yusuf -#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
9m
The case they are citing is a total different to this case. All their issues has been against them from EPT and Appeal court
#RiversSupreme

showblack:
Following

Definitely wike is going to win this case Except the Judges as usual perverse judgement in favour of Dakuku just like they did in lagos.

Still observing.

[quote author=Molarmass4luv post=42367749]D day has finally come [color=#006600][/color].definately Wike will win except justics is been perverse as usual by the judiciary.

Nigerians want to see the verdict reflect justice and fairness. If the judiciary must regain it lost faith by the citizens it has to be free from interference from the APC led federal government. Since the Justices were not also elected under a party platform.

Aminat508:
Lmao @ hungry

madam better go and update your diary oo and stop opening your teeth as if you are advertising for close up.

Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
13s
We have demonstrated evidences and tendered documents from the bar, just like the petitioners did.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
14s
Which is unacceptable by us. The tribunal striked out 120 paragraphs against us and it was front loaded before time.
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
2m
But pindiga who listed to us never delivered the ruling, but Ambrosa that didn't listen to us gave the ruling.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
3m
We filed a motion, and it was not attended to. The court of appeal told the EPT to give ruling....#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
4m
Case number five is in respect of consistency. Cases number 6/7 case of concurrent findings is not accepted.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
6m
My lords within the short time we submitted some authorities and we adopt same.... Seven of them.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
6m
May I adopt the briefs and urge your Lordships to allow this appeal
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
8m
Appellant reply to second respondent is dated 20/1/2016 and filed same day
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
10m
Wole Olanipekun SAN - our brief is dated 16/1/2016 and filed on same date
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
11m
@PdpNigeriavs HE.Dr.DAP
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
13m
E.Ukala SAN - I adopt same my lords
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
13m
Yusuf Ali SAN - I adopt same my lords
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
14m
Olujimi, SAN - I adopt same my lord.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
16m
May I my lordship adopt all appearances announced earlier.
#RiversSupreme

dahaz:

madam better go and update your diary oo and stop opening your teeth as if you are advertising for close up.

on my way.... Won't open my teeth again.

loading

Governor Wike God will see U thru dis battle and make U victorious in Jesus name...Amen.

What is the position of the judgment now?. I expect Wike to win

Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
9s
The witnesses of the 1st respondent who was sponsored was unbelievable - Olujimi
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
1m
There appeal has no legs on which to stand on whatsoever.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
2m
They never called any single witness to speak to the documents tendered.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
2m
We tendered voters registers and demonstrated them, while the tendered documents running into thousands.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
2m
We tendered voters registers and demonstrated them, while they tendered documents running into thousands.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
3m
To the main appeal most of the time he Wole Olanipekun SAN wasn't at the EPT - Olujimi -
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
5m
Olujimi, SAN - We rely and adopt our briefs for lack of merit, I will humbly invite your attention to page 2 of the first respondents briefs
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
5m
They ought to have filed a motion. I urge you to discountenance his appeal -#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
8m
They didn't call any POs. May I urge your lordship to uphold this appeal because it is unprecedented.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
9m
In Abua/Odual, Ahoada-West/East, etc
they called only 1 soldier each.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
11m
Page 38, 4442 polling units in RS they called only 38 POs, They didn't tender voters register.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
13m
PW49 Said uploading of data is 6 weeks, what they had was uploaded less than 3 weeks......#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
14m
They scrutinised there own and refused to scrutinise ours. May I refer you to paragraph 10.19 page 31.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
15m
We have demonstrated evidences and tendered documents from the bar, just like the petitioners did.#RiversSupreme
View det

Nice one from Wike's legal team. Keep it up! Keep exposing the previous judges who presided on the appeal cases!

kcmichael:
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
9s
The witnesses of the 1st respondent who was sponsored was unbelievable - Olujimi
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
1m
There appeal has no legs on which to stand on whatsoever.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
2m
They never called any single witness to speak to the documents tendered.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
2m
We tendered voters registers and demonstrated them, while the tendered documents running into thousands.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
2m
We tendered voters registers and demonstrated them, while they tendered documents running into thousands.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
3m
To the main appeal most of the time he Wole Olanipekun SAN wasn't at the EPT - Olujimi -
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
5m
Olujimi, SAN - We rely and adopt our briefs for lack of merit, I will humbly invite your attention to page 2 of the first respondents briefs
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
5m
They ought to have filed a motion. I urge you to discountenance his appeal -#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
8m
They didn't call any POs. May I urge your lordship to uphold this appeal because it is unprecedented.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
9m
In Abua/Odual, Ahoada-West/East, etc
they called only 1 soldier each.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
11m
Page 38, 4442 polling units in RS they called only 38 POs, They didn't tender voters register.
#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
13m
PW49 Said uploading of data is 6 weeks, what they had was uploaded less than 3 weeks......#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
14m
They scrutinised there own and refused to scrutinise ours. May I refer you to paragraph 10.19 page 31.#RiversSupreme
View details·
Rivers Tribunal
@RiversTribunal
15m
We have demonstrated evidences and tendered documents from the bar, just like the petitioners did.#RiversSupreme
View det