pocohantas:

LOL.
This is why I say you just counter for the sake of countering. I said, this particular one isn't my headache...not that one. Is English this hard for you or you just love twisting things? ? Don't try to play victim dear,pls don't . You attacked my character first by bringing my previous post into this. You probably fornicate and watch porn, I have seen you 'justify' domestic violence...though you claimed you were being liberal and logical. Now I am not the kind of person to kill myself over this and you're so hurt, WHY? ?

I wasn't lucky you were asleep, don't flatter yourself
I know your ex username, and I know all the 'immoral' things I have seen you support. You deactivated that account, they wouldn't have been that difficult to fetch.

Point is, I don't support her...but I won't kill myself over her. She posted it on HER IG, that's probably her hustle and someone brought it here. The person that brought it, has been seen supporting the KILLING of a young girl, just because she is a 'slay queen'...I wonder why you aren't calling her out for that, oh...you're not aware . Same way another wrote a thread that kind of supported broke guys and someone called her out. You defended her that day because that particular thread appealed to you. You're not to be taken serious

Read my siggy, take it easy before you get to that point...
Take it easy you hear

sunshineG:
sis you should take it easy
You seem pained, but this is just for fun...

Blackhawk01:
Raggedyann, Pocohantans, Wordworld and SunshineG. WTF!

You guys should find your way to the Politics section, romance section is strictly for chasing femalezzzz.

pu7pl3:



Yea...won't blame them tho..
But its good to have brain massages once in a while

RaggedyAnn:




Hmmmm........

Alright, line after line....

Lines 4&5: what I find hypocritical is choosing to focus only on criticizing the person who uploads these nudes without acknowledging and equally condemning a society that is obsessed with sex. That's the point! And I'm well within my bounds to find that hypocritical because it is. But this kind of selective judgement comes from individual biases which have to be addressed, in order to deal with the problem of indecency holistically. And honestly.


Lines 6, 7 &8: the moral argument regarding the relevance of prostitution in society is not made in isolation. The only reason it arises is because there is an argument for the justification of rape and adultery, and a claim that men cannot be monogamous. Which then makes the prohibition of prostitutes a tacit endorsement that rape and/or adultery is expected. The law should not shy away from committing to one solution for infidelity. If it doesn't want to acknowledge that men can be unfaithful, then the crime, which people should be incarcerated for, is infidelity (or fornication) itself. It solves the dilemma of choosing between adultery, rape or prostitutes.

Lines 9 & 10: I have not changed the subject. My first post, from the very beginning, addressed the hypocrisy of condemning the person putting up the nude pictures, and not criticizing those who are obsessed with that kind of material. I pointed out the correlation between the demand from a depraved society and the supply by an immoral individual immediately. I even gave the example set by women: they don't endorse this trash online; so it's not perpetuated. You might say they aren't is visual as men but, we are all visual beings in the end. If you do see men taking their clothes off on the internet, it's probably a gay site.

Lines 11 &12: As stated above, the hypocrisy I'm referring to is this selective judgement and criticism exhibited by individuals who choose to only view this from one side of the divide. Yes, there are men who support these immoral acts, and they are the ones who've contributed to the demand for it. They're the ones deserving of an equal dose of 'stick' from anyone who wants to criticize indecency for the purpose of improving society and not just for the so.e purpose of shaming women. It has nothing to do with double standards. At all.

Lines 13 & 14: Of course stopping demand would stop supply. Supply exists because of demand. And supply is not made in a vacuum. If you have ever prepared a business plan, you would know that if you are not addressing a specific need, you've got nothing. On the other hand, if a demand exists, it would inspire supply through whatever means - trade, manufacture or smuggling, and eventually policy change - because demand has to be satisfied. I don't know why you insist that you're ignorant about this basic principle of economics. But in your ignorance, you are entirely at liberty to laugh your balls off over the fact that France has outlawed the patronage of sex workers, because ignorance is bliss and laughter is usually a sign of that.


Lines 15, 16, 17 & 18: I expect the normal laws of economics to take effect. When you say that "this commodity cannot get exhausted", I'm unsure about your meaning. We are talking about sex-for-sale. The market reaction can already be vetted in this recession, where we are constantly reading articles about sex workers slashing their prices because people can no longer afford them. Do you not see how responsive their supply is to the change in demand from their customers? If the trend continuously declines, and no one is able to afford them anymore, they will not start giving it away for free; they would diversify their businesses and discover what other needs can be satisfied in the community. Like hairdressing or something.

A black market is just as likely to spring up from suppressed demand, as it would from suppressed supply. But if culpability rests with the buyer, he is more likely to seek treatment for his unnatural cravings than he would if the seller were held responsible. And if he can suppress those cravings, there would be no market.

Blackhawk01:
Raggedyann, Pocohantans, Wordworld and SunshineG. WTF!

You guys should find your way to the Politics section, romance section is strictly for chasing femalezzzz.

pocohantas:

As usual... reverse psychology

PLS, I never said you shouldn't castigate her...you are the one bothering yourself over my not joining you actively to do that...

sunshineG:
no you actually did in your first post
You claimed that there are more important thing we could do with our time

Anyway hope you are enjoying my self

RaggedyAnn:
Wordworld

We are all selling something. Marketing is a universal idea. We all define our individual brand (the things we stand for). And we all hope for patronage. Whether is friendships, business relationships or marriage. The consideration we stand to gain is not always money. But the principles of marketing still apply. Need assessment, product definition, packaging, advertisement. All of that is still relevant, or you might find yourself overstaying your welcome and being rubbished as a person.

I'm saying this now because you seem to be criticizing my choice of words with women in the sex market. It's not out of place to say that they have a product they're supplying.

And to the rest, I still say: I am not arguing about the need for women to remain virtuous. If you want to know what I am on about, follow the trend with Sunshine G. Or, just look at my first post. It's good for women to be virtuous. It's good for the whole world to be virtuous. And your comments may help enlighten people more about it but, if you constantly mention me before making the all-too-necessary comments, I keep feeling like you're expecting to respond. And that's not reasonable, considering that you're fighting a different cause.

pocohantas:


No, I didn't. I used the word WORSE and MORE...that means,this isn't unimportant or good, but it isn't top on my list in comparison to the ones I or you mentioned. Ah beg, always ask for clarification

sunshineG:
you just explain the meaning of important now
Something that is not top of your list or is it important

pocohantas:

We all have our priorities, that isn't difficult to figure out

The thread you made reference to, your focus was on the sidechic...I didn't kill you over it. Pls ooo...let me be with mine. Hian! Bye pls...

WORDWORLD:


pu7pl3 already gave an intellectual stunninng punchy answer. what we are doing is BRAIN massage. Politics section is too TRIBALISTIC for my liking. To be honest these babes you have mentioned are sound. THEM PAPA NO WASTE SCHOOL FEES MONEY.

sunshineG:
OK
1)no one choose to condemn anything. It was clear from my first post I condemn such acts in its totality. Hence, I condemn both the cheap lady and the men who are making her feel special for such acts. However, I fail to understand why you see a reason to crucify me and that guy you quoted his post because we have the right to hear our opinion

2)you made your conclusion, based on one event. Trying to form some sorts of hypothesis based on our opinion about another unrelated event. However, my comments are not meant to be inferred to mean another thing without my consent. My condemnation of this acts does not mean I support rape which I made clear in my earlier post, and I sure no one will try to do the ssam, that is just plan ridiculous. Rape is done by force this isn't

3)I have made my position clear times without number that I condemn the guys who are involved too. I don't need to go over that again, hence your justification for labeling me a hypocrite is false

4)There is no normal law of demand for a commodity that is not produce and a commodity that is not exhaustible, for example, unlike say beer that is produced and requires a lot of finance to make a finished product, the Virginia of a woman does not require such effort, so stop in demand will not discourage production
In line with this, disturbing demand for sex workers will only create oversupply which may counter the intention behind the decision

RaggedyAnn:



1 & 3: Well, I didn't start by labeling you anything. I quoted Buhari_son for criticizing the woman; and I asked him "Don't you consider your righteous indignation a bit hypocritical?" Exposing both sides of the indecency coin. And then you quoted that, and from then on, we've spiraled on to this. If you acknowledge the fact that consumers of indecency are equally worthy of criticism, then what are we on about?

2: I don't get it.

4: the relationship between demand and supply is basic; supply varies directly with demand. If a product is, as you say, not produced and inexhaustible, what that intricacy would affect is 'price'. And as therefore expected, sex is cheap. Relatively cheap. In this recession, however, price has affected demand. And sex workers can afford to crash prices as low as possible (to cover only overheads: cosmetics, gear, medication, and whatever) because there's no production cost. But they can't go to zero. Supply will shut down if there's no demand at the 'cost to the seller'.

But don't take my word for it. Do some studying and simulations in your spare time. Let it be deductive.

Blackhawk01:


Y'all did a very good job, I must confess. Got me darting from one moniker to the other, sound debating skills, no insult whatsoever. That's rare around here.

WORDWORLD:


What i find most appropriate in all you have written is "AND YOUR COMMENTS MAY HELP ENLIGHTEN PEOPLE MORE ABOUT IT" to me that is the whole essence of fingering my phone key pad to mental orgasm. So people can squirt and ejeculate all the rubbish in their system and embrace VIRTUE.

And what cause are you fighting?! Since you have declared its different from mine.

MissCokie:


That's because i don't wish to make her more famous, so i had to edit her IG handle. I hope you understand

WORDWORLD:


"There are no chaste minds. Minds copulate whereever they meet". Eric Hoffer. Those are "RARE" minds no INSULT very mature minds really and honestly i enjoyed every single bit of our ENLIGHTENMENT.

Boils down to, "what we are looking for is not people who agree with us but people who think well of us and know how to express it. We cherish such peple though they disagree with us" Eric Hoffer.

And,

"When we begin to think that most people are no better than we, the world seems full of people who are fairly unpleasant". Eric Hoffer.

THANKS FOR YOUR REMARKS.

dederocs:
Nothing wrong in this, it's the way of the world... Instagram likes, and followers equals more business and money.

She is in business, while you zombies are complaining. Sexy sweet pussy.

sunshineG:
bro you read a lot ooo
Shoo
Citing reference after reference

RaggedyAnn:



Of course, that's the part that would appeal to you and be the "most appropriate in all" I have written. It is tailored to your ego. You have to be right. But that only proves how dense your preconceptions are, and how inflexible you are in argument. A pat on the back, instead of an "Aha-moment" is ultimately a waste of time, because it leaves you with nothing new to add to your body of knowledge. It shouldn't give you an orgasmic feeling, it should leave you exasperated. Frustrated that, once again, you've not found superiority in argument.

My cause? You know where to find it if you are interested. I referred you to it.

WORDWORLD:


I chose the life of an EXPLORER. Hence always searching to discover. With each step i make in life, its my responsibility to know where its leading me too. MY FINDINGS IS THAT TRUTH LEADS TO BLISS AND THEIR SHOULD BE NO COMPROMISE.

sunshineG:
that is the truth my bro, but these ladies are heal bent on their perceptions of life
They see anyone that tries to reason with them as an enemy of some sorts, they do not see reasons in others ideology
I tried to make them see why we should both condemn the act of this lady for the betterment of humanity, but they saw it as the highest level of hypocrisy
So in other words, the truth is still hidden in their minds probably behind the feminism in them
But I salute your courage and intellectual prowess

sunshineG:
no no no
You don't get it
Sex workers have little to no overhead(cost of production) because they don't buy their virgina, and the cost of production you listed are just what a normal lady will need apart from drugs
I am an economist so I don't need to read to disprove your point
I gave you an example of where law of demand and supply may apply
I told you where there is significant need for finance for production(overhead)
Uttering demand will discourage supply( the reason why the federal ministry of health informs smokers are liable to die young ) to discourage tobacco company from expanding production

But when it comes to sex and sex workers, supply will continue to exsit even if demand is cut off, hence cutting off demand without working on the supply chain is just as ridiculous as doing the opposite

But don't take my word for it, you can read more on that topic

Regarding the issue surrounding hypocrisy I have chosen not to repeat my self

WORDWORLD:


It has nothing to do with EGO. Such a disease i have long cured, uprooted from my heart which by the fleeting of time i weed by ENLIGTHENMENT so as to become an ENLIGHTEN ONE. There is no ego to it at all! You may think as you like. The good thing still remains that our conversations serves as an ENLIGHTENMENT. That is my point!

RaggedyAnn:


What kind of business sense would it make if you don't factor in your attire, cosmetics, perfumes, hair extensions, and medication as part of your overhead costs? These are things that help prostitutes sell themselves, and they can't do without them in the business. For everyday girls, these things may still help their presentation (or may just be an indulgence) but, for prostitutes they are indispensable. And they must be sure to keep a steady supply to drive their market. If they want to be sure they're making profit and not just keeping themselves in good hair and make up, they have to evaluate every expenditure that is made in connection with the business. It does not meant that every customer will pay for a full tube exfoliating cream and a whole lipstick, overheads are expressed in percentages of total expenditure and allocated per customer.

So there, you're an economist but, you're refusing to apply the skill you've paid for. This example you gave, with the tobacco company, is an excellent example to confirm that demand must be tweaked for regulated consumption, and not supply. But to correct your point: the federal ministry of health's primary concern isn't the production of the tobacco companies, but the health of consumers. If the consumers heed the warning and the demand for cigarettes fall, the reduced production is a natural consequence of that shift in demand.


With sex workers it's the same. If demand falls, supply falls. And girls will leave the business to do something that people are willing to pay for. They are not going to supply it free of charge.


Regarding the issue of hypocrisy: it has been argued to completion.

Buharison:

E pain am oo, you don turn nanny already