THERE IS NO A SINGLE NIGERIAN WHO SECURED THE FREEDOM OF SOUTH AFRICANS. THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO HAVE EVER DONE SO ARE SOUTH AFRICANS THEMSELVES.

stillchris:


And my source clearly proves your military was clueless when they entered Lesotho. Unlike your claim of PERFECTION.

SANDF didn't even go in with a clear objective. They didn't even know what rout to take nor where to go.According to the same source.

And your blatant lie of restoring peace in 48 hrs is clearly not in my source you compulsive liar.

So if you gladly want to use my source as your evidence I'll advise you read it carefully and realize you just turned your gun on yourself

Dunderhead

1. Perfection because all objectives were met
- South African infastructure was secured
- Rebellious LDF units were brought to heel
- Political Stability was restored

2. They had a clear objective, but since the operation was launched in a rush, they didnt have specific details. Newsflash: military operations never go according to plan.

3. Quote where I said "restored peace", I said (multiple times) seized/captured/conqoured the country in 48 hours

My claims are, and have always been:

- We counqoured the country in under 48 hours
- This was acheived despite being outnumbered 2.5:1
- We inflicted over 100 casualties for the loss of only 10 men
- We met all our mission objectives.

I leave you with a quote:

Over and above, one cannot disagree with the Chief of the SANDF, Gen Nyanda, that the military objectives defined in the mandate were accomplished. To this end, it would be fair to state from a clinically military viewpoint that Operation Boleas had been successfully conducted, as it did succeed in stabilizing the security situation in Lesotho and safeguarded South Africa's interests in that country

- Military Intervention in Lesotho: Perspectives on Operation Boleas and Beyond

Msauza:




The last time I remember, Nigeria was captured by whites around 1400 and SA only in 1700.

South Africa was colonized in 1902 and gained independence in 1910......Whites never captured anything up and till the British came.

Msauza:




The last time I remember, Nigeria was captured by whites around 1400 and SA only in 1700.

SA was captured and discovered before any known parts in subsaharan Africa. South Africa was caught during the great trek, so early in human history that the boers have been able to convince you that you're settlers just like them. Your sense of history is really
Zulu - class
Lagos only became a colony in the late 1800s. FACT.

By 1957 Nigeria was already independent politically and economically.

Well you know 1994 is only yesterday and to add salt to injury, you're still economically dependent and imbecilitated.

When is the next frustration of xenophobia coming?

jln115:

Gripen A/B is considered 4th Gen, C/D is considered 4.5 gen.....And the new Gripen E/F could be the first 5+/ 6th Gen aircraft according to some experts.

patches689:


Gripen is 4.5 gen

Patrick and Jillingy provide evidence that the Gripen C/D is 4.5 GEN, and I'll post evidence to show why it isn't in response.

DictatorZAR:


I really think you have a few screws loose. What I'm happy about is the fact that Benin state is considered africa prostitution capital.

The issue should be what are 1,5m doing in SA if your country is better. The issue is why are Nigerians stampeding at our Embassy in your country for our visas.

That is becos they have something to gain there. Hunters don't roam in bushes for nothing.
Do you know how many Nigerian are in UK, US, China, Cameroon, Congo, we are every where just like the Chinese. They remit billions of dollars back home every year.
Pls post your source that Benin state is prostitution capital in Africa.

lezz:
SA was captured and discovered before any known parts in subsaharan Africa. South Africa was caught during the great trek, so early in human history that the boers have been able to convince you that you're settlers just like them. Your sense of history is really
Zulu - class
Lagos only became a colony in the late 1800s. FACT.

By 1957 Nigeria was already independent politically and economically.

Well you know 1994 is only yesterday and to add salt to injury, you're still economically dependent and imbecilitated.

When is the next frustration of xenophobia coming?

Soon cos they are so confuse that they don't even know their problem.
How will you solve problem without knowing the root of the problem.

Henry120:




Patrick and Jillingy provide evidence that the Gripen C/D is 4.5 GEN, and I'll post evidence to show why it isn't in response.

According to Aerospaceweb and RAF (Australian) Air Power Development Centre Bulletin Classification's its 4.5 gen

http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/publications/Details/475/170-Five-Generations-of-Jet-Fighter-Aircraft.aspx

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0182.shtml

Wiki summery of the two:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fighter_generations#cite_note-aerospace-7

Henry120:




Patrick and Jillingy provide evidence that the Gripen C/D is 4.5 GEN, and I'll post evidence to show why it isn't in response.

They are dull. so you mean Brazil that ordered them will now have fifth generation fighter Jets. Gripen are not even as good as J10B.

patches689:


According to Aerospaceweb and RAF (Australian) Air Power Development Centre Bulletin Classification's its 4.5 gen

http://airpower.airforce.gov.au/publications/Details/475/170-Five-Generations-of-Jet-Fighter-Aircraft.aspx

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0182.shtml

Wiki summery of the two:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fighter_generations#cite_note-aerospace-7

Patrick,

According to Militaryfactory.com, Airforces-technology.com, IHS Janes.com and most importantly SAAB, the Gripen C/D is described as a 4 GEN aircraft.

These are the sources that matter.

www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=67


Gripen C/D is 4 GEN, while NG is next generation.

Henry120:




Patrick and Jillingy provide evidence that the Gripen C/D is 4.5 GEN, and I'll post evidence to show why it isn't in response.

I feel my mate Patches has provided enough evidence on this matter.

iblawi:
They are dull. so you mean Brazil that ordered them will now have fifth generation fighter Jets. Gripen are not even as good as J10B.

J-10B Fighter is a 4++ GEN fighter. It simply out-classes the Gripen C/D in every department.

Henry120:

Patrick,

According to Militaryfactory.com, Airforces-technology.com, IHS Janes.com and most importantly SAAB, the Gripen C/D is described as a 4 GEN aircraft.

These are the sources that matter.

www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=67


Gripen C/D is 4 GEN, while NG is next generation.

So the Australian Airforce are wrong?

Quote janes saying the C/D is 4th gen and then we can talk.

Your other sources are irrelevant in the face of the opinion of the R.A.A.F

jln115:

I feel my mate Patches has provided enough evidence on this matter.

Jillingy Patches is not your "mate". None of the sources he provided are credible.

Henry120:


J-10B Fighter is a 4++ GEN fighter. It simply out-classes the Gripen C/D in every department.

Yet when we compared them we found this to be completely untrue

Henry120:


Jillingy Patches is not your "mate". None of the sources he provided are credible.

Over and above, one cannot disagree with the Chief of the SANDF, Gen Nyanda, that the military objectives defined in the mandate were accomplished. To this end, it would be fair to state from a clinically military viewpoint that Operation Boleas had been successfully conducted, as it did succeed in stabilizing the security situation in Lesotho and safeguarded South Africa's interests in that country

- Military Intervention in Lesotho: Perspectives on Operation Boleas and Beyond

Henry120:


Jillingy Patches is not your "mate". None of the sources he provided are credible.

Who are you to say who is and who isnt my mate?

patches689:


So the Australian Airforce are wrong?

Quote janes saying the C/D is 4th gen and then we can talk.

Your other sources are irrelevant in the face of the opinion of the R.A.A.F

Saab is the manufacturer of the Gripen, and they classify them as 4 GEN.

End of story.

Henry120:


Saab is the manufacturer of the Gripen, and they classify them as 4 GEN.

End of story.

Please cite where they say that

patches689:

Who are you to say who is and who isnt my mate?

Who are you to say that an individual you don't even know his name is your mate?

Henry120:


Who are you to say that an individual you don't even know his name is your mate?

He said I am his mate

So he is thus my mate

Henry120:

Patrick,

According to Militaryfactory.com, Airforces-technology.com, IHS Janes.com and most importantly SAAB, the Gripen C/D is described as a 4 GEN aircraft.

These are the sources that matter.

www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=67


Gripen C/D is 4 GEN, while NG is next generation.

And? your same sources claim that the Rafale, Eurofighter, Su30MK, SU35, Mig29smt, J10B ect ect are all 4th generation aircraft as well.....Why? you might ask? Its because technically speaking there is no such category as 4.5 gen...only 4th gen and then 5th gen and so forth. even our Cheetahs are classified as 4th gen.

patches689:


Over and above, one cannot disagree with the Chief of the SANDF, Gen Nyanda, that the military objectives defined in the mandate were accomplished. To this end, it would be fair to state from a clinically military viewpoint that Operation Boleas had been successfully conducted, as it did succeed in stabilizing the security situation in Lesotho and safeguarded South Africa's interests in that country

- Military Intervention in Lesotho: Perspectives on Operation Boleas and Beyond

Dummy, why did you quote me?

Henry120:


Dummy, why did you quote me?

You questioned my sources

Henry120:


Jillingy Patches is not your "mate". None of the sources he provided are credible.

Who are you to decide who's my mate or not? And you wont get a more credible source than from RAAF themselves.

patches689:

He said I am his mate
So he is thus my mate

No, you are not. You don't even know the guy.

jln115:

Who are you to decide who's my mate or not? And you wont get a more credible source than from RAAF themselves.

He doesn't even know your name, how are you his mate?

patches689:

You questioned my sources

What has lesotho got to do with my initial question, mumu?

Henry120:


What has lesotho got to do with my initial question, mumu?

Hurry up and cite SAAB

Henry120:


Saab is the manufacturer of the Gripen, and they classify them as 4 GEN.

End of story.

Sukhoi classify the Su30,35,47 as 4th gen
Dassault classify the Rafale as 4th gen
Lockheed Martin classify the F16 block 60 as 4th gen
PAC and CAC classify the JF-17 a 3rd gen.....seriously im not even joking!!!![

Henry120:


He doesn't even know your name, how are you his mate?

jln115!! and his Patches689, you see!!! we know each others names!!

Henry120:


Saab is the manufacturer of the Gripen, and they classify them as 4 GEN.

End of story.

Gripen C/D is 4.5 generation


https://www.rusi.org/analysis/commentary/ref:C52FA1CE451AC6/#.VeWp5jPRb6A