bleskid:
I'm a very humble guy

Abi now.
3 gbosa 4 d pesin wey born you

Bolarineliza202:

It wasn't op that said it.....
It was one author that quoted her not me,don't confuse my already confused brain please

lol

Bolarineliza202:

Abi now.
3 gbosa 4 d pesin wey born you

thank you very much pls may I know you ... I'm martins ,,, blesboi ubebe @fb ...blesboi ubebe on Twitter .... @ blesboi ubebe on Instagram....

bleskid:
thank you very much pls may I know you ... I'm martins ,,, blesboi ubebe @fb ...blesboi ubebe on Twitter .... @ blesboi ubebe on Instagram....

I'm Elizabeth

Bolarineliza202:
I'm Elizabeth

are u on any social media ...

Bolarineliza202:
I'm Elizabeth

I'm also on WhatsApp 09081500165

bleskid:
are u on any social media ...

Yes on facebook though I'm not active on it like before.

bleskid:
I'm also on WhatsApp 09081500165

I'm yet to have a whatsapp account.

RodgersAkpafu:

That's the point
It does NOT match
And China is a wrong example
Because they developed for decades draconian policies to limit their population growth rate
That is what contributed in part to their prosperity.

You want to know what is common to every country with an exploding population?
Poverty, misery and social unrest

And what you said in your last paragraph also validates my point.
Aging population is easier to fix than an exploding population
Because while the former is trying to bring new life
The latter has the people here already and how do they deal with them if not systematically kill them off

You have still not presented any facts to support yiur argument. China matched its booming population with infrastutural development. Yes they had to limit population growth, but now they have increased their birth rate for couples to 3 children. This is the second time in two decades they would be raising birth ratw for couples. So why would they want their populatiin to increase after limiting it at first? Because they have the infrastuture to absorb the population growth.

Birth cintrol and population control are schemes brought by developed countries to not tilt the scale in favour of others. If population growth is not a driver in economic devlopment, why is canada planning to bring in 400k immigrants per year?

Countries with huge population (especially if most of them are young) are usually seen as beacon of economic growth provided they have the economy and infrastuture to support it. Read about the asian cubs.

Give me an instance where a nation had an aging population and were comfortable with it

DrFunmisticGlow:
honestly, nigeria needs a two child policy and to legalise safe abortions

Nigeria needs to develop the economy and infrastuture. Our problem is not population but bad governance.The population is a huge selling point for the country. Why do you think any company coming to Africa first considers Nigeria? Because they know it has a huge market. Even those that cant operate in Nigeria due to poor infrastuture, go to Ghana to produce goods to sell in Nigeria.

Six and three adopted children from other races.

Bolarineliza202:

I'm yet to have a whatsapp account.

give me you number now let me call or just flash me let me call

Bolarineliza202:
A friend of mine once told me that she wishes to have only two kids and I was like;
Dey there dey make mouth, honestly you can never understimate and resist the power of mister dickson,the thing go just dey sweet ya , till you will have more than the number of the planned kids you won't realise.She only nodded and smiled

So my fellow nairalanders with the situation and economy of Nigeria,how many kids do you wish to have?

2 ..MAX 3

afroxyz:


You have still not presented any facts to support yiur argument. China matched its booming population with infrastutural development. Yes they had to limit population growth, but now they have increased their birth rate for couples to 3 children. This is the second time in two decades they would be raising birth ratw for couples. So why would they want their populatiin to increase after limiting it at first? Because they have the infrastuture to absorb the population growth.

Birth cintrol and population control are schemes brought by developed countries to not tilt the scale in favour of others. If population growth is not a driver in economic devlopment, why is canada planning to bring in 400k immigrants per year?

Countries with huge population (especially if most of them are young) are usually seen as beacon of economic growth provided they have the economy and infrastuture to support it. Read about the asian cubs.

Give me an instance where a nation had an aging population and were comfortable with it

Population and population growth rate are not the same.
China lost millions to hunger because they had so many people that they could not feed.
This is an empirical fact.
Chinas rise to power also coincided with their tight control of their population growth. Having control over this makes economic planning easier.
Many of you dont seem to get that
Uganda has a higher population growth rate than Nigeria, even though they have a relatively smaller population than we do
And guess what, they are in a bigger mess than we are

The nexus between rapid population growth rate and poverty misery and social unrest is an empirical fact.
It's my field, so I know
Aging population and exploding populations are both not ideal, but the former is still way better than the latter.
And talking of Canada, the main reason for the policy boils down to two things

1. The retirees are getting more and more, nd are refusing to die (it's a good thing)
Advances in medicine has made us live longer
Unfortunately for many who grow into 70+ their economic productivity reduces and hence have to be catered to, which leads to the second issue

2) Pensions and benefits
Because of the aging population living longer, there are more old people to take care of financially.
These old people paid into the fund and aee drawing out of it. Most western govts have squandered these funds (George Bush is no 1 example).
They need more workers to pay into the fund for these old people to keep drawing out of it.

If they were not living longer, the issue of reducing population wont really be an issue .but because there are old people who need to be taken care of, and the govt has a responsibility to do that, they need young workers to pay into the fund
Nothing more
Nothing less

Automation can solve the labour issue once and for all in these western countries
But there is an issue....
Robots dont pay taxes or spend money or contribute to retirement funds
If you dont have grip on the population growth rate, your country will be failed and finished, another statistical fact
Even in the middle east, the countries that are talking apart breed like rats for the most part

franxalive:


2 ..MAX 3

may ya wish come true

Bolarineliza202:

may ya wish come true

AMEN AMEN AMEN AMEN AMEN

YOU TOO DEAR!!!

2

2 at most one should have been great but Ayo lo ma pa

Beebah2000:
7 for toilets?? I don't understand

He mean condom tins. But are u a learner.

Bolarineliza202:

I'm yet to have a whatsapp account.

I don't use that email .. I have seen your massage but I can't check before I forget the email details

computersoft:
He mean condom tins. But are u a learner.

yeah

bleskid:
I don't use that email .. I have seen your massage but I can't check before I forget the email details

It's okay.

Bolarineliza202:
It's okay.

pls call me so that I will call you back ..

koyyess:



I am pretentious because I pointed out your dumbness and addiction for d1ck?

You have no shame at all and yes, you have mental problem. I hope your smart friend gets the memo and stays clear from you. She will make a better mother than you will ever be.

*She will make a better mother than you will ever be*
This part got me laughing
See husband material 1,000 yards
Dindinrin mumu ode dumbass
Na this type boy shag anything under skirt dey pretend like say he never made mention of the female genital before.See the male version of Jennifer Lopez
Professional sex maniac spotted

2

millionboi:
till ur wife hit monopause

Yeah, then I take in another one to continue

Bolarineliza202:
A friend of mine once told me that she wishes to have only two kids and I was like;
Dey there dey make mouth, honestly you can never understimate and resist the power of mister dickson,the thing go just dey sweet ya , till you will have more than the number of the planned kids you won't realise.She only nodded and smiled

So my fellow nairalanders with the situation and economy of Nigeria,how many kids do you wish to have?

By God’s grace 3 or 4

MeghaneMorgane:

By God’s grace 3 or 4

1 or 2 is ok, madam

none here in Nigeria.

RodgersAkpafu:

Population and population growth rate are not the same.
China lost millions to hunger because they had so many people that they could not feed.
This is an empirical fact.
Chinas rise to power also coincided with their tight control of their population growth. Having control over this makes economic planning easier.
Many of you dont seem to get that
Uganda has a higher population growth rate than Nigeria, even though they have a relatively smaller population than we do
And guess what, they are in a bigger mess than we are

The nexus between rapid population growth rate and poverty misery and social unrest is an empirical fact.
It's my field, so I know
Aging population and exploding populations are both not ideal, but the former is still way better than the latter.
And talking of Canada, the main reason for the policy boils down to two things

1. The retirees are getting more and more, nd are refusing to die (it's a good thing)
Advances in medicine has made us live longer
Unfortunately for many who grow into 70+ their economic productivity reduces and hence have to be catered to, which leads to the second issue

2) Pensions and benefits
Because of the aging population living longer, there are more old people to take care of financially.
These old people paid into the fund and aee drawing out of it. Most western govts have squandered these funds (George Bush is no 1 example).
They need more workers to pay into the fund for these old people to keep drawing out of it.

If they were not living longer, the issue of reducing population wont really be an issue .but because there are old people who need to be taken care of, and the govt has a responsibility to do that, they need young workers to pay into the fund
Nothing more
Nothing less

Automation can solve the labour issue once and for all in these western countries
But there is an issue....
Robots dont pay taxes or spend money or contribute to retirement funds
If you dont have grip on the population growth rate, your country will be failed and finished, another statistical fact
Even in the middle east, the countries that are talking apart breed like rats for the most part

Oga provide facts and stop making assumptions based on western theories and propaganda.

My point has always been population growth + infrastructural development = economic prosperity. This should answer your question about Uganda.

You cant grow your population without harnessing that labour to boost productivity. Its a time bomb.

The countries with the fastest GDP growth are those with growing populations and the infrastructural capacity to back it up.

Countries go poor because they dont develop their infrastuture, not because they have a high population growth.

Even our forefathers understood this. Thats why they had many wives to bear children (population) to take care of their lands (infrastructure). If they didn't have abundant farmlands, they would not marry many wives.

I have never heard where an aging population is used as an indication of an economy with good prospects. Economists always use young demographics and population growth. Once again i refer you to the asian cubs.

China became the manufacturing hub of the world because they were able to leverage their huge population to reduce production costs. Thats why American companies outsourced their manufacturing to China. Take a look at the trade deficit betqeen China and US to compare.

So you think it is a coincidence that the two biggest markets and economies in the world (US and China) are the most populous countries with high level infrastrtural development? The biggest economy in Africa is the most populous country on the continent.

If more people are getting older and retiring, who would work to boost the economy? Are the pension funds infinite that they would not get exhausted?


Even western development was built on population growth through slave trade and exploitation of cheap labour


What automation are u talking about? Automation would only free up some jobs to allow humans focus on higher things. Even if you want to automate, is it not humans that would engineer and program the robots?

Once again i ask: China has increased birth rate for couples from 1 child to 3 children in 2 decades. This is a country that has a high level of automation, booming economy and churning out more millionaires than any country presently. Why didnt they sit back and say we should not grow our population? Why didnt they allow robots automate production?

If you have a growing population, and the labour market has the capacity to absorb them, you are on the path to economic prosperity.

Leave all these globalist theories. They are only meant to serve one set of people.