Richvkunt:

@Babe,

It is six in the morning,don't you think you should be playing your role? Keeping your man warm,if you have one.
By the way,the Messi thing,you can't understand,football is a man thing.

It's 1.00am where I'm at, and I ain't ready to sleep yet.    See your mouth like "football is a man's thing."  
I understood the Messi thing very well! I know a lot about Football! I'm an/was Arsenal fan! Correct one o! I've been to Emirates sef-  

I knew you would have nothing else to say and you would start yanning dust sooner or later! Typical!

Richvkunt:
I knew you would pop out of the woodwork sooner,than later.

1.Whatever i say on this forum is me in real life,I don't front,I don't claim to be what I am not.If you decide not to believe me that is your problem not mine.Get yours cos I will get mine,okay?

2.If a girl sleeps with her boyfriends best friend,how do you expect me to take her serious?The question is who seduced who?In this life as far as I am concerned Women are not as weak a species as they pretend to be,and they have all kinds of physical weapons they use to keep poor ignorant brothers on leash.They claim to be the weaker s.ex,but have various weapons they employ to keep brothers down.

3.Very funny dear,in fact you just agreed with my point that the world and this forum would be a much more peaceful place if every one stuck to their role in life.Lionel Messi is a fantastic footballer,but I do not think he would do so well if he was stuck in goal,as a goalkeeper.-See it dear-Know your ROLE!

lari03:
tell them: shoe get size. Ferragamo or Oshodi, do they serve the same purpose?
Imagine if Adam never took that apple from Eve(Basketmouth)
/more controversy/: what if the apple was sex?
Ki elegbe m'egbe.

BABE!:

It's 1.00am where I'm at, and I ain't ready to sleep yet.    See your mouth like "football is a man's thing."  
I understood the Messi thing very well! I know a lot about Football! I'm an/was Arsenal fan! Correct one o! I've been to Emirates sef-  

I knew you would have nothing else to say and you would start yanning dust sooner or later! Typical!

TCD:

I think this is Highly inappropriate for the Moderators to call the OP a "male chauvinistic Dinosaur". That is an Insult.

The forum rules stipulate insults are not allowed and here we have the site owners labelling someone a Dinosaur for airing his views which he is entitled to. THIS IS WRONG and Mr seun should know better.

This is distasteful and such a disgrace on the part of the moderators.

lari03:

in support of your opinion, I mean aren't dinosaurs extinct?

Well,  that's the whole point of calling him a dinosaur . People that think like this are as good as--- . It's a very appropriate Euphemism

I don't think the Mods/Seun insulted him though. I mean He's a male! He's sounds like a Chauvinist, and like Ogugua said, people that are call women "playthings" can also be called Dinosaurs because a few of them are left.-- Accept y'all want to prove me wrong.  

Richvkunt:

Men are by nature polygamous,there is no man that can stick to ONE woman,except you are a virgin or a sanctimonious fool,pretending on NL,with the hope that one of the females is gonna hook up with you.

Women are created to be playthings for men,they should please know their roles!

pro01:

"A man of sense only trifles with women, plays with them, humors and flatters them, as he does with a sprightly and forward child; but he neither consults them about, nor trusts them with, serious matters".

- Lord Chesterfield (1694-1773)

BABE!:



Well,  that's the whole point of calling him a dinosaur . People that think like this are as good as--- . It's a very appropriate Euphemism

I don't think the Mods/Seun insulted him though. I mean He's a male! He's sounds like a Chauvinist, and like Ogugua said, people that are call women "playthings" can also be called Dinosaurs because a few of them are left.-- Accept y'all want to prove me wrong.  

TCD:

Haba, please let's leave sentiments out of it. Yea, I mean you are a woman, you obviously don't agree with the OP's views, even I don't agree with them but that doesn't make it appropriate to call him an animal for expressing his own views.

Its not euphemism but a direct insult to the OP's person. Its akin to me calling Muslims Pigs and claim its an appropriate euphemism because islam is dirty and contains dirty practices. Does that not sound distasteful to you? That is wrong. We should advocate more for a tolerant world where everyone is free to agree and disagree like civilised people not labelling people goats, cows, dinosaurs because they have a different view from you or you consider their Opinion wrong.

The moderators are a disappointment. They should lead by example.

Actually, the thing is I agree with MOST of the things Bother Richmond said. Go to the first page for proof.  There are a ton of opinions I don't agree with on here, but I don't throw insults around to reinforce my debate if I engage in one. So don't get it twisted, I'm not an advocate of name-calling.

BUT, iN mR Richmond's case--(lol) I'm gonna leave room for a bit of Euphemism (yes Euphimism).

I'm gonna speak for the mods here. The purpose of labeling him as a Dinosaur was not to degrade him. They'll never do that. I trust them. The purpose of that term was to relate him and his opinions with those of Dinosaurs. Again, people that still think like that are almost all extinct. So, come to think of it, It's kind of appropriate.

A Polar bear would have been more appropriate though, coz Dinosaurs are no more (they'll gone), while those bears (endangered species) are still around, only a few though (relatively).

Women are created to be playthings for men, they should please know their roles!
Rant over,am out!

BABE!:

Actually, the thing is I agree with MOST of the things Bother Richmond said. Go to the first page for proof.  There are a ton of opinions I don't agree with on here, but I don't throw insults around to reinforce my debate if I engage in one. So don't get it twisted, I'm not an advocate of name-calling.

BUT, iN mR Richmond's case--(lol) I'm gonna leave room for a bit of Euphemism (yes Euphimism).

I'm gonna speak for the mods here. The purpose of labeling him as a Dinosaur was not to degrade him. They'll never do that. I trust them. The purpose of that term was to relate him and his opinions with those of Dinosaurs. Again, people that still think like that are almost all extinct. So, come to think of it, It's kind of appropriate.

A Polar bear would have been more appropriate though, coz Dinosaurs are no more (they'll gone), while those bears (endangered species) are still around, only a few though (relatively).

Like most of them "always" say on here when people insult one another--"You asked for it"-- mR richmond asked for his own share today too. No wahala. lol

^^ another male chauvinist dinosaur, smh