0lumide:

Oya nao bring it on!!!

If you never of heard of tongue wobbly (a childish ebonic slang) and typos then I doubt you are anything younger than 40yrs old

Sagamite:

Abeg, wetin be "proper"? Is that suppose to be pauper? 

And you want us to believe you attend UBC!

I told you I will clear that up today, didn't I?

Sagamite:

Of course I have heard of it. It is the street language of community college hoodrats and the language used for lectures in such schools, not UBC.

ChinenyeN:

Yeah, though I understand the reference to pedophilia and Inbreeding, as a defense/rebuttal to pro-homosexuality arguments, I never really understood how/why people based their arguments solely off just those two.

Inbreeding, for instance, is to counter the 'consenting adult' argument that pro-homosexuality people make.

Then, pedophilia is to often times to express the moral and/or disgust component and to sometimes highlight and counter the 'genetic' or 'born this way' argument.

On another note though, I just love how people so generously vomit out the word 'bigot'. I guess we are all at liberty to use it. .

ChinenyeN:

Eko Ile, you were doing such a good job handling yourself in this topic, don't start playing dumb now.

Inbreeding argument is just to counter the 'consenting adult' argument. What don't you understand?
'Bigot' is very much a bigoted way of calling someone/anyone 'intolerant'. What don't you understand?

Eko Ile:


What's there to counter when both are not even related?

On another note though, bigots are intolerant people just like the anti G/ay homophobes in this thread, so what's your point?

Eko Ile:


What's there to counter when both are not even related?

On another note though, bigots are intolerant people just like the anti G/ay homophobes in this thread, so what's your point?

ChinenyeN:

'Consenting Adults' is a different and unrelated point, really? Pray tell how, if pro-homosexuality people also use this point, rather frequently if you ask me?
Again, I'll state it simply, using the word 'bigot' to call someone else 'intolerant' shows your own bigotry. Do you understand that? It's not hard. The word 'bigot' is an offense-driven word. Any reasonable person would know that.

vicenzo:

@Eko Ile
That post is meant for chinenye and not you.My mistake.

Eko Ile:


Again, both acts are different and the society treats them as such. You are on your own with your own personally manufactured interpretation.

In.cest is not universally illegal by the way.

Bigot as defined in the dictionary is what you call intolerant people. Period. I'm not interested in your own personal take and understanding.

vicenzo:

the rate these bigots are quick to point at Inbreeding and pedophilia

ChinenyeN:

I never really understood how/why people based their arguments solely off just those two.

ChinenyeN:

Eko Ile, I thought, with the way you handled yourself here, that you would understand my simple post, but I guess not. Now I have to take the time to explain, more than may actually be necessary.

1. Inbreeding and Homosexuality are certain and most definitely not the same thing. The concepts are not related. They are not even similar. That I understand.
2. But the similarity or non-synonymy of the two is not my point. That is not what I am talking about at all.
3. What I am talking about is the argument of 'consenting adults'.
4. Where you fail at, Eko Ile, is your assumption that I am equating Inbreeding and Homosexuality as synonymous, when I am in fact not.
5. I am only talking about the argument of 'consenting adults'.
6. In fact, I know you are not blind. You must have noticed where I stated the below:

6. -cont- meaning that it doesn't make sense to use Inbreeding as one's argument, as if it satisfies your defense.
7. Inbreeding and homosexuality are not the same thing, but that doesn't void out the 'consenting adult' argument.

Now, do you understand that?

ChinenyeN:

1. The word 'bigot', is a offense-driven and often times emotionally-backed word that personalizes any and everything it is referenced to. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that.

2. The word 'bigot' is not a word you say, just to make a point. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that.

3. The word 'bigot' is an intensifier. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that.

4. The word 'bigot' is only applicable when someone finds something disagreeable or intolerable. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that.

5. The word 'bigot' is, in all sense of the word, a bigoted way of calling someone 'intolerant'. This should not at all be difficult to understand.

Now, do you understand that?

ChinenyeN:

You are not getting the point. This is not about illegalities, or rights, or privileges. That is not what I am talking about. Instead, I am talking about the argument of 'consenting adults'. How many times must I repeat that simple statement until you understand? Must I act as if I invented grammar itself, before you get a clue of the simple point I am making?

Eko Ile:

This is getting redundant and pointless

Eko Ile:


I get your point, but in.cest is not always about consenting adults, most of the time it's about fathers Being Intimate with their own kids.

ChinenyeN:

You're right. It is. I make a very simple statement. You go off on a different point, not the same point I'm making. I explain the already very simple statement. You continue on your different point, not the same point I've been making. I repeat my simple explanation of an already very simple statement. Yet, you continue talking about something else. You are right. This is getting redundant and pointless, especially since you want to continue harping on a separate point from what I am actually and have actually been discussing since I initially posted in this topic. Until you understand that; until you understand that you and I are not talking about the same thing, we will continue on this redundant round-about.

Or better yet, considering myself, I find such a thing tiresome. If you choose to continue talking about something other than what I am here discussing, then the end result is simple. We just won't discuss, period. It still boggles me how people on NL don't understand a simple straight-forward statement.
No. You don't get my point, because if you get my point, then we would be discussing about my point, and you would not be making so many unfounded attempts to drive on a separate issue/point altogether. Honestly, my simple point/statement shouldn't pose this much difficult for discussion.

Eko Ile:

Was it not your point that the in.cest angle was well applied?

ChinenyeN:

I never really understood how/why people based their arguments solely off just those two.

ChinenyeN:

No. That was never my point. In fact, let me quote myself once more.
Just in case this is beyond your understanding, I will make an attempt to further explain. It makes no sense to me for someone to think that their argument/defense is sufficient when they mention Inbreeding.

Simply put, the Inbreeding angle being well-applied was never my point. Instead, it was quite the contrary.

Do you understand now? You grossly misinterpreted a very simple statement, and that has cost us, what could in fact have been, a nice discussion.

ChinenyeN:

Is it that my posts are too simple? Because one thing I know is that they are not at all complex. If anything, it seems that people are fond of assuming that there is more than what I write in black and white, as you clearly showed in misinterpreting a very simple statement regarding my stance on the use of Inbreeding as an argument. The thing with Vicenzo has nothing to do with misinterpretation, but everything to do with me not specifying the foundation of my initial post. I did not specify the angle I was coming from, so he took it to mean that I was replying his post directly. It was a mistake on my part, which I take full responsibility for.

Can you honestly sit here and tell my that my posts are complex? (a serious question, meant for you to answer)

Eko Ile:


Again, why counter with different and unrelated points?


And bigot  as universally know and defined in the dictionary is what you call intolerant people , not your own personal interpretation.