BABE!:

It's very possible. You're angry and annoyed that the OP insulted all women, and you think the  "sensible" thing to do is to insult his mother?

There's no difference between you and the OP if you think that's the "normal" way to respond to him. It makes you both chauvinistic Pigs!

freecocoa:

Come O BABE wait first,let me be sure I saw what I just read,Did you just refer to me as a PIG? What's that supposed to mean na?where did I insult his mother? Did I tell anyone to insult his mother? He wrote "WOMEN" is his mother not one? People who called her useless are just repeating what he already said,I really wouldn't want to start exchanging words with you cos that will really annoy me more,please let me sound this as a very BIG warning,whatever it is that's making you support him is not my biz but mind what you say to me,what did I do to you to warrant being called an EZI,I really don't find it funny,just respect yourself.

nuela100:

doesn't make sense,he insulted all women including his mother remember.why r u supporting him anyway?

sexkillz:

[size=14pt]\Reprimanding people for castigating the Op, by calling them chauvinistic Pigs to you is not hypocritical.[/size]

BABE!:

lol. Darling calm down. I didn't call you a pig. Why would I call you a pig na? Haba. Carefully re-read what I typed; taking every word into consideration this time. Plus, my use of "you" didn't mean I was referring to you in particular. The "you" is for anyone insulting his mum.

I'm not supporting him. That's pretty obvious.


It makes sense. Ok. He insulted your mum, and you decide to insult his mum in return--gimme one difference between you and him.

I'm  not supporting him. That'a very obvious.

I'm not saying what he did was right. However, it's pretty "hypocritical" to reprimand him for insulting all women by insulting his mum.

freecocoa:

that's all water under the bridge now,just no provoke me again or I go change an for you.

BABE!:

LOL. Jokes.

sexkillz:

[size=14pt]Insulter's being bigots in this case then is acceptable to me, and i see nothing wrong in that, since he practically begged to be insulted. . . [/size]

freecocoa:

Err mm swerry,no be joke o,you better take and put it into consideration to avoid unwanted gap teeth. You know how far na*winks*

sexkillz:

[size=14pt]Since i made my point, it have been very nice to make yours without sounding "smartish". . .

Cheerz![/size]

yommysomguy:

lol, smartish?

agnesefe:

Please mod, I am constrained to comment, despite initial resistance to the contrary, on the redirection to this thread from the chauvinistic link on the homepage. The tag and homepage treatment would-if it has not- provide fodder and soothing for the ADHD, that this currently presents,-given the bracket and tenor of his submission- despite original noble intentions asides eliciting traffic. In addition, the barrage and wanton salvoes to both the username and forbearers has further elevated its status, if the current skewed evaluation of humor and celebrity is anything to go by, and won the affection and interest of a segment of the e-community and, by some serious extension, provided armour for misogynists and male chauvinists alike-the persecution of a people or order only strengthens or arms their resistance and resolve. That army is not deserving of our promotion-the appropriate response would have been to ignore or educate, rather than fall for the cheap bait.