Amenhotep:

@ davydylan

Go hang yourself man! Lunatic!

davidylan:

Didnt you all say you were a religion of "peace"?

Amenhotep:

I'm a christian FOOL!

davidylan:

I've heard this line a hundred times. You fool no one Bandits of mohammed.

Amenhotep:

You're sick man. You need help big time!

denex:

Even Ahmedinejad knows he doesn't have the right to build nuclear weapons, and that is why he is not doing it, and that is why he is making it clear to the world that he is not doing it.

denex:

davidylan, I think you should listen to Ahmedinejad more. You keep looking at translations from the USA and Israel who will help us translate "Develope Nuclear Technology" to "Build Nuclear Weapons".

davidylan:




I have better things to do than listen to that man who embodies all i dislike in a dishonest hypocrite.

denex:

@davidylan
if you do not listen to him, then you cannot claim to accurately know what he said. My people in Benin used to say "who no go no know".

oyb:

case closed . Davidlyan hates himself!!!

davidylan:

Ahmedinejad signed a treaty NOT to build nuclear weapons.

Listen to a man who:
1. denies the holocaust
2. Denies the presence of homosexuals in his country
3. Insists that Isreal be driven into the sea?

I have better things to do than listen to that man who embodies all i dislike in a dishonest hypocrite.


The Iranian President is clearly tending towards  being a terrorist and criminal.
Let me also say i dont like the way you guys are turning this talk to a religious thing. Please!

davidylan:

@ Topsido, it is playing the ostrich to think you can discuss Ahmedinejad and the middle east without talking about islam. Islam is what drives the middle east[b], islam is what drives ahmedinejad and islam is what drives the blind support from many of the discussants here.[/b]

Many Iranian Americans in the Washington area describe President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a provocateur, a hypocrite and an embarrassment to Iran. Yet some are disturbed about the hostile reception Ahmadinejad has received this week during his visit to the United States.

Students, professionals and academics in the region's Iranian emigre community said yesterday that they were frustrated and disappointed that the visit has focused on sensational issues such as Ahmadinejad's denials that the Holocaust occurred and that homosexuality exists in Iran.

Instead, they said[b] they wished that the rare encounter between a senior Iranian official and the U.S. public would raise issues that they consider more pressing to residents of Iran-- such as the oppression of women, the quashing of political dissent and the social control exercised by the country's real powers among the conservative Shiite Muslim clergy.[/b]

"I agree that Ahmadinejad is a despicable human being, but he is not a dictator. He cannot dictate anything," said Ahmad Karimi-Hakkak, director of the Persian Studies Center at the University of Maryland. The Iranian president was introduced Monday as a "petty and cruel dictator" by the president of Columbia University, which had been pressured not to let him speak at the New York City campus.

"Technically, he is a nobody in Iran's system, but he likes to make inflammatory comments," said Bijan Ganji, an Iranian-born law student at George Washington University. "He has nothing to say on the issues that really matter to most Iranians: human rights, the lack of political and social freedoms inside Iran. It's especially hard for us here, because we have to keep explaining why we have such a pathetically embarrassing president."

There are thousands of Iranian Americans in the Washington area, many of whom are exiles who fled after the Shiite revolution of 1979. They include surgeons, lawyers, developers and carpet importers. Some are monarchists who long for the return of the pro-Western Pahlavi dynasty, some are secular progressives and others are devout Shiites who think women should be covered in public.

But none of those interviewed yesterday expressed support for Ahmadinejad, 51, a layman with anti-Western views who was elected two years ago on a populist platform. His post is subordinate to those of the country's senior Shiite leader and his clerical advisers. He has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map" and has denied that millions of Jews were killed by the Nazis. He has strongly asserted Iran's right to develop nuclear power for peaceful purposes, but U.S. officials fear that Iran has military nuclear ambitions.

auwal87:

If Ahmadinejad is developing nuclear weapons, there is nothing can stop him from saying so, also, he will never say he will not. What is the true is America have an interest in the country's wealth, just like Iraq,

auwal87:

and Israel is not doing good in Palastine,

auwal87:

basically, the US may attack Iran but without any solid reason except to take over the country's bulk wealth to feed the Jews with Weapons to take over the whole middle east countries.

auwal87:

US want to CONQUER the whole MIDDLE EAST and HAND OVER to ISRAEL , (.) WHY? BECAUSE OF THEIR WORLDLY INTEREST WHICH IS WILL END SHORTLY!

denex:

Well several countries whose populations are predominantly muslim are utilising nuclear technology already. In fact one has confirmed nuclear weapons yet they have not used it on anyone yet. It is the Christian countries that keep attacking people with Nuclear Bombs and Depleted Uranium.

So remind me. Who exactly is the bad guy here?

denex:

Well several countries whose populations are predominantly muslim are utilising nuclear technology already. In fact one has confirmed nuclear weapons yet they have not used it on anyone yet. It is the Christian countries that keep attacking people with Nuclear Bombs and Depleted Uranium.

So remind me. Who exactly is the bad guy here?

davidylan:

Pakistan and India have already threatened themselves with nuclear missiles over Kashmir.

The US remains the only nation to have ever used nuclear weapons - ONCE in 1944! Yet you say "christian" countries (the US is NOT a christian country by its constitution) "KEEP ATTACKING PEOPLE" with nuclear weapons?

Which other "christian" country is attacking another with nuclear weapons? Iraq used chemical weapons on the Kurds in the 1980s, where were you?