Pidggin:


Why haven't Eskimos developed furs to protect them from the blistering cold environment where they have lived for centuries?

Where are the fossil evidence to show that dinosaurs evolved?

Show us evidence of progression of elephants and why has the transitional process stopped (if it ever existed) they are still a bit too clumsy for proper movement, don't you think they should have transitioned into a slimmer version by now? Thanks to evolution

Several findings have showed the discovery of new species with characteristics not found in any other specie, how is this possibly a result of evolution? And don't tell me it occured in spurts because you will end up contradicting yourself. How can evolution which is supposed to occur gradually in every specie, suddenly occur in spurts in some certain ones

Your god Charles Darwin never found the missing link until his death


Coelacanth, after 350million years has still not developed a leg to walk on, by now they should be walking on land with you and I

Are you aware that scientists have declared the Archaeopteryx fossils with feathers as forgery?

If evolution was true all species should have transitional links not only few Hehehehe

The most modern laboratories cannot still create a living cell, lol how can organic life be created from inorganic matter? No scientist has been able to do this when the smallest living cell contains more than 60,000proteins of hundred different configurations. The complexity of a single cell shows the handy work of a master designer, it did not happen by chance


Charles Darwin (your god) had no concept regarding the complexity of DNA. He did not know that this was the key to identity


Scientists have proven that 80% of the life forms in his tree of life did not evolve from the predecessor

donnffd:


Do you know one thing about science, it is true whether you believe it or not!, but let me ask you one question!

If you believe that God can override nature to create living things as described in the Book of Genesis, then what reasons do you have, other than your religious beliefs, that God could not have created living things through a process of evolution?

promise10:


YES! And no matter how a lie is refined, defined and presented as the truth, do you think it can stand the test of time??

i have read this evolution, and discovered it to be a lie. A very big lie, bro.

That's why i hardly refute it, because i have no gain in refuting a lie. As for me, evolution has nothing to refute.

Even if, i become an atheist tomorrow, i see it as a great dishonesty to believe in evolution.

ValentineMary:
After I read the OP and comments from theist,I am beginning to feel despair for our educational system.

One guy even said it has been debunked because it is still a theory and not a law. what do u guys learn in school

Wilgrea7:



I'm not claiming i know it all but at least u guys should try to prove us wrong... concerning the theory of natural selection and theory of adaptation i have no problem with it..

my problem lies in 2 things

1. highly complex form of life came from a blast of nothing

2. animals like girrafes had very short necks but on stretching their necks became longer over time..

I'm not insulting ur belief.. all i want is clarification... links are allowed

ValentineMary:

These issues have been explained extensively over time. I don't want to spend time stressing on it again.

annunaki2:


Unfortunately these your so called explanations are full of assumptions, inconsistencies and outright hallucinations. They are very far from convincing and it actually takes faith to the extent of delusion to believe the evolution mumbo jumbo than to believe in the concept of intelligent design.

ValentineMary:
After I read the OP and comments from theist,I am beginning to feel despair for our educational system.

One guy even said it has been debunked because it is still a theory and not a law. what do u guys learn in school

annunaki2:


Unfortunately these your so called explanations are full of assumptions, inconsistencies and outright hallucinations. They are very far from convincing and it actually takes faith to the extent of delusion to believe the evolution mumbo jumbo than to believe in the concept of intelligent design.

raphieMontella:

intelligent design is the mumbo jumbo...

Wilgrea7:



I'm not claiming i know it all but at least u guys should try to prove us wrong... concerning the theory of natural selection and theory of adaptation i have no problem with it..

my problem lies in 2 things

1. highly complex form of life came from a blast of nothing

2. animals like girrafes had very short necks but on stretching their necks became longer over time..

I'm not insulting ur belief.. all i want is clarification... links are allowed

annunaki2:


It would be to you if your mental faculties are not capable of comprehending it.

raphieMontella:

hehe...but your brain comprehend evolution abi?

annunaki2:


Well considering the fact that you evolved from a monkey, I can't expect you to comprehend anything intelligent like "intelligent design".

raphieMontella:

First,you have to understand that evolution is not ''darwinism''(darwins theory of evolution)
just like gravity is not newton's law of gravity..
Evolution,like gravity is a FACT...
the proofs you need on evolution can be found---HERE
And related issues on evolution---HERE
P.s :It will take you some time tho...

annunaki2:


My brain does not acknowledge myths. Meanwhile kindly explain to us why the dragonfly as not evolved in 450 million years and the crocodile as not evolved in 200 million years as there are fossilised evidence of both creatures dating back to time mentioned.

wirinet:
You either wrote the nonsense above from your head or copied a Jehovah's Witness tract. Which scientists question evolution, don't they have name?
Which DNA research shows that DNA cannot mutate to form a different organism, doesn't the research paper have a link or reference?

Please stop pushing your religious beliefs as science.

Wilgrea7:
evolution was never concrete... that's why its called theory of evolution and not law of evolution

Kalatium:


You are arguing in ignorance, a scientific theory is different from lay man's theory. Scientific theory cannot become a law

Wilgrea7:


yes Sir. after i made this post i actually did some research on evolution and creation.. i must say... i don't totally disagree with evolution .

I believe in micro evolution(small changes over time). it happens and it has been happening. but I've not seen any basis or proof for macro evolution(large changes over small period of time). i believe in creation. the created species can evolve (micro evolution) over a specific period of time due to environment and climatic factors.. but saying our complex universe came from a mistake... a bang of nothing... I've not seen any proof whatsoever.. if u have u can share.. I'm ready to learn

Wilgrea7:


yes Sir. after i made this post i actually did some research on evolution and creation.. i must say... i don't totally disagree with evolution .

I believe in micro evolution(small changes over time). it happens and it has been happening. but I've not seen any basis or proof for macro evolution(large changes over small period of time). i believe in creation. the created species can evolve (micro evolution) over a specific period of time due to environment and climatic factors.. but saying our complex universe came from a mistake... a bang of nothing... I've not seen any proof whatsoever.. if u have u can share.. I'm ready to learn

Wilgrea7:
I believe in micro evolution(small changes over time). it happens and it has been happening. but I've not seen any basis or proof for macro evolution(large changes over small period of time).

Seun:
Macro-evolution is not large changes over a small period of time. It's large changes over a very long period of time. Macro-evolution is what happens when micro-evolution goes on for a very long period of time. There is a saying that little drops of water make a mighty ocean. What you're saying is that you believe in little drops of water but they cannot possibly make a mighty ocean. Look at the lion and the tiger, which are distinct species, yet so similar. Do you really think a lion-like animal couldn't evolve into a tiger-like animal? That's macroevolution, right?

wirinet:
You either wrote the nonsense above from your head or copied a Jehovah's Witness tract. Which scientists question evolution, don't they have name?
Which DNA research shows that DNA cannot mutate to form a different organism, doesn't the research paper have a link or reference?

Please stop pushing your religious beliefs as science.

CeoMYN:
This should be in the science section, seeing it in the religion section shows the intent of who wrote this.
No link, no names, nothing nothing.
This is trash!

Kalatium:


I didn't copy from a Jéhovah witness tract, this is real evidence see the link http://www.icr.org/article/5136/282

Kalatium:


You are arguing in ignorance, a scientific theory is different from lay man's theory. Scientific theory cannot become a law

Kalatium:
Evolution will continue to be the most controversial theory in science, this is because it is made up of pure assumptions. Fossils are not evidence for evolution. An American paleontologist discover that it fossils forms faster in centuries than previously thought which is In millions of years.