4Play's Posts
Nairaland Forum › 4Play's Profile › 4Play's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 (of 278 pages)
davidylan:I think she lacks a heart! Was actually humming my favorite Sound of Music tunes right now |
onyinye2: Glad to have support for my movie tastes from 2 teenage girls. Mitigating factor though, was a teen when I watched it so might have a different perspective if I watch it now. |
[quote author=Ebony-Silk link=topic=206172.msg3250973#msg3250973 date=1229820598]excuse me? That movie was the bomb. . . . .I played the theme song on my clarinet over and voer again for almost a year. . . .[/quote]Excuse me young lady but I found the ending of the movie a bit too soppy. Karma, you see am? Someone who has a heart, even if she likes the movie a bit too much. |
You kidding? Titanic was a good movie! Anybody with a heart would like that movie, it wasn't particularly great but it was good. Was in secondary school then and many of my mates seemed to love it . . . . .and none of them emigrated to San Francisco |
@Karma For someone who claims Titanic was her best movie ever, don't hold your movie tastes in high regard. The movie wasn't too bad though, just not worth going to the cinema to watch. |
[quote author=HR.hotness link=topic=206172.msg3250925#msg3250925 date=1229819528]LMAO! I'm a girl and i refused to get caught by d hype [/quote]The person who dragged me there didn't enjoy it either. Always best for a man to select the movie. |
Thank God nobody added Sex and the City, I had the misfortune of going to the cinema to watch that. Only male in the whole place, was ashamed of myself but I was coerced to go. ![]() |
It's probably clueless teenagers that make up his fan base. It's a mystery to me. |
Doyin na correct fan na . . . . . no be everybody be glory hunters like some people here. For those asking Doyin to support Arsenal, what's the point of supporting a club that is in terminal decline? At least Pompey fans have a trophy to celebrate with, all Arsenal fans have is sour grapes and constant whining Everybody in England knows Arsenal's fan base is drawn from the dregs of society - tramps, hookers, drug pushers,e.t.c The whole of the North London area is teeming with vermins. |
Tope, why you comot the shoe from your profile? davidylan:U go make bed na, you be jack of all trades; jeweller and house boy! Make sure you wash the plates and sweep the room, I want my queen to have a spotless house. tope2000:Don't worry ,I know better jewellers. Because say I give this one contract, e begin toast you. |
I still prefer the 4-4-2. You can get the same sort of protection an extra central-midfielder affords in 4-3-3 by playing a midfielder whose starting position is on the flanks but who is also comfortable playing down the middle. It seems the 3-5-2 formation is dead now. Many German teams, like Hitzfeld's early seasons with Bayern, popularised it but it seems to have lost its lustre. Capello used that formation with Roma but no team seems to adopt it anymore. Glen Hoddle pushed strongly for it. My problem with it is that it leaves teams vulnerable down the flanks if the full-backs, who double as wingers, don't track back astutely. |
tope2000:I for talk davidylan:Tope husband go talk, ordinary jeweller go talk. Infact, I go return that ring, find another jeweller to make a better ring. |
tope2000:So anybody wey call you ''my love'', you dey respond to am? Kai. . .I feel betrayed o. ![]() |
These formations sef . . .I think you are refering to 4-3-3 : 4 defenders, 3 central midfielders and a striker flanked by 2 wingers. This seems to be in vogue. The key attraction of the 4-3-3 is that it allows extra-protection through the middle in the form of 3 central midfielders - usually, 2 of the 3 will be defensive midfielders. It's also flexible - when holding on to a lead, the 2 wingers track back and the formation effectively becomes 4-5-1. When chasing a goal, the 2 wingers effectively become auxilliary strikers while a playmaker, one of the 3 central midfielders, pushes forward to stay closer to the 'lone' striker. |
KarmaMod:In what way? Spoil her relationship with her prospective mother-in-law or her boyfriend? Saying no in this situation should come naturally that the very idea that this situation lingers on makes it look like a fabrication. |
KarmaMod:Yes Ma, let me just deal with a few points though sunshinemi:It's either you are a fabulist or a pudding head or a combination of both. If you can't be bothered to say no and inform your boyfriend, you are probably not old enough to be in a relationship. Anything else is pointless whining. |
debosky:Exactly, it's only Gunners that will be after Sharon. I heard that email has been traced back to an IP address registered by a man called Manuel Eboue. . . sounds familiar? |
@sunshinemi Abeg, carry this your cock and bull story to a publisher or something. |
busybein:Like I said earlier, a firm no will solve this problem. Either that or continue whining. If she wasn't whining over this, it will be something else. Also, cut this crap about ''extortion''. The trademark of termagants is to use hyperbole in referring to people they have issues with. Extortion indeed. |
busybein:I'm not as interested in the details per se as I am in the sheer volume of whining by women about their partner's parents. It's quite clear women take the lead in this. In this case, I haven't seen much for her to whine about. Of course, this is probably another fictional story but the idea that she is miffed because she has a demanding ''mother-in-law'' is laughable. The sums mentioned are arguably small and a firm no will resolve this problem. Instead, what we have is yet another whiny woman. |
KarmaMod:As if women don't have other avenues to do their own bitching? Let's face it, it's either parents are more irritating when their sons are involved, as opposed to their daughter, or women are more likely to whine about parents. I think it's the latter. |
Anyone seen the pattern? Girlfriends whining about their partner's parents. How many times have you seen a man open up a thread to complain about his girl's parents? The common thread is that of whiny girlfriends complaining about everything on the planet. N5000 worth of recharge cards? You would think we are talking of phone bills of N50,000 . . . bloody whiny women. |
@topic Unpatriotic Nigerians at work again! Don't you know non-Nigerians use this site? We should always paint the best picture possible, that is what patriotism demands. |
oyb:Let me get this straight. A condemnation of genocide in Darfur is anti-Islam. Not only have I got you to agree with me that your prophet's sexual peccadilloes is akin to a pedophile's, you now seem to agree that Islam is a synonym for Arab. That is the only rational explanation for why you seem to think that any mention of Halabja or Darfur is ipso facto anti-Islamic. As for references to Liberia and Rwanda. I don't see why a mutt like you seems to think there is any logical connection with the topic. The topic is about Iraq, the question is why your sense of outrage is ''time-constrained''. Only events after 2003 make you angry, events prior to 2003 only seem to inspire inane rants about Hiroshima/Nagasaki and Sierra Leone(apparently, S. Leone doesn't have a sizable Muslim population). I started by asking you why the terms - Halabja, Anfal campaign - have never been seen in your posts. Before one could say ''Arab mental slave'', you went off on a rant about Indian reservations and the 2nd World War. What will it take to get this collection of brain washed abds to condemn Arab atrocities without whining about ''anti-Islam''? |
These people fail to see the irony. Tell them about Darfur and Halabja and they claim you are anti-Islam. The victims of these places are Muslims! It's a tacit admission by these knuckleheads that they see Islam as a synonym for Arab. They conflate Sunni Arab interests with Islamic interests. That's why many see Islam as a mere deification of Arab culture, a vehicle for Arab supremacy. Nobody here has even mentioned the hundreds of thousands of non-Muslims that lost their lives in South Sudan. |
oyb:Look at this mutt. As I have stated on NL on several occasions, start a thread about the many African conflicts and you get very few responses. All of a sudden, Liberia and Zimbabwe ''fall under my radar''. Look at this dumb Arab wannabe. Every African, apart from abds like you, constantly bemoan the violence that plagues Africa. However, the reason Darfur has greater resonance, a la apartheid South Africa, is that this is a case of outside settlers wreaking havoc on an indigenous population. Again, this mutt is seeking all avenues to avoid saying a bad word of his Arab masters. |
oyb:Consensus ad idem! Your prophet is sort of like pedophile priests . . . . . thanks for the admission. Of course, add the fact that he engaged in mass murder that will make events at Abu Ghraib look like child's play and one can understand why Halabja doesn't stir your conscience. wonder what modern times would have to say about ll the evil commited in your god's nameI think you guys are the torch bearers for committing evil in the name of religion, want me to list contemporary examples? Why cry more than the bereaved? Do you see the Japanese, staunch pro- Americans that they are, incensed with rage over Hiroshima? The Japanese even sent troops to support the US in the war. Stop being an abd and be a human being for once. If Darfur didn't teach you a lesson about your allegiance to the Arabs, I wonder what will. |
oyb:That's not the issue because the question isn't literal. Every right-thinking African feels grave remorse about those events. However, what makes Muslims like you unique is that your sense of outrage is dictated by your Sunni Arab masters. It's the most perverse form of groupthink you will ever find. |
oyb:See abd trying to teach me English! Maybe they never showed you this in Koranic school:http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pornographic Sexual deviant? Try humping a 9 year old child and massacring thousands while telling people you are sent by God. In modern times, your Arab prophet would have been sectioned! Again, you seem to be unable to condemn outright the massacres of Saddam without deploying your warped perspective of history. Tell me what Japan circa 1945, ironic since the Japanese are staunch pro-Americans , has to do with the massacre of Kurds and Shia. If Saddam was a Kurd and his victims were Sunni Arabs, you will be hyperventilating like a dog with your hatred for Saddam. |
@Abd al Arab Porn, for the benefit of the grammatically challenged and prurient abd, also refers to sensational material. Maybe it might be best if we discussed in Arabic but your slave masters lost the culture war. The US following in the footsteps of Saddam? Is that what you were taught in the Koranic school? Show me one example of the US gassing an entire village in Iraq, deporting an entire people or selectively massacring Shias. You have latched on to the tired old tactic of referencing US silence in Saddam's earlier massacres. I'm inclined to think that the Arabs, who universally supported Saddam's wars against Iran and the Shia, have a moral compass and should be judged on their own merit. You should be able to condemn your slave masters for their atrocities against minorities - whether in Darfur or Halabja - without demanding why the US failed to act earlier. Make up your mind abd, do you want the US to intervene in Arabia or not? |
@Oyb The Arab slave Since you joined Nairaland, the terms; Anfal, Halabja, Barzani tribes, e.t.c have probably never been seen anywhere in your posts. Is your sense of outrage dependent on the parties to the atrocity? If Sunni Arabs massacre Kurds in the hundreds of thousands, Oyb plays the ostrich. Oyb's sense of outrage is restricted to invoking gory porn by googling 'Abu Ghraib'. Abu Ghraib has been in existence before Bush could spot Iraq on the map, but strangely, your disapproval only extends to the post-war period. |
So HotFunmi is relocating to Nigeria at last. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 (of 278 pages)
Always best for a man to select the movie.

