₦airaland Forum

Bastage:
What a mouth-breather.
You don't seem to understand that research actually involves studying other than Biblical material. If you did, you would understand that I don't have to make a claim for more validity - the facts in non-scriptural materials speak for themselves and logically expose the Bible as flawed. Want to pick one of those exposures and debate it with me? How about the Christ figure himself? Want to explain to me why there isn't one single documented reference of him outside of scripture? That's just one solitary point I could tear you a new asshole over but the "Good Book" contains hundreds more.

Of course, a plank like you can go around blabbing their mouth off, acting like they know what they're talking about but all you are is a fart in the wind. You've nothing of substance whatsoever to say - just some pansy-assed retard whining because you don't like people pointing at the obvious holes in your religion.

Yet you dipshits are always trying to shove that religion down everyone else's throat. Reap what you sow, bitch.

The above is a degradation of reasoning, to call you an slowpoke will be an insult to imbeciles. To start with, why does this oaf assume my beliefs? 

One would think that a person who seeks, with comical effects I must add, to side with reason will deploy some iota of logic. This blithering oaf proclaims that he researches non-spiritual material, what would make any intelligent person think religionists don't consume literary content outside their holy books?

In essence, a summation of your argument is that your views are valid because you "research" non-spiritual material. That is the logic of an idiot. You seem to have an ahistorical approach to life, nobody outside the fringes of the historian profession doubts the existence of Jesus, what is debated is the accuracy of his biography. To assert that there is no single documented account of him outside scriptures marks you out as a clueless buffoon.

Every non-believing oik now thinks he is Richard Dawkins. To even question the existence of prominent contemporary scientists who are believers is as idiotic as questioning the existence of matter.  I've seen millenialists with a greater grasp of logic than this cretin.

Bastage:
It's amusing that they try to claim that all the smart people are Christians but then overlook the Hitlers of the world.
Maybe if Germany had won WW2 huh?  

This guy displays the historical nous of a slug. For someone questioning the Christianity of Louis Pasteur to even imply that Nazi Hitler was a Christian is incredible. The Hitlers of this world? Name worse mass murderers in the 20th century than Hitler, Stalin and Mao Zedong - not exactly a collection of ''Jesus freaks''.

Bastage:
Let me illustrate why you're an ignorant asshole.

I haven't once stated that my opinion is "more valid".

The crass triangulations of a knobhead. Asserting that you never made the above statement is again besides the point, for I never even attributed such a statement to you. However, discounting the fact that you dumb as a stump, you must realise that the crux of your argument is that your opinion is more valid than David's or his co-religionist.

I would add as well that claiming to have researched a subject is not the ignorant reply that you claim it to be - especially when the majority of you Bible-bashers don't even have the balls to do it yourself but merely swallow the party line like gimps wearing gag-balls. All you do is bury yourself in the Bible, listen to your pastors and then bleat like sheep.

I recognise the problem. Folks like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens have made "anti-religion" seem like the only intellectually defensible viewpoint any lucid thinker can hold. What you now have is this contellation of cretins, like Bastage and Huxley, who seem to think that by agreeing with such luminaries, they are neccesarily intelligent.

To assert that you have researched this subject is not a valid answer. People who hold contrary opinion have also conducted their research. The real question is what makes the conclusions you have drawn from your research any more valid. That, slowpoke, is the only intelligible response you could have made.

Bastage:
@4Play.
Don't be an asshole.
I explained what the research involved.
OK. Maybe not being an asshole is difficult for you but at least try to read what I wrote before commenting with trivial crap.

Thanks for the invite. Now, let me illustrate why you are a slowpoke.

Firstly, to state that you have researched the subject is besides the point, it's not assumed here that you arrived at your opinion after bumping your head, albeit, given your crassness,it is not far fetched. Nobody but an idiot responds to the question of what makes their opinion more valid by stating they researched it.

Now,you now claim you have told us what your ''research'' involves. What a knob. . . .you merely told us your areas of interest. The irony is that the self-assured bumpkins who castigate religion are often people who sorely lack the ability to reason.

"lots of research". . . . this should win an award for tautology.

Q:What makes your opinion anymore valid than others

A: I did lots of research

No sh*t. . . had you not said that, I would have thought you arrived at your opinion after indulging in some spliff.

How do we know what actually sparked the whole nonsense?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/property_and_mortgages/article5284863.ece

British house prices tumbled at a record 16.1 per cent in November, marking the sharpest drop in property values for a quarter of a century. 

The average price of a house in the UK is back to the July 2005 level of £163,445, but this is 124 per cent higher — or £90,000 — than the figure in November 1998.

With barely suppressed schadenfreude, watching Niall Ferguson's The Ascent of Money reminded me of how difficult it is to go against herd mentality, especially the bone-headed "buy-to-let" panglossians in the UK as recently as late 2007.

What a difference a year makes.  If you bought a house following the advice on this thread, you effectively invested at the peak of the market. 

A prescient but rare example of going against the herd:

candylips:
[b]honestly buying a house in london at this moment might not really be a smart move. The house prices are off the roof.
Some people have forecasted a possible drop this year or next year. [/b]You can consider gettin somewhere just outside london and build up value for a couple of years , sell it and get your dream home in london. That is what most first time buyers are doing these days

Na only Muki and Debo wey dey left on this thread like stricken sailors cast adrift.

Other Gaynners like Kit and Loyika have abandoned the cause, pleading "busy schedules".   I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for Arsenal. . .  .naah, just kidding.    One minute, they are celebrating a victory in which their best asset was a blind linesman, the next, they are mercilessly humiliated by a small club like Burnley.

Another addition to NL's astonishing collection of fictional threads.

Can we get back to the topic please? Typical Nigerians, they always divert threads.

@Lady T

U see as my bros dey hijack my PC,dey type nonsense?

RubyPearl:
That's Osisi

I know, na why I dey tell her to counsel these guys. Make dem leave my woman alone.

tope2000:
Prove it

I will take out a full page ad in the Metro - 29 December '08 - to announce my love to the public. Just keep an eye out.

I just love this Tope, she drives me crazy.

Kweenisha:
No.
I can't even wash my own car

You no see as all these randy men come change topic. Dem want snatch my girlfriends by force. Abeg, preach to them o. I want to settle down but randy men keep pestering my future wife.

tope2000:
Me sef no want 4play anymore, i beg

Tope! My sweet heart.   You know I love you from the bottom of my heart.

doyin13:
You sure say na the same Morenike. . . . . . .

Abegiits all about the chest  

You see chests for her profile? There are more important things in life than chest, na so woman go carry chest smother u to death.

RubyPearl:
Dude, I don't even know what love is?
care to tell me?  

You know na, love is what I have for you. I first realised I loved you the first time I saw your post, immediately, I called my mum and told her to that I have found the One.

RubyPearl:
Didn't you say you were scared of Ekiti women?

You know, I meant that I was fearful of you rejecting me. My love for you is so strong, I'm scared you won't love me back.

@Akola

Wetin happen to that Dimeji? The guy just faded like that. I remember when he come on as a sub against Togo in 1990 in our 3-0 win and scored , after that, he just disappeared. I think the guy played Saudi '89,abi?

whatever90:
what about tope200,hr hotness and co

Who them be?

RubyPearl:
Don't mind him.
Na every woman with chest he go run after

Na wa o, I just love everything about you- your demeanor, pulchritude, smarts - no be chest matter at all.

The guy is a midfielder, so most of those guys you mentioned are not in direct competition. Even then, I think Jose wants to recreate the 4-3-3 formation he had at Chelsea with 2 wingers flanking the sole striker, so Hamsik's versatility will come in handy.

Milan needed to spend their money wisely. I don't see attack as their key problem. Some people were saying it's Milan's slow build up that meant Gila didn't perform but that hasn't harmed Pippo.

RubyPearl:
David, how you dey jare. I missed you die

Chai, I'm heartbroken! See as person come snatch my girl in broad daylight.

whatever90:
oh not 4play again wt another woman?

No be the same Morenike I have been dying for all these years? See how u dey spoil my name.

DavidDylan:
u get shame so?  
No need to chase Ruby . . . she's firmly in my corner . . . o boy i dash you Tope.  

Chai, u dey covet woman wey me and am go way back in history? Ruby and I were made for each other.

DavidDylan:
the type of "wet" fight that leads to . . .

Person go come web forum, begin chase woman, some people no get shame.

The Lovely Ruby, how body? Tell you what, I'm thinking we should get together some time. I think I'm falling for you, can't help me self.

Come, na true say NFA strictly instruct our U17 boys make dem no comot their shirts when they score, so people no go see their hairy chests?

Was it Philip Osondu or Odartey Lamptey that reacted badly to growth hormones? Club medics thought the guy was a growing teenager and tried to enhance his height, like they did to Messi.

As for the Yak, I hope he recovers quickly, although, he is no use to Nigeria anymore

You can't compare the quality they had in attack to what they have for central-defence. Dinho is shadow of his former self, never mind that he chips in with goals - he did that even for Barca when he wasn't on form.

Has anyone seen that Hamsyk? The guy looks very good but it seems Inter are probably going to get him.

I think you must be the product of inbreeding. Idiot should have been euthanised, seen more senile people who are more clued on than this cretin.

@Imperror

When you enrolled into St Retard Pry School, why did you think the school was so-called?

I thought you had better things to do, you confused self-contradictory slowpoke. Maybe senility is setting in, that's why pr*ck doesn't know a Manc from a Gaynner.   Must be a congenital retard, type folks abort in the West.