₦airaland Forum

Patchesagain:
Multiple instances of its use have been posted.

NO single citation has NEVER been posted for Link-ZA operations in reality
.

FighterPilot:
Bad outings for Nigerians today. They are being harassed like hell.

LOL.....you that thinks satellite does not move off a target's longitude, you think satellite freezes on on spot for hours

Your BSc should be withdrawn
.

Patchesagain:
We want to arrest Bashir because he is a fvcking war-criminal

Good job, also arrest South African government officials who bribed FIFA to give RSA 2010 world cup hosting which you did NOT deserve
.

Patchesagain:
Read his post
Understand his post
Comment accordingly

Make counter-arguments and stop crossing out or striking through other people's comments at random like a M0R0N.

No wonder you got banned yesterday for trolling.

Patchesagain:
You are known as the single most deceitfull person on this forum

Now, citation please

Patchesagain:
Citation needed for ATR radar range

After you southies post citation that ATR-42 uses SeaSpray radar. Then I will immediately post my own range proof....407 km
.

Patchesagain:
You really want to compare who has more money?

SANDF budget is allmost double yours, and soon it will be quadruple yours

Most of SANDF budget is spent on soldiers salaries and HIV anti-retroviral drugs for 30 battalions of living-dead zombie soldiers of RSA.

.

Patchesagain:
The beauty of a datalink is that it does not need to have a console inside of it

You mean the ugly side of it's incapacity.

Consoles process data, so data-link has no console to analyse data......becomes half useless, the target is NON-IDENTIFIED, your Hawk jet just attacks anything that moves in that target location even if it is a friend....

MikeCZAR:
You claimed the ATR-42MP has a radar range of 300km months ago!

You been failing to substantiate that claims!

Now you've increased it to 400km.

Substantiate your claims first then we have a mature debate.

I said 330 km range last year. Today I say 407 km radar range for ATR-42 and I stand by it.

Tell us your source of ATR-42 Seaspray radar, then I will post the 407 km range source.

We cannot agree on radar range if we don't agree on what type/name of radar is on the aircraft.

You made your claim before mine. You failed to answer me since then, show us source of the Seaspray radar and I will immediately post the 407 km range source.


Fair deal....or no deal
.

MikeCZAR:
Citation needed.

You go first, post the proof of the radar you named since 3 days ago

MikeCZAR:
Your ATR-42MP uses the Seaspray surveillance radar.

.

FighterPilot:
Why does he due to give citation when you have failed to provide yours. Yes gripen rada range is 500km.

Do you know that MikeCZAR has not posted a single citation for over 100 comments he wrote here in 7 days ?

Also, he says ATR-42 radar is Seapray radar, I asked for proof, he refused....so....let him prove the name of the radar with a citattion and I will post proof of the 407 km range

MikeCZAR:
Your ATR-42MP uses the Seaspray surveillance radar.

.

MikeCZAR:
The Gripen radar is 500km. Confirmed by SAAF.

Citation needed !
.

MikeCZAR:
Is 400km a standard?

Where is that 400km coming from?

You want other people to post citations for you, yet you NEVER post one citation upon many requests to prove your own claims.

ATR-42 radar is 407 km range. Confirmed for NAF.

You say it's Seaspray radar on ATR-42, I asked for citation, you ran away.....keep running.....keep telling lies...

MikeCZAR:
You said SAAF pilots don't get to fly.

Compare flying hours please!

Is that difficult?

We are talking about war, so you post your Gripen combat hours per year, I know it is ZERO, but please post it, don't be ashamed now
.

MikeCZAR:
A-Darter: 20km

Stop telling random lies.

A-Darter range is ONLY maximum 19 km.

"Guided by a heat-seeking homing head, the A-Darter maximum range is approximately 12 miles (19 km)."

http://www.defenceweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=38741:a-darter-contract-moves-missile-programme-forward&catid=35:Aerospace

#Stop posting random lies
.

MikeCZAR:
Compare flying hours!

Yes, tell us How may combat hours do SAAF Gripens fly in a year ? .

MikeCZAR:
what kind of prove?

Citataion showing completed project or operational use today. You don't know what proof is?

I notice 99% of your comments no longer carry any citations or proof. You just lie serially like a man bewitched with lying spirit
.

MikeCZAR:
The CNIS was implemented after the 98 defence review every equipment bought after will have to be compatible with that TDL.

This includes Submarines, fighters and more.

The implementation andrew was talking about regarding installation on the C-130s, Oryx and others.

You are telling stories from your bedroom, provide proof that Link-ZA is operational and on all SANDF equipment. Simple
.

MikeCZAR:
we are talking about fighter Jets not transporters!

Compare flying hours!

How may combat hours do SAAF Gripens fly in a year ?
.

MikeCZAR:
1. How many protected aircraft were shot down?

2. 3rd Generation missile.

3.

IRIS-T range: 25km

A-Darter range: 20km

PL-9C: 22km

The best SAAF Mirage were shot down by Cuban boys

A-Darter range is 19 km.

PL-9C is near BVR 35 km range
.

MikeCZAR:
compare flying hours!

Compare combat hours NOT the useless SAAF VIP transport hours
.

MikeCZAR:
No match!

Why are getting the Rafale if its the best. Why don't they just get more Sukhois.

Regarding that I was just kidding, but the Russians once brought the SU-35 and others jets to SA.

After the coming to power of the democratic government. Maybe the thinking was that since the ANC was in power the defence might start looking to Russia.

They held exercises and with long range missiles the Cheetahs were able to hold their own.

We keep asking you for citation to prove this, yet you fail to do so.

Stop peddling lies here, if you want to do comedy thats a different thing. Stop making up fake stories.

MikeCZAR:
Compare hours!

NAF flew 6,000 combat sorties in 6 months.

SAAF flew 0 combat sorties in 20 years.

Dead air force of Soweto
.

FighterPilot:
The link ZA is alive and kicking and continues to evolve.

You have no proof.

FighterPilot:
http://itweb.co.za/mobilesite/defenceweb/home/item_id-6184/

It is now mandatory for all SANDF communications equipment to be Link ZA-compliant.

A paper plan is NOT = Execution/Completion.

Words of recommendation on paper don't become equipment unless you produce the stuff itself and pay for it, then install it.

Show us SANDF data-link in action/operation, show us proof, like we showed you Nigerian data-link performing wonders, show us proof you have functioning data-link and that all your equipment have it....proof wanted.....post citation proof of operation !
.

MikeCZAR:
1. How many SAAF aircraft protected special counters measures were shot down in Angola?

2. 3rd Generation vs 5the generation missile.

4. Range of 22km.

1. SAAF ran away from MiG-23 jets and teenage Cuban pilots in Angola, your air force chickened out

2. PL-9C is anti-ECM, and missiles don't fight missiles, they fight aircraft. The PL-9C is a missile that was developed in the era of Gripen jet.

3. A-darter range is worse....19 km maximum. PLC-9 range is 22 km to 35 km near BVR

NAF will kill SAAF
.

Henry120:
We would shoot down their tiny Gripens.

Gripen pilots with short range missiles and lack of qualifying flight hours. Those SAAF pilots hardly every fly or train.

SAAF Gripen jet is used as a mere deterrent NOT threat.

FighterPilot:
All SANDF equipments are now Link-ZA compatible and can relay and collect data.

Proof that ALL have Link-ZA, post a proof that the job was completed on ALL SANDF equipment
.

FighterPilot:
ISTAR fails to scare Boko haram, so how will it scare me down here in Pretoria? Bwahahahaha… It stand no chance in SA.

See Boko Haram running away from ISTAR....NAF scatters Bokos, Shekau III is now on the run for cover

SAAF cannot show you this video....only NAF.....watch and weep for the ISTAR-LESS SAAF .....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rykows2Bj3M&feature=youtu.be
.

FighterPilot:
With tactical data link there is no matter of first.

You have to use ISTAR to search and collect the data first, that is first.

No data gathered, means nothing to transmit on data-link.

ATR-42 has data-link + ISTAR = NAF is complete
.

Henry120:
Why don't you prove us wrong, cite one operational use of LinkZA in Combat or proper exercise use?

Even if it is against Rhino poachers, they should show us one use of LinkZA datalink
.

Henry120:
And our PL-9C missiles have a longer range than theirs.

He knows, he is just afraid to go there, the ISTAR terror alone scares every Southie, they fear to fight against superior technology....and that fvcking deadly ATR-42 radar range of 407 km....African king !
.

FighterPilot:
Bwahahahaha…

It is not me, rather blame Boko haram for humiliating your recently wasteful transaction.

All I see is Boko Haram in the grave or in captivity, we humiliate them on the streets.

SANDF cannot stop humiliation by Rhino thieves on daily basis inside your homeland.

See your Boko friend being dragged on the street after being disarmed in battle....you envy our war history
.