Aletheia's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Aletheia's Profile › Aletheia's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (of 82 pages)
Meanwhile, confusion and lull took over at the General Hospital, Badagry, on Tuesday following the sacking of the 788 striking doctors by the Lagos State government.So where were the newly employed doctors? The limits of propaganda will soon be seen. |
By SaharaReporters, New York |
[quote author=~Bluetooth]Na me you dey yab like this ? Anyways,I wont get personal with you because you are laready frustrated already probably you are one of the affected doctors or your folks are involved.No occupation has the monopoly of strike,why are doctors always in the frontline to embark on it ? Simple,because lives will be lost.Everybody knows the country is a failed one but the least we should tolerate is from doctors to aid mass murder all in the name of increased allowance.Why are they not opting for a compromise in all these but insist the government must pay them ? To attend or work for government is not obligatory.If they dont pay you well,go for the private sector or better still,vote for pdp in 2015. [/quote]I have worked in the public sector and I am currently in the private sector in the FCT. The LASG is trying an old tactic from government's playbook which is very well known to those of us who have been active in demanding that doctors be paid their due remuneration. Before you get all emotional, do find out the answers to these questions: 1. Did the LASG enter into an agreement with the doctors to pay them or not? 2. Has the LASG fulfilled their own side of the agreement or not? The purported "sack" is nothing but a bluff. Watch as doctors call the LASG's bluff and up the stakes. Mark my words: Fashola will blink first. In the ongoing struggle for just wages for doctors, history repeats itself as politicians across the country fail to learn the lessons of history: you can not break a doctors strike by "sacking" them. That move is guaranteed to escalate the confrontation. Before doctors embark on a strike, they usually try all avenues to resolve the issues. Strike is always a last resort. No doubt Fashola has been stonewalling on the doctors demands believing that he can blackmail them with the "Hippocratic" oath. |
[quote author=~Bluetooth]abegi jare. . .there is nothing you want to tell me about doctors.If working for government is not ok for you,why not move to the private sector ? So people should continue to die because our doctors are poor abi ? Do you presently force your employer to pay you according to what is obtainable around the world ?[/quote]My current employer pays me what is comensurate with my level as a consultant on conmess. The LASG signed an agreement with the doctors. It should honor it. Embittered folks like you who wonder why doctors should be paid their due remuneration can go and see a roadside mechanic next time they are ill. Typical ill thought meaningless grand gestures that excite foolish Nigerians - the LASG has "sacked" its doctors signalling a collapse of its health system and you morons are busy applauding. . .the reason the LASG did that is because they do not care anything for the so-called masses. After all, should Fashola fall ill today, he's jetting off to Europe for treatment where almost certainly the same Nigerian doctors he 's refused to pay will be part of the health team treating him. But since you serially sodomized sycophants are suffering from Stockholm syndrome, you wouldn't understand that. In any case, it will be interesting to see how you spin it when the LASG climbs down. |
[quote author=~Bluetooth]Btw,why do medical doctors earn more than other health practioners in the health sector ? [/quote]Such a silly question. Next time you fall ill, go and consult a roadside mechanic. It is just such moronic opinions that are egging the LASG on. Let me tell you the next phase: watch as the doctors deploy the "nuclear" option and work becomes grounded in ALL hospitals both state and federal in Lagos; then you will know why doctors earn more all over the world and not just in Nigeria alone. |
[quote author=ekt_bear]Then LASG made the correct decision. They've de-fanged this union that has caused them a lot of trouble, and from what you say will have no difficulty replacing the doctors with ones of comparable quality. Good. Next time one of these unions wants to strike, perhaps they should pause and make sure that they are not overestimating how difficult it will be to replace them.[/quote]Don't believe all you read on NL. No union has been "defanged". We shall all make reference to this thread when the clueless LASG climbs down from this grandstanding designed to impress folks like you. You talk about market forces so I am sure you know the answer to why there are more Nigerian-trained doctors in the US than in Nigeria! |
Eko Ile: About time. Good riddance to bad rubbish. They can all waka to Abuja and let GEJ pay them federal wages.No doubt you will eat your words when Fashola climbs down after his bluff is called. You think you can sack 1000 doctors just like that! Bunch of jokers that call themselves leaders and the sycophants that call themselves followers. |
Pastor AIO: Is this based on religious belief or on Scientific investigation or on some other means?My religious worldview suggests so and science seems to echo that. . .only there is no consensus as to how it will all end. Fire and Ice Some say the world will end in fire, Some say in ice. From what I've tasted of desire I hold with those who favor fire. But if it had to perish twice, I think I know enough of hate To say that for destruction ice Is also great And would suffice. - Robert Frost See Theories About the End of the Universe Perhaps there really is a Restaurant At the End of the Universe. ![]() In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. from The Restaurant at the End of the Universe Pastor AIO: I would question the assertion that time was linear.I shouldn't be surprised at this objection. Some others hold that time is cyclical: Both the Rig Veda and Brahmanda Purana describe a universe that is cyclical or oscillating and infinite in time. The universe is described as a cosmic egg that cycles between expansion and total collapse. It expanded from a concentrated form — a point called a Bindu. The universe, as a living entity, is bound to the perpetual cycle of birth, death, and rebirth. Pastor AIO:An interesting quote that seems at first glance to be dialetically opposed to the Hindu view. Pastor AIO: ps. I'm not sure that I believe the 2nd law of thermodynamics. But let me first look into Shannon's etcWhat are your objections regarding the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics? |
Pastor AIO: The question then is, does the history of the cosmos have a limit to the events that can occur in it, or will History be one day bound to repeat itself.Since the Universe has an end. . .then the history of the cosmos would have a limit to the events that can occur. Time is linear so History in the strictest sense will not repeat itself though certain patterns may recur. Thus we do not expect that at some point in the future we will see Napoleon repeat his famous palindrome "Able was I ere I saw Elba". When we realize that music is order/structure/information encoded or imposed on an unordered set of sounds - Shannon's entropy (an extension of the second law of thermodynamics leads me to conclude that there is a limit to the possible amount of music that can be created. Interestingly this second law in the forms of Gibbs entropy and von Neumann entropy assures that History does not repeat itself. |
luckyCO: Brothers & Sisters!As Stephen lay dying in the book of Acts. . .what was the prayer he addressed to Jesus? The answer to this question tells you those 2 so-called "men of God" are just expressing their opinions. . . Also did Jesus not teach us to pray: "Forgive us our sins as we forgive those who trespass against us"? |
wirinet: Of course there is a finite number of possible or conceivable sounds. First of all sounds are mechanical disturbance of air that our ears are sensitive to. And the human ear is sensitive to a limited range of frequencies, from about 20hz to 20MHz. We cannot perceive lower and higher frequencies.Just the point I 've been trying to pass across --- only you put it across in a clearer way. Thanks. @Deep Sight, refer to wirinet's post for the answers to your questions: Deep Sight: Is there really a finite number of possible or conceivable sounds?Yes, there is. Deep Sight: @ Alethiea: infact, you should probably also address this separately with respect to all sound since you have referred to sound waves, et all. In the day that mankind reaches the "very large number" of all possible sound as you put it: do you think mankind will never be able to create any new sound.Yes there is because there is a limit to the number of sounds the human tongue can produce. Why do you think the different alphabets have a limited number of consonants and vowels? |
Deep Sight: The creation of music rests in combinations. Do you really think that there is a possible limit to to sorts of sounds and combinations thereof possible?Yes. That's the point I made in #4 of my earlier post. Deep Sight: Do you think there are not sorts of sound as yet undiscovered?Not on this earth. |
Deep Sight: Do you think that this places a ceiling on the amount of musincal tunes that could ever be conceived?If you have a number so huge that to the human mind it seems infinite though it is not in actual fact infinite then from a practical perspective, there would appear to be no ceiling. |
Pastor AIO: The only relation to Zeno would be in the mention of an infinitely divisible continuum. Otherwise I am talking about something else entirely.Thanks for the correction. I'm not knowledgeable about music. Wish I'd given more effort and time to studying it when I was younger though. P.S. I googled it. Seems middle C = 261.625565 hertz or 264.298 Hz or 262 Hz or 278.4375 Hz or 256 Hz. No consensus it seems. |
fork adict: OK. Let me tell you a few things wrong with slavery:^ Of course slavery is evil, but not necessarily because of the points you highlighted above which are just the symptoms of man's depraved sinful nature just as the institution of slavery itself is. Simply asking the question --- what is wrong with slavery seems to have triggered an emotional response for a lot of you. ![]() When you treat the underlying problem the symptoms which you have listed will go away. Even in the 21st century, slavery still exists, why hasn't it gone away completely? In answering this question, I hope it will force you to examine closely why slavery existed, and the economic factors that drove it. |
logicboy: Wow, you keep exposing yourself as an arrogant douchebag who knows nothing;I am not defending slavery. Slavery is mentioned in the Bible, just as other things are mentioned in the Bible. There is nothing like biblical slavery, ergo "You were defending biblical slavery = christian apologist" is a false statement. The OT neither affirmed nor condemned slavery. It sets out instructions for slaves to be treated humanely. When Jesus says: Love your neighbour as yourself & do on to others as you would have them do onto you; he clearly addresses the evils of slavery. But being a f[b]oo[/b]l blinded by rage & emotions you didn't see that. Nor pay heed to my earlier exhortation: aletheia: Go and do some thinking and reading, then perhaps you will realize what exactly is wrong with slavery --- and it is not the mutilation or beating that some slaves endure. logicboy: 2) The treatment of slaves is what differentiates a slave and a servant. A slave is not paid or whipped or mutilated etc. "Humane slavery" is an oxymoron and since you mention "humane slavery", you're a slowpoke. What is humane about hard labour without pay or whipping. How can slavery be humane in the first place?^ Fo[b]ol[/b]ish ignorant. When the bible uses the term bondservant? Is it any different from slave. Illogical emotional rantings. So some servants are not beaten, whipped or mutilated by their employers because they are paid. Clearly you are a dunce! What about slaves that rise up to become rulers or married their masters/mistresses? You a poor grasp of economic history. logicboy: 3) The bible says the slave master will be punished only if he kills the slave. Is that a punishment or a loophole for beating a slave? Dont be foolish.I begin to believe that English comprehension skills are not your forte. What is the Biblical prescribed punishment for killing another person unlawfully? Go and read the relevant passages again. logicboy: 4) Both the biblical slavery and Transatlantic slavery were economical as well as racist.Clap for yourself . . . half-baked knowledge is dangerous and has made you heady. Some sought to provide the transatlantic slave trade with racist justification, but it was largely driven by economic interests, first the need for strong mine workers by the Spanish in South America and then as a source of cheap labor in the sugarcane, tobacco and cotton plantations. Have you done your assignment and researched the link between the invention of the Cotton Gin and the American Civil War? The ancient form of slavery did not have this overt racial undertone. The concept of "race" was not prevalent then. All sorts of people could be bound over into slavery not just war captives. By Roman law, a parent could sell his son or daughter into slavery to pay off a debt. Read about the anguish of the Widow of Zarephath in the book of Kings . . . to see the economic system in practice. logicboy: 5) Verse 26 and 27 focus on the hitting the slaves eye and tooth. So that's acceptable to you? You flog the back of your slave, pierce the slave as long as you dont touch the eye or teeth? What difference does that make? You believe in the flogging on the back and legs?Don't be an as[/i]s. Stop going round in circles. Refer to my earlier post: aletheia: Moreover, you dishonest fool are deliberately silent on verses 26 and 27 of the same chapter: which show that the intent and spirit of God's commands do forbid mutilation and force. logicboy: 6) If God is a good God then he would have stopped slavery rather than regulate it. I wouldnt wish slavery on my enemy.He is not obliged to act according to your expectations. While you are it, petition him to abolish today's cut-throat mercantilist economic system that leaves you no better than an indentured servant. logicboy: 7) You are a slavery apologist and a sick, perverse person ![]() Failing to [i]logically make your case . . . you appeal to emotions. Nonsense. There is no God --- you say. Why then does God's condemnation or not of slavery bother you? Why is slavery a bad thing? Your deficient argument is summarized thus: 1) Slavery is bad because some slaves are beaten & mutilated. Unfortunately for you --- one needs not be a slave before being beaten and mutilated. 2) Slavery is bad because slaves are not paid. Quite silly argument because --- your definition of payment is quite narrow. Not all economic exchanges need involve money. The slave works. . .in exchange he is clothed, fed, housed and taken care of when ill. Isn't that basically what he would use any earned money for? 3) Working as a servant is better because servants are paid (really - all servants are paid?) and are not beaten or mutilated (yeah, right - how naive you are) The whole of creation is fallen and lies in darkness. What is important to Jesus is not your foolish man-made economic systems whether Slavery or Modern Capitalism but the redemption of the souls of men. Do you think you are the first foolish ones asking Jesus to condemn things that they think are important to them . . . things such as economic systems, politics, the government of the day etc. There were present at that season some that told him of the Galilaeans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. And Jesus answering said unto them, Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galilaeans, because they suffered such things? I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem? I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. (Luk 13:1-5) The message is clear: Except you repent, you shall all perish. So be there asking about slaves --- some of whom even though dead are far far better off than you because they are indeed alive . . . because Jesus knows them by name. |
Deep Sight: Again, what does this tell us about the nature of reality? ![]() First off: your starting premise is flawed. We can create a whole lot of musical tunes . . . but is it really an infinite number? Pastor AIO says there are an infinite number of gradations between one pitch and another. A Continuum in fact. 1. I think the nature of sound waves belies that. Sound waves are discrete mechanical waves not continuous EM waves, e.g middle C is 256 Hz. They are generated by vibrations propagating through a medium. 2. Not all sound is perceived as music. Indeed what is music to one culture is dissonance to another. Sounds making up music must be arranged in a certain harmonic sequence for them to be perceived as pleasant by the human brain. It can be supposed that this perception is hard-wired into our brains and thus must necessarily limit the ways in which a potential composer would arrange notes into a harmonious melody or else we would all be composers randomly assembling sounds into music. 3. Given the foregoing, we are left with a limited but very very large number of sounds (gogoolplex) and a limited but very very large number of ways (gogoolplex) in which to combine them into music. 4. You cannot generate an infinite amount from a finite amount --- since there is always an upper limit to the number of ways in which finite quantities can be combined (Combinatorial mathematics affirms this). 5. In conclusion: gogoolplex raised to gogoolplex may seem to us infinite but it is still not infinity. I think we use the words infinite/infinity rather loosely, don't you think? Perhaps if you could express pi (or other transcendental numbers) in music . . . |
fork adict: I AM NOT AN ATHEIST. I NEVER WILL BE. NO DISRESPECT TO THOSE WHO ARE.The question I asked is simple: what is wrong with slavery? Na so una dey take fail exam. Can you explain the thought processes wherein you parlayed that question into "So to you. Slavery is so good and there is nothing wrong with slavery right?". I am curious as to how you arrived at that conclusion based on that simple question. |
logicboy: Lol....you think your christian apologist theories amount to an educationChristian apologist theories? And I haven't even quoted one Bible verse yet. Is that what you call what I wrote above? You are more confused than I thought. Wait until I start the apologetics. logicboy: 1) The treamtent of slaves is what is wrong with slavery. No one desrves to work under such conditions (mutilation and beatings)F[b]oo[/b]lish child. So if one practices humane slavery --- without beating or mutilating his slave --- then that's good? Go and do some thinking and reading, then perhaps you will realize what exactly is wrong with slavery --- and it is not the mutilation or beating that some slaves endure. For one who egomaniacally calls himself "logicboy". You are apt to fly off the emotional handle . . . presenting ill thought out & illogical arguments. logicboy: 2) You foolishly believe that slavery over 3000 years ago (in the bible) was much more civilized than 500 years ago. The bible in Exodus allows you to beat a slave as long as he can survive it for 2 days;Clearly we must add critical reading of a passage and understanding it to your educational requirement list. Or is it a question of having poor English reading skills? You ignore the key phrases "he shall be punished". . .which show that he will die for killing another human being. The other key phrase is "since the slave is his own property" which clearly shows that slavery was an economic system of production. Moreover, you dishonest f[b]o[/b]ol are deliberately silent on verses 26 and 27 of the same chapter: which show that the intent and spirit of God's commands do forbid mutilation and force. Slavery was very widespread throughout the Middle East in ancient times. The Israelites simply adopted the custom of their many neighboring cultures. . .just as they adopted the monarchial system. God included regulations to control and limit the practice. Simple logicboy: 3) Nowhere in the bible doe it condemn slavery, it condemns only kidnappers. Slaves came from other cities and tribes. Slavery and kidnapping are twi different things in Jewish times in the bible. Taking people as spoils of war from other cities was accepted and not kidnapping.If it was accepted in their time --- why is that a problem for you. It was an economic system. . .and a means of production. The Bible prescribed rules for it just as it did similarly for other aspects of economic practice. |
[quote author=9-zeros]d*ck head, are u rily a christian? do u knw d consequence of callin some1 a FOOL in d bible?. btw, who told u m an atheist? i hv no religion. jst pray u dnt go to hell, cuz d sinners u smash here wud rily laugh out loud. ur question is 2 lame, plus i dnt play wit boys. oh ma gaud![/quote]^The f[/b]oo[b]l hath said in his heart, There is no God. . .as you implied by writing 'God'. So you have no religion --- what does that make you? Confused. The Way of Jesus Christ is a religion. No body will be laughing in hell. I asked a straightforward question --- and you jumped in with your self-righteous whining. Were you not told to be slow to speak? Now scram or answer the question --- what is wrong with slavery? |
Pastor AIO: Because there are an infinite number of gradations between one pitch and another. A Continuum in fact.Do I detect an echo of Zeno's Achilles & the Tortoise paradox? |
logicboy: You are clearly not OK.Hahaha. . .so what is wrong with slavery is whipping & mutilation? Meaning by your infantile reasoning, those slaves who were not whipped or mutilated, had a good thing going. The education of "logicboy" begins. . . Typical of you poorly educated sort with grandiose delusions of enlightenment. You see slavery and the imagery for you is the transatlantic slave trade and it's associated evils. You ignore the basic fact that slavery is first and foremost an economic system of sinful Man just like Capitalism & Communism which it predates. And like Capitalism & Communism: there are associated ills and evils. The decline of slavery was just a question of time with the advent of the industrial revolution & the advent of mass production techniques. Here is your assignment: Go research the link between the invention of the Cotton Gin and the American Civil War. Furthermore, the Bible condemns in clear terms slavers. . .and prescribes rules that mitigates the baser aspects of slavery. In ancient societies, slaves had well-prescribed legal rights. Your ignorance is compounded by your assumption that all slaves were so because they were seized and sold off into slavery, ignoring the record of history that shows that quite a number were born as slaves or forced into slavery by misfortune. Being ignorant of these facts; you chose to hide behind "whipping, chaining & mutilation". This link will help further your education |
[quote author=9-zeros]oh ma gaud! wat is wrong wit slavery? better go down on ur knees n pray to ur 'God' 4 wisdom. smh.[/quote]Another blithering, blathering emotional f[/b]oo[b]l indulging his lemming-like instinct of following the atheist crowd. Since you know, why don't you answer the question (which is by no means rhetorical): what is wrong with slavery? |
logicboy:For one who calls himself "logicboy". . .your "logic" is terribly deficient. 1. Is it a necessary condition of slavery that slaves gets whipped, chained & mutilated? Answer: NO 2. Do all slaves get whipped, chained & mutilated? Answer: NO 3. Why is it so difficult for you to answer my question in clear, lucid and logical terms --- what is wrong with slavery? 4. You asserted that Jesus is a coward for saying nothing on slavery. . .and yet your own cowardice is revealed by the plain and simple question: what is wrong with slavery?. A direct question which you have assiduously failed to answer while hiding behind emotional bluster. It is ironic "logicboy" that you appeal to emotions. Logic I thought does not require emotions to state it's case. The simple question --- what is wrong with slavery? has revealed your vain empty emotional grandstanding for what it is. Now be man enough to answer the question so that we can proceed with our conversation. . . |
logicboy: Please, let your family get whipped, chained and mutilated.They don't need to be slaves for them to get whipped, chained and mutilated. Your reply is nothing but emotional piffle. Again I ask you quite succinctly: What is wrong with slavery? |
^ Image123 don vex with Pastor Chris. ![]() |
logicboy: 2) Jesus never talked about slavery in the bible like a coward because slavery was all around him.What's wrong with slavery? Jesus didn't talk about slavery. . .so what? |
afam4eva: Who drinks alcohol to get drunk?Plenty people I know of. . .what is your point exactly? |
Avicenna: I was born into a deeply Islamic family. I am regarded as a sort of Alfa in my area. I had my wolimat early so I know all about this. The very concept of Allah is what I do not agree with which I have therefore shunned. One thing I have realized during clinicals,is that cadaver remains cadaver just useful for medical research. I took solace in that their 'soul' is in a better place but the concept of soul itself remains unproven. I no longer believe in a Book that I was forced to accept as the truth. For instance,you quoted parts of the Quran. I do not believe in Allah from whom it came from,so I do not regard it anymore.It probably provides an interesting insight into your conflicted thoughts that you chose for your new handle the name Avicenna - one of the more famous Islamic polymaths and philosophers who himself was a devout Muslim. Are you sure you 've completely made the break from Islam? Concerning the soul. . .the original Avicenna had this to say While he was imprisoned in the castle of Fardajan near Hamadhan, Avicenna wrote his famous "Floating Man" thought experiment to demonstrate human self-awareness and the substantiality and immateriality of the soul. Avicenna believed his "Floating Man" thought experiment demonstrated that the soul is a substance, and claimed humans cannot doubt their own consciousness, even in a situation that prevents all sensory data input. The thought experiment told its readers to imagine themselves created all at once while suspended in the air, isolated from all sensations, which includes no sensory contact with even their own bodies. He argued that, in this scenario, one would still have self-consciousness. Because it is conceivable that a person, suspended in air while cut off from sense experience, would still be capable of determining his own existence, the thought experiment points to the conclusions that the soul is a perfection, independent of the body, and an immaterial substance. The conceivability of this “Floating Man” indicates that the soul is perceived intellectually, which entails the soul’s separateness from the body. Avicenna referred to the living human intelligence, particularly the active intellect, which he believed to be the hypostasis by which God communicates truth to the human mind and imparts order and intelligibility to nature. However, Avicenna posited the brain as the place where reason interacts with sensation. Sensation prepares the soul to receive rational concepts from the universal Agent Intellect. The first knowledge of the flying person would be “I am,” affirming his or her essence. That essence could not be the body, obviously, as the flying person has no sensation. Thus, the knowledge that “I am” is the core of a human being: the soul exists and is self-aware.[40] Avicenna thus concluded that the idea of the self is not logically dependent on any physical thing, and that the soul should not be seen in relative terms, but as a primary given, a substance. The body is unnecessary; in relation to it, the soul is its perfection.[41][42][43] In itself, the soul is an immaterial substance.[44] |
@Image123: How do you reconcile these two posts: Image123: Yeske, OP you deserve to be embarrassed and even slapped by Oyedepo. You're insensitive to the people around you. Image123: The pastor is not the odd one out in his church, he's the leader. In his case, people'd want to copy him not 'embarrass' him. You're a dirty, ordinary jatijati only member na, know your level, lol. Condescend to men of low estate? Ever seen that in your phone Bible?Before the printing press was invented the Bible was written on parchment. Does that mean we should be carrying around the Bible as scrolls of parchment. There is nothing wrong with using a phone. If you make an exception for the pastor, then you should make exception as well for the members. |
pDude: Mtschewww! I almost jumped for joy until I realized it was LiTRES. I initially thought it was barrels.Don't be a blithering i[/b]dio[b]t. You should be more sensible than that. Which filling station pumps up to 2.5 million litres of petrol per diem? do enlighten us. |
[quote author=ekt_bear]How can the guy buying french fries from my burger joint tell me the owner who to appoint? You are the customer. I am the salesman and owner. You are only a "shareholder" in my business in that you buy what I sell. You don't get to dictate who runs the bank unless you put money into it. End of story.[/quote]Your post is couched in half-truths: first off, all 193 members are shareholders in the WB. And then: As of 15 November 2009 the United States held 16.4% of total votes, Japan 7.9%, Germany 4.5%, the United Kingdom 4.3%, and France 4.3%.So you see the other 83.6% can out vote the US except on matters regarding a change of the WB charter. Moreover things are changing as economies such as India and China grow in size: India will have a larger say in the affairs of the World Bank as it has become the seventh largest shareholder in the multilateral lender with 2.91% voting rights.So what do you think will happen when China becomes the world's largest economy? Concerning the structure of the WB: Membership |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (of 82 pages)
[/quote]I have worked in the public sector and I am currently in the private sector in the FCT.
So people should continue to die because our doctors are poor abi ? Do you presently force your employer to pay you according to what is obtainable around the world ?[/quote]My current employer pays me what is comensurate with my level as a consultant on conmess. The LASG signed an agreement with the doctors. It should honor it. Embittered folks like you who wonder why doctors should be paid their due remuneration can go and see a roadside mechanic next time they are ill. 
