BlueAgent's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BlueAgent's Profile › BlueAgent's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 (of 419 pages)
Janosky:In addition to calling Ishmael "the son of the bondwoman", God later referred to Isaac as Abraham's only son: 1. Then He said, "Take now your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you." Genesis 22:2 It is clear that God Himself recognized Isaac as being Abraham's only son. We also see that Paul chose to describe Isaac in the same way that God did. He did this by calling Isaac Abraham's only begotten son: 1. By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received the promises offered up his only begotten son, Hebrews 11:17 So, Paul means what he is saying. Paul describes Isaac as being Abraham's only begotten son because God Himself had pronounced the same thing long before. Ishmael was only an illegitimate seed and not a son. This " unique" Argument is Only Made to support the Trinity Doctrine The example of Abraham, Isaac, and Ishmael is always brought up as the basis for the argument that Jesus cannot be the only-begotten Son of God. However, we have seen that God Himself never calls Ishmael Abraham's son. Instead, He calls Ishmael the son of the bondwoman but when God talks to Abraham, He calls Isaac Abraham's only son (Genesis 22:2). The only reason for having the argument, that "only-begotten " means "unique " in the case of Jesus, is this: Theologians want to do away with the understanding that Jesus actually is the Son of God, that He came out of His Father, because it goes against the doctrine of the Trinity. Since they argue that Isaac was not Abraham's only son, they then urge that Jesus cannot be God's only Son because the same Greek word is used to describe both Jesus and Isaac. There is no reason to resort to changing an obvious meaning of a word. The most direct and obvious meaning of "monogene " is ONLY-generated , only-begotten , Only-born , the sole or only begotten child . as we discussed earlier. It does not mean "unique" at all. But it means "mono" = only and " gene" = generated or begotten . There are other examples of the "only-begotten" word that is translated correctly and everyone agrees with the translation: And when He came near the gate of the city, behold, a dead man was being carried out, the only son of his mother; and she was a widow. And a large crowd from the city was with her. Luke 7:12 for he had an only daughter about twelve years of age, and she was dying. But as He went, the multitudes thronged Him. Luke 8:42 Suddenly a man from the multitude cried out, saying, "Teacher, I implore You, look on my son, for he is my only child ". Luke 9:38 Since these examples describe normal family and human existence; The begotten aspect of how the child came to be is automatically assumed even by the reader. The "begotten" meaning is an actual part of the sentence whether the word is present or not. But in the case of Jesus, the begotten aspect had to be spelled out to make it clear how Jesus began, according to the actual meaning of the word. In each of these three examples, it is an only-begotten son, daughter, or child. The argument is never made by these same theologians that it actually should be translated as a unique son, daughter, or child. Only when the word is used in connection with Jesus do they start to object! So, the argument that Isaac is only a unique son, is definitely not strong enough to warrant a change in our understanding of a basic Greek word. The absurdity of this argument is especially obvious when we consider that even God considered Isaac to be Abraham's only son and He pronounced him as such. Paul was only saying what God had said long before! The most obvious, direct, and simple meaning of the Greek text, using the actual meaning of the words, tells us that Jesus is indeed the only begotten Son of God! It is a very simple translation and there is an obvious meaning to the word! There is no mystery about it. Their presupposition or assumption that the Trinity doctrine is correct has forced them to make this poor argument. It is only because of the Trinity doctrine that this debate is even tried as an argument. They simply do not want Jesus to be the only- begotten Son of God because He can not actually be begotten within the Trinity concept. A Small Study into the Greek Word for "Only Begotten" Let's look at an interlinear Bible to begin our search: (This wonderful online interlinear Bible is found at: http:// www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/NTpdf/joh3.pdf ) In the Online Interlinear Bible we see that "monogene " means ONLY-generated or only-begotten . So, we see that in the verse, Jesus is described as the only begotten Son of God. This is the most direct meaning of the text using the actual meaning of the word. Let's look into the words a bit more deeply: Strongs # 3439 monogene mon-og-en-ace - comes from Strongs # 3441 "Mono " and Strongs # 1096 "ginomai " "Mono " which is often translated "alone" or "only ". The Scriptural use of this word is very obvious. "Mono " is the prefix for "one" or "only ". English examples would be: mono chrome (one color), mono tone ( one tone) and mono gamy (one spouse at one time). "gene " comes from "ginomai " It is a prolongation and middle voice form of a primary verb; ' to cause to be' (" gen"-erate) i.e. reflexively to become (come into being)" (see The New Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, New Strong's Concise Dictionary of the words in the Greek Testament, page 19). So, "gene" can mean: come , become, made , fulfilled , be (come), be ( brought to pass ). When we put the words together " monogene " means: "the only one that has come to pass " or, "the only one who has been brought to pass " or " the only one to come into being". "monogene " is also known to be associated within the context of a birth. So when we see Strongs definition it makes good sense: In Strong's Concordance, #3439 "monogene " from 3441 and 1096; means Only-born , i.e. sole - only (begotten , child ) (James Strong, LL.D., S.T.D., The New Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, New Strong's Concise Dictionary of the words in the Greek Testament, page 59) In the Thayer's Lexicon, "monogene " means unigenitus, single of its kind, or only . It is used of only sons or daughters when viewed in relation to their parents . (Joseph Henry Thayer, D.D., The New Thayer's Greek - English Lexicon of the New Testament, page 417) In the New Englishman's Greek Concordance, we can see where "monogene " is found in the Bible and how it is used. The New Englishman's Greek Concordance and Lexicon by Jay P. Green, Sr., page 579) Luke 7:12 - the only son of his mother, Luke 8:42 - For he had one only daughter, Luke 9:38 - for he is mine only child . Heb 11:17 - (Abraham) . . .offered up his only begotten (son) John 1:14 - as of the only begotten of the Father, John 1:18 - the only begotten Son, which is John 3:16 - his only begotten Son, that whosoever John 3:18 - of the only begotten Son of God 1 John - 4:9 - God sent his only begotten Son This agrees with what we saw from the Online Interlinear Bible: ONLY-generated or only-begotten So, it is clear what "monogene " actually means. It follows what we found in both the Strongs Concordance and the interlinear Bible I have above: ONLY-generated , only- begotten , Only-born , the sole or only begotten child . "monogene " is a well known Greek word. It is not rare and vague; There is a simple meaning to the word. In the example of Jesus, it is only because of the Trinity objection that this debate is even tried as an argument, throwing the word into question. As a result, they have tried to redefine the word to something that would agree with the trinity doctrine. |
Janosky:But No Angel ever received praise or worship or ever forgive sin but Jesus did. 1. But when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says: "Let all the angels of God worship Him ." Hebrews 1:6 Matthew 9:2 And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy; Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee. Matthew 9:5 For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk? Mark 2:5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee. Then he said, "Lord, I believe!" And he worshiped him (John 9:38 |
Janosky:But No Angel ever received praise or worship or ever forgive sin but Jesus did. 1. But when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says: "Let all the angels of God worship Him ." Hebrews 1:6 Matthew 9:2 And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy; Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee. Matthew 9:5 For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk? Mark 2:5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee. Then he said, "Lord, I believe!" And he worshiped him (John 9:38 |
Janosky:But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son , born of a woman, born under the law, Galatians 4:4 Am still wondering while this Bible verse did not say God sent an Angel born of a woman considering the fact that Angels are also called Sons of God. Consider this Bible verses they all call Jesus God. Philippians 2:6 Who, being in the FORM of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: Philippians 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God. 1. For unto us a Child is born , Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful , Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Isaiah 9:6 Hebrews 1:7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire. 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. 1:9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. |
okosunehis:1. "In that day you will ask in My name, and I do not say to you that I shall pray the Father for you; 2. "for the Father Himself loves you, because you have loved Me, and have believed that I came forth from God . 3. "I came forth from the Father and have come into the world. Again, I leave the world and go to the Father." John 16:26-28 The words came forth and came out are not idioms The phrase "came forth " is translated from the Greek word: ("exerchomai " Strongs # 1831) which means to "issued forth " or to have " issued from". Jesus issued forth from the Father. In the next verse, "proceeded forth " also comes from the same Greek word. The next Scripture is very interesting. In verse 41, the leaders decided to push their point by saying that they were not illegitimate like Jesus was. Thus they were saying Jesus was Illegitimate! In response, Jesus expanded His message by telling them where He actually came from. So, Jesus told them that He was not illegitimate at all. He proceeded forth from God! Christ told them: If God were their father, they would love Him because He came out of the Father, and He came from God, who sent Him into the world. Jesus was speaking very plainly, telling them where He came from, yet it was as if they had not heard Him: 1. "You do the deeds of your father." Then they said to Him, "We were not born of fornication; we have one Father--God." 2. Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God ; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me . 3. "Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. John 8:41-43 Jesus said He came forth from God when He was accused of being illegitimate. So it is clear that Jesus was speaking of His original birth from the Creator. Jesus is not illegitimate! In this and the next Scripture we find that Jesus spoke of two different events. 1) He proceeded forth or He came forth from God and, 2) He came into the world (God sent Him). The text is not just a fancy way to describe His coming to the earth twice. But rather, Jesus was saying that He proceeded forth from God and He also came from God who sent Him to the earth. 1. "Now they have known that all things which You have given Me are from You. 2. "For I have given to them the words which You have given Me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came forth from You; and they have believed that You sent Me. John 17:7-8 Christ's followers knew that Jesus came forth from God and they also believed that God had sent Him to the earth. Since He was the only begotten Son of God, Jesus was actually composed out of the "stuff" of God! He was in the form of God! 1. Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus , 2. who, being in the form of God , did not consider it robbery to be equal with God , Philippians 2:5-6 Jesus came forth from His Father in the form of God. |
Janosky:1. "In that day you will ask in My name, and I do not say to you that I shall pray the Father for you; 2. "for the Father Himself loves you, because you have loved Me, and have believed that I came forth from God . 3. "I came forth from the Father and have come into the world. Again, I leave the world and go to the Father." John 16:26-28. You can never hid the truth for too long. The words came forth and came out are not idioms The phrase "came forth " is translated from the Greek word: ("exerchomai " Strongs # 1831) which means to "issued forth " or to have " issued from". Jesus issued forth from the Father. In the next verse, "proceeded forth " also comes from the same Greek word. The next Scripture is very interesting. In verse 41, the leaders decided to push their point by saying that they were not illegitimate like Jesus was. Thus they were saying Jesus was Illegitimate! In response, Jesus expanded His message by telling them where He actually came from. So, Jesus told them that He was not illegitimate at all. He proceeded forth from God! Christ told them: If God were their father, they would love Him because He came out of the Father, and He came from God, who sent Him into the world. Jesus was speaking very plainly, telling them where He came from, yet it was as if they had not heard Him: 1. "You do the deeds of your father." Then they said to Him, "We were not born of fornication; we have one Father--God." 2. Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God ; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me . 3. "Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. John 8:41-43 Jesus said He came forth from God when He was accused of being illegitimate. So it is clear that Jesus was speaking of His original birth from the Creator. Jesus is not illegitimate! In this and the next Scripture we find that Jesus spoke of two different events. 1) He proceeded forth or He came forth from God and, 2) He came into the world (God sent Him). The text is not just a fancy way to describe His coming to the earth twice. But rather, Jesus was saying that He proceeded forth from God and He also came from God who sent Him to the earth. 1. "Now they have known that all things which You have given Me are from You. 2. "For I have given to them the words which You have given Me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came forth from You; and they have believed that You sent Me. John 17:7-8 Christ's followers knew that Jesus came forth from God and they also believed that God had sent Him to the earth. Since He was the only begotten Son of God, Jesus was actually composed out of the "stuff" of God! He was in the form of God! 1. Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus , 2. who, being in the form of God , did not consider it robbery to be equal with God , Philippians 2:5-6 Jesus came forth from His Father in the form of God. |
okosunehis:Like I said before I can barely disagree with you. where I have concerns is where people( Jehovah Witness) equate Jesus to Angels and claim he is not the literal Son of God but that he is Son of God like every other created being man and Angels. But this is contrary to the word of God that says Jesus is the express image of God, who has the fullness of the Godhead(divinity) dwelling in him and that he Came forth or come out from his father. note the came forth and came out are not Idioms. |
Janosky:Jesus is the literal son of God. In Proverbs we find special mention of God's Son. 1. Who has ascended into heaven, or descended? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has bound the waters in a garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His name , and what is His Son's name , If you know? Proverbs 30:4 Who is it that has made the earth? And who is it that has gone into heaven and come back. He has the wind in His fists and waters in a garment. God has done all these things. It is God who has created all things. Now who is His Son? Yes mention of God's Son is here in the book of Proverbs. What part did the Son play in the creation of all things. 1. All things were made through Him [Jesus] , and without Him nothing was made that was made . John 1:3 1. God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, 2. has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds; Hebrews 1:1-2. 1. By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God , so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible. Hebrews 11:3 |
Maximus69:You are not a seeker of truth, you are only interested in meeting your Church beliefs and expectations 2 Timothy 2:15 Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. What makes you a fellower of Christ and God is not a feel good attitude or feeling, but the word and teaching of God. John 8:31-32 1 To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. 32 Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” |
Janosky:1. "In that day you will ask in My name, and I do not say to you that I shall pray the Father for you; 2. "for the Father Himself loves you, because you have loved Me, and have believed that I came forth from God . 3. "I came forth from the Father and have come into the world. Again, I leave the world and go to the Father." John 16:26-28. You can never hid the truth for too long. The words came forth and came out are not idioms The phrase "came forth " is translated from the Greek word: ("exerchomai " Strongs # 1831) which means to "issued forth " or to have " issued from". Jesus issued forth from the Father. In the next verse, "proceeded forth " also comes from the same Greek word. The next Scripture is very interesting. In verse 41, the leaders decided to push their point by saying that they were not illegitimate like Jesus was. Thus they were saying Jesus was Illegitimate! In response, Jesus expanded His message by telling them where He actually came from. So, Jesus told them that He was not illegitimate at all. He proceeded forth from God! Christ told them: If God were their father, they would love Him because He came out of the Father, and He came from God, who sent Him into the world. Jesus was speaking very plainly, telling them where He came from, yet it was as if they had not heard Him: 1. "You do the deeds of your father." Then they said to Him, "We were not born of fornication; we have one Father--God." 2. Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God ; nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me . 3. "Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. John 8:41-43 Jesus said He came forth from God when He was accused of being illegitimate. So it is clear that Jesus was speaking of His original birth from the Creator. Jesus is not illegitimate! In this and the next Scripture we find that Jesus spoke of two different events. 1) He proceeded forth or He came forth from God and, 2) He came into the world (God sent Him). The text is not just a fancy way to describe His coming to the earth twice. But rather, Jesus was saying that He proceeded forth from God and He also came from God who sent Him to the earth. 1. "Now they have known that all things which You have given Me are from You. 2. "For I have given to them the words which You have given Me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came forth from You; and they have believed that You sent Me. John 17:7-8 Christ's followers knew that Jesus came forth from God and they also believed that God had sent Him to the earth. Since He was the only begotten Son of God, Jesus was actually composed out of the "stuff" of God! He was in the form of God! 1. Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus , 2. who, being in the form of God , did not consider it robbery to be equal with God , Philippians 2:5-6 Jesus came forth from His Father in the form of God. |
Janosky:You keep contractdicting yourself none of this Bible verses means what you intend it to mean if nothing else they expose your lie that Begotten means firsts. E.g By faith Abraham, when God tested him, offered Isaac as a sacrifice. He who had embraced the promises was about to sacrifice his one and only son, But we know that Isaac was not the first son of Abraham, it was Ishmael who was the first son of Abraham. Rather than mean the First Son the word 'Begotten' means Isaac was the legitimate official Son of Abraham. In that same vain Jesus is the legitimate official unique special and beloved Son of God. Just like Isaac was recognized as Abraham's only begotten son despite him having Ishmael because Isaac was a child of convenant who was Begotten by Abraham. So also Jesus is recognized as the only Begotten Son of God despite God having trillions of Angels and Man that are also called Sons of God. It grieved Abraham to scarifice his Son to God, so also it grieved the heart of God to give his only Begotten son as a scarifice for humanity. 1. In this the love of God was manifested toward us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through Him. 1 John 4:9 |
Janosky:So we're is it written that First means to be begotton in the dictionary meaning? |
Janosky:You like to digress from the arguments at stake, instead answering questions with straight answers you are looking for loop holes were there are none |
Janosky:Where is the trinitarians claim? the Bible is clear on this matter that God is the father of Jesus who beget him and God through Jesus created all things. We are made to know that all things where created by Jesus and without him nothing was ever created. It is your responsibility to prove to us how Jesus is a created being and yet God's word tells us that all power and principalities were made by Jesus and without him no power or principalities was made. Stop quoting Dr Geisler's his word does not count if it contradicts God's word. |
Janosky:John 1:3 contains two direct statements that tell us that it was the preexistent Jesus who created all things. “All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.” Notice that John is not content to say only that all things were made through Him, but John adds the fact that “without Him nothing was made.” Paul confirms exactly what John wrote: “For by Him all things were created.” Paul goes on to make sure that we understand what he means by all things—”that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him” (Colossians 1:16). Since Jesus created all things, He could not have been one of the “created things.” Paul then adds, so there can be no mistake, “He is before all things, and in him all things hold together” (Colossians 1:17 , NIV). Dr. Norman Geisler comments: “The context of this passage makes it clear that there are no exceptions; Christ is the Creator of all things including angels and everything visible or invisible. Nowhere is this made more clear that Christ is not a creature—angelic or otherwise—than in the relation of angels to Him. Since Christ could not be both the Creator of everything and at the same time a creature Himself, it is necessary to conclude that He is Himself the uncreated Creator of all creation” ( Christian Apologetics, 1988, p. 338). He adds a footnote: “In view of the clear teaching that Christ is Creator and not a creature, the Arian misinterpretations of phrases like Christ is ‘firstborn’ (Colossians 1:15 ) or ‘beginning of creation’ (Revelation 3:14) are wrong. Christ is ‘firstborn’ in the sense of being the unique (not created) Son of God. Christ is first over creation, not first in it” (ibid.). Micah 5:2 stated that the messianic King to come was “from everlasting.” Jesus had appeared in His divine life before His human birth as the priest-king Melchizedek (see Hebrews 7), “having neither beginning of days nor end of life” (Micah 5:3). |
Janosky:You mean that God so loved the World that he gave us an Angel posing as a son. 1. "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son , that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16. |
Janosky:Is Jesus Created? Is Jesus God, a divine being, or is He a created being? Some people believe that Jesus is actually a part of God's creation and that Colossians 1:15 supports the idea that Jesus is just a created being. Is that true? Is Jesus really a created being or is Jesus in fact a divine being? 1. Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature : Colossians 1:15 KJV When we read this text, the words that are used in the King James Bible make it sound like Paul is calling Jesus a created being: " the firstborn of every creature". So, when he says Jesus was the firstborn of every creature, is Paul really saying that Jesus was the first one to be created? Lets look into this question. When we start to look around at other versions of the Bible we can see that there is another way to understand what Paul is saying. New King James Version New International Version New English Bible The Revised English Bible New Century Version Phillips Goodspeed 15. He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. Colossians 1:15 15. He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. Colossians 1:15 15. He is the image of the invisible God; his is the primacy over all created things. Colossians 1:15 15. He is the image of the invisible God; his is the primacy over all creation . Colossians 1:15 15. No one can see God, but Jesus Christ is exactly like him. He ranks higher than everything that has been made. Colossians 1:15 15. Now Christ is the visible expression of the invisible God. He existed before creation began . Colossians 1:15 15. He is a likeness of the unseen God, born before any creature, Colossians 1:15 Instead of saying that Jesus was the first created being; Paul could be saying that Jesus is over all creation, that He existed before creation began. Does Jesus rank higher than any created being that has ever been made? Lets look at the next verse to see which interpretation might be correct. 1. He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation . 2. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth , visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. Colossians 1:15-16. NKJV |
Janosky:In the Book of Revelation Jesus is called the beginning of the creation of God. To the angel of the church in Laodicea write: the amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God, says this (Revelation 3:14 ). This verse has been used to say that Jesus was a created being. Jesus Is The Origin Of God's Creation The word translated "beginning" can also have the meaning of "origin." This idea is that the creation of all things originated with Jesus. He is the source of creation. Summary Jesus is called the beginning of God's creation. This does not mean that he is a created being. It refers to the fact that he is the origin of God's creation - he is the one who originated the creation process. |
Janosky:beget verb be·get | \ bi-ˈget , bē-\ begot\ bi-ˈgät , bē- \ also begat \ bi-ˈgat , bē- \ ; begotten \ bi-ˈgä-tᵊn , bē- \ or begot ; begetting Definition of beget transitive verb 1 : to procreate as the father : SIRE // He died without begetting an heir. 2 : to produce especially as an effect or outgrowth // Violence only begets more violence. Other Words from beget Synonyms More Example Sentences Learn More about beget Keep scrolling for more Other Words from beget begetter noun Synonyms for beget Synonyms breed, bring, bring about , bring on, catalyze, cause , create , do, draw on, effect, effectuate, engender, generate, induce , invoke , make, occasion , produce, prompt , result (in) , spawn , translate (into) , work , yield Visit the Thesaurus for More |
Janosky:I guess they are all first born in this Bible verses according to your meaning of beget? Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5 And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7 And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; |
Janosky:when did dictionary start defining Begotten as first Son or Daughter ? Was Isaac Abraham's first Child? but the Bible says he was BEGOTTEN by Abraham. No we're in the Bible is Begotten referred to as been the first child of someone if that be the case the Bible would not have told us that Jesus was the First showing that he was first among many others that were Begotten. Where in the Bible are Angels call God or are said to be in the FORM(class,nature, species) of God? |
Janosky:Keep confusing yourself. Israelites are living beings so the word beget or born means to bear or create. But in the case of Jesus God himself told us that Jesus is his son Begotten by him and that Jesus is called God and should also be worshipped, here we have more than enough evidence to prove that Jesus was BEGOTTEN by God. |
Janosky:So using your logic Abraham did not beget Isaac? Matthew 1:2-17 2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; I guess the word beget there is an Idiom |
Janosky:That's false because the Bible does not allow us to make our on interpretation of words. The word come out and come forth are not Idioms. When we allow the Bible to explain itself we will see that God beget Jesus that explains why Jesus is called God and has God's nature . The word begat sheds more light on the word come out and come forth that it means every single latter of what it means You think God is a man that needs a woman and man to meet for them to bear children? that's naivety for one to limit God by using human understanding. If God could create and design Amoeba and plants like plantains and bannana that reproduce through ASexual reproduction , that is they do not need a mate to reproduce than why is it impossible for God to procreate without a spouse? https://sciencing.com/amoeba-reproduce-10005613.html |
solite3:Even beyond the question of scriptural support, we must ask the question of precisely what the doctrine of the Trinity means. Christians say that their religion is not polytheistic, that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are not three separate gods but are in some way all the same being. But if this is the case, then what is it that makes the Christian god a trinity? In what way are the three distinct while at the same time remaining one? The difference is not one of presence or extent; all three members of the Trinity are believed by Christians to be omnipresent. The difference is not one of power; Christians believe all members of the Trinity to be omnipotent. Nor is the difference one of knowledge; Christians believe all members of the Trinity to be omniscient. But what else can be the source of the distinction? Do the members of the Trinity have separate consciousnesses, so that their thoughts are different from each other? Do they have separate wills, so that their desires and preferences differ? If neither is the case, then in what sense are they distinct? This is the fundamental paradox of the Trinity. If the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit have separate consciousnesses or desires, then they are each separate gods, and there is no sense in which they are the same being. In that case, Christianity is polytheistic. But on the other hand, if the Son and the Holy Spirit have no separate consciousness or will from the Father, then they have no independent existence at all – they are merely instruments or tools through which God works to accomplish his will. One would not call a carpenter’s hammer a carpenter in and of itself, nor would one say that the carpenter was the same as his hammer. In this case, if the members of the Trinity have no separate consciousness, will or desires, then there is no Trinity at all – the whole doctrine is essentially just a convoluted way for God to talk to himself. Either way, the resolution is the same: the Christian divinity can be either one or three, but not both at the same time. When trying to explain the meaning of the Trinity, Christian theologians often speak of it as a divine mystery that lies beyond full human comprehension. If this is true, it is strange that God, if he wanted us to understand and relate to him, would create us in such a way that a fundamental aspect of his nature would lie forever beyond our grasp. But a more important objection to such claims is this: If a claim is labeled beyond our ability to understand, then how are we supposed to tell if it is true? What assurance do theists have that the Trinity is a true fact about the world that is genuinely beyond our ability to comprehend, as opposed to a false claim invented by people whose illogical nature is protected from scrutiny by labeling it a mystery we aren’t intended to understand? But of course, there is no such assurance. The Trinity, if it is to be believed, must be believed purely on the basis of faith. And this is what i find unacceptable. Like other religious doctrines, the Trinity bears all the hallmarks of an idea invented by men – men who could not come up with perfect solutions to the logical problems in the system they had created, and so instead tried to paper over those problems, to prevent people from examining them too closely, by warning others in advance that this is something they should not expect to make sense. Such irrationality should be rejected by all thinking minds; it has never brought us anything of benefit. The light of reason points the way to a better path, if only we are willing to follow it. |
Seamtri:You dey mind the clown. |
Kennyswagz1:Very dumb race. |
Ugwuoke347:True. but what is ideal is different from what is real. |
isthatso:On point. |
isthatso:Gbam!!!!! Guy I owe you two bottles. |
oglalasioux:True. |
subcbouy:I Concur. Success has many friends. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 (of 419 pages)
.