Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 4:48pm On Mar 24, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: Buda, below is what I wanted ODB to tell you, because he was there. I wrote it to deepsight on Feb 16 on my last thread (Einstein):
As for cogito, I was expecting you to ask how when I told you it was disproved but you kept mute. It was proved wrong not long after Descartes expounded it. Here goes. [b]You can't prove the existence of something by starting with the assumption that the thing already exists. Thus the statement should be: "There is thinking therefore I am", which of course doesn't make any sense.[/b] Descartes assumed his own existence by using the word "I". And that is a flaw in his argument, since it shows he couldn't actually doubt his own existence. But explain to me how and why you keep promoting this Descartes nonsense here if you know it was flawed and had been proven wrong as we've repeatedly argued it was. I've made it bold so you can't ignore it as you ignore all questions you are asked. |
Sports › Re: FORMULA ONE F1 Official SeasonThread - Revamped by budaatum: 6:35am On Mar 24, 2024 |
Carlos Forza!
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 1:19am On Mar 24, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: Bwahaha my ass. I clearly said from beginning that Descartes assumed solipsism to write - he doubted everything he could possibly doubt including his own existence. Then concluded falaciously that thinking meant he existed. This is precisely what we've been trying to inform you, yet you keep yelling Descartes, but go even worse than he does by claiming you are only sure you think. And when we ask you who this particular entity called you that thinks is, you go blind and don't see the question.
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 4:45pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
You are way too sold on Descartes, who's doubting was to prove the existence of a God, which it seems he did not bother to doubt too much despite having no evidence for the existence of his god, and which shows you are just beginning the journey of understanding your own existence. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain is a 1994 book by neuroscientist António Damásio. I've included a pdf link so you have no excuse not to get a copy and read it. https://archive.org/details/antonio-damasio-descartes-error |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 4:28pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: Once again, the ONLY thing we are SURE exists is thinking...... Who or what is it that thinks your thought above if you do not exist to think it? Who or what is it that thinks my thoughts that differ to what you think if I did not exist to think it and write it for you to read and think about? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 4:19pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: See below By the way, your entire argument is based on dishonesty, and finger pointing to evade your own actions of repeatedly insulting and avoiding answering questions you know point out the flaws in your position. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 4:11pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: See below Your argument is that you are not certainly sure that you exist. And that despite the fact that you must have woken up somewhere today, and eaten today and have relatives and friends and neighbours who must have communicated with you today, and have people you call mummy and daddy and who call you their child. So, kindly explain the point of further explaining to you that you must exist just to respond to this post. And would you also claim not to know for sure if the children you go on to have exist or not? |
Family › Re: It Is Devilish And Outrightly Wicked To Request A DNA Test From Your Wife. by budaatum: 3:16pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
FRANCISTOWN: The context of the poor in you statement is what I don't understand. And I can't relate because I'm heavily guarded both financially and intellectually. Well, I'm very poor when it comes to relationship intelligence.
BTW, I'm failing to see the point in the link you shared. Was it to validate that all women are capable of paternity fraud if not put in check? It is poor to think all women or men behave the same. |
Family › Re: It Is Devilish And Outrightly Wicked To Request A DNA Test From Your Wife. by budaatum: 2:55pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
FRANCISTOWN: You didn't get the drills in that statement, did ya? Lemme tell ya something. There is no faithfulness without free will. A prisoner doesn't have much opportunities.
I can do whatever I like with my body. Now, me keeping that body for one person is where faithfulness is.
She on the other hand can do whatever she likes with her body. She keeping that body just for me is where faithfulness lies.
What I'm saying is. I have many important and useful things to do with this my small head than worry about what a woman decides to do with her own body. Emphasis on "own".
If she decided to sleep around with her body. Then it's a no offense, very much obliged. The day her cover blows is the day she becomes one of my pleasure pack, I won't even let her know her cover is blown. But I'm sure she'll be the only one left in the relationship, yet I'd still be very active in the drillship until she realizes that her time and body is wasting.
I have a god-complex personality. Anything that'd make me beg in a relationship isn't something I'd do. Therefore, you can never catch me cheating.
I'll not even contend or struggle with you. Give the child to whoever you wanna give it to. Since I come from the family of Caesar. No matter where you are in any part of the world. You have less than 5years to return the child to where they actually belong. That's if you are not dead by then. Funny enough, the exact scenario happened to me once.
Anyways! I hope guys can see that women always want to pull a fast one on guys. You are not different from the rest. You poor mans, thinking all women are the same. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/26872615/geremi-divorce-dna-test-wife-kids/
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! by budaatum: 2:24pm On Mar 23, 2024*. Modified: 3:40pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
budaatum: Please explain why any time should be wasted on you and your magakraken lies. basilico: Seems like your memory is like that of Chicken. Backtrack to see what you wrote then vis-a-vis my opinions
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 2:18pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
LordReed: Bwahahahahaha! Once again more shallow stupidity from the perennial dumbarse. You went shopping on Quora but failed to actually comprehend the substance of what is being discussed. I think it must be concluded that he thinks his senses can not be used to verify what he reads or even if his senses exist at all, my Lord. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! by budaatum: 2:14pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
Please explain why any time should be wasted on you and your magakraken lies. basilico: Are you a johnny -come-lately. For months on end I kept putting up data about how Ivermectin knocked out covid in India, Brazil etc where it was prescribed. Budaatum led the choir in denying the data from CDC and FDA websites. FDA were lying about Ivermectin's ability to reduce mortality. They had Budaatum types to silence those who were pushing for IVM and HCl .Plus Ibime and wirinet. They faucci group wanted no drugs at all because the vax would never have been approved. Faucci lied,people died, big pharma made hundreds of billions from the vaccine. Search basilico+ Uttar Pradesh here . Your jaw will drop at the Insanity of Budaatum. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 2:09pm On Mar 23, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: So if you die in a dream and put in a box, you'll no longer wake up??
You don't need to prove anything, it simply underscores the fact you don't know what this reality.realy is This is just plain stupid and a waste of time. |
Romance › Re: Most Ladies Don't Know What They Want by budaatum: 4:07am On Mar 23, 2024 |
Goalnaldo: Dey play 😂 somebody that won't eat at home when we have issues. Yesterday night their made called to tell me she slept off without eating looking at my picture on her phone She blocked you on WhatsApp according to you, so I guess you can now date "their made". |
Romance › Re: Most Ladies Don't Know What They Want by budaatum: 4:01am On Mar 23, 2024 |
She obviously knows she does not want you.
|
Culture › Re: Short History Of Ifon Osun In Osun State by budaatum: 3:50am On Mar 23, 2024 |
|
Family › Re: It Is Devilish And Outrightly Wicked To Request A DNA Test From Your Wife. by budaatum: 2:30am On Mar 23, 2024 |
FRANCISTOWN: I always tell my girls that we are all free individuals, and everyone is free to do whatever they want with their body so, I find it useless to check my partner's phone, or worry about whether she's cheating or lying. And pray tell why I'd let you fuq me please, when you are a free individual who is free to fuq your diq in any hole? Don't you think I value myself enough to not have you poke that diq in me since I don't know where you've been poking it and what diseases you might have picked up with it? But here you are thinking you'd have no regard for your own health not to talk of mine, and then think the opportunity would arise whereby I'd get pregnant and you'd be the person I'd want to give it to, when the truth is more likely that the pregnancy, if any, is likely yours but I'm giving it to a better man than you are because he respects himself and me more. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 2:20am On Mar 23, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: Remember we are talking about true nature of reality. You have No WAY of independently verifying what your senses tell you about it. So, you can't independently verify what your senses tell you about the true nature of the cars approaching the busy road you are about to cross? I'm just glad not everyone uses their senses as little as you do or there'd be plenty more road killed. PoliteActivist: Some people say this reality is a dream - you wake up when you die. You have NO WAY of proving them wrong. I don't need to prove them wrong, just as I don't need to prove you wrong. What I don't need do is buy into their ignorance and stupidity to think I'd wake up when put in a box and stuck deep in the ground when dead. And I definitely would not be combining my resource with such fools on any project or venture. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 2:07am On Mar 23, 2024 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 12:00am On Mar 23, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: Are you now firmly convinced your senses could be lying to you, or you still think they are infallible? No one is claiming their senses are infallible! That's why one would ask and knock and seek instead of merely believing the first thing one observes or is told, so as not to be lied to or lie to oneself. But I suppose you might be the sort who crosses the road after your senses have lied to you that there is no car coming after it has lied to you that you don't exist. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 11:52pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
I guess one must accept that you do not know how to use your senses, and you assume everyone must be lazy and as incompetent as you are because that must justify your lack of effort to learn to use your senses. PoliteActivist: Bottom line: we are not CERTAIN what we experience through our senses is true. And we cannot tell for SURE when our senses are correctly reporting the way things really are and when they are not. The reverse is also true: our senses may refuse to perceive a given reality for whatever reason - you simply subconsciously refuse to see or feel it. OR the brain is too busy doing other things right then - example, people injured in battle or sports don't feel any pain from their injuries until afterwards.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! by budaatum: 8:45pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
basilico: Hahaha. Wapo is you ur credible source. Anyway she is stupid yo try this. Go Marjorie!
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 8:35pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: It is actually your senses. You rely on them to tell you what's going on. If they tell you there is a fat man when there's not, they deceived you No, I do not rely on my senses to tell me what is going on. My senses merely perceive, while my mind is used by me to interpret what my senses perceive. There's no way my senses can perceive a fat man that is not there, because my mind will tell my senses to look again to confirm. But if your senses work that way and perceive fat men that are not there, be a Ferrari salesperson so your senses can tell you to exchange a real actual brand new red Ferrari for the imaginary million pounds in my imaginary bank account that are both not there please. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! by budaatum: 7:50pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
You must be the last one to figure out what most already knew.
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 7:48pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: Wow! This is becoming rather childish. You are the only adult I know who doesn't know your senses can EASILY deceive you. What do you think make magic tricks possible?? It is not your senses that deceive you when a magic trick works, but your actual lack of knowledge of the trick, and you not developing your senses, and the trickers ability to misinform your underdeveloped senses. What makes magic tricks possible is the knowledge the tricker has, and your own ignorance. If you were not ignorant and instead knew how a magic trick works you'd find you wouldn't be tricked by magic. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! by budaatum: 7:36pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
Go Greene! File to vacate Johnson please.
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 6:32pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: I'm really surprised you can't grasp this simple concept: something needn't actually happen for you to perceive it happened! I think it is English that is your problem. If one claims to be perceiving something that is not actually happening, would you not say that person is stupid and tripping and maybe high on bad weed or just plain lying? if I perceive, as in register with my own senses something actually happening, then something must actually be happening for me to perceive it. For example, if I perceive, as in register with my senses, a boxing match where an ant is beating Anthony Joshua, then that ant must actually be beating Anthony Joshua for me to be perceiving it. Now, that doesn't mean that anything you claim you perceive actually happened, because you have admitted that you don't know how to use your senses and you just might be lying or tripping, while I don't create imaginary crap in my own head and claim I perceived it when I couldn't possibly have perceived it. PoliteActivist: In The Matrix thoughts were fed to a person hooked to a machine and he was living a full life - but in reality he was hooked to a machine, non of it was actually happening Some people watch Tom and Jerry and claim rats talk too, but Tom and Jerry and Matrix is not actual reality the last time I checked. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 3:40pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: As for Descartes, he started out by doubting EVERYTHING ...... Wrong! He did not seem to have doubted that an "I" existed that thought, and literally put his cart before his horse.
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 3:37pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: Our senses are that way - they can totally fool us Your senses can totally fool you, you mean, while many are smart enough to question what they perceive with their senses so as not to so easily be fooled. It's like you trying to fool yourself here that you don't exist because you are not sure that you exist, while we are smart enough to know that an entity exists that registered on this site and calls itself PoliteActivist and has been posting in this thread. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 2:46pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: See Last Thursdayism above. EVERYTHING can be faked except the thoughts themselves What you mean is you can easily be deceived! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Debate Religionists * by budaatum: 2:45pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
PoliteActivist: As I've told you, it is very likely things are as we experience them. For us too have a conversation I have to assume certainty that you exist - ignoring the small possibility that you exist only in my head! Just as Einstein believed everything is predetermined but had to pretend it is not in other to functsociety society. So, you assume certainty that I might exist, but you doubt that you yourself exist, or that you might only exist in your head that might not exist? I wonder if it's predetermined that you will tie yourself in knots. |
Christianity Etc › Re: I Am Going To Stay Without Food Throughout The Whole Of Ramadan by budaatum: 12:45pm On Mar 22, 2024 |
SuperOnyi:

@budaatum and the OP, where y'all at? I'm still on the journey, it's not easy but we keep pushing... buda is eating normally and regularly and is not fasting. |