₦airaland Forum

basilico:
Anything that is not correct there? Name one only.

Sixfiguresmart:
if you were leavened enough, you would have been exposed to the word. Go ask an Arab Muslim what revert means cos you're mullah seems to be a 2nd grader in Islamic studies

triplechoice:
But new studies done to observe directly what goes on in the brain when people are having the experiemce didn't identify such neural mechanism causing it. .Only electrical charges was observed during this period and rhat is not the same as brain mechanism but effect of something going on that. is yet unknown.

Sixfiguresmart:
Nigerians please judge this case betwen me and muslims. Muslims asked me to read the Qur'an and revert. They took me to their masjid.

basilico:
None of the cases went to discovery. The truth is suppressed but it will be out one day. that senile warmonger never got 81m votes

Vote counting was halted the night of the election in many swing states with no reason given or fake reasons supplied (water main, just toilet overflow)
Hundreds of eyewitnesses gave testimony at multiple states' legislative sessions detailing the election crimes
Video evidence showing concealed cases of ballots being pulled out and scanned repeatedly in Georgia after the poll watchers were removed due to the "water main leak".
Voters identified as indefinitely confined to illegally receive absentee ballots even though they are young and healthy
Ballots for voters under the age of 18 were counted
Voters submitted multiple ballots in the same state or across multiple states
Voters submitted ballots in states they do not live in
Poll watchers illegally removed from polling places for questioning fraudulent vote counting
Absentee ballots counted even though voters never requested or filled them out
Vote counting machines had overridden vote selection percentages above 60% in some counties, and FAR above normal ranges in many others (Antrim county machine audit)
Vote counting machines had the overridden vote selection logs wiped for 2020, but previous years' log data was still there (Antrim county machine audit)
ANTRIM COUNTY VOTING MACHINE AUDITED
2000 Mules: Thousands of individuals repeatedly dropped off multiple ballots into drop boxes violating the law. The total number of these ballots alone is enough to shift the result of the election.

panafrican:
Did the heir to the throne get impatient waiting for 70 years ?

basilico:
Buda gets me wrong most of the time.

basilico:
No judge appointed by Clinton or Obama or FBJ ever gives Trump a favorable ruling.
Banana republic.

KnownUnknown:
You do love to ramble.

Otematum/Budaatum/whateveratum is a consummate liar. The freak really does enjoy bamboozling the simpletons around here. A peculiarly duplicitous person. The type to call others’ religious opinions “faith” while calling theirs “understanding”.

The statement is not a lie and you could be one and the same.

basilico:
Known for its artistic, inventive and cultural innovations, the Tang dynasty is considered a ‘golden age’ of Chinese history. Spanning from 618-906 AD, the dynasty saw a flourishing of poetry and painting, the creation of famed tricoloured glazed pottery and woodblock prints and the advent of pioneering inventions, such as gunpowder , which ultimately changed the world.

basilico:
Buda gets me wrong most of the time. I do not hate america. I hate the left who are working day and night to transform it to their ( marxist?) utopia.
If China became the sole superpower the whole world would go up in flames. The Chinese are after dominance which they had thousands of years ago.

KnownUnknown:
You could be. Both Atums share similarities after all. I have no faith in you.

KnownUnknown:
Why not? Buda can be whateveratum she pleases. Nothing new under Atum.

basilico:
The unwritten agreement is that US will protect Taiwan if China decides to invade. Nowhere is it written but it is understood

https://www.youtube.com/w atch?v=YaRnlsyhD7M

Obrigardo:
You expect me to waste my time on you. When I give you links with reports, you'll say it's planted lol

You've seen the reports and you already know. So get lost

Obrigardo:
I still don't understand why someone in his right thinking mind will argue against this. I've said time and time again these maga cultists will do all they can to justify the hate in their heart. It is pure hate and nothing else. Do well to know the foundation of all their obfuscation and misinformations.

KnownUnknown:
@Budaatum
Do you live in Nigeria?

Sixfiguresmart:
Can you see how the quran gets humbled by me? And, I am not and academia. Travel and see how they have shredded the quran to pieces. Even your clerics cannot handle the heat. Go and ask shabir Ally what his eyes have seen

OgaVoltron:
Looks like buda is having a Jekyll & Hyde moment. Wetin happen?

OpenYourEyes1:
Bump...

..

Sixfiguresmart:
Okay Sir! I got you.

Now, am I authorised to refer to allah as they?

basilico:
US did not want a Russian base in Cuba nearly bringing the world to the brink of a nuclear war then
Whats so important to them setting up base in Ukraine.

When you have time watch this


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If61baWF4GE

saxywale2:
Establishment Republican vs MAGA Republican

Donald Trump reportedly threatened to sue Fox News Thursday after the network aired a “advertisement” about him from the Lincoln Project.

Ps: DOJ has appealed special master ruling


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ0vPIo9eyY

basilico:
Because there is no official agreement between Beijing and Washington about Taiwan.

sonmvayina:
I don't understand this your blabbing...

What should I take from it?

Sixfiguresmart:
So, you agree that allah is polytheist. The deflection does not work for me.
Do you see why the Bible is very essential? Can you see why Mohammed said that if you need authentication of the quran, go to the Christians? Can you see that your only straw out of this question is the Bible? You see the authority of the Bible that you discredit? Would you now accept that the Bible is the word of God?

FemiAjani:
That's not exactly what I'm doing, and it's also a bad analogy. I'll tackle why it's a bad analogy first: Doctoring has a specific goal -- to see to the health and well-being of the patients, especially through the treatment of ailments and injuries. That goal in turn provides a means for objectively testing what is and isn't good doctoring: patient outcomes. Doctors who, all things being equal, tend towards good results for their patients are good doctors, and those who trend towards bad patients are bad doctors. When two doctors point accusing fingers at each other and accuse their counterparts of being a bad doctor while insisting they're a good doctor, I, who barely know the difference between mitosis and dialysis, can still look figure out which one's most likely right based on how their patients do. The medical community, in turn, can also arrive at the idea of what a good doctor will or won't do based on objective analysis of patient outcomes. This is critically different from what we see in Christianity. On the one hand, let's say we have an NIFB preacher expressing a desire to see the government round up and execute all gay people and identifies chapter and verse requiring the execution of gay people in the Old Testament, and also quotes Jesus saying that not one jot or tittle of the old law has passed away. On the other hand, let's have a Catholic who's pro-life (meaning ACTUALLY pro-life) and opposes the death penalty, who herself can cite passages chapter and verse about why we shouldn't be executing people - even if she, too, thinks that being gay is a horrific sin and gay people should be excommunicated. On the third hand, we've got an Anglican who says we should accept all into our communities, even sinners, and since we're commanded not to judge we shouldn't be asking whether or not they're sinners anyway, much less condemning them, and he too can quote chapter and verse. (I know that the metaphor in which we have three hands is absurd, but so is the idea of the Bible providing objective morality.) All three point at the others and say they're wrong on the subject of morality, they're reading the text wrong and are mistaken, I have the right answer. Unlike with the doctors, I have no objective way to decide which of them (if any) to believe. The Christian community thus has no objective, shared standard for determining which is the correct way of interpreting the text, and so can't arrive at a shared, objective standard of who is a good Christian or a bad Christian.

FemiAjani:
Am I basing my view of Christianity on the "bad" Christians? (So far as that term means anything without an objective yard stick for who is a bad Christian and who isn't?) Not entirely. They're part of Christianity, but they're not the whole of Christianity. (Don't ask me if they're a majority -- I don't have solid numbers on that either way, and don't know how someone could even get those numbers. Conducting surveys asking people to label themselves as good or bad Christians probably isn't going to get good data.) But they are getting extra focus from me for two very good reasons. First is what I previously pointed out: they're a threat, and it's human nature to pay disproportionate attention to threats. Second -- and this is why they're particularly relevant in this discussion -- they provide a pointed counterexample. The example of the "bad" Christians proves that having that shared source of morals to return to as an objective standard doesn't work. Am I willing to focus for a bit on other versions of Christian morality, including yours? Sure! But first you have to actually tell me which version you're talking about. Despite my prodding, you still haven't spelled it out. Simply calling it Christian doesn't distinguish it from the morality that the "bad" Christians call Christian morality, nor does saying that you're basing it on the Bible when they're quoting chapter and verse from the Bible as basis for their morality. As an aside, I disagree with your notion that Christianity is based on a book of words. Christianity existed for hundreds of years before the Bible was ever canonized. If it didn't need the book to be Christianity then, it doesn't need the book to be Christianity now. The Bible is important in Christianity, but clearly it's not necessary. @MaxInDHouse, nevermind what I said earlier. And no... you do NOT have any answers.