Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 5:14pm On Jul 13, 2017 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 4:45pm On Jul 13, 2017 |
hopefulLandlord: the Jew also said there are those alive then that won't die till he comes back, even told them to keep running when persecuted cuz he'll come fast and they won't run around too much before he's back
those guys are still alive today running all over Israel to escape persecution of Judaism and Islam, they're theoretically at least over 2027 years old right now, still waiting for that glorious return, running around for millennia They'll soon come here and start shouting "context" and "holy Spirit" upandan.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 4:44pm On Jul 13, 2017 |
spacetacular: Intellectual dishonesty or actual intellectual genius in truth. You are the one who is being intellectually defunct. Whatever, man. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 4:33pm On Jul 13, 2017 |
dalaman: The people that wrote the bible do not even know that people lived in China and North America yet you are here trying to tell lies to yourself just to rationalize their ancient mythology and superstitions. You get work oo. So now every body will see the dead Jewish hippe's return via TV? You guys are real jokes. Keep making things up. As in, the post shut me up. I couldn't comprehend such display of intellectual dishonesty. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 2:09pm On Jul 13, 2017 |
TLuzzie: Indeed! IF it had a beginning. If Physical Cosmology later reveals that the universe had no beginning, and has existed forever, then the idea of an eternal origin must be discarded, and "God" in ALL its forms will be [color=darkgreen]permanently dead[/color]. I think the universe has no beginning. Mistake people make is assuming that the Big Bang was the beginning, Beyond the Planck epoch, science have theorized that there was something, just that it has no predictive value. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 1:44pm On Jul 13, 2017 |
TLuzzie: Lol. When I call myself an atheist, it's in relation to the Gods of monotheistic and polytheistic religions, not the origin of the universe, which MUST definitely exist IF the universe had a beginning. So you might want to ignore semantics and letters and focus on the idea behind them. The caveat there is IF. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 5:16pm On Jul 12, 2017 |
TLuzzie: Hahaha. Double think and Paradoxes are the trademarks of Abrahamists. They carry mutually exclusive ideas in their heads all the time.  Theists come up with the most bizzare adjectives to describe their god. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 4:37pm On Jul 12, 2017 |
felixomor: Theist - (Merriam Webster Dictionary)
Full Definition : belief in the existence of a god or gods; specifically : belief in the existence of one God viewed as the creative source of the human race and the world who transcends yet is immanent in the world...
------ Please go and get a dictionary. How can something transcend and yet be immanent? These word salads are getting too much. Too much mental gymnastics. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 12:56pm On Jul 12, 2017 |
KingEbukasBlog: Because God is a pure mind , infinite intelligence, consciousness while the universe is matter, unresponsive .
It's like asking why a book needs an author or why a program needs a programmer . The author is the mind behind the book , the programmer is the mind behind the program . And we are now in the realm of pseudo philosophical talk. Okay, thanks though. At least I learned something. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 12:33pm On Jul 12, 2017 |
KingEbukasBlog: There is no origin . And yes , the universe continously needs God for its existence. And God can decide to end the existence of the universe since it is greater than it and exist as a separate conscious being. Creatio ex materia already said that the universe can exist separate from god, it just needs the continuous intervention from god in order the sustain it's existence. I think adding that caveat is some sort of ad hoc hypothesis to make the argument make sense. Going by the logic of creatio ex materia, god can go off in one direction dancing outside the universe and generally having fun, while the universe can go off on it's own to develop into the universe as we know and never the twain shall meet. Why does the universe need god for its sustainability? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 12:18pm On Jul 12, 2017 |
KingEbukasBlog: No it does not because without God the universe will not exist . The universe needs God to continously interact with it for it to exist from past infinitude
That means God can decide to end the existence of the universe even though it has coexisted with It from past infinitude .
You get? Let me see if I get. The universe and god are not two parallel lines from the same "point" of origin, they intersect at some point and the universe continuously needs god for its existence? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 12:15pm On Jul 12, 2017 |
KingEbukasBlog: A we talking of Christianity or theism? What concerns the scripture now because it does not even say the universe came from nothing.
Created out of the being of God is somewhat like panentheism, whereby the universe is the material manifestation and it interprenates in it but the immaterial being is yet distinct and greater than its material manifestation.
Ephesians 4:6 King James Version (KJV) One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
I think this verse gives the greatest hint that everything was created from the being of God . Can somebody explain this to me in simple English. Thanks. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 12:10pm On Jul 12, 2017 |
hopefulLandlord: "Creation out of being of god" how meaningless can a sentence get? I wonder who came up with the discipline of theology. It adds nothing whatsoever, just a bunch of fools, sitting together and making baseless claims. The fact that they award degrees is just extremely stupid. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 11:50am On Jul 12, 2017 |
TLuzzie: Oh, interesting. Can you tell me how CREATION OUT OF [color=darkgreen]THE BEING OF GOD[/color] occurs, and which part of the scriptures of your theistic religion of Christianity backs it up? Creatio ex materia renders god redundant in my opinion. I see nothing for god to do in that scenario. Creatio ex nihilo is just stupid. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christian Doctors And Science Students (science Vs Religion) by CatfishBilly: 11:47am On Jul 12, 2017 |
CatfishBilly: Since Spacetacular didn't answer my question, maybe you might. Can prayer work in the face of an incompetent doctor? A classic case of "Cognitive Dissonance" is preventing Spacetacular and Joshthefirst from answering this question . |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 10:29am On Jul 12, 2017 |
So, is the first cause a result of some chain reactions that was outside of an "external" influence or some dude got same play doh and started creating shiiiiit? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Deism- The Last Refuge For A Dubious Religious Apologist by CatfishBilly: 8:01am On Jul 12, 2017 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Miracle Or Not? You Tell Me. by CatfishBilly: 3:15pm On Jul 11, 2017 |
EnigmaticEnigma: That friend had no idea who my professor was.
Remember I said I called the tow company and if they had trucks available at the time, I wouldn't even have found the need to go to the computer lab.
It's not very often in Dallas, that you call a tow truck company for assistance and they tell you that they don't have trucks.
Lastly, imagine a key in the middle of the street. Not in a closed classroom or a closed toilet, but a street were thousands of students/ordinary folks use. Then of all the people walking on that street, it's my professor who happened to pick it up. Same professor I wouldn't have called, if not for my friend. Same friend I wouldn't have met, if the tow company actually sent a truck as usual when I called.
Remember, the friend suggested I call the professor cause he thought I may have left it in class, which may be common. Meanwhile, the professor found the key on the street. From what you mentioned here, your friend made an educated guess (it's not out of place to think that your professor saw your keys when he assumed that you lost them in class) which coincidentally, happened to be correct. So, I'll put it down to a mixture of an educated guess plus coincidence |
Christianity Etc › Re: Miracle Or Not? You Tell Me. by CatfishBilly: 1:50pm On Jul 11, 2017 |
It's either your friend saw your Professor picking up the key or saw him or someone like him putting it up on the traffic light base or he just made a wild guess and it worked. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Arguments For The Existence Of God by CatfishBilly(op): 9:02am On Jul 11, 2017 |
141. ARGUMENT FROM TERRORISM (I) (1) Terrorists destroyed the WTC, killing thousands. (2) One piece of the rubble sort of looks like a cross. (3) Therefore, God exists. 142. ARGUMENT FROM TERRORISM (II) (1) A plane was hijacked by terrorists. (2) The passengers prayed and attacked the terrorists. (3) The plane crashed into a field, killing all aboard. (4) Therefore, God exists. 143. ARGUMENT FROM TERRORISM (III), a.k.a. PERCHANCE'S SISTER'S ARGUMENT (II) (1) September 11th was really, really bad. (2) We have bad things happen to us when we're doing something bad. (3) Therefore, September 11th was a punishment for something we did. (4) Maybe it was being arrogant? (5) Yeah, that's it! (6) God let September 11th happen to teach America humility. (7) Therefore, God exists. 144. ARGUMENT FROM MASS MURDER (1) Stalin was an atheist. (2) He murdered millions of people. (3) Therefore, God exists. 145. ARGUMENT FROM TORNADOS (1) A large tornado hit Kansas City. (2) The tornado missed a church but destroyed several hundred homes. (3) Therefore, God exists. 146. ARGUMENT FROM SPAGHETTI (1) A few people saw something weird in a bowl of spaghetti. (2) Some Catholics believe that it is the Virgin Mary. (3) Therefore, God exists. 147. ARGUMENT FROM MONEY (1) All U.S. currency contains the motto "In God We Trust." (2) Therefore, God exists. 148. ARGUMENT FROM THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (I) (1) The Pledge clearly states that America is "one nation, under God * * *." (2) The existence of God is thus a necessary condition for the existence of America. (3) America exists. (4) Therefore, God exists. 149. ARGUMENT FROM THE FOUNDING FATHERS (I) (1) Some of America's Founding Fatherswrote favorably about the Bible. (2) The Founding Fathers were really, really smart. (3) Accordingly, the Bible must be true. (4) The Bible says that God exists. (5) Therefore, God exists. 150. ARGUMENT FROM THE FOUNDING FATHERS (II) (1) The Declaration of Independence includes the words "God" and "Creator". (2) Only a Christian would include the words "God" and "Creator"! (3) Therefore this is a Christian Nation. (4) A Christian Nation couldn't last over 200 years without God's help. (5) Therefore, God exists. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Atheists Don't Know That Atheism Is Also A Tool To Control And Limit. by CatfishBilly: 7:13am On Jul 11, 2017 |
ifenes: This is really interesting. I am happy to see people who think outside the box with upgraded minds. All humans are the same but all do not vibrate at the same frequency.
All mobile phone can primarily make calls and send text messages but you cannot expect the 3310 Nokia to carry out the unique functions of an iPhone 7. In fact the vintage Nokia fone will argue that it is not possible to do a video call simply because it cannot do it or imagine such possibility. This is what goes on in the human world. Logic is limited and those governed by logic alone are prone to sever ignorance. They want evidence they can see with their limited foresight. It is not impossible to explain a 3 dimensional theory to a 1 dimensional being.
Once upon a time I joined an "Atheist" whatsapp group chat via naira land. Honestly I have never met such extreme ignorant minds as I did on there They claim to be "free thinkers" but will not consider the possibility of a parallel universe or possibilities of existence of higher dimensions. They were always quick to debunk. They crave debunking anything contrary to their views. Such mindsets are enslaved to science and Charles Dawkins just as Christians are to the false interpretations of the bible. Oga ife, please, let this go. I'm begging you. |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Mathematics Professor John Lennox Destroys Shallow Atheist Reasoning by CatfishBilly: 10:59pm On Jul 10, 2017 |
KingEbukasBlog: Atheism belongs to the gutters . Wow, you'll burst an artery one day, bro. Take it easy. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Meaninglessness Of "I Have A Deep Personal Relationship With Jesus Christ" by CatfishBilly: 10:05am On Jul 10, 2017 |
I don't know. A part of me feels that jonbellion is gradually evolving into a theist.  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christian Doctors And Science Students (science Vs Religion) by CatfishBilly: 5:38pm On Jul 08, 2017 |
Joshthefirst: This is not a case of science vs religion. Christian religion has never declared medicine futile. So stop trying to put them against each other. Since Spacetacular didn't answer my question, maybe you might. Can prayer work in the face of an incompetent doctor? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christian Doctors And Science Students (science Vs Religion) by CatfishBilly: 11:31am On Jul 08, 2017 |
This
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Arguments For The Existence Of God by CatfishBilly(op): 8:05am On Jul 08, 2017 |
131. ARGUMENT FROM INTELLECTUAL SUPERIORITY (1) [Christian posts argument.] (2) [Atheist refutes argument.] (3) Atheist, you obviously didn’t understand my argument. (4) Therefore, God exists. 132. ARGUMENT FROM CATCH-PHRASE, a.k.a. INVERSE TRUE SCOTSMAN ARGUMENT (1) There are no atheists in foxholes. (2) [Atheist points out atheists in foxholes.] (3) They don’t count. (4) Therefore, God exists. 133. TERCEL’S ARGUMENT FROM PROBABILITY (1) We should believe what probably is true. (2) I have arbitrarily assigned the proposition “God exists” a probability of 0.75. (3) That probability came from my ass, which I know assigns extremely accurate probabilities to propositions concerning the existence of God. (4) So God probably exists. (5) Therefore, God exists. 134. ARGUMENT FROM FREE GIFT, a.k.a. KISSING HANK'S ASS (I) (1) If some guy came up to you on the street and offered you a billion dollars for nothing in return, would you take the money or deny his existence? (2) Therefore, God exists. 135. ARGUMENT FROM CHARITY (1) Atheists don’t build hospitals. (2) [Atheist points out Bill Gates and Ted Turner, who donate billions of dollars to charity.] (3) Yes, but do they build hospitals? (4) Therefore, God exists. 136. ARGUMENT FROM SERIOUS ASSERTION (1) God exists. (2) No, seriously. (3) Therefore, God exists. 137. ARGUMENT FROM POSITIVE OUTCOME (1) Even if God doesn’t exist, it would be better if people believed He did. (2) Therefore, God exists. 138. ARGUMENT FROM LACK OF EVIDENCE (I) (1) I believe that if God exists, there will be no evidence for his existence. (2) There is no evidence for the existence of God. (3) Therefore, God exists. 139. ARGUMENT FROM LACK OF EVIDENCE (II) (MODIFIED SIMPSON’S ARGUMENT) (1) God, if you exist, please give me absolutely no sign. (2) (3) Therefore, God exists. 140. ARGUMENT FROM IDIOCY (1) I am an idiot. (2) Even an idiot can see that God exists. (3) Therefore, God exists. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christian Doctors And Science Students (science Vs Religion) by CatfishBilly: 7:52am On Jul 08, 2017 |
Image123: Of course it does, serious people more brilliant and accomplished than you would ever be don't spend hours daily doing unimportant things that don't matter. Do they?
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Christian Doctors And Science Students (science Vs Religion) by CatfishBilly: 6:16pm On Jul 07, 2017 |
spacetacular: Read above. So, compare that to these But I say to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know him but did to him whatever they wished. Likewise the Son of Man is also about to suffer at their hands.” So Jesus said to them, “Because of your unbelief; for assuredly, I say to you, if you have faith as a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you. Matthew 17:12, 20 NKJV Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them by My Father who is in heaven. For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst. (Matthew 18:19-20) Amen, I say to you, whoever says to this mountain, ‘Be lifted up and thrown into the sea,’ and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it shall be done for him. Therefore I tell you, all that you ask for in prayer, believe that you will receive it and it shall be yours. (Mark 11:24-25) These totally presented Jesus as a cosmic vending machine. How do you reconcile? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christian Doctors And Science Students (science Vs Religion) by CatfishBilly: 6:06pm On Jul 07, 2017 |
spacetacular: And I have shown you that Prayer cannot be experimented upon. So the Templeton foundation prayer experiment isn't evidence as its impersonal to you. Below is an analysis of the experiment.
"The problem with the Templeton prayer study was based in the hypothesis itself: if we pray for someone then God will intervene in some supernatural way to restore a person’s health. No doubt this is a wonderful concept, but it eliminates the truth about the subject being studied. In the same way that the Prosperity Gospel cult has undercut the basis of Christian belief, this study is based on a lie. Somehow people have come up with this idea that if we ask for something then we can obligate God to deliver.
What kind of God would he be if we were able to say just the right words or preform just the right action that would somehow get God’s attention and thus getting a desired result? This concept makes God not God at all, but rather some cosmic vending machine or light switch
In John chapter 3 Jesus describes to a religious leader, Nicodemus, the nature and action of God. “The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going.” This makes the scientific study more akin to the study of psychology. If God is a volitional being, then we cannot expect that God will perform based on a regular standard and without fail.
In essence this study was not about prayer at all, but about the effect of positive words and their impact on a person’s health.
This is not to deny the power that abides in prayer, but it does stand in the face of a fallacy. Prayer is not about getting our goodies from God, but it is about trusting God to do what is best. It is about building a relationship and leaning on the truth that comes from that relationship.
This study would be just as flawed if it were conducted on child-parent relationships and we expected that the child would receive everything she asked her parents for. No doubt we would think very poorly of a parent who did that and it would be no stretch to expect that the child would be a lazy, fat brat. No doubt we would be in quite a big mess if God also fulfilled every request to our liking. It frankly gives me much satisfaction that this study was a failure, because it strengthens my trust in a God that cannot be contained".
So you see what you say drew you away from God drew another to God in a much stronger way.
Carefully read the observation again. Jesus actually presented himself as a cosmic vending machine. The new testament is littered with passages to that effect. Unless you're choosing not to look at it from that angle, then that would firmly be your choice, not what the scriptures say. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christian Doctors And Science Students (science Vs Religion) by CatfishBilly: 5:36pm On Jul 07, 2017 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Christian Doctors And Science Students (science Vs Religion) by CatfishBilly: 5:35pm On Jul 07, 2017 |
spacetacular: Arguments without proof are not tenable. I told Jack to drop his arguments along with evidence. Have you done same? I've dropped the Templeton foundation/Harvard prayer experiment, from which I came to the conclusion that prayers are futile in the face of an incompetent doctor. You still haven't answered the question. |